Has anyone noticed the big change in the voting mechanism. It seems
that the pictures are being shrunk down below the 600 pixel size that
is set for the gallery. Two issues for me:
1) picture is even smaller - makes it harder to evaluate
2) the sizing function can massacre the picture making it
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:38 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Battery Charger for K10D
I don't know Bill.
You currently sound pretty charged up about it.
Are you alternating between positive and negative about
Gang,
By the generosity of Pentax Norway I have both the DA* and the FA* 200
on loan for the week-end. I will do some more testing today before I
post any pics, but yesterday I went about testing the alledged Purple
Fringing (PF)problem with some classigal twig-against-sky shots. My
results
I'm sure many of you have already seen this image:
http://www.panix.com/~johnf/gallery/images/wedding.jpg
(explanation at http://www.panix.com/~johnf/)
P.S. FWIW, curently in the DVD player is Life On Mars.
I lived in Manchester in 1973, so I'm definitely
I'm totally with you, Bruce.
I have posted here before on how the voting page is programmed, and
this change seems to be addressing one of my main criticisms; the
total size of the webpage.
Because of the way it is programmed, the page has to pre-load all the
full-gallery-size images at first
Wow, that's one great children portrait!
Jostein
2008/3/9, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling baby...
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5175511395924019618
Shot with an *ist D, M 1:1.4 50mm
rg2
--
Great grab, paul.
There's one thing that doesn't fit in that pic.
Something about footware...
Jostein
2008/3/8, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Came out of the coffee shop today, and before I could change the ISO
on the camera, I spotted these ladies crossing the street.
Fortunately, one
Good fun.
Then I made the mistake to go to the main page to look for more.
I don't think I need to know how you found that page... :-)
Best,
Jostein
2008/3/8, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Got a real chuckle out of this series of pix. If at first you don't
succeed...
From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/08 Sat PM 09:18:40 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Costco slide scanning
So.. whose were reversed? 8-)
har! I wish I could say mine, so Costco would suck less. Alas,
theirs were the reversed ones. ;)
Rebekah escribió:
There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling baby...
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5175511395924019618
Shot with an *ist D, M 1:1.4 50mm
That's a good picture and the black and white conversion is excellent. A
Hehe... That's always my ultimatum too. I can shoot if you promise
I'm not the only one you rely on. Works wonders to set people's
expectations. :-)
Jostein
2008/3/8, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Yashica-Mat camera is great for that use as it is almost
completely quiet. One of the very few
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/08 Sat PM 11:40:15 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K20D AF calibration data
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: K20D AF calibration data
I am now officially curious and
giggle/
Great idea, no matter the technical limitations.
Jostein
2008/3/9, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
G'day All,
This is technically a terrible photo. It took a few goes to get the
lighting composition right, and at some stage the focus got screwed
up. Which resulted in some heavy
2008/3/8, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it Barbara Mandrill?
I thought it was Barbara Streisand...
Looks more like Boy George, though.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The Pentax Flashgrip has a switch called slow sync, it disables the
forced sync speed.
Greetz Jos
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Most Canon flash units are pretty much limited to working with the
Canon bodies. You might consider a Metz flash unit with an
interchangeable dedicated module that
So far, the three DA lenses i have. The 50,16-45 and 50-200.
BUT
It seems an issue with more close up subjects. If i am shooting
something with some bulk or size to it, all seems fine.
I cannot get out my door at the moment, so i'll retest all three this
morning, however i thinl its going back,
Opps fo r got the A50, which started all of this for me.:-[)
Dave
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:54 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far, the three DA lenses i have. The 50,16-45 and 50-200.
BUT
It seems an issue with more close up subjects. If i am shooting
something with some
I thought you had taken my spellin class.:-)
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gawd, this keyoard sucks:-). Fill in the lanks. (I'm using my daughter's
laptop.)
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Film is
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:39 AM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/08 Sat PM 11:40:15 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K20D AF calibration data
- Original Message -
From: David J
Looks like we took a pretty goo hit on this one. The sun is almost up
and i'll grab a shot of the driveay before my plow guy gets here.
About a 4' drift by the garage door and the back yard looks like the
snow we used to get
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Bob.
If i happen to go back soon, i'll grab a longer lens and try some more
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent Dave.
I'd like even more detail on the station,
but would hate to lose the curving rails.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat,
When you are adjusting on the K20D, are you doing wide open, like i am
on my tests.
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep. DA 50-200. I was adjusting the focus point. It was pretty close
to right on. Tried to do the DA 12-24 tonight. Wide open at
I like it.:-0
Sorry
Nice mood and lighting. Here stare is looks like she is deep in
thought, or bored to tears.:-0
I think a small top crop might work.
Dave
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
Have been flat-chat for the last few weeks, so
Fun shot.
I don't see any pen holders in the pockets.
:-0
Dave
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:23 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
This is technically a terrible photo. It took a few goes to get the
lighting composition right, and at some stage the focus got screwed
up.
Looks like dejavu all over again... Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:45 PM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear gang,
Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
thingy in this image?
http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg
Thanks,
Jostein the
Well your work paid off. The shot works well. On what is the image of
the young lady displayed? is that a laptop screen? Couldn't figure
that out.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2008, at 1:23 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
This is technically a terrible photo. It took a few goes to get the
lighting
Thanks Bruce. I didn't realize she had seen me until I processed the
pic. I was quite a bit away -- the lens was at 200 and this is a 50%
crop -- but I saw hair flying and running feet, so I fired away.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Yes, indeed. Her spotting you takes
Thanks, Paul. Sort of a mean thing to do to those living in snow
country, huh? ;)
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. The foreground framing works well. An excellent shot.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:32 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Jack.
I quite often try and frame my
Yes, I would like to have heard the story behind those shoes, but the
ladies took off down the street. They were apparently in a hurry.
Perhaps they were part of a wedding party.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2008, at 6:02 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
Great grab, paul.
There's one thing that doesn't fit in that
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2008s=0category=landscapeblog=20080305151639
I've been currently using tone mapping techniques to expand dynamic
range on K100D Super but would appreciate to see how K20D expanding
dynamic range looks on your pictures. 200% (maximum) would be nice to see.
Thank
No, guess I hadn't. Will do so.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed the big change in the voting mechanism. It seems
that the pictures are being shrunk down below the 600 pixel size that
is set for the gallery. Two issues for me:
1) picture is even smaller -
Dave,
You weren't consuming mass quantities of beer, by chance, were you?
(Great concept too!)
Regards, Bob S
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:23 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
This is technically a terrible photo. It took a few goes to get the
lighting composition right, and
Wait a minute. The A50 isn't autofocus. If you're having problems
with that, you have some kind of focusing screen misalignment or
other related hardware problem.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2008, at 7:55 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Opps fo r got the A50, which started all of this for me.:-[)
Dave
On
Yep. I adjusted all the lenses wide open, save for the FA50, which I
tested at f2. I'm going to try the FA 80-310 today, and I'll be done.
All my other lenses are manual focus.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2008, at 8:08 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
When you are adjusting on the K20D, are you doing wide open,
Looks like an older iMac G4 screen to me.
Godfrey
On Mar 9, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Well your work paid off. The shot works well. On what is the image of
the young lady displayed? is that a laptop screen? Couldn't figure
that out.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2008, at 1:23 AM, David
I just picked up on this image and glad I did. I agree the girl's
having noticed the camera adds much. Her winter foot ware, however,
makes me shiver. :(
Well seen and caught, Paul.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I would like to have heard the story behind those shoes,
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:23 PM, David Savage wrote:
... However, I thought I'd share to help educate all you non singles
as to
what it is us lonely losers get up to (~160kb):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2203/2264394579_309bab1386_o.jpg
K10D, DA 10-17mm f3.5-4.5 FE @ 10mm, 1/60 @ f5.6,
Excellent Dave.
I'd like even more detail on the station,
but would hate to lose the curving rails.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:17 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Escorted two loads to Buckingham Quebec this week. I noticed this on
the second trip, in a small town on
Thanks Jack.
On Mar 9, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
I just picked up on this image and glad I did. I agree the girl's
having noticed the camera adds much. Her winter foot ware, however,
makes me shiver. :(
Well seen and caught, Paul.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
You weren't consuming mass quantities of beer, by chance, were you?
You'd think so. But we only had a couple of beers each. :-)
(Great concept too!)
Thanks Bob
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:00 PM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
giggle/
Great idea, no matter the technical limitations.
Jostein
Thanks Jostein.
We had fun making it too :-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2203/2264394579_309bab1386_o.jpg
A very funny picture, well done!
Thanks Godders.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:04 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fun shot.
I don't see any pen holders in the pockets.
We're lonely losers not lonely geeks.
There's a difference :-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well your work paid off. The shot works well.
Thanks Paul
On what is the image of
the young lady displayed? is that a laptop screen? Couldn't figure
that out.
Paul
A Mac of some description. The one with the screen
Actually, it was a link direct to that page that I found on a
construction forum. I've not been to the main page - now you've aroused
my curiosity. ;]
-p
AlunFoto wrote:
Good fun.
Then I made the mistake to go to the main page to look for more.
I don't think I need to know how you found
I just now decided to do some voting and noticed the changes you
mentioned.
Images do load more quickly by a nanosecond or so and I don't have a
personal problem with it.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed the big change in the voting mechanism. It seems
that
Around here you'll see people wearing shorts and flip flops in the
snow. Those shoes are downright sensible.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, I would like to have heard the story behind those shoes, but the
ladies took off down the street. They were apparently in a hurry.
Perhaps they were
This is a question for the PDML folks with k100's or ds that have
Scene Modes. When you use one of the modes, such as portrait or
landscape, is the raw format available or does the camera default to
JPG?
One of the students in my class has a Rebel XT and showed me that the
camera made Raw files
On the DS at least, raw is available when scene modes are invoked. I
never tried a scene mode before so I learned something.
George Sinos wrote:
This is a question for the PDML folks with k100's or ds that have
Scene Modes. When you use one of the modes, such as portrait or
landscape, is the
Hey Scott,
just thought I'd throw in a major thanks for all your work on the PUG.
I really look forward to it each month :)
rg2
On 3/6/08, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It went this time. Maybe when I hit themed or open the first time I
put the cursor in the wrong place and
cute pup, thank goodness it's not a cat ;) do you have a truck buddy,
or is that seat taken by your camera?
rg2
On 3/8/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My driver has this little guy for a truck buddy.
We had to stop for a moment, and i grabed this shot.
As far as I'm aware, only Canon does the utterly crippled scene modes
(No RAW, no ISO selection, etc).
-Adam
On 3/9/08, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a question for the PDML folks with k100's or ds that have
Scene Modes. When you use one of the modes, such as portrait or
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Pentax Scene Modes vs. Raw
As far as I'm aware, only Canon does the utterly crippled scene modes
(No RAW, no ISO selection, etc).
My Canon using buddy found some sort of hack (The Undutchables?) that revised
the firmware to
allow a
Hipper?
Rebekah wrote:
cute pup, thank goodness it's not a cat ;) do you have a truck buddy,
or is that seat taken by your camera?
rg2
On 3/8/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My driver has this little guy for a truck buddy.
We had to stop for a moment, and i grabed this
Yes, if it was a cat it's ears would be too big.
On Mar 9, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Rebekah wrote:
cute pup, thank goodness it's not a cat ;) do you have a truck buddy,
or is that seat taken by your camera?
rg2
On 3/8/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My driver has this little guy for
I haven't been particularly inspired lately, but last night I went to an
opening. The work was interesting. I took along the *ist-Ds with the
85mm f2, 43 f1.9 and A 24 f2.8. Didn't actually take a lot of pictures,
mainly spouted banalities about the artists work and consumed
inexpensive
I actually like the focus point slightly in the background and a bit
off center...
Marcus
--
Am 09.03.2008 um 20:51 schrieb P. J. Alling:
I haven't been particularly inspired lately, but last night I went
to an
opening. The work was interesting. I took along the *ist-Ds with the
85mm
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Peso Not a cat photo
Yes, if it was a cat it's ears would be too big.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7030837
I want ot know what happenned to it's neck?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I like it. I think you made a good choice. Nice shot.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2008, at 3:51 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I haven't been particularly inspired lately, but last night I went
to an
opening. The work was interesting. I took along the *ist-Ds with the
85mm f2, 43 f1.9 and A 24 f2.8. Didn't
Yep,
I originally liked the trellis in the background, but the girl _is_ the
subject
The crop vote has it. Thanks David, Paul and Bruce
D
David J Brooks wrote:
I like it.:-0
Sorry
Nice mood and lighting. Here stare is looks like she is deep in
thought, or bored to tears.:-0
I think a
To be precise, a Tamron SP, 70-210mm 3.5, and it worked perfectly with
the *ist-D. It's not perhaps the creme de la creme of telephoto
zooms, but it's taken some good pictures for me:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/05/07/Sports-Photog
Thanks all :) I appreciate everyone taking the time to look and
comment. Take care!
rg2
On 3/9/08, Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah escribió:
There's nothing better than an open-mouthed kiss from a drooling baby...
- Original Message -
From: Tim Bray
Subject: PESOs gripes: K20D Tamron 70-210
To be precise, a Tamron SP, 70-210mm 3.5, and it worked perfectly with
the *ist-D. It's not perhaps the creme de la creme of telephoto
zooms, but it's taken some good pictures for me:
When I attach
Couple of kid pics. Expired Tri-X in Dektol. I shot these well over a
year ago, probably with the MX and either the M 50/1.7 or 35/2.8. I think.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganAndMolly/photo#5175852803846950770
Hipe
Dave
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:50 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hipper?
Rebekah wrote:
cute pup, thank goodness it's not a cat ;) do you have a truck buddy,
or is that seat taken by your camera?
rg2
On 3/8/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cute pup, thank goodness it's not a cat ;) do you have a truck buddy,
or is that seat taken by your camera?
Camera.:-)
Although i think Lucy would make a good truck buddy.:-0
Dave
rg2
On 3/8/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:09 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:04 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fun shot.
I don't see any pen holders in the pockets.
We're lonely losers not lonely geeks.
There's a difference :-)
Ah. As we say in
Thanks Paul.
I did some more tests today, and K10D is going back. My macro shots are all off.
They all look fine in the finder, but i refuse to bracket focus.
I was always ticked at my Pentax dslr close ups and macro results. I
think i see why now.:-(
Dave
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Paul
I just bought this one from a friend. Ridden once by someone who
decided road biking wasn't for him; it just happens to fit me perfectly
and cost a fraction of what it did new (much less a new Trek Madone)..
Trek 5200 - Almost everything on this bike is carbon: frame, fork, seat
post, stem,
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7037177
Shot this around 9am this morning after the storm went through. It was
a pretty good one to. Like the old days.:-)
Five shots using doubletake trial version.
K10D, DA 50 F2.8, WP in CSI
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
On 9/3/08, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7037177
Shot this around 9am this morning after the storm went through. It was
a pretty good one to. Like the old days.:-)
Five shots using doubletake trial version.
K10D, DA 50 F2.8, WP in CSI
Very nice.
I had some one-wheeled enablement last week. My back wheel collapsed
so I had to buy a new one! Plus cog and rear mech. Annoying really
because I wanted to do more work on the bike but was going to wait
until after my wrist operation. Unfortunately this forced my hand.
Bob
Cotty wrote:
that as big as it gets?
That's what she said...
Christian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/3/08, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7037177
Shot this around 9am this morning after the storm went through. It was
a pretty good one to. Like the old days.:-)
Hummm.
Me to. Sorry but i quess thats it then
Dave
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/3/08, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7037177
Shot this around 9am this morning after the storm went through. It
Doesn't work with Live View.
Oh Well.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Bray
Subject: Re: PESOs gripes: K20D Tamron 70-210
As far as it not being able to set the aperture, (I'm presuming the
adapter is an A style, and
is actually in the A position) I've had problems in the past with
Tamron Adaptalls working fine
On 10/3/08, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Try clicking on the tab below the image that says larger.
Got it ta.
Excellent shot. The bloke in the distance makes it.
Nice one DB
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
William Robb wrote:
Doesn't work with Live View.
Oh Well.
William Robb
Well, of COURSE not!
If you're 'remote' then how can you avail yourself of any live view?
From 20 feet away?
Stands to reason!
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Timber
Subject: Re: Zenitar 16mm PK
Charles Robinson wrote:
Zenitar 16mm
Could you share your opinion about this lens? I am planning to buy one
MC Zenitar f2.8 16mm and any comment would be welcomed. The best would
be if you can link some PEF files
Click the larger button on the navigation bar, (below the picture).
Cotty wrote:
On 9/3/08, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7037177
Shot this around 9am this morning after the storm went through. It was
a pretty good one to. Like the
PPS: I am impressed so far with the K20D.
Pentax is known to have had problems with the new factory near Hanoi
where the DA* lenses were produced. I'm told this is why the subsequent
DA* lenses were delayed. Paul is correct that I took a risk by buying
the DA* lenses early. But I learned a few
You should read the manual Tim. You haveto enter the focal length to get shake
reduction. Just enter the focal length at which you will use the lens. Or turn
shake reduction off. To enter the f-stop, set the exposure dial to M. Then push
the green button, and the camera will set a shutter
I like the second one. Looks like a great neigborhood too. In regard to the
first one, I have two words: get low. Shoot kids at kid levels.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Couple of kid pics. Expired Tri-X in Dektol. I shot
You might want to take a peek at the focusing screen first and try to see if it
is seated properly. Or perhaps it's just better to let Pentax deal with it. If
they look fine in the finder, your problem is probably hardware alignment.
Paul
-- Original message --
Apparently it's an A lens. I see you have it working. Excellent. Ignore my
green button comments.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should read the manual Tim. You haveto enter the focal length to get
shake
reduction. Just enter the
I've got Flashblock installed on my Firefox so now I don't see any
thumbnail at all...
:-|
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed the big change in the voting mechanism. It seems
that the pictures are being shrunk down below the 600 pixel
My driver has this little guy for a truck buddy.
We had to stop for a moment, and i grabed this shot.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7030837
She was pretty hipper, probably being in the truck all morning, and
was a bit hard to shoot, but i managed that one.
D200, 18-70, LR adjust
On 3/9/08, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Doesn't work with Live View.
Oh Well.
William Robb
Well, of COURSE not!
If you're 'remote' then how can you avail yourself of any live view?
From 20 feet away?
Stands to reason!
keith
The Nikon and
Nice ride, I'm not much into carbon or skinny tires (My current
dream-ride is a Kona Sutra) that's an excellent example of the breed.
Nice, light fast.
While I love the snow, I'm torn by the current lot of it, because I
can't wait to get back on the road. I've been off the bike for too
long.
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: Darned Remote Assistant
Well, of COURSE not!
If you're 'remote' then how can you avail yourself of any live view?
From 20 feet away?
The remote assistant allows one to operate every aspect of the camera (except
Live View) from
the
I was wondering if that would be the case. On the other hand there
might be an update coming, eventually.
keith_w wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Doesn't work with Live View.
Oh Well.
William Robb
Well, of COURSE not!
If you're 'remote' then how can you avail yourself of any
http://links.pictures.aol.com/pic/af70brGLOS2f4K3nV1HBLLFUswsm
Ka6JF9llv4xQp5Fd3Ig=_l.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/2uummd
Nice ride, I'm not much into carbon or skinny tires (My current
dream-ride is a Kona Sutra) that's an excellent example of the
breed.
Nice, light fast.
While I
It's easier with a computer, but...
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/12/07/tricks-of-the-composite-photograph/?Qwd=./ModernMechanix/2-1938/composite_photographQif=composite_photograph_0.jpgQiv=thumbsQis=XL#qdig
http://tinyurl.com/yofjn5
-p
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
A few days ago I found a box of unprocessed black and white. Plus, I
had a few rolls recently exposed. So I've been doing a lot of donkey
work the past two days trying to get it all souped and sleeved. These 3
are from GFM last year. Mamiya C220 and Tri-X.
These two are shots of Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the second one. Looks like a great neigborhood too. In regard
to the first one, I have two words: get low. Shoot kids at kid
levels. Paul
Thanks, Paul. I liked the second one better, too. I try to get down to
their level when I can, and I'm _only_ 32, but
Thanks, Mike.
Jack
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/06 Thu PM 07:08:37 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Tyro Question
Having read several posts where back/front focus issues have been
discussed, I
Rabbit ears? A disciple of Knarf? Gosh, I didn't
even know he had a following!
The first pic is very grainy and the angle is awkward.
I like the second one mostly for its context.
Rick
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Couple of kid pics. Expired Tri-X in Dektol. I
shot these
Doug Brewer wrote:
On Mar 8, 2008, at 1:31 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
2008/3/8, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
General thoughts? It must be confusing to be a baboon. Brightly
coloured face, brightly coloured arse. It would be very easy to get
the 2 mixed up.
Truly confusing. Especially
I finally paid attention to suggestions here and applied them to some
birds at the feeder.
I haven't been too satisfied with my results, the birds being out of focus.
I shot some with the K20D and A400/5.6 -
ISO cranked up to 800 and aperture down from f5.6 to f7.1 - f9.0.
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
