Hmm. An hommage to Paul Strand.
http://www.aperture.org/store/prints-detail-w.aspx?ID=313
Bob
Sort of a dry week for new photos, but I like the mood in this one
from today's walk.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/17-pickets.jpg
Pickets - Neighborhood Details 2008
Olympus E-1
Mark
And the conclusion is? Not one to criticise surveys but I trust you
don't teach Research Methods ;)
Peter
On 28/02/2008, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AlunFoto wrote:
I like IE7.
Never seen any of those clusterphuck issues you mention, whatever
that word means... :-)
Thanks Ken. Were it not for the very obvious advantages in terms of
noise, I could have done without it. But it is certainly proving a
worthwhile investment.
Paul
On Mar 2, 2008, at 11:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Nice captures all Paul.
In brief, due to reduced noise at high ISO, the new
For me, problems began after installing a WindowsUpdate from
Microsoft. It may have coincided with an update from Google, though.
If diving into a conspiracy theory, I would prefer this one:
Microsoft has recently entered the marketplace where Google dominates;
online content and applications.
I'm trying to figure out if the new Pentax DA* 16-50mm and 50-135mm lenses
are worthy replacements for my Sigma 24-70mm and 70-200mm lenses. All four
lenses have a max. aperture of f2.8. All would be used on K10D bodies.
I've had the former two lenses for about 5 years now (since the MZ-S that
I
(correction) That should have been the latter two lenses (i.e., the
Sigma lenses) that I've owned. Thanks again.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Jerome Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if the new Pentax DA* 16-50mm and 50-135mm lenses
are worthy replacements for my Sigma 24-70mm and 70-200mm lenses. All four
lenses have a max. aperture of f2.8. All would be used on K10D bodies.
On Mar 2 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
On Mar 2, 2008, at 9:05 AM, David Savage wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Bong Manayon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First time for me to comment on coffee shop photos...this perks me
up!
Urgh...what a grind.
I might just have to start filtering posts a
Jerome, the Sigma lenses that you have cover focal length form 24 mm
to 200 mm, whereas Pentax lenses cover from 16 mm to 135 mm. So that
Pentax range is wider and shorter. Not knowing your style I cannot
produce any reasonable opinion. However, if your Sigma lenses work for
you - why bother? I
Good work.
Never thought to do this with cati.
Thnaks
Dave
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love being able to see when shooting IR.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08_03/08_03_IRCacti/index.htm
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seeking opinions on three subjects:
3. I'll leave this one as a wildcard. Just say whatever's bothering
you.
Mark.
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and
Looks good Paul.
Hope she's better
Dave
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The K20D arrived today. Got home from work late. Installed a charged
battery from the old stockpile. Attached my battery grip and the FA
50/1.4 lens. Grace wasn't feeling well,
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:52 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Erickson
Subject: PPG Brain Damaged Voting System
My assessment of the Pentax Photo Gallery is that it encourages
brain-damaged snap judgements. It provides 5 thumbnails
I have both the 16-45/4 and the 16-50/2.8. Both are very nice and
capable lenses. My current favourite of the two is the /2.8, but I may
be defending my investment here... It would certainly be a nice
replacement for your Sigma.
For telezoom, I have an ancient Sigma EX 70-200/2.8. Bought from
From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/03 Mon AM 12:21:30 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Costco slide scanning
Bob, I JUST returned from Costco and have JUST popped the CD of my
scanned slides into the computer. 29 cents apiece, no other charges.
Bought some cheap Vodka at the Ambassador Bridge Sunday.
Dave
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who wants a beer?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/03 Mon AM 01:53:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Battery Charger for K10D
Sheesh. Grounded. ... ]'-)
Naughty. To the cells with you!
Personally, even though it's expensive, if I felt the need
From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've uploaded a few for you to see, with a comparison between some I
scanned myself on someone else's machine when I had a chance. My
scans aren't perfect, but I'm satisfied they are fairly close to the
original picture so you can see the difference between
From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/03 Mon AM 03:32:34 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Costco slide scanning
Are you happy with the results?
Not really. For the most part, they look almost good, a few will
need to be inverted (scanned
Ar.
Got back two days late from Fargo,
(should have been on Friday, but got home late Sunday) only to have
the wife tell me Purolator stopped at the house Friday
with my K10D shipped from Pentax.
As always with these groups, they show up when no one is home, and
leave the little sticky
- Original Message -
From: Jerome Reyes
Subject: Pentax vs. Sigma Fast Glass
I'm trying to figure out if the new Pentax DA* 16-50mm and 50-135mm lenses
are worthy replacements for my Sigma 24-70mm and 70-200mm lenses. All four
lenses have a max. aperture of f2.8. All would be used
The Swedes need to pick their game up. Leica - hardwood box. Pentax - velvet
bag. Hasselblad - folded cardboard.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/03 Mon AM 04:00:44 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Silly cameras
So obviously
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I love being able to see when shooting IR.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08_03/08_03_IRCacti/index.htm
Nice work!
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
But i can't see it.:-)
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/NTS%20PHOTOS/?action=viewcurrent=night-5573.jpg
D200 and 18-70.
About 1 am Friday morning.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Just saw this on TV last night and took a screen grab from the
trailer online. I saw a different TV trailer, though, that showed the
Pentax twice. A Hasselblad, a Leica and some digitals can also be
seen in the trailers and online gallery from the movie.
Timer shot at exit 251 on I 75 Michigan.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/NTS%20PHOTOS/?action=viewcurrent=me-truck-5533.jpg
D200 and Nikon 18-70 using 10 timer with camer on back of pick up
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
Happy birthday, late.
A 5 year old getting a nice lens like that. My My.:-)
See if you can find a used Sigma 300 F4. I have one and am very pleased with it.
Cannot remember exactly what i paid, but it was under $1000 for sure.
Dave, a fellow Canadian
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Francis
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/NTS%20PHOTOS/?action=viewcurrent=Mack-bridge-5542.jpg
From my rear view mirrior.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks David. She's still coughing a bit but getting better.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks good Paul.
Hope she's better
Dave
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The K20D
Jerome Reyes wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if the new Pentax DA* 16-50mm and 50-135mm lenses
are worthy replacements for my Sigma 24-70mm and 70-200mm lenses. All four
lenses have a max. aperture of f2.8. All would be used on K10D bodies.
I've had the former two lenses for about 5 years now
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:04 AM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have both the 16-45/4 and the 16-50/2.8. Both are very nice and
capable lenses. My current favourite of the two is the /2.8, but I may
be defending my investment here... It would certainly be a nice
replacement for your
Good job. A nice composition. Great color.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Timer shot at exit 251 on I 75 Michigan.
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/NTS%20PHOTOS/?action=viewcurrent
=me-truck-5533.jpg
D200
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe Mike was suggesting, in a too-subtle-for-his-own-good way,
that the lamp post near the middle of the frame could be eliminated.
Yes, but the lampost enhances the tilt so nicely - or if it doesn't
enhance it, it
Joe Wilensky wrote:
Anyone want to share any stories about spirit photography?
I was once shooting photos in the dungeon of Warwick castle (and how
many of us haven't done that?) with my PZ-1p and ISO 100 slide film. Due
to dungeon designers' famous lack of attention to adequate lighting I
And you had to pay Costco for those
I'm not planning on it.
rg2
On 3/3/08, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
Are you happy with the results?
Not really. For the most part, they look almost good, a few will
need to be inverted (scanned backwards), and a couple
Not elating at all, Bill. :-(
Did you get it to work quickly again?
Jostein
2008/3/3, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto
Subject: Re: Heads-up: IE7 and GMail entanglement
That could be what they've done by pure accident too, of course, but
Nice picture Dave. I think this is the best of the series. It really
shows some scale to it.
The Mackinac bridge photo is good, but a bit busy from shooting inside
the truck cab.
I can't believe Wisconsin restricts travel to nighttime only. That's a bummer.
Sorry you missed your K10D's return
Mark, I've been there but took no pictures in the dungeon. Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Wilensky wrote:
Anyone want to share any stories about spirit photography?
I was once shooting photos in the dungeon of Warwick castle (and
I hope Dag Thrane is reading this thread. He has some fabulously
spiritual shots.
Jostein
2008/3/3, Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just saw this on TV last night and took a screen grab from the
trailer online. I saw a different TV trailer, though, that showed the
Pentax twice. A Hasselblad,
I've done a bit of spirit photography:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2154000size=lg
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Wilensky wrote:
Anyone want to share any stories about spirit photography?
I was once shooting
Here are some samples I shot a while back -
From the 16-50mm f/2.8:
http://Georges.smugmug.com/gallery/3331947_WrfQH/1/185538966_oCv8e
From the 50-135mm f/2.8
http://Georges.smugmug.com/gallery/3968224_TsEyp/1/230590301_hNFxn
Portraits taken with various Pentax lenses, the photos in the later
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Over at Ned Bunnell's web site:
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-k-ad.html
That's my kind of add... I prefer a twist of lemon to the olive
though... :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Friday must be Purolator day :-)
They called by my house to on Friday morning. I wasn't in.
However, the lady at the Almonte Home Hardware called me just after
lunch to let me know they had the parcel. I only had a 30km drive to
go and pick it up :-)
Mine was my mk3 coming back from its recall for
Hey, it's Dave. And a tower!
:-)
You're looking go...err...ahh...upright, yeah upright! Unlike the
tower (Lazy blood tower, laying down on the job)
Cheers,
Dave
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:10 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timer shot at exit 251 on I 75 Michigan.
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto
Subject: Re: Heads-up: IE7 and GMail entanglement
Not elating at all, Bill. :-(
Did you get it to work quickly again?
I uninstalled IE7, and was able to make things work again. I just had my new
machine worked on a
while back, the tech
That must be a sight. Dave Brooks driving down the highway camera
plastered to his eye shooting into the rear view mirror. I'm glad I'm
not in front of you...
David J Brooks wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/NTS%20PHOTOS/?action=viewcurrent=Mack-bridge-5542.jpg
From my
Actually, it was a bit of Dewars:-).
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That was a bit predictable Paul :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done a bit of spirit photography:
That was a bit predictable Paul :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done a bit of spirit photography:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2154000size=lg
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way to override this.
I can use my Spotmatic or ES combined with the same flash in auto mode
to get slow speeds
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:54 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tilt can be good...
..then again:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9880.jpg
Cheers,
Dave :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Feb 29, 2008, at 12:40, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 29, 2008, at 12:34, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Neat idea. the Pentax 110 with a 4/3 sensor. A really tiny DSLR.
In
addition to not having a cheap DSLR, Pentax not longer has a
particularly small DSLR every current offering is based
- Original Message -
From: Vic Mortelmans
Subject: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way to
Currently I have a few lenses which I always use:
Kit 18-55
Tamron 28-75
A-28mm f2.8
FA-50 f1.7
Zenitar 16mm
Those are the basics which I carry around most of the time I am
buying a K10D and handing down my DS to my daughter for her wedding.
Since the K10D is not coming with
Never thought to do this with cati.
MARK !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GESO: IR Cacti
Good work.
Never thought to do this with cati.
Thnaks
Dave
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:11 AM,
Thanks to all who replied. David Savage probably had me convinced
immediately with his comments of:
what's the point of owning Pentax if you're not going to get
the one part of the system that they do exceptionally well.
Also, to answer W. Robb's question of...
why a person would put third
And you didn't even wave !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cotty is a ..
Bought some cheap Vodka at the Ambassador Bridge Sunday.
Dave
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL
Mark Roberts wrote:
AlunFoto wrote:
I like IE7.
Never seen any of those clusterphuck issues you mention, whatever
that word means... :-)
Besides, nobody knows if this current issue is introduced by Google or
by Microsoft. But the latter makes a more popular target, I guess.
My money
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Filling a gap in the lens lineup - suggestions?
I've always wanted something in an ultra-wide - most of the time when
I use the kit lens it's for that 18mm setting.So I'm thinking that
something like the Pentax 12-24 would
On Mar 3, 2008, at 10:40, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have the DA*16-50/2.8. It is a better balanced lens than the
DA16-45 and feels nicer in use. I still prefer using the 14, 21, 43
mm primes in this range due to their smaller, handier size and
weight, but the 16-50 proves to be a fine
http://tinyurl.com/36cf4v
http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R8wnFBqmwhI/Bmc/UaoZxbijN_c/s1600-h/mar_03_08+003.jpg
Comments always welcome.
Thanks,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure time
you want to use manually along with the aperture? Most cameras with
TTL flash metering I've used will still
- Original Message -
From: Jerome Reyes
Subject: Re: Pentax vs. Sigma Fast Glass
as long as the Pentax 50-135mm is still very sharp at the long end (at
least at f4.0, if not wide open ???).
Oh yes, it's sharp. Don't worry about that.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:02, William Robb wrote:
I think the 12-24 is rather wide for a general purpose lens, I find
it is more of a specialty
lens when I really just need something wider than the 14/2.8. The
16-50 would be the better
walkaround lens and is still quite wide.
I think I've
Hello Jerome,
Some of it depends on usage. Obviously the 16-50 is much wider than
the 24-70. The 70-200 is longer than the 50-135 but it is much
bigger and heavier.
For me, at one point I had a Tamron 28-75/2.8 and Tokina 80-200/2.8.
This was primarily for wedding work, but I found that the
2008/3/3, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just out of curiosity I looked up the visitor stats for my web site by
browser:
Internet Explorer 7 26%
Internet Explorer 6 23%
Internet Explorer 5.5 2.9%
Internet Explorer 5 2.9%
Firefox 26%
Mozilla
Very evocative and moody. I like it a lot.
I'm conflicted on the street light. I think it contributes to the picture, but
I wish it was fully in frame. If you don't have the rest of it, I might remove
it or, alternatively, create what's missing.
Paul
-- Original message
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto
Subject: Re: Heads-up: IE7 and GMail entanglement
How about:
http://www.google.com/analytics/
I use StatCounter on my site.
It's very good.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:09 AM, William Robb wrote:
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure time
you want to use manually along with the aperture? Most cameras with
TTL flash metering I've used will still control the flash output that
way.
No. Unfortunately, with a
Like that one a lot, frank.
Only thing that bugs me is that the edge of the street light bleeds
off the page, which disturbs the line of the top of the image.
G
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:05 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/36cf4v
Vic Mortelmans wrote:
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way to override this.
Isn't this the behavior that Cotty was able to defeat with his
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you didn't even wave !
I did so. Neither you or Paul waved back.:-)
Dave
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cotty is a
I have two eyes you know.:-)
Dave
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:31 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That must be a sight. Dave Brooks driving down the highway camera
plastered to his eye shooting into the rear view mirror. I'm glad I'm
not in front of you...
David J Brooks wrote:
Thanks Paul.
K10D is in for focus look see, so i shot the D200 this time.
Its equally as good as the K10D, but i just like the K10D a bit better.
For some reason, my action shots on the D200 seem soft, not as crisp
as the K10D, but the D200 does a good job on static objects.
Dave
On Mon, Mar
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice picture Dave. I think this is the best of the series. It really
shows some scale to it.
The Mackinac bridge photo is good, but a bit busy from shooting inside
the truck cab.
True, but it was the only opportunity
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:18 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, it's Dave. And a tower!
:-)
You're looking go...err...ahh...upright, yeah upright! Unlike the
tower (Lazy blood tower, laying down on the job)
Normally it would be the tower that's upright and Dave that's
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:09 AM, William Robb wrote:
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure time
you want to use manually along with the aperture? Most cameras
AlunFoto wrote:
2008/3/3, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What tools are you using to collect this data?
How about:
http://www.google.com/analytics/
Amazingly, I signed up for analytics quite some time ago, but forgot all
about it. Thanks for the reminder. Looks a little like this:
On Mar 3, 2008, at 10:18 AM, William Robb wrote:
.. They pretty much all worked that way back then. ..
None of my AE capable Nikons of that era (FE2, F3) forced a shutter
speed when I set them on manual exposure control. They metered the
flash TTL for the aperture I chose and ran the
I like this one. Not sure if the light is a good thing or bad thing here.
Dave
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:05 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/36cf4v
http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R8wnFBqmwhI/Bmc/UaoZxbijN_c/s1600-h/mar_03_08+003.jpg
Comments
Nice use of dof
Dave
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Spotted at one of the local eateries (~110kb)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2067/2277093852_7b6b776989_o.jpg
K10D, FA 77mm f1.8 Ltd., f1.8 @ 1/200, ISO 1600
Enjoy.
Dave
--
Good colours and detail.
Dave
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:39 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...looking for a good time?
http://tinyurl.com/273xtu
http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R8Vkl0gqgqI/Bk4/8ZTdlwUB6Mk/s1600-h/feb_27_08+002.jpg
Comments welcome.
cheers,
Great shot Frank, and works well in BW.
Ah the Zan.
I to can remember all that of which you speak. Sometimes i wish it
would come back.
Dave
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:54 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what they used to call this city: Toronto the Good. Up to
about
Yes it was, and I'm sure he'll post it again...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Vic Mortelmans wrote:
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way to override
Not quite blurred enough...
frank theriault wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/36cf4v
http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R8wnFBqmwhI/Bmc/UaoZxbijN_c/s1600-h/mar_03_08+003.jpg
Comments always welcome.
Thanks,
frank
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
-- Dr.
Has anyone heard much about this lens yet? I'm very interested. I like
the constant aperture and this will be mainly an outdoor lens. I'm
assuming DA16-45 f4 quality with SDM, i.e., the high end kit lens. I'm
wondering if it will be weather sealed.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
William Robb wrote:
I believe you can disable the forced sync by covering the small pin to the
left of the sync
terminal on the hot shoe.
A nice experiment... will this also disable the TTL capabilities?
My own advice would be to use a good quality non dedicated flash such as a
Vivitar
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto
Subject: Re: Heads-up: IE7 and GMail entanglement
That could be what they've done by pure accident too, of course, but
accidents are not half as elating to imagine, are they? :-)
I managed to let an update happen that included IE7 and all of a
Only way I was able to shoot slow sync with that combination was to
shoot on 'manual' flash setting and do the math.
It always pleased me that the 280 would release the 1/80 shutter for
such shooting.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey
Very good catch.
Love her expression.
Yes i fear Mom and Dad might be a tad ticked.:-)
Dave
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:23 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day Trend Setters,
Was out at a cafe yesterday, had a (new) camera, played a silly game
with a little kid, took a picture
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:11 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/NTS%20PHOTOS/?action=viewcurrent=Mack-bridge-5542.jpg
From my rear view mirrior.
Cool shot!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another photo available for viewing ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/16-pensive.jpg
Pensive Moment - This Cafe Life 2008
Panasonic L1 + Vario-Elmarit-D 14-50/2.8-3.5 ASPH OIS
ISO 160 @ f/3.5 @ 1/25 sec,
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:23 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day Trend Setters,
Was out at a cafe yesterday, had a (new) camera, played a silly game
with a little kid, took a picture thought I'd share (~140kb)
On Mar 3, 2008, at 14:18, frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:23 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
G'day Trend Setters,
Was out at a cafe yesterday, had a (new) camera, played a silly game
with a little kid, took a picture thought I'd share (~140kb)
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:23 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day Trend Setters,
Was out at a cafe yesterday, had a (new) camera, played a silly game
with a little kid, took a picture thought I'd share (~140kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_042.htm
As always any
http://www.foto8.com/home/ Warning: it wants to load Quicktime
--
Bob
Text of their press release:
News Release, London 01 March 2008
Announcing Foto8 - A New Way for Photography
In Print, Online, On Display
In April 2008 Foto8, a London based publishing company will release a
new version
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Vic Mortelmans wrote:
My own advice would be to use a good quality non dedicated flash
such as a Vivitar 285.
Probably a better advice on the longer term. Non-Pentax side question:
will this type of flash also be of use on a modern Canon DSLR?
I agree with
I'm a little concerned with photos made while driving ... !
G
On Mar 3, 2008, at 6:11 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/NTS%20PHOTOS/?
action=viewcurrent=Mack-bridge-5542.jpg
From my rear view mirrior.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I doubt I'll make it to GFM this year (I will probably
be giving a talk at a meeting in Chicago), but New
York is only 1 1/2 h from Philly by train...
Rick
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/2/08, Scott Loveless, discombobulated,
unleashed:
Norm is, too, but you probably don't want
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bottom of the frame states:
Pentax K20D, FA 77mm f1.8, 1/50 @ f2.8, ISO 800
Well.
That would 'splain the lovely bokeh then, eh?
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
I didn't like the DA16-45 very much. I found it bulky and its
reverse direction zooming made it an awkward lens to use at wide
angle settings ... it doesn't balance well. Felt the same way about
the (even larger and heavier) Canon EF 24-75/2.8L when I had it.
I have the DA*16-50/2.8. It is
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
