On 25/10/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Love the geometry in this shot. The tilt works well, or we're you just
tilted.LOL
Thanks Brooksy. Ever since I had my spirit level knocked out of the top
of my head, I've had problems standing up straight !
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
On 25/10/07, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you guys get to this side of the pond at the right time, we need to
organize a trip to a race here in the US. And if I come to Jolly Old
Blighty, I'd surely appreciate a point toward the nearest race at the
time. :-)
you got it
We
On 26/10/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, you never manage to disappoint us, Cotty ;-). So you did not
manage this time either ;-). Classy.
Thanks Boris
Now tell me, that Tokina RMC - is it still K-mount? and does it have A
aperture position? I might help you to get rid
In a message dated 10/24/2007 6:25:31 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, rwomer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A photo from our trip to Germany in June 2006.
I was wandering the back streets near the English
Garden when I was almost run over by this car
careening around the corner. I managed to get this
The Wildlife Photographer of the Year exhibition opens today at the
Natural History Museum in London:
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit-us/whats-on/temporary-exhibitions/wpy/onlin
eGallery.do
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit-us/whats-on/temporary-exhibitions/wpy/
--
Cheers,
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Hello John,
JF No - they're different. The 540 has both a diffuser panel (for use
JF with wide angle lenses) and a catch light plate (for use when you're
JF using the tilt head to bounce flash off the ceiling); it reflects a
JF small amount of the flash output towards the subject so you get
On 10/26/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/10/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Love the geometry in this shot. The tilt works well, or we're you just
tilted.LOL
Thanks Brooksy. Ever since I had my spirit level knocked out of the top
of my head, I've had problems
Great job on these Godfrey
Dave
On 10/25/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More Alcatraz ... interior ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/44d.htm
Comments, critique, etc always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hey, at least my picture had a guy standing in a field.
I like this one better, however, despite the unfortunate choice of
title. Let's rename it.
How about Hey, what are those fuzzy round things in the air?
Steve
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/25/2007 5:48 PM
On 10/25/07, Kenneth
John Francis wrote:
No - they're different. The 540 has both a diffuser panel (for use
with wide angle lenses) and a catch light plate (for use when you're
using the tilt head to bounce flash off the ceiling); it reflects a
small amount of the flash output towards the subject so you get
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5125620428037273858
I'm not really sure what drew me to this sign, the wording or
implication i suppose.
Anyway, there were quite a few of thes on Hwy 60, some were around
Three Rivers Michigan.
K10D, 16-45 shot on the fly with a bit of pan.
On 10/25/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
I tried it last Sunday, not sure if i didi it right. I thought you
would up with 1 dng or Pef file from the exposures, but my directory
shows one jpg and one Dng file with the same number. Most were 5-6
exposures.
On 10/25/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Anyone tried the multi exposure mode K10D
I tried it last Sunday, not sure if i didi it right. I thought you
would up with 1 dng or Pef file from the exposures, but my directory
David J Brooks wrote:
On 10/25/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Anyone tried the multi exposure mode K10D
I tried it last Sunday, not sure if i didi it right. I thought you
would up with 1 dng or Pef file from the
Cotty wrote:
Just watched part one of a six-part documentary series called The Genius
of Photography. If you get the chance (BBC World?) do try and watch it.
I would say that it's one of the best and most important television
documentaries about the medium in recent years, if not for some
In a message dated 10/26/2007 7:17:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very clumsy web interface :-(Bob S.
That's true, but some of the junior awards are really impressive.
Marnie aka Doe
On 10/26/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Wildlife
Very clumsy web interface :-( Bob S.
On 10/26/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Wildlife Photographer of the Year exhibition opens today at the
Natural History Museum in London:
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit-us/whats-on/temporary-exhibitions/wpy/onlin
eGallery.do
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Hey, at least my picture had a guy standing in a field.
I like this one better, however, despite the unfortunate choice of
title. Let's rename it.
How about Hey, what are those fuzzy round things in the air?
Steve
Unfair to Redwing blackbirds... I bet Ken very
It seems it is on BBC Four. No chance to watch this one here in Belgium.
We have BBC one and BBC Two but tnothing else. Some have BBC World but
that's it :(
On 10/26/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just watched part one of a six-part documentary series called The Genius
of Photography. If
David J Brooks wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5125620428037273858
I'm not really sure what drew me to this sign, the wording or
implication i suppose.
Anyway, there were quite a few of thes on Hwy 60, some were around
Three Rivers Michigan.
K10D, 16-45 shot on the
The Halloween precursor full moon crept in last night, and I celebrated with a
wee bit of scotch. So I had to try to see if I could get a decent pic with my
bargain big glass: the A400/5.6 plus the A2X-S converter. There was some water
vapor in the air, so I think I can top this on a perfect
On 10/26/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On 10/25/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Anyone tried the multi exposure mode K10D
I tried it last Sunday, not sure if i didi it right. I
On 26/10/07, Thibouille, discombobulated, unleashed:
It seems it is on BBC Four. No chance to watch this one here in Belgium.
We have BBC one and BBC Two but tnothing else. Some have BBC World but
that's it :(
I'll let you know if it's available online.
As a matter of interest I will be saving
Thanks Jack. Yes, the rotation and light were such that those peaks stand out.
I've seen them before but not in my own pics.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A wee bit of scotch? I, also, have some cheap class, but no cheap
scotch.
On 26/10/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
And the closing(ish) sequence is enough to take your lunch away. I will
be extremely happy when this fad for quickfire (and, preferably, wobbly)
sequences has died. I would suggest taking the director for a sound
thrashing behind the bike
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
More Alcatraz ... interior ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/44d.htm
Comments, critique, etc always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
This is excellent.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 25, 2007, at 20:22, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
More Alcatraz ... interior ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/44d.htm
I like it. Only thing I'd change if I were standing there would be to
get up a bit so that the table didn't block the bottom of the door -
but that's
Hmm.
http://www.vogue.co.uk/vogue_daily/story/story.asp?stid=48097
'Hand-finished'?
£6,200?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I've had the day off work, and happened to be in the area so I went to
the exhibition this afternoon. It is superb, as usual, although I
don't think the winner is the best in the show.
One of the things that always amuses me is the captions. Some of them
have wonderful throwaway comments in
Several years ago, we were on an underwater excursion off the island
of Maui. At certain points along the way, divers would bring up
interesting things for us to see through the sides of the boat. The
most interesting things was this octopus. As you can see, it squirted
it's ink in an attempt
Bob W wrote:
Hmm.
http://www.vogue.co.uk/vogue_daily/story/story.asp?stid=48097
'Hand-finished'?
That means some 12 year old girl in China tightened the nuts with a wrench.
£6,200?
Insane, but there are lots of people willing to pay for a brand name.
Let 'em. I suppose it's better
Bob W wrote:
One of the things that always amuses me is the captions. Some
of them have wonderful throwaway comments in them, which I
think must be deliberate in some cases:
Needs a little amendment for those in London Essex in the UK:
I was leading a photographic expedition to Abbey
Cheap maybe, but great quality. I had one of those which I used with
the A2X-L and I loved it. Difficult to keep steady of course, but the
results were good.
Here's an oldie, shot handheld through a windscreen. Doesn't show off
the quality of the glass, but I quite like the picture.
Bob W wrote:
Hmm.
http://www.vogue.co.uk/vogue_daily/story/story.asp?stid=48097
'Hand-finished'?
£6,200?
I think this is more Frank's style...
http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
Certainly if I had the cash, I'd order one right now
Very eco friendly.
--
Christian
A wee bit of scotch? I, also, have some cheap class, but no cheap
scotch. ;)
Good shot...under the infl..er..under the circumstances.
Hadn't noticed the extremely high mountain range that I think I see at
about a 5:30 location.(?)
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Halloween precursor
No chance on BBCWorld as of right now in the USA either. Regards, Bob S.
On 10/26/07, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems it is on BBC Four. No chance to watch this one here in Belgium.
We have BBC one and BBC Two but tnothing else. Some have BBC World but
that's it :(
On 10/26/07,
Nice moon shot.
I have the K 400 i bought from a lister a few years back. Not a bad lens.
Dave
On 10/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Halloween precursor full moon crept in last night, and I celebrated with
a wee bit of scotch. So I had to try to see if I could get a
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFAWR6hzZek
Funny, sad,
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Wonder how many hemp fibre lugs one needs to smoke, err, use over
the years.;-)
I quess if you want a second bike for the wife, you just cut a piece
off and place in some water for a year or two.
Dave
On 10/26/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Hmm.
Funny, but not sad. Book sales are healthy. People still read. My kids read.
Grace tries to read. That's likely to continue.
When I was looking for readers for my as of yet unpublished novel, I found
people were much happier with a stack of unbound typewritten pages than a
computer file.
On Oct 26, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/44d.htm
I like it. Only thing I'd change if I were standing there would be to
get up a bit so that the table didn't block the bottom of the door -
but that's nitpicking.
Stark and spooky,
Nice shot. Interesting that you were able to se the A2X-L. My A400/5.6 has an
interior baffle that interferes with the long snout of the A2X-L. Pentax says
they're incompatible. Did you remove the baffle?
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 10/26/2007 8:55:40 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several years ago, we were on an underwater excursion off the island
of Maui. At certain points along the way, divers would bring up
interesting things for us to see through the sides of the boat.
Pretty cool really. I'm not sure if the floor slopes that much, but
the overall shot gives one a feeling that they might slide right off.
--
Bruce
Thursday, October 25, 2007, 11:25:32 AM, you wrote:
C Haven't posted anything for ages, so must be about time. I took my lad
C to Mercedes-Benz
Dang, that 600 is nice. You do amazing things with it and I love to
look at your work. One very minor nit is that I wish the bird was
turned just slightly more towards me. But a wonderful shot just the
same.
--
Bruce
Thursday, October 25, 2007, 9:59:18 AM, you wrote:
KW Check out
KW
I could be wrong - it was a long time ago, but I'm fairly sure it was
the L, and I didn't do anything to the lens.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 October 2007 16:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Very cool. Reminds me of one I saw on the ice at the Joe:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup agreed.
Whats a PZ-1P.??
:-)
Dave
On 10/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated
Thanks Dave. I had the K at one time as well. It was quite good but wouldn't
focus close enough to shoot birds. When the D came out, I figured I should sell
it and buy an A. That gave me both much closer focus and full auto metering. I
think I sold the K for $300 and bought the A for $400. Not
Yup agreed.
Whats a PZ-1P.??
:-)
Dave
On 10/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/26/2007 8:55:40 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several years ago, we were on an underwater excursion off the island
of Maui. At certain points
On Oct 26, 2007, at 9:37 AM, Christian wrote:
Bob W wrote:
http://www.vogue.co.uk/vogue_daily/story/story.asp?stid=48097
£6,200?
Ridiculous.
http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
Now those look darn neat!
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFAWR6hzZek
Funny, sad,
Dave
Long rant. You've been warned.
I think you may have missed the point, Dave. This is a jab at the
unwashed masses who insist on using the internet. Having worked a
variety of support jobs, from the
Well, it is a better moon than I have ever done and I have even
cheaper glass than you do for that kind of thing. Nice shot.
--
Bruce
Friday, October 26, 2007, 7:38:54 AM, you wrote:
pcn The Halloween precursor full moon crept in last night, and
pcn I celebrated with a wee bit of scotch. So
It is one less than a PZ-2p.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, October 26, 2007, 10:11:52 AM, you wrote:
DJB Yup agreed.
DJB Whats a PZ-1P.??
DJB :-)
DJB Dave
DJB On 10/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/26/2007 8:55:40 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
Thanks Bruce. The only pleasure I take in redundantly shooting the moon is
trying to better a previous shot. A crystal clear, very dry night is what's
needed. Of course, some nice composites can be made using old Mr. Moon in
combination with something else.
Paul
-- Original message
Excellent. Hope there was a fence between you and that critter.
With film, you're still a little short for moon shots with the 400 and a 2X
converter. You'd have a pretty heavy crop. A 600 and a 2X would get you in the
ballpark.
Paul
-- Original message --
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave. I had the K at one time as well. It was quite good but
wouldn't focus close enough to shoot birds. When the D came out, I
figured I should sell it and buy an A. That gave me both much closer
focus and full auto metering. I think I
Bob W wrote:
Hmm.
http://www.vogue.co.uk/vogue_daily/story/story.asp?stid=48097
'Hand-finished'?
And 'ergonomically designed', too. I wonder how other manufacturers
design their bikes.
£6,200?
And here I thought the light alloy, disk brake, 28-speed bikes at
£2000-3000 had
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:18 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFAWR6hzZek
Funny, sad,
Ancient. That video has been around for at least six years.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Nice rant, Scott.
how about this:
I did support for a hotel property management system in 1998/99. These
were small hotels, super 8 Days Inn, HoJo, Knight's Inn, etc that were
being forced by the parent company to use a PMS. most of the clerks at
the hotel were older and/or had never used a
In a message dated 10/26/2007 11:20:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Long rant. You've been warned.
I think you may have missed the point, Dave. This is a jab at the
unwashed masses who insist on using the internet. Having worked a
variety of support jobs, from
Scott Loveless wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFAWR6hzZek
Funny, sad,
Dave
Long rant. You've been warned.
I think you may have missed the point, Dave. This is a jab at the
unwashed masses who insist on using the internet. Having worked a
variety of
In a message dated 10/26/2007 7:39:29 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Halloween precursor full moon crept in last night, and I celebrated
with a wee bit of scotch. So I had to try to see if I could get a decent pic
with my bargain big glass: the A400/5.6 plus the
On 26/10/07, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pretty cool really. I'm not sure if the floor slopes that much, but
the overall shot gives one a feeling that they might slide right off.
Thanks Bruce. The floor is level :-)
Here's the outside of the building:
http://tinyurl.com/2rc48k
On 26/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I did support for a hotel property management system in 1998/99. These
were small hotels, super 8 Days Inn, HoJo, Knight's Inn, etc that were
being forced by the parent company to use a PMS. most of the clerks at
the hotel were older and/or
Well, it seems that the PUG is definitely back to life after a period in a
certain comma...thanks Scott !!
Thanks to all the positive comments to my entry...I think that I was really
lucky to catch this one.
About its orientation...well, yes, every time that I go back to this picture I
dislike
I agree. I've got to get myself a decent tripod before I
try again - my attempts show too much camera shake.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:21:49AM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Well, it is a better moon than I have ever done and I have even
cheaper glass than you do for that kind of thing. Nice
Based on my (possibly faulty) recollection of my attempts - a
600 and a 2x is just about perfect for a 1.5x crop moon shot;
you'd really want a little more for film. Stacking a 2x and a
1.4x would probably be about right, although that might add too
much optical softness (as well as increasing
So this month's bicycling magazine which apparently isn't supposed to be
mentioned on this list has a nice back-cover ad for the Pentax Optio
Z10. I like the ad, kinda sexy with a woman's mid-riff showing her
belly button. The hook is that the Z10's lens does not extend from the
body when it
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent. Hope there was a fence between you and that critter. With
film, you're still a little short for moon shots with the 400 and a 2X
converter. You'd have a pretty heavy crop. A 600 and a 2X would get you
in the ballpark. Paul
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:15:53PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Long rant. You've been warned.
I think you may have missed the point, Dave. This is a jab at the
unwashed masses who insist on using the internet. Having worked a
variety of support jobs, from the lowly DSL help desk to
You're recollection is correct. My shot with a 400 and 2X on the K10D is
cropped to about 2/3 of the frame. I believe the nice moon pic Ken showed here
was with a 2X and the 600/4.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on my
Cotty wrote:
PICNIC :-)
Problem In Chair Not In Computer
PEBKAC
Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair
ID 10 T error
SNMP
Simply Not My Problem
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks Adam,
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:23:40 -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
The Humber Valley park system, as well as the Don Valley and Taylor
Creek parks are not to be missed if you like Nature. Toronto is a VERY
green city. You can easily spend a few days exploring the park system.
OK, I may just
I agree. Its almost like they don't want you to view the images. This is not
the first year they've put
the results on the web. You'd think they'd have learned.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wildlife
How about Hey, what are those fuzzy round things in the air?
Those are bokeh's. You get an unlimited supply when you get the 600 FA. ;+}
I know I've used the title before, just don't remember where.
Beats the hell out of Red-winged Blackbird # 503. ;+}
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
Hi all,
Took a trip to a country garden today... no pictures of much artistic
merit, but some nice autumn colours.
http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/GESO_26-10-07/index.html
Hope you like...
Drew.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks Brendan,
The neighbors and the police probably have photos. I'll ask them to send you a
couple :-)).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pretty good, Paul. Not bad for the A400 5.6 (your tele
converter is better than mine,
Pretty good, Paul. Not bad for the A400 5.6 (your tele
converter is better than mine, damn you...).
And now I'm off to the garage to get a hammer. I'm
going to beat myself in the head repeatedly in order
that I never conjure up images of you naked.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
More like 800 years, surely..
:-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ancient. That video has been
In a message dated 10/26/2007 1:16:36 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Took a trip to a country garden today... no pictures of much artistic
merit, but some nice autumn colours.
http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/GESO_26-10-07/index.html
Hope you like...
http://www.bob.blakely.com/garter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Shot over a year ago. I don't usually take this kind of thing, and might do
better now, but I don't think it turned out too badly.
I think I was actually do some lens testing.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/orange.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 10/26/2007 4:36:12 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.bob.blakely.com/garter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
=
I'm getting page not found.
Marnie
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you
Make that:
http://www.bob.blakely.com/Garter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Make that:
http://www.bob.blakely.com/Garter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Aah..flower.(?) Uniquely seen and nicely done. :)
(tinniest bit lighter would maybe help)?
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot over a year ago. I don't usually take this kind of thing, and
might do
better now, but I don't think it turned out too badly.
I think I was
Jack Davis wrote:
Aah..flower.(?)
I answer yes for Marnie - but I think it looks like a catapillar
crawling out of a little den...
or something else .
Uniquely seen and nicely done. :)
(tinniest bit lighter would maybe help)?
On my monitor, I wouldn't want it to be any
Bob Blakely wrote:
Make that:
http://www.bob.blakely.com/Garter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
how about mark that and size it down? I'm set for 1000 and it is way
way too large to make sense of it.
ann
Art is not a reflection of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/26/2007 4:36:12 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.bob.blakely.com/garter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
=
I'm getting page not found.
Marnie
me too -- pretty funny , given Bob's title
ann
Your browser should have a shrink to fit or zoom button. IE does (lower
right hand corner of screen) and I believe Firefox does too, if I remember
correctly from when I used to use it.
...But I will shrink it for you.
http://www.bob.blakely.com/LittleGarter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
Good one. Her mirth overfloweth!
Paul
On Oct 26, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Bob Blakely wrote:
Make that:
http://www.bob.blakely.com/Garter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a
reflection.
Nice macro. Well composed and exposed. I think, in this case, more
DOF would make an even nicer picture. And it's not always easy to get
a tripod in for a macro (or enough light for a small ap). But I like
it as presented.
Paul
On Oct 26, 2007, at 7:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot
Yes, the only thing dumber than users are the help desk people. Sorry, but I am
currently going round and round with the people at Supermicro. What is it about
DOA, they do not understand?
---
The replacement motherboard you sent me is DOA it does not power on, not even
the bare board.
In a message dated 10/26/2007 6:17:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aah..flower.(?) Uniquely seen and nicely done. :)
(tinniest bit lighter would maybe help)?
Jack
==
Maybe Jack, looks okay on my monitor, though. Thanks!
Marnie aka Doe :-)
---
In a message dated 10/26/2007 6:28:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jack Davis wrote:
Aah..flower.(?)
I answer yes for Marnie - but I think it looks like a catapillar
crawling out of a little den...
or something else .
Uniquely seen and nicely
In a message dated 10/26/2007 6:56:44 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your browser should have a shrink to fit or zoom button. IE does (lower
right hand corner of screen) and I believe Firefox does too, if I remember
correctly from when I used to use it.
...But I will
In a message dated 10/26/2007 7:06:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice macro. Well composed and exposed. I think, in this case, more
DOF would make an even nicer picture. And it's not always easy to get
a tripod in for a macro (or enough light for a small ap).
One from the archives (~100kb):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP1607.jpg
*istD, FA 100mm f2.8 Macro, 1/125 @ f5.6, ISO 200
Cheers,
Dave :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
She is! It was a very, very fun wedding.
These days I love to catch folkes at just the right time from the best angle
possible - if I can.
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean
http://www.neovenator.com/2007/10/am-now-officially-29.html
I've been getting some good buzz on this one, so I thought it might bee okay
to post here.
Specs:
*istD, ISO 400, D-FA 100 Macro, f2.8, 1/200
Thanks,
John
(for anyone who might have reason to contact me offlist, please note the new
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
