Cotty wrote:
Pity Bill isn't around, I'm filming at Auschwitz on Tuesday - I could
really get my chance to justify the holocaust...
Give me a shout if you need any contacts over there. At least one list
memeber in Krakow, also.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:38 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I have no reason not to. But speaking of native speakers, I suppose
Sting is native enough, isn't he?
If memory serves he's from Scotland. I don't know if that makes him a native
English speaker
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
The same time that we start referring to darkroom work as analogue post
processing?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Welcome to the club!
Gasha, 6x7/MLU/75mm
Jens wrote:
Hi guys
Some of you may be giving a camera like this away - But I went out and bought
one :-)
I went to visit a studio today to buy one of their Pentax 67's. Mostly used by fashion
photographers, of which there are not many left in this
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
You're pretty good with a cell phone. what kind is it?
Thanks, but all I do is point the thing and press the button.
It's a fairly basic model, Sony Ericsson K610i. I bought it 3 years ago after
I broke my T100 in the same fall that broke
Thanks Gasha
Do anyone her happen to have a pdf manual for the camera nad prism finder?
Or know where to find these for free?
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Nov 4, 2010 09:35 Gasha cir...@konts.lv wrote:
Welcome to the club!
Gasha, 6x7/MLU/75mm
Jens wrote:
Do anyone her happen to have a pdf manual for the camera nad prism finder?
Or know where to find these for free?
http://www.pentaximaging.com/support/manuals-and-literature/
Dario (of the 6x7 steam club)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Go for it, Nick.
They seem to be getting cheaper each day :-) Although I've noticed, that on
ebay the prices seem to vary a great deal. For instance a 165mm LS lens (which
I want soon) seem to sell for sometimes 100 USD and sometimes 500 USD,
according to completed listings.
Regards
Jens
--
Jens, you only fuel my wants to get one myself (or at least a 645/66).
I'm certain you will produce beautiful work with it.
Cheers
Thibs
2010/11/3 Jens p...@planfoto.dk:
Hi guys
Some of you may be giving a camera like this away - But I went out and bought
one :-)
I went to visit a studio
Thanks.
Yes film is great - again. I believe that the digital photography revolution
have really killed many of the bad or not so good labs. No developing at the
nearest street corner anymore. Now we MUST go to a real pro-lab. And when we
do, we get excellent high rez. negs, that will scan to
Hmmm, the pictures are really wonderful, including that of an odd fellow
in the restaurant of some sort *friendly grin*. But where's Frank? I
wanna see Frank's picture *broad grin*.
Glad to have you back with these most enjoyable pictures, Ann!
Boris
On 11/3/2010 5:42 PM, Ann Sanfedele
On 11/3/2010 6:38 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
OK, I'll get the boasting out of the way, first: I found out yesterday
that I've had three more of my submissions accepted, and one declined,
for the Pentax Photo Gallery. I'll take those odds! I still have two of
my original submissions
My take on this is the following:
There's no wonder that cameras do indeed change the exact values of
exposure parameters. This is nothing new.
Oe will display 1/30 at f/2.8 (AV mode) when really the camera decided
to use 1/27 but for clarity purposes, displays 1/30.
I have no problem with that.
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Thibouille wrote:
My take on this is the following:
... snip ...
With reviews as they are done now (good or bad) the fact that some
cameras (yes, Nikon being one of them but Pentax might be as well)
display (always) Iso6400 but use Iso5000 is nothing but a
On 4/11/10, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Give me a shout if you need any contacts over there. At least one list
memeber in Krakow, also.
Thanks. On a coach straight from Krakow to Auschwitz and then return
some hours later. 5am flight from Gatwick, so hotel night before and
next
My 165/4LS, which was truly mint, went for $175. I had purchased it new from a
store that was going out of business for the same price about seven years ago.
My 55/4 -- the most recent and most desirable version of the three 55 mm
lenses-- went for $326. It was also in like new condition.
Paul
also check this link:
http://www.antiquecameras.net/pentax6x7lenses.html
G
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Jens wrote:
Do anyone her happen to have a pdf manual for the camera nad prism
finder?
Or know where to find these for free?
http://www.pentaximaging.com/support/manuals-and-literature/
Dario
What was your impression about 55/4 ?
Is it worth to get it ?
I didnt had luck to get reasonable price on ebay...
Gasha
paul stenquist wrote:
My 165/4LS, which was truly mint, went for $175. I had purchased it new from a store that was going out of business for the same price about seven
Hehe, got your point Larry but there's a difference between promoting
the good things of a product (not stating bad ones) and bold lies.
I'll add that politics lies are no reason to accept lies everywhere
else except maybe if this is the world one wants to live in.
2010/11/4 Larry Colen
Maybe about the same time we stop referring to 35mm-sized imaging
sensors as full-frame?
;-)
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:31 AM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
The same time that we start referring to darkroom work as
On 10-11-03 9:42 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
If you liked Teresa, I added one more shot of her in body-building mode to my
mini GESO ...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/5143832857/lightbox/
I like it.
The one suggestion I'd make is
I didn't see any references to Harold Edgerton, Papa Flash, in the bomb photos.
He formed a company EGG and created a special camera to capture the blasts.
Mechanical shutters were way too slow to stop a blast.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapatronic_camera
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at
Thank you very much, Paul.
-bmw
On 10-11-03 9:24 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Good one. Love that glow.
Paul
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
If you liked Teresa, I added one more shot of her in body-building mode to my
mini GESO ...
Power which, I feel, is reflected in her eyes too.
Thank you, Steven!
-bmw
On 10-11-03 9:31 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I like this one. It's kind of a glam shot but there is a clear hint
of power in that muscle definition.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, paul
Thank you, Christine.
-bmw
On 10-11-03 11:19 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
What Paul Said. the 1st one of the 3-shot gallery--very, very nice!
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: paul stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent:
But yes, you did. That's what I was after.
I don't ask anyone to like it. Just to do it.
If you hate it, you'll love digital way of doing things a lot more.
But then if have quite some convenience you probably did not get:
1/ the Durst are fully automatic, meaning it will do the math itself
if
The last version of the 55/4, with the lens information printed on the
tapered end of the focusing barrel (like an SMC-A lens) is excellent.
The 55/4 that precedes it was not.
Paul
On Nov 4, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Gasha wrote:
What was your impression about 55/4 ?
Is it worth to get it ?
I
I have an old-style 6X7. It is a wonderful camera. I have a few
rolls of film in the freezer, and one of these days, I'm going to go
out and re-live the good old days.
Most of the folks who used to develop my film and make reasonable
priced contacts are long gone, unfortunately, so developing
Thanks, Frank! Sometime I may try playing with the luminance sliders to see if
I can improve the appearance of sharpness.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Tue, 11/2/10, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: Re:
I still have my 6x7 with metered prism and the 90 2.8 and the 200 Tak.
I shot a few rolls of BW in 2007 i think it was. There is a Blacks
camera not to far from me that still does processing and scanning. I
should run a few rolls through it. Have to check the fridge but should
have some BW as well
Amen, Brother.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Nick David Wright
pedalsandpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe about the same time we stop referring to 35mm-sized imaging
sensors as full-frame?
;-)
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:31 AM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:16 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
The same time i spell a post corectly
Dave
--
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed
moral
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:32 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
Doesn't look like it's in there yet. It does support the 645D.
Right now i am looking at cameras that my computers ie LR2 and CS1
will
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
First you want honesty in advertising? What next? Honesty in politics?
Politeness on mailing lists? A Pentax
with decent autofocus?
MARK!
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
If you shoot RAW DNG, almost any conversion software will support the
K-5.
Paul
On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:32 PM, John Sessoms
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks
I must say i'm impressed. So does CS5 support the K-5 then.??
Looks like they're on the Pentax self-support site - 67, 67II and 67 TTL
Pentaprism:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/support/manuals-and-literature/
From: Jens
Thanks Gasha
Do anyone her happen to have a pdf manual for the camera nad prism finder?
Or know where to find these for free?
Regards
From: Larry Colen
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Thibouille wrote:
My take on this is the following:
... snip ...
Those are bold lies and should be presented as such.
First you want honesty in advertising? What next? Honesty in
politics? Politeness on mailing lists? A Pentax with decent
Here are 2 photos from this morning, just after sunrise and just before.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5Samples#
Regards, Bob S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
From: Thibouille
But yes, you did. That's what I was after.
I don't ask anyone to like it. Just to do it.
If you hate it, you'll love digital way of doing things a lot more.
But then if have quite some convenience you probably did not get:
1/ the Durst are fully automatic, meaning it will do
I am having a vague *grin* recollection of that park...
Boris
On 11/4/2010 4:55 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Here are 2 photos from this morning, just after sunrise and just before.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5Samples#
Regards, Bob S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I wish you would stop this Bob! I really don't have the time right now to
list/sell my K20's and buy K-5's. And I don't have the ready funds to buy one
without selling one or both of the K20's. So stop with the tempting photos
already!
BTW, does it work in the daylight as well? Or is it a
Mighty crisp, Bob! Thanks for showing!
Jack
--- On Thu, 11/4/10, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject: K-5 sample photos - this AM
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, November 4, 2010, 7:55 AM
Here are 2 photos from this morning,
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:16:23PM -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
About the same time we stop using architect as a verb...
--
Christian
-
http://404notfound.blogspot.com
Thanks Jack,
I wanted to put an ISO 1600 sample out there and the deer cooperated
this morning.
With the ISO 400 crescent moon at the stop light, I couldn't help myself... :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Mighty crisp, Bob! Thanks for
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having a vague *grin* recollection of that park...
Boris
On 11/4/2010 4:55 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Here are 2 photos from this morning, just after sunrise and just before.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=541
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I guess 400 is then new 100.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having a vague *grin* recollection of that park...
Boris
On 11/4/2010 4:55 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Here are
Yes Boris, that's the Arboretum, the same park we visited.
With sunrise at 7:26 AM today, it was a chance to catch the deer.
You can just see the lake in the background.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having a vague *grin*
Steve,
I like ISO 400 on the K-7 as well.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess 400 is then new 100.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Boris Liberman
yeah, yeah, stunningly beautiful, great to be alive, how glorious is
God's creation, etc. That's all you got?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=541
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
yeah, yeah, stunningly beautiful, great to be alive, how glorious is
God's creation, etc. That's all you got?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=541
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Stan,
Sorry. It works in the daylight too. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
I wish you would stop this Bob! I really don't have the time right now to
list/sell my K20's and buy K-5's. And I don't have the ready funds to buy
We can work on half of that. ;-)
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:47 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Larry Colen
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Thibouille wrote:
My take on this is the following:
... snip ...
Those are bold lies and should be presented as such.
First you
Steven Desjardins wrote:
I guess 400 is then new 100.
So 200mm becomes 300mm and ISO 400 becomes 100... now I guess the in-depth
meaning of digital.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
I used to think RAW DNG was something you got at a Korean restaurant.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:16 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
If you shoot RAW DNG, almost any conversion software will support the K-5.
Paul
On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3,
Great light, stunning image. It pays to be up early!
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=541
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
No..but it's my most successful in shooting around neighborhood street lights,
etc. ;)
Thanks, Steve!!
Jack
--- On Thu, 11/4/10, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: This AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date:
I do like the vampire camera idea. Wouldn't it have to be mirrorless?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Stan,
Sorry. It works in the daylight too. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:13, Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=541
Neato!
We had a couple mornings in a row this week with similar lighting effects on
the undersides of the clouds... but there I was, stuck on a freeway driving to
work. I had to take a
Pleasing to read, Bob! Thanks! It pays especially well in the fall..and are
lucky. :)
Jack
--- On Thu, 11/4/10, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: This AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, November
I've done that. I've also thought about sending my eyes to Pentax USA
for some back focus adjustment.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:13, Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=541
Neato!
We
Work? Oh yeah, I remember that. (UGH!) Your time will come. More pollution will
then make even better sunrises and sunsets. ;)
Appreciated words, Charles.
Jack
--- On Thu, 11/4/10, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
From: Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com
Subject: Re: PESO: This AM
yeah with a sensor shaped something like the batman logo perhaps?
2010/11/4 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
I do like the vampire camera idea. Wouldn't it have to be mirrorless?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Stan,
Sorry. It works in the
LOL..
Jack
--- On Thu, 11/4/10, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: This AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, November 4, 2010, 8:35 AM
I've done that. I've also
thought about sending my eyes to
Minimum ISO of 3200, only comes in black, shutter release is a little
pin pointing up.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:41 AM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah with a sensor shaped something like the batman logo perhaps?
2010/11/4 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
I do like the vampire
On 10-10-28 9:32 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Those who never had the opportunity to develop/make prints from films,
you dunno what you're missing. Just do it !
Similarly, those who've never had the opportunity to program a computer
by punching cards, adding job control to the deck, dropping the
Agreed John but you get something usable to begin with.
Once you mastered the use of the enlarger, then you can proceed to the
chemistry part.
If you try to learn everything at once, no wonder people hate it ;)
2010/11/4 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
From: Thibouille
But yes, you did.
I shot a few hundred frames last night at a dress rehearsal. Took a K-7 and K-x
with me, with a 77 1.8 lens and 50-135 2.8 lens. There were MANY people on the
stage so both lenses ended up being a bit too long. But both had some problems
with the dramatic lighting conditions. When I tried using
Incredible sky, nicely captured.
Dan
http://tinyurl.com/matyola
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=541
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:31:02AM +0100, DagT wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
The same time that we start referring to darkroom work as analogue post
processing?
Which will be shortly after we stop dialing numbers on our cellphones
Oh I remember those painful days of punched cards.
Your program doesn't compile because of 3-4 syntax errors
(typos or misplaced commas or semicolons).
So you correct the 3 you find and resubmit the deck.
Of course, it fails because there was the 4th error you didn't see or
failed to correct.
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom
work...
.. just after stopping calling it 'Brightroom' (truly in use over here :-)
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Jeffery,
The removable square tab is so that when a polarizing filter is
mounted you can adjust it.
Lightroom 3 has some good noise reduction algorithms and Boris
mentioned liking Topaz.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
I shot a few
Thanks, Dan. In the future I'll just languish in bed and pull this up about
10:00 AM. ;)
Jack
--- On Thu, 11/4/10, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: This AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date:
I'm going to start editing tonight. I'll give the Topaz a look. I really need a
new Mac (mine is 4 years old).
Jeffery
On Nov 4, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Jeffery,
The removable square tab is so that when a polarizing filter is
mounted you can adjust it.
Lightroom 3 has some
On 4/11/10, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nah! I just want to be able to walk down the streets and hear people
murmuring, Boy, that guy sure is *RICH*!, instead of the usual Ain't
he good lookin'!
John you should try going out by yourself and not with you pal.
- ;-)
--
On 4 November 2010 10:55, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are 2 photos from this morning, just after sunrise and just before.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5Samples#
Regards, Bob S.
Great, more logs to the fire :-s
--M.
--
\/\/o/\/\ --
On 3 November 2010 21:33, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 6:25 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I've heard a few nice comments about the K5 AF. Thus far I've treated
them like UFO sightings, but maybe. . .
Pentax has conditioned us to set our AF expectations so low that
On Nov 4, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Thanks Jack,
I wanted to put an ISO 1600 sample out there and the deer cooperated
this morning.
With the ISO 400 crescent moon at the stop light, I couldn't help myself...
:-)
Bob, I don't think that *anybody* could help you.
--
Larry
Am 03.11.2010 23:05, schrieb Bob W:
does this mean you don't want to buy the Viagra?
B
Please don't mention the V-word in regular emails, that could mess up my
self-learning spam filter ;-)
Steffen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:16 AM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:38 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
wrote:
I have no reason not to. But speaking of native speakers, I suppose
Sting is native enough, isn't he?
If memory
On Nov 3, 2010, at 8:16 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
What do you mean *we*? white man.
(*) http://www.michaelclark.name/jokes/misc/the_lone_ranger_and_tonto.shtml
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Nick David Wright
pedalsandpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe about the same time we stop referring to 35mm-sized imaging
sensors as full-frame?
GAAH!
Oh, did I say that with my outside voice? 0:-)
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:31:02AM +0100, DagT wrote:
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
Digital Darkroom has a nice beat and you can dance to it
Post processing sounds like you are dealing with mailed packages
yeah, I'm back now
ann
On 11/4/2010 7:22 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I'm going to start editing tonight. I'll give the Topaz a look. I really need a
new Mac (mine is 4 years old).
Jeffery
Jeffery,
Topaz is giving you full (no watermarks, reduced size, etc) 30 days
trial. I tried - it seems to be doing noticeably
On 11/4/2010 7:36 PM, Steffen Zahn wrote:
Please don't mention the V-word in regular emails, that could mess up my
self-learning spam filter ;-)
Steffen
Logical indeed.
But can this honorable community come up with at least one word starting
with each and every letter of English alphabet,
On 3 November 2010 17:22, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Gaaa! Nuclear, not new-cue-lar!
Oh well, Carter and Bush II couldn't pronounce it either.
Jeffery
As a one-time nuclear physicist (sort of), this is a pet peeve of
mine. We should get one of these T-shirts, Jeff:
Late but actual follow up to my original review. I do apologize for
unnecessarily protracted silence...
The interesting dimensions are:
1. Photograph on the front cover: 273 mm x 183 mm.
2. Vertical picture: 123 mm x 184 mm.
3. Horizontal picture: 230 mm x 184 mm.
Boris
--
PDML
On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Agreed John but you get something usable to begin with.
Once you mastered the use of the enlarger, then you can proceed to the
chemistry part.
If you try to learn everything at once, no wonder people hate it ;)
Been there, done that. Didn't
probably true...
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Thanks Jack,
I wanted to put an ISO 1600 sample out there and the deer cooperated
this morning.
With the ISO 400 crescent moon at the stop light, I couldn't
A for Aperture Simulator (that's obvious)
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/11/4 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
But can this honorable community come up with at least one word starting
with each and every letter of English alphabet, that shouldn't be
mentioned...
Let
Thanks to all who commented with kind words and corny comments too ...
as to some specifics ...
P N Stenquist wrote:
... But who's that scruffy old man with the hot dogs? Some homeless
guy you found in Detroit? :-))
Paul
On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:42 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Betcha it's so the prism mounted flash is not blocked
John / WA1JG
On 11/4/2010 12:27 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
By the way, why does the hood of the 35-150 zoom have a square tab that is
removable?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
When /will/ we stop referring to post processing as Digital Darkroom work...
Several years ago, as far as I can tell. I never used the term and I
can't remember the last time I heard anyone else do so.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
No, the opening won't help the on-board flash work with this lens. The opening
is for adjusting a polarizer. I use it all the time when shooting cars.
Paul
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:11 PM, John Graves wrote:
Betcha it's so the prism mounted flash is not blocked
John / WA1JG
On 11/4/2010 12:27
My Mac seems to struggle (run very slowly) with Lightroom and Aperture, so I've
sort of avoided them until a get a screamer of a new computer. I give Topaz a
run for the money this weekend when I edit 400-some shots.
What I'm not looking forward to is removing a microphone from the side of the
Hi!
Just bought Topaz Denoise. Here is an image I processed with it. K-5 is
good, but I am not buying it - there is no need, really.
Have a look:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/11/peso-2010-47-topaz-cat.html
Please be brutal and honest, especially those of you who have experience
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
My Mac seems to struggle (run very slowly) with Lightroom and Aperture, so
I've sort of avoided them until a
get a screamer of a new computer. I give Topaz a run for the money this
weekend when I edit 400-some
Doubling the memory in it would probably make a big difference. I think it is
2gb. I'm a novice with Macs (I did all sorts of hardware upgrades on my first
few PCs). The Apple Store down here could do it, but they are nested in the
most overcrowded mall in the metropolitan New Orleans area, so
As a full time biologist, they use it when talking about the nucleus of an atom
and also as the nucleus of a cell. My cell physiology professor from 1970 used
to blow a gasket when a student asked about the nuculus.
The Dean of Allied Health at my college can't pronounce it either, so he just
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
