If 50-200 Zuiko is fast (like f/2.8), then it could be preferable
because ultimately it will give you even closer reach. If you decide to
go with K-7, I suggest a battery grip that may help your steadiness.
On 11/2/2010 5:13 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I have been using faster lenses (77/1.8)
On 11/1/2010 11:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Are we doing one, Mark? similar deadline--Januaryish?
Plan is for just like last year: Submissions accepted from Jan 1 to
Feb 28. Book publication in late April.
You're hereby better person than Miserere...
Boris
Personally, I think that Pentax backward compatibility is way overrated
compared to what it truly is.
On 11/1/2010 11:41 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Miserere wrote:
Boris, I'd say yes and no. I suppose we should take into account what
*might* happen 5 years from now, but what's more important to
On 11/1/2010 8:47 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Many on this list want Pentax to produce a FF body. These would all
be incompatible with the DA lenses. Apparently it might also be
incompatible with the FA lenses, at least in terms of AF
Steven, it would seem that Pentax FF body is not going
Since you like me are wordy, my just as wordy reply interspersed :-).
On 11/1/2010 8:22 PM, Miserere wrote:
Boris, I'd say yes and no. I suppose we should take into account what
*might* happen 5 years from now, but what's more important to me is
what happens this Friday when I go shooting. If I
On 11/1/2010 8:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
There is something that bothers me slightly.
The future is a crystal ball with a lot of fog and little if anything to be
seen. I don't think Pentax knows the future, including their future moves
beyond the
On 11/1/2010 8:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Nothing is sacred. Evolution happens.
Exactly. But it also means that one has to carefully think when to move
along with the evolution - be it upgrade their computer or camera gear.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 11/1/2010 8:29 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Yes, but if one is already invested in the system and using it
productively, it doesn't make much sense to fret over what might
happen. I know my cameras and lenses do everything I need to do right
now and will continue to do so for at least the near
On 11/1/2010 8:27 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
I understand being concerned about the future in general and about the
sustainability of the Pentax system in particular, but you cannot go
into details. I truly don't understand how could one figure out a
possible single move (such as stopping putting
On 11/1/2010 6:41 PM, Thibouille wrote:
Not so sure Boris, AFAIK the most problematic mechanical part in
current mount isn't the AF screwdriver but the aperture lever.
That is something I (personally) don't care about. To my luck, I had my
share of problems with K and M lenses and presently I
On 11/1/2010 8:55 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
The needle tracks up and down both of my arms spell out fast
primes, but my K-x will do better in low light with f/2.8 glass than
my K100 did with f/1.8 glass, the K-5 better still. /Pentax will get
more low light benefit for their development dollar from
On 11/1/2010 10:30 PM, Miserere wrote:
You know Bob, I did just that, I put the 31 Ltd on my ME Super and all
my photos came out in BW! I'll never use that lens again on a film
camera body, I'm sticking to using it on my K10D, where it gives me
colour images.
Fool me once!
--M.
Gee,
Cotty wrote:
http://cottycam.posterous.com/blowing-in-the-welsh-wind
Give me a shout next time you're heading there. My parents live on the
Wirral, so it's about 35 minutes without traffic to Conwy. Will probably
be there the weekend before Christmas.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Boris Liberman wrote:
Quite right, Dario. Predicting the future is lousy occupation... What
you're saying is that trying to cross the ocean on the small boat is
risky. As well, one might be better off paying the price of buying a
ticket to the Atlantic cruise ship...
As a general rule, I
On 11/2/2010 9:07 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Sure. I was only wondering how can we:
1 - Discuss seriously a single step someone hypotesize will happen five
years from now,
and then:
2 - Decide a camera system strategy based on the agreement (or lack
thereof) about that
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:26:47PM -0400, Miserere wrote:
On 1 November 2010 23:18, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody thought we'd lose the aperture ring until I stumbled across the FAJ
lens description on Pentax's site, (I don't remember how many years ago).
He's
On 11/2/2010 7:38 AM, John Celio wrote:
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/39959453/ns/sports-baseball/
Finally! */My/ San Francisco Giants* are World Series Champions! :D :D :D
You ought to be a very wealthy man, John... :-)
Congratulations nonetheless :-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:06 AM, cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
I'd like to see the centerfold--is it of naked chemists such?Cheers
Christine from Chicago
I don't need the centrefold, I get to see a real naked chemist every day :)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Nick David Wright wrote:
I just hope it's as small as it looks. That gives me an idea. If you
have time, would you shoot a photo of the 200T and 280T side-by-side?
I used to own the 280 and that would give me a better idea how big the
200 really is. I'd appreciate it very much.
On Nov 2, 2010, at 12:53 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Bonus! Gazanias. Christine commented favourably on these ...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/5091067524/lightbox/
So will I but I am very partial to them, we have lots in our garden in plenty
of different colours. They'll be
On 11/2/2010 9:14 AM, John Francis wrote:
In any case, I reckon Pentax are pretty good as far as compatibility goes.
We haven't yet seen a body that drops support for the A-series lenses,
although it's almost 20 years since the FA lens family first showed up.
I'm sure we'll see such a body
On Nov 2, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Hope the PUG has a 2010 theme that includes torn flesh.
Maybe not... I remember what my knee looked like a couple of years ago. You'll
be glad I didn't photograph it.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:11 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I love the caption on that shot at the top. Chris Pound explains how
much he likes the 645D while, in the background, Ned Bunnell indicates
how many grand it will cost.
I think it's one of the best captions I've ever seen. :)
Dave
--
Fascinating. It is hard to put into words, Bong, but the color image is
lighter, seemingly with smoother tonal changes. The b/w image has
stronger contrast and to me its mood is slightly different...
If I make no sense whatsoever, just disregard this message.
Boris
On 11/2/2010 2:22 AM,
Two questions:
1. Did you try to tickle him?
2. If you pinch him, will he disappear?
Well, make that three:
3. Is he afraid of garlic?
:-)
Boris
On 11/1/2010 6:36 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5134425479/
comments and critique welcomer as always
--
PDML
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Fascinating. It is hard to put into words, Bong, but the color image is
lighter, seemingly with smoother tonal changes. The b/w image has stronger
contrast and to me its mood is slightly different...
If I make no sense
One of my tango instructors wanted some photos for her website, and we spent a
few hours this afternoon playing with camera and lights. It started off a
little rough, but once we hit our stride, we got some decent shots:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625294995780/
You may find
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/1/2010 8:55 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
The needle tracks up and down both of my arms spell out fast
primes, but my K-x will do better in low light with f/2.8 glass than
my K100 did with f/1.8 glass, the K-5 better still. /Pentax will get
On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:35 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
That is a God Awful pun.
Thank you very much.
On 10/31/2010 8:10 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I'd like to thank John for the inspiration
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5133567061/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I have been using faster lenses (77/1.8) for stage productions until now, but
want to get a bit closer with a zoom. Do any of you who have this lens feel
that it will focus reliably in sometimes dim stage lights with a K-7?
Because of the
On Nov 1, 2010, at 4:53 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
My brother-in-law's sister recently agreed to model for me, and we spent a
very pleasant afternoon this past Saturday in her lovely home. I enlisted my
own sister as assistant. Teresa has been working out body building so after
doing some
On 11/2/2010 10:43 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
You have a camera body you like and lenses you like which work with
it. At some point, it may be worth your while to see if there are
lenses that you can't live without, and what body would make the best
use of them. If you're lucky, you won't need to
2010/11/2 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
That is a God Awful pun.
and it isn't even all that new either =)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS2khYJZKwA
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
2010/11/1 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Paul, without intent to sound provocative here, but Nikon D7000
appears to move in the opposite direction - it offers compatibility
with non CPU'ed lenses by having mechanical aperture coupling. This
kind of introduction would make even less sense
2010/11/1 CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com:
He's a Windows computer - Canon Camera guy, but
otherwise pretty stable.
MARK!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
and remember... TGIF... toes go in first =P
2010/11/1 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
If you stuff the toes of a pair of shoes so they'll have the right shape to
photograph well, you have to remember to take all the crumpled up newspaper
out again before trying to put the shoes on.
Duh!
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:37 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
But fortunately I have an agreement with the potential buyer of most of my
other gear.
Wow! How big of a weekly allowance do you give her?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Larry, here is where you totally loose me...
On 11/2/2010 11:09 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:37 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
But fortunately I have an agreement with the potential buyer of most of my
other gear.
Wow! How big of a weekly allowance do you give her?
--
Larry
Remind me to tell you the story of the name Purple City some time...
2010/11/1 Sam L samthegr...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:51 PM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice. Like it a lot.
Looks like the mayor of Purple City just announced Complementary
Contrast Week =)
Now I
2010/11/1 Sam L samthegr...@gmail.com:
The yellows were intentional. The purples are certainly way more
exaggerated compared to what my screen originally displayed.
don't change them. they're what makes the image.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Larry, here is where you totally loose me...
On 11/2/2010 11:09 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:37 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
But fortunately I have an agreement with the potential buyer of most of my
other gear.
Wow!
I realized that, but unlike you being jocular, I was being serious
*friendly smile*.
Boris
On 11/2/2010 11:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Larry, here is where you totally loose me...
On 11/2/2010 11:09 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 1, 2010,
Given the investment in the 645D, I doubt that we'll see a 24x36 sensor DSLR
from Pentax. They already have two lines of lenses and bodies, including what
seems to be a potential top contender for the pro market.. And they are both
full frame. Neither comes with half a sensor.
Paul
On Nov 1,
I can second Christine's recommendation. I've shot performers with the DA*
50-135 and K7 with good results. Many wide open at ISO 6400 in dim lighting. No
problem with autofocus or exposure. I believe all of these are either ISO 5000
or 6400, most at f2.8:
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:30 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 1 November 2010 18:24, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
With the imminent arrival of the K5, perhaps we've lost sight of the
other new arrival.
Here's a quite positive review of the K-r.
On Nov 2, 2010, at 4:46 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I have been using faster lenses (77/1.8) for stage productions until now,
but want to get a bit closer with a zoom. Do any of you who have this lens
feel that it will focus reliably in
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/1/2010 8:55 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
The needle tracks up and down both of my arms spell out fast
primes, but my K-x will do better in low light with f/2.8 glass than
my K100 did with f/1.8 glass, the K-5 better still. /Pentax will get
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/7320285/
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 11/2/2010 12:31 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Why would Pentax even consider developing more FA limiteds? They're
not optimized for the APS-C image circle. They were designed for
cameras that are no longer being produced. I expect Pentax will
develop more fast primes, like the DA 77 limited for
On 11/2/2010 12:09 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Given the investment in the 645D, I doubt that we'll see a 24x36
sensor DSLR from Pentax. They already have two lines of lenses and
bodies, including what seems to be a potential top contender for the
pro market.. And they are both full frame.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Given the investment in the 645D, I doubt that we'll see a 24x36 sensor
DSLR from Pentax. They already have two lines of lenses and bodies,
including what seems to be a potential top contender for the pro market..
And a CSC (EVIL or not) will require another line of
paul stenquist wrote:
Given the investment in the 645D, I doubt that we'll see a 24x36 sensor DSLR
from Pentax. They already have two lines of lenses and bodies, including
what seems to be a potential top contender for the pro market..
The extra lens line for APS-C is way overestimated. Only
The article is available on the Chemical Hertiage website as well:
http://www.chemheritage.org/discover/magazine/articles/28-2-silver-and-sunlight.aspx
No centerfolds though. You must need a subscription to get the good stuff.
Chris S
--- Original Message Follows ---
From:
LOL. I never think to look there. OK, guys, just go to the website.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:32 AM, chris...@canada.com wrote:
The article is available on the Chemical Hertiage website as well:
http://www.chemheritage.org/discover/magazine/articles/28-2-silver-and-sunlight.aspx
No
Right. I'm just saying this is another route to incompatible lenses
than many members actually want.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/1/2010 8:47 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Many on this list want Pentax to produce a FF body. These would all
be
Well, if the future FF body (just assuming for a moment that it might
happen some day) can simply mask out the unused part of image circle if
you mount a DA lens, then part of the problem is solved. It seems Nikon
is doing similar thing.
Boris
On 11/2/2010 1:54 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
On 2 November 2010 23:00, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if the future FF body (just assuming for a moment that it might happen
some day) can simply mask out the unused part of image circle if you mount a
DA lens, then part of the problem is solved. It seems Nikon is doing
On 11/2/2010 2:07 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Boris,
Nikon know nothing, heck they don't even have an MF digital!
Cheers,
Well, I think some kind of smiley and/or emoticon would be in order here...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2 November 2010 23:11, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/2/2010 2:07 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Boris,
Nikon know nothing, heck they don't even have an MF digital!
Cheers,
Well, I think some kind of smiley and/or emoticon would be in order here...
It was implied, one post
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Nick David Wright
pedalsandpr...@gmail.com wrote:
shoot pictures of their own feet?
http://blog.nickdavidwright.net/2010/10/feet.html
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.net/
Dunno. I hate feet, but still do it
I missed it too, Tan.
Been too busy to read the list recently
Wendy
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
What the heck?!?! I missed the whole thing! Bill is gone?
He has to be one of the longest standing members of this list...
I don't know what to say!
Sorry, no Pentax content
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wendybeard/5129698722/in/photostream/
(my daughter's daughter.. :-) )
--
Wendy Beard
Carp, Ontario
Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On 2 November 2010 23:00, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if the future FF body (just assuming for a moment that it might happen
some day) can simply mask out the unused part of image circle if you mount a
DA lens, then part of the problem is solved. It seems Nikon is doing
That's a treasure! All around beautiful.
Jack
--- On Tue, 11/2/10, wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com wrote:
From: wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com
Subject: OT: Little pumpkin
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 5:29 AM
Sorry, no Pentax content
2010/11/2 Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com:
Nikon know nothing, heck they don't even have an MF digital!
couldn't be - Kennyboy after all shoots Nikon's pro model, the D40...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Given the investment in the 645D, I doubt that we'll see a 24x36 sensor
DSLR from Pentax. They already have two lines of lenses and bodies,
including what seems to be a potential top contender for the pro market..
And a CSC (EVIL or not) will require another line of
He called Godfrey a faggot. That made Godfrey happy, but it made a
lot of other list members angry because they think Bill shouldn't call
Godfrey that. So they hyperventilated and got all over Bill's case in
some idiotic guise of 'moral' enlightement and political correctness.
Tom C.
On Sat,
2010/11/1 Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com:
perhaps they are commandos who haven't yet figured out that the war is
over...
Bob's right. You never would have spotted the ninjas.
those were of course hiding behind the commandos...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hey grandma, that's one for the brag book! :-) Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:29 AM, wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, no Pentax content
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wendybeard/5129698722/in/photostream/
(my daughter's daughter.. :-) )
--
Wendy Beard
Carp,
Ok then. So, Wendy and Paul - do we have a contest? :-
Lovely pictures of a sweet child and welcome back, Wendy!
Boris
On 11/2/2010 2:29 PM, wendy beard wrote:
Sorry, no Pentax content
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wendybeard/5129698722/in/photostream/
(my daughter's daughter.. :-) )
That's disappointing ... its nearly the same size as the 280t.
Guess I'll just stick with my original idea and get the Vivitar 2000.
Also, I don't recall the 280T having controllable manual power.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:22 AM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Nick David Wright
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:15, Tom C wrote:
He called Godfrey a faggot. That made Godfrey happy, but it made a
lot of other list members angry because they think Bill shouldn't call
Godfrey that. So they hyperventilated and got all over Bill's case in
some idiotic guise of 'moral' enlightement and
Thanks Christine. Like you, I'll be the only person in the audience (dress
rehearsal), so I'll be able to close in. The shots you posted look great. A far
cry from mine from the mid-1990's when I had to use Fuji 800.
Jeffery
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
The DA*
Thank you very much, Paul.
-bmw
On 10-11-01 9:47 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Well done. The portrait is excellent IMO.
Paul
On Nov 1, 2010, at 9:21 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Thank you, Dave!
-bmw
On 10-11-01 10:14 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I like the second shot a lot. Well posed
Dave
On
The Zuiko isn't very fast, so I've used it outdoors for the most part. Indoors,
I'd probably have to go with 5.6 at the largest.
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:12 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
If 50-200 Zuiko is fast (like f/2.8), then it could be preferable because
ultimately it will give you even closer
I have a K-x and used it (for the first time) on the last stage production. I
didn't really have any DARK dark scenes, so it worked okay. I know this show
will have some serious darkness.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:46 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Jeffery Smith
As with Jack, i prefer the colour version.
Dave
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
I went on a walk in a local public cemetery on halloween with somber
and black white in mind but what greeted me was color (have not
been in these places for decades).
IMO, Godfrey was being his annoying arrogant self and irritated Bill.
It's cause and effect.
If Godfrey provoked it, and he didn't care about the response, and
moreover accepted the acclaimation, then I don't quite see why anyone
else should or did.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Charles
Cute
Dave
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:29 AM, wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, no Pentax content
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wendybeard/5129698722/in/photostream/
(my daughter's daughter.. :-) )
--
Wendy Beard
Carp, Ontario
Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Good close, sharp shots Paul. I'll probably start with an ISO of 1600 and see
how it goes. I've never used the setting that allows me to choose shutter speed
and aperture while letting the camera choose the ISO. This seems like a good
opportunity to try that feature.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010,
Oh, then it is no issue - DA* 50-135/2.8 would seem to be your best
option among those at hand.
Boris
On 11/2/2010 3:53 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
The Zuiko isn't very fast, so I've used it outdoors for the most part. Indoors,
I'd probably have to go with 5.6 at the largest.
On Nov 2, 2010,
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:59, Tom C wrote:
IMO, Godfrey was being his annoying arrogant self and irritated Bill.
It's cause and effect.
If Godfrey provoked it, and he didn't care about the response, and
moreover accepted the acclaimation, then I don't quite see why anyone
else should or did.
On 10-11-02 4:24 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
One of my tango instructors wanted some photos for her website, and we spent a
few hours this afternoon playing with camera and lights. It started off a
little rough, but once we hit our stride, we got some decent shots:
Thanks, Steven.
They do make good photo fodder. I wish I could see her more often than
I do.
-- Walt
On 11/1/2010 12:18 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
She has beautiful eyes.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
My great-niece stopped by
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
While I didn't buy the 31 Ltd for film, due to its FOV, and then I bought it
for its FOV on DX sensors.
Great minds think unlike, and small minds too ;-)
Dario
I bought my 77 Ltd because it was shiny.
Dave
--
Thanks, Jack.
If I'd had more hair, I'm pretty sure it would have turned grey overnight.
-- Walt
On 11/1/2010 12:31 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Ghastly, Walter!! ;) Will likely experience night terrors for some time.
Seriously cute, Walt.
Jack
--- On Mon, 11/1/10, Walter
Thanks for letting me know. Western Kentucky was on my short list.
I'll now remove it.
Nice photos BTW
Dave
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
My great-niece stopped by to terrorize me last night. And, since I don't
get to see her very often,
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it
wrote:
While I didn't buy the 31 Ltd for film, due to its FOV, and then I bought
it
for its FOV on DX sensors.
Great minds think unlike, and small minds too ;-)
Dario
I bought my 77 Ltd because
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO, Godfrey was being his annoying arrogant self and irritated Bill.
It's cause and effect.
If Godfrey provoked it, and he didn't care about the response, and
moreover accepted the acclaimation, then I don't quite see why anyone
DagT wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
And a CSC (EVIL or not) will require another line of lenses. That will
have
priority over a possible 24x36 system.
However, I admit I would consider buying a Pentax 24x36 DSLR, while I
don't
think about the 645D as a possible target of mine.
I don't think
LOL... that probably sums it up.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO, Godfrey was being his annoying arrogant self and irritated Bill.
It's cause and effect.
If Godfrey provoked it, and
True enough.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if the future FF body (just assuming for a moment that it might happen
some day) can simply mask out the unused part of image circle if you mount a
DA lens, then part of the problem is solved. It seems
And we wonder why camera companies have problems.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it
wrote:
While I didn't buy the 31 Ltd for film, due to its FOV, and
I don't know much about FF/FX/24x36/whatever we want to call them/
bodies offered by others. Can anyone estimate how much it would cost
if Pentax simply stuck a bigger sensor in a K5-like body? $2500? I
think the problem they have is that going after the Canikon folks in
their home court is a
I don't understand why people think it is their right to use the the
word faggot and then get all hurt when someone exercises their right
to call them a jerk. Bill wasn't banned, he left on his own. I
wish he had stayed because I often liked what he had to say. But you
can't call people names
No need to apologize. What an adorable baby and picture.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:29 AM, wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, no Pentax content
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wendybeard/5129698722/in/photostream/
(my daughter's daughter.. :-) )
--
Wendy Beard
Carp, Ontario
Because it was gratuitously offensive? Because its sole purpose was to offend?
If Robb wanted to call him that, he could have done it offlist, but wanted an
audience to see it. The audience saw it. If this list were entirely composed of
racist, sexist, homophobic members, then that sort have
I do find myself in low light on many occasions. I mean, what active
photographer doesn't? I was attracted to the K7 because of all the
good things I heard about the 77 point exposure system, which I
figured would affect a higher percentage of my shots. It was
tempting, however, to wait for the
I love you too, Tom. I ignore you too.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
He called Godfrey a faggot. That made Godfrey happy, but it made a
lot of other list members angry because they think Bill shouldn't call
Godfrey that. So they hyperventilated and got all
Sure I do. I'm a Red Sox fan and I remember 2004. What I found
amazing was that the Giants bats just came to life during the WS in a
way we had;'t really seen all season. It's not like the Rangers have
a weak staff (although he bullpen is a bit suspect).
Congrats!
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:38
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
