On Oct 9, 2010, at 9:23 AM, John Francis wrote:
If you will be using it in Italy and Spain, you probably don't need two new
cards;
a single SIM card (and phone number) would work in both locations.
What are roaming charges like in Europe? It can easily work in your favour to
buy a new SIM
Last time we went to Maine, we looked in vain for moose among the fall
colors.
if it's any consolation we don't have many around here either.
This time we found some, up close and personal.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/Moose#
that's a fantastic set of photos, and what a
Do not get hypothermia. Not even mild hypothermia. It is not fun.
I went to Hanmer Springs today, about 2 hours north-west of Christchurch where
I live. It's a lovely little town, popular for its hot springs, bungy jumping
and skiing. I was there to race in a duathlon event which consisted
shit I just paid € 24 just to get wheelsets changed, no balancing
included either...
2010/10/9 Jerry in Arizona glewis4...@yahoo.com:
I bought them on Tire Rack and shipped to an independent installer so those
services were not included in the price of the tires.
Jerry
From: David J
within the EU there is an initiative by the commission to ban roaming
charges, right now though it very much differs from country to country
some providers such as vodafone germany offer plans where an
international call costs € 0.75 once on top of the normal charges -
this is your best deal if
eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
shit I just paid € 24 just to get wheelsets changed, no balancing
included either...
You just haven't explained it correctly to them...
My tyre dealer tried this once. I made it well clear that he'd be better
off pulling those stunts on other people if
On 9/10/2010 4:10 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 8, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
That was memorable.
It started out being a pleasant night. My friends playing support, all is right
with the world. But Loene sensed there was something odd happening with the
headliner. And there was
On Oct 8, 2010, at 11:59 PM, David Parsons wrote:
It's reportage, not fine art. Having the principles in the shot, and
lit well enough to print is all that is needed. The newsworthiness is
what matters.
My point exactly.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:25 PM, paul stenquist
Fascinating. Nice work.
Paul
On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:26 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Last time we went to Maine, we looked in vain for moose among the fall colors.
This time we found some, up close and personal.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/Moose#
Regards, Bob S.
--
PDML
Hey - these are politicians. There won't be any priciples present.
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 07:16:07AM -0400, paul stenquist wrote:
On Oct 8, 2010, at 11:59 PM, David Parsons wrote:
It's reportage, not fine art. Having the principles in the shot, and
lit well enough to print is all
Been there, done that, in a mid-August thunder-rain-sleet-snowstorm in the
White Mountains in New Hampshire many years ago. One of our threesome got
chilled enough to take leave of his reason for a while. Scary.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sat, 10/9/10, David Mann
Oh no. Is that a new camera?
http://chemistry.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I love the mood. Some of those backfground lights blur like rose
windows. The side lit shot of the guitarist smiling is wonderful.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 9/10/2010 4:10 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 8, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
I like them. The public buildings in DC are not know for their warm
tones. I like to refer to the architectural style as Federal
Massive
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I had to stay the weekend in D.C. for a work seminar several weeks ago
and had a free day to
Well done, Steven!
Jack
--- On Sat, 10/9/10, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Peso: Catseye
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, October 9, 2010, 10:20 AM
Oh no. Is that a new camera?
Michelangelo is responsible for that style. He was the first architect to
take the classical order beyond a single storey and opened the doors, so to
speak, to Mannerism.
B
I like them. The public buildings in DC are not know for their warm
tones. I
like to refer to the architectural style
On Oct 8, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
That was memorable.
It started out being a pleasant night. My friends playing support, all is
right with the world. But Loene sensed there was something odd happening
with the headliner. And there was
The band came on and asked everyone to
On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
a mid-August thunder-rain-sleet-snowstorm in the White Mountains in New
Hampshire many years ago. One of our threesome got chilled enough to take
leave of his reason for a while.
And they don't get much higher than 5,000 feet. The most
Thanks for the tip, Cotty! I'll definitely keep that in mind as I
sharpen and hone my elbows for the next few days.
-- Walt
On 10/8/2010 6:06 PM, Cotty wrote:
Forget the shots that all the other photogs will be getting - stick with
the TV reporters and wait til they get their chance to do
A week from today I'll be taking off for Phoenix to join a couple of my
long-time, well-known sisters and another we'll be meeting for the first time
-- we only discovered her this past January; she's English; our father served
in the US Army Air Force in England during WWII -- and then spend
On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
A week from today I'll be taking off for Phoenix to join a couple of my
long-time, well-known sisters and another we'll be meeting for the first time
-- we only discovered her this past January; she's English; our father served
in the US
On Oct 8, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Last time we went to Maine, we looked in vain for moose among the fall colors.
This time we found some, up close and personal.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/Moose#
Nice shots.
http://www.chivalry.com/cantaria/lyrics/moose.html
--
40cm/4.5 Zeiss Jena
22in/5 Bausch Lomb
Really big beasts. Already on boards.
Came with an Eastman #2 body.
I'm thinking about building a reducing back and
mounting the K-x on the back with the Zeiss on the front.
(Yes, the Eastman came with the extension rail.)
Will trade for an equivalent
On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
40cm/4.5 Zeiss Jena
22in/5 Bausch Lomb
Really big beasts. Already on boards.
Came with an Eastman #2 body.
Sound like fun, do you have pictures of them?
I'm thinking about building a reducing back and
mounting the K-x on the
Work and lots of choral music-making have kept me from posting a PESO in
several weeks. I still don't have time, but what the hell.
I took my camera along when I was out doing an errand this morning. I'm
inclined toward the BW version, but not strongly.
Color:
Here they are:
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/twolenses.jpg
As a matter of scale, that's a 5x7 film holder in front of them.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Campaign photography can be artful at times. What I'm after is
getting the requisite shots -- standard grip-and-grin stuff, but being
on the lookout for compelling images. Granted, the sheer scale of
presidential campaigns dwarfs US Senate campaigns, but I don't see why
there can't be
I like the BW version better, too. It seems to do more with the
light and shadows.
-- Walt
On 10/9/2010 2:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Work and lots of choral music-making have kept me from posting a PESO in
several weeks. I still don't have time, but what the hell.
I took my camera along
On Oct 9, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
If you think that you're the rankest, you obviously have not smelled certain
of the people on the list.
Thanks for the suggestions, Larry. As to the above, I am the most amateur of
the amateurs here, but I'm not the least timid about insisting
One of my friends from dancing asked me about cameras a while back. It turns
out that on my advice he just bought two K-xen for the high school photography
class he teaches.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hey! No line-cutting!
-- Walt
On 10/9/2010 2:59 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I am the most amateur of the amateurs here
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Nice pics, but they're not from arranged press conferences. They were taken by
someone following the candidate day in and day out. That makes all the
difference in the world. But do the best you can. I'm sure you'll get some good
results. At the very least, you'll get an education.t.
Paul
On
On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Work and lots of choral music-making have kept me from posting a PESO in
several weeks. I still don't have time, but what the hell.
I took my camera along when I was out doing an errand this morning. I'm
inclined toward the BW version, but
Hey Eric, no pulling rankest on us. ;-') I agree with Larry. If
you have a kit zoom (18-55 or so) take just in case you see the best
shot ever and the 28 just won't do it.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
A
Good advice from Larry. I'd certainly like something longer than a
28mm when heading for the Grand Canyon/ Four Corners area.
Don't know if you've been that way before, but, unless you're in a real
hurry, I highly recommend zipping over to Sedona and taking AZ 89a up
Oak Creek Canyon from
My understanding is that this isn't a prearranged press conference
sort of thing. It's actually a couple of campaign events -- rallies,
where the organizers have given me assurances that I'll have largely
unfettered range to take shots. In fact, if the follow-up press
conference appears
Eric,
Rankness come with time.
Usually in the presence of geeky or dweeby people.
If you were to carry just a 28mm, that would probably cover most of what you
want to get.
But don't think of needing a wide lens for the Grand Canyon.
You may be surprised what the *sense* of compression from a
To quote C. Montgomery Burns, Excellent ...
I've been working on converting a backslid Canonite who has fallen away
from photography in recent years. He's pretty resistant, though.
-- Walt
On 10/9/2010 2:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
One of my friends from dancing asked me about cameras a
On Oct 9, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
If you're shooting outdoors, it can be very handy to have a polarizer. Not
that the polarizer won't work as well to bring out the clouds shooting either
directly into, or directly away from the sun as it will shooting at 90
degrees. I.e.
On Oct 9, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I'm taking my DS and one lens, an a 28/2.8.
If there's room I may also take my Smena Symbol film camera. The lens is pretty
sharp, and I've gotten some decent shots with it. [As far as sharpness goes,
that is. They have absolutely no artistic
On Oct 9, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hey! No line-cutting!
I've been paying attention here. I know what I'm talking about. I do appreciate
the fact that no one holds it against me, though.
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:21 -0400, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
If you're shooting outdoors, it can be very handy to have a polarizer. Not
that the polarizer won't work as well to bring out the clouds shooting
either directly into,
On Oct 9, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Hey Eric, no pulling rankest on us. ;-') I agree with Larry. If
you have a kit zoom (18-55 or so) take just in case you see the best
shot ever and the 28 just won't do it.
Thanks, Steven. My only a lenses are the 28/2.8 and a 70-210/4.
On Oct 9, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Your PL is probably a linear type.
To use a polarizing filter, you rotate it while looking through the
viewfinder to get the best effect - they work best at a angle of around
90 degrees to the sun, as Larry said.
Thanks, Brian. Yeah, I
Thank for the advice, everyone. I've ordered a worldwide SIM card that
routes calls through the UK but actually gives me a US phone number. So
when I call my wife, or she calls me, her cell phone will register it as
a US call--no charge. Of course charges accrue at my end, about $1 per
minute.
Rick, Color version looks old. BW looks like dirty/dingy decrepit
sidewalk. Bob S.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Work and lots of choral music-making have kept me from posting a PESO in
several weeks. I still don't have time, but what the hell.
I
On Oct 9, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
You may be surprised what the *sense* of compression from a long lens will do
for landscapes like that. There are good, reasonably-priced 100-300 range
zooms out there. I have an old Tokina 35-200 that is quite sharp but they
sell
Joe, How about sending a text message to her on arrival. Bob S.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Joseph Tainter jtain...@mindspring.com wrote:
Thank for the advice, everyone. I've ordered a worldwide SIM card that
routes calls through the UK but actually gives me a US phone number. So when
I
Bob W., Paul, and Larry - glad you liked them.
Steve Otis - never knew the Maine natives didn't see many moose.
Glad we got to see some this time.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:40 AM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Fascinating. Nice work.
Paul
On Oct 8, 2010, at
Work and lots of choral music-making have kept me from posting a PESO in
several weeks. I still don't have time, but what the hell.
I took my camera along when I was out doing an errand this morning. I'm
inclined toward the BW version, but not strongly.
Color:
Eric,
I just took a trip this past August to the Canyon/Four corners area.
Our trip was a family vacation, not photo safari, so I wanted to pack
light, too. I brought one lens, a 17-70. Which was fine -- I used
the wide end a good bit of the time -- but there were several times I
wished I'd
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 02:59:52PM -0400, Eric Weir wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
a mid-August thunder-rain-sleet-snowstorm in the White Mountains in New
Hampshire many years ago. One of our threesome got chilled enough to take
leave of his reason for a while.
On Oct 9, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
And think about bringing a tripod. We first
entered the park at sunset -- which was SPECTACULAR. I was totally
kicking myself for leaving my lightweight tripod at home... it would
have been great to do some longer exposures at sunset.
On Oct 9, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Good advice from Larry. I'd certainly like something longer than a 28mm when
heading for the Grand Canyon/ Four Corners area.
I really want to travel light. And I'm strongly inclined to take the advice
given earlier and stick with one lens.
On Oct 9, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
KEH is right here. . . . I'll take a look.
There were a couple a 135/2.8s, but they're more than I want to spend at the
moment, and the comments about it on Stan Halpin's site are not encouraging.
On Oct 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I have an m 100/4 macro, an Albinar 135/2.8, and an a 70-210/4. And the guy
who sold me the p3n threw in a Vivitar 70-150/3.5.
This got buried in a longer response. I thought I'd lift it up in case anyone
had any recommendations.
Both the
On Oct 9, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:21 -0400, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
If you're shooting outdoors, it can be very handy to have a polarizer. Not
that the polarizer won't work as well to
Watch for a Pentax SMC-M 135/3.5. Excellent lens and a bargain at about $60.
Paul
On Oct 9, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
KEH is right here. . . . I'll take a look.
There were a couple a 135/2.8s, but they're more than I want to spend at
On Oct 9, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I have an m 100/4 macro, an Albinar 135/2.8, and an a 70-210/4. And the guy
who sold me the p3n threw in a Vivitar 70-150/3.5.
This got buried in a longer response. I thought I'd lift it up in
On Oct 9, 2010, at 3:05 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Watch for a Pentax SMC-M 135/3.5. Excellent lens and a bargain at about $60.
I had one and loved it, but got a 2.5 because I felt I needed the extra speed.
Ended up selling the 3.5 to a list member. If I had the K-x rather than the
K100 when
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:05 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Watch for a Pentax SMC-M 135/3.5. Excellent lens and a bargain at about $60.
Thanks, Paul. What's your thought regarding my anxiety about missing out on
lessons about exposure if I rely on the exposure lock button to set aperture?
On 8/10/10, paul stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here, the TV crews and print journalists frequently have to fight for
post press conference interviews and usually have to settle for a group
session where they take turns asking questions. One on ones are rare.
Paul, you would seriously
On 8/10/10, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yeah, I was making a reference to the herd mentality more than the
proper techniques for getting good shots at a press conference. :-)
This can be used to advantage. I've known freelance stills photogs throw
a red herring by getting a mate
On 9/10/10, Walter Gilbert, discombobulated, unleashed:
or back off and look for some
interesting angles of the interaction between the candidate and the press.
Take your monopod, and get a high shot right over the press focussing on
the subject at close range. If there's enough cameras and
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
It's looking like if I take anything long it'll be the 70/210 zoom?
that's probably the most versatile of the long zooms, so I'd bring that. If
you were going in April, I'd say to bring the macro for flowers. Though if
that's a Series/1
On Oct 9, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
UV, and skylight filters are clear. They nominally block out UV light that
would focus differently than visible light, and expose film our of focus,
causing a slight blurriness. These days they mostly serve two purposes:
1) Protect the
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:05 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Watch for a Pentax SMC-M 135/3.5. Excellent lens and a bargain at about $60.
KEH has several. $43 to $65.
Maybe I should let go of my obsession with being able to control aperture from
the camera. As Larry suggested, and as I aspire to do,
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
1) Protect the surface of the lens, being cheaper and easier to replace.
Would you want to use a polarizing filter the same way?
I would not, because you will lose more than a stop of light. There is
also the possibility of
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:05 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Watch for a Pentax SMC-M 135/3.5. Excellent lens and a bargain at about $60.
KEH has several. $43 to $65.
Given your's and Larry's comments on it, and those on Stan Halpin's site, I'm
gonna
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:19 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:05 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Watch for a Pentax SMC-M 135/3.5. Excellent lens and a bargain at about $60.
Thanks, Paul. What's your thought regarding my anxiety about missing out on
lessons about exposure if I rely on
I'm a bit confused. Is the the 28 an A or FA? Why would the manual
(M) lenses teach you less about exposure. You'll learn quite a bit
with the M's since you will notice the exposure more. As a matter of
fact, when I use the M's on static subjects I often adjust the
exposure with the histogram.
For your trip, I wold just rely on the multi-point exposure. But if your
scene is almost all whites and tans, like a bright beach or desert scene,
dial in + 1/2 stop exposure comp. If it's almost all really dark tone, dial
in -1/2 stop exposure comp. Or just shoot Raw and correct in your
With memory cards as cheap as they are, I don't shoot in anything but RAW. I
never need a string of closely-timed images, so RAW is normal for me. Unless it
is overcast, I won't even think about shooting at midday. I know, it's sort of
a lazy attitude, but dawn and dusk are so much better for
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9304908/IMGS01259.JPG
;-)
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
ROTFL. Great shot.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9304908/IMGS01259.JPG
;-)
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
--
PDML
Of course. But sometimes, you have to make pictures in an it is what
it is situation. The light will be harsh, but the scenery will still
be breathtaking. Enjoy your family, make the best of the photos, bring
home happy memories.
And be careful when taking family photos at the rim of the
Eric,
Throw the A70-210 lens into your bag and use it if the chance arises.
Put the 100mm macro onto the camera tonight and start practicing with
the green button.
You'll learn plenty and the conscious step of pressing the button to
determine speed will be educating.
It's really not a problem,
That thing's huge.
(He's growing up too!)
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9304908/IMGS01259.JPG
;-)
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter,
On Oct 9, 2010, at 10:31 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
With memory cards as cheap as they are, I don't shoot in anything but RAW. I
never need a string of closely-timed images, so RAW is normal for me. Unless
it is
If you're talking about the cat's eye, it's millions of years old. If it's a
cat-like skin for the latest Optio, yeah, it's new.
So, what new camera do you have?
(great photo, BTW)
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sat, 10/9/10, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
From:
This was my first attack on Bustopher (the cat) with the K7. I hope to do
better; I usually donate a pet pic to the local SPCA for a Fundraiser .
-Original Message-
From: Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 19:49:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I'm a bit confused. Is the the 28 an A or FA? Why would the manual
(M) lenses teach you less about exposure. You'll learn quite a bit
with the M's since you will notice the exposure more. As a matter of
fact, when I use the M's on
On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:38 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this. The exposure lock button is only valuable
if you have a weird exposure situation, you can take a reading off a neutral
subject and lock it.
I think, on the DS, it's a the only way to set aperture with a
A copy of this got sent without the explanation I intended to insert: As you'll
see below, I originally attached three photos, which caused the message to
bounce. So now I know attaching photos is a no-no. Too bad. The three I tried
to send made a nice set to go with this story. [Which as I
Eric -
What a fascinating story! And so great that you're all going to get
together. If you'd like to share the photos, you can e-mail them to me
off list and I'll post them on my web site for a week or two - longer if
you'd like.
-p
On 10/9/2010 11:35 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
A copy of
Pentax didin't go entirely to Plastic filter threads, thought all of
my FA lenses, (except for the 43mm limited), have plastic threads, the I
only have two F lenses one with plastic threads, one metal, and all the
A lenses I own have metal threads, though I understand some A lenses are
On 10/8/2010 1:47 PM, Bob W wrote:
Then again, maybe I'm right-eyed
http://www.petapixel.com/2010/10/06/use-da-grip-for-capturing-sharper-
images-in-low-light/
Wouldn't really work with a rangefinder
to hell with that - this is the most interesting thing on the page:
87 matches
Mail list logo
