Looks like your lens is a keeper, Dave.
On 12/6/2010 9:43 AM, David Mann wrote:
Another one from today's walk with the 16-45. More documentary than art.
The Manchester Courts building sustained severe structural damage in the
September 4 earthquake. A campaign was mounted to try and save
that's very atmospheric. It reminds me of Paris in the 1970s when all the
cinemas seemed to show nothing but porn (not that La Piscine is porn).
Bob
Another from nocturnal Paris.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12049494size=lg
(K7, DA 16-45, ISO 1600, handheld)
Rick
--
PDML
Christine, I am thinking that you're not doing yourself justice here.
The two last shots are excellent whereas the very last one is simply
outstanding. You can easily print it big and hang it on the wall.
As for the rendering that you said you did not quite like. I noticed two
things (I may
Larry, this weekend I met a guy who was shooting with Canon 1Ds (no
marks) - 10 years old FF beastie. He told me the joke that if you make
two mistakes, word Nikon becomes Canon. I pointed out that opposite
was true as well :-).
On 12/5/2010 11:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last
On 12/5/2010 11:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last night when someone saw my camera she comented:
Pentax, the poor man's Nikon.
What else could we do with this:
Cannon, for the skilful photographer.
Or how about Pentax 645D, Hasselblad on a budget.
--
Sent from my Android phone with
Pentax - even Chuck Norris reads the manual.
Ecke
2010/12/6, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
On 12/5/2010 11:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last night when someone saw my camera she comented:
Pentax, the poor man's Nikon.
What else could we do with this:
Cannon, for the skilful
Come to think of it, no.
Pentax - Chuck Norris /wrote/ the manual.
uhm... yeah right =)
OK drop that though...
Ecke
2010/12/6, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com:
Pentax - even Chuck Norris reads the manual.
Ecke
2010/12/6, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
On 12/5/2010 11:36 PM, Larry Colen
On 6/12/2010 12:57 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Another from nocturnal Paris.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12049494size=lg
(K7, DA 16-45, ISO 1600, handheld)
Rick
SighRomy Schneider
Such an evocative shot. More nocturnes, please
--
der...@iinet.net.au
I just got home from the dance event I was photographing this weekend. It was
an awful lot like work, except for the bit about the paycheck.
One of my challenges photographing the dance competitions was the aspect ratio
of the room. Unfortunately it wasn't at the venue with the wonderfully
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Very playful, Frank. Cheers, Christine
Thanks, Christine, and thanks to everyone else who commented (even Larry).
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
Larry,
I am not sure what competition you were shooting, but it sounds a bit
weird to me.
What are you shooting that you need to have 40' to be in one shot?
Team performances with 8 couples at once?
I find that it is very rear that a full-dance-floor shots work
composition-wise.
I am not even
Pentax - Honest value is still important.
From: John Mullan
Pentax, feed your creative side, not your ego.
jm
-Original Message-
From: eckinator
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 8:25 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax slogan
2010/12/6 John Sessoms
On 6 December 2010 06:32, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I just got home from the dance event I was photographing this weekend. It
was an awful lot like work, except for the bit about the paycheck.
One of my challenges photographing the dance competitions was the aspect
ratio of the
The simplest answer is to either mount lights in the overhead or
bounce lights from the floor into the ceiling. Bouncing will give you
the most even light by making the entire ceiling your light source
with the benefit of not needing worry about blinding someone right
next to the flashes to
Pentax - best aftersales quality control in the market ]=)
2010/12/6 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
Pentax - Honest value is still important.
From: John Mullan
Pentax, feed your creative side, not your ego.
jm
-Original Message-
From: eckinator
Sent: Sunday, December 05,
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Ha! I thought it was a mirrored hallway full of elevators! :-D
Oddly enough, my point still stands. ;-)
-- Walt
The multiplied elevator crowd is a particularly nightmarish vision... I
would think, for many.
Enhanced for me by my lookalike prominent in the
From: Daniel J. Matyola
I still have both of my flight jackets from 1963-1968. They both
still fit, and I still wear both of them occasionally. Neither meets
your description.
One is the classic Navy issue G-1 brown leather jacket, with mouton
fur collar. The other is a green nylon jacket
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/01/review-pentax-k-5/#focusing
My conclusions about focusing speed seem to differe from everyone
else's. Opinions welcomed!
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
Yes, I think that we should have a section for Open Gallery or
non-theme images in every monthly gallery, as we did some time ago.
That may encourage more people to contribute.
Speaking of which, any news on the December PUG?
As an exercise, I went back and downloaded all my PUG entries, over
BTW, I really like the image of the skater on that page.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
Miserere, I must say that with K-7 my impressions were similar. It was
somewhat better or slightly better but not omg better. I am thinking
that general improvement came from the decrease of the microadjustments
when the lens would arrive to approximate focus. K10D seems to need few
more steps
That is an excellent portrayal of the damage, and a fine image.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:43 AM, David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz wrote:
Another one from today's walk with the 16-45. More documentary than art.
The Manchester Courts
Very crisp images, Dave. The DA16~45 appears to have been a good move.
Jack
--- On Sun, 12/5/10, David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz wrote:
From: David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz
Subject: PESO: Not So Lucky
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, December 5, 2010, 11:43
The leather jackets with fur collars were not usually worn in the
cockpit (and not even taken to Southeast Asia). Yes, the Marines
always received the left-overs from old stock when the Air Farce and
the Navy came out with new gear.
The Nylon jackets were worn in the cockpit, back in the states
Le 05/12/10 23:56, Ann Sanfedele a écrit :
The red jacketed figure is just the right place and right touch.
and that's why nr 3 is my favorite, too .
dominique
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:33:25 -0500
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I never submitted because I figured they'd all be rejected. It takes
a certain kind of mind to appreciate my lack of vision.
!MARK!
not only that I think i want that on my tomb pebble
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I find the biggest advantage of K-5 autofocus is that it's able to lock in with
relatively little light. As you note, continuous autofocus is better, but spot
autofocus is also able to lock onto moving objects much more easily than was
that of the K-7. I've used only SDM lenses thus far -- the
On Dec 5, 2010, at 23:10, P. J. Alling wrote:
You've got one channel I don;t think you're going to have a lot of control,
brightness and contrast is about it.
Heh. Yeah, I was going to amend my post with that observation... It is a
little bit freeing when all you can do is brightness,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:12, Boris Liberman wrote:
Miserere, I must say that with K-7 my impressions were similar. It was
somewhat better or slightly better but not omg better. I am thinking that
general improvement came from the decrease of the microadjustments when the
lens would arrive to
Thanks for your efforts here.
Dave
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/01/review-pentax-k-5/#focusing
My conclusions about focusing speed seem to differe
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Peter Loveday pe...@loveday.org wrote:
I'd really like to see the limits increased a bit on the PUG. 256K? 720
pixels? Welcome to 1998 :)
1998, I'm, still trying to claw my way out of 1968.
Dave
- Peter
-Original Message- From: Brian Walters
Sent:
I read your description, otherwise I have no opinion, I'm still using a
K20D.
The difference in motor sound could be accounted for from the difference
in body composition.
On 12/6/2010 9:05 AM, Miserere wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
Buy a Nikon if you want good pictures.
Buy a Pentax if you want great pictures, but slow AF speeds.
Dave
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:28 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I always thought of Nikon as the rich mans Pentax.
On 12/5/2010 4:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Very nice Rick. Great colours
Dave
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Another from nocturnal Paris.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12049494size=lg
(K7, DA 16-45, ISO 1600, handheld)
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Excellent. Now you know why i avoid malls.
Dave
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:46 AM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, DA15mm, 1/90s, f/5.6, ISO800
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
2010/12/6 David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
Buy a Pentax if you want great pictures, but slow AF speeds.
you mean:
Pentax - high speed semi-automatic manual focus?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
I think the entire English speaking world is too obsessed with safety
though in this case it looks justified.
On 12/6/2010 2:43 AM, David Mann wrote:
Another one from today's walk with the 16-45. More documentary than art.
The Manchester Courts building sustained severe structural damage in
You know those are quite good BW, remember the old Green filters were
supposed to give the most natural rendition when used with
panchromatic BW film, seems that may translate fairly well to having
only the green channel in a DSLR.
On 12/6/2010 10:03 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 5,
On 12/6/2010 9:03 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola
I still have both of my flight jackets from 1963-1968. They both
still fit, and I still wear both of them occasionally. Neither meets
your description.
One is the classic Navy issue G-1 brown leather jacket, with mouton
fur
My current normal lens is the M 35mm f2.0, semi automatic focus? Hell
I've got stop down metering!
On 12/6/2010 10:18 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/12/6 David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com:
Buy a Pentax if you want great pictures, but slow AF speeds.
you mean:
Pentax - high speed semi-automatic
They look great to my eye.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2010, at 23:10, P. J. Alling wrote:
You've got one channel I don;t think you're going to have a lot of control,
brightness and contrast is about it.
Heh. Yeah, I was going to
Pentax: better keep your day job.
Pentax: official camera of The Beatles.
On the plus side ...
Pentax: when you're ready for prime time.
On 10-12-05 7:51 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
You all need to keep your day jobs:-).
On Dec 5, 2010, at 7:42 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
Carry a Pentax... meet
On 6 December 2010 10:34, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
They look great to my eye.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2010, at 23:10, P. J. Alling wrote:
You've got one channel I don;t think you're going to have a lot of
On 6 December 2010 10:06, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I read your description, otherwise I have no opinion, I'm still using a
K20D.
The difference in motor sound could be accounted for from the difference in
body composition.
I was wondering about that, but they don't
Pentax: Because autofocus is for pussies anyway.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Me Three!
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Madame RD romd...@orange.fr wrote:
Le 05/12/10 23:56, Ann Sanfedele a écrit :
The red jacketed figure is just the right place and right touch.
and that's why nr 3 is my favorite, too .
dominique
Very nice. I would pull down the highlights a bit, but otherwise they look darn
good.
Paul
On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 5, 2010, at 23:10, P. J. Alling wrote:
You've got one channel I don;t think you're going to have a lot of control,
brightness and
Hi,
I'd like to say some words about the difference between K20D and K-5.
Often I do test cameras head-to-head i.e. I do use both at the same
conditions simultaneously. This time I used the other way and abandoned
my old trusty K20D for a three days. Completely. Simply took K-5 and
got used
Pentax: Where's the fire?
On 12/5/2010 3:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last night when someone saw my camera she comented:
Pentax, the poor man's Nikon.
What else could we do with this:
Cannon, for the skilful photographer.
Or how about Pentax 645D, Hasselblad on a budget.
--
Sent
Hi,
at least the motor spare part codes are different :)
BR, Margus
On 12/06/2010 5:58 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 6 December 2010 10:06, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I read your description, otherwise I have no opinion, I'm still using a
K20D.
The difference in motor sound
On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I am somewhat new to the low light photography
After seeing what Ralf does it really intrigues me, too. I'll never get to his
level, but I'd like to see what *is* possible. Absolutely no idea what the
subject matter would be. And kinda
Going through my old PUG entries, I found the one that I submitted 10
years ago, for the December 2000 Gallery. The Theme was
Synchronicity III, which meant that we all tried to take a
photograph at the same moment, all around the world. The moment was
the Autumnal Equinox (back in those days of
From: Boris Liberman
On 12/5/2010 5:09 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Well, it melts doesn't it? ... little, gooey puddles and then it sort of
just dries up and goes away.
8-D
John, you're supposed to eat your ice cream and not let it go gooey and
the dry up... /grin/
Yeah, I know. Around
From: David Mann
Another one from today's walk with the 16-45. More documentary than
art.
The Manchester Courts building sustained severe structural damage in
the September 4 earthquake. A campaign was mounted to try and save
it, but engineers declared it unsafe so the city council voted to
Occasionally one of my posts to the list of mine doesn't get through and is
eventually bounced back to me. That's happened today with a response to one of
the threads I've been participating in. I tried resending, but it still hasn't
gotten through.
This happens both when I'm sending a new
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/11/photogalleries/101130-best-space-pictures-2010/#/space92-hubble-anniversary_19582_600x450.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
From: Charles Robinson
On Dec 5, 2010, at 23:10, P. J. Alling wrote:
You've got one channel I don;t think you're going to have a lot
of control, brightness and contrast is about it.
Heh. Yeah, I was going to amend my post with that observation...
It is a little bit freeing when all you can
Occasionally one of my posts to the list of mine doesn't get through and is
eventually bounced back to me. That's happened today with a response to one of
the threads I've been participating in. I tried resending, but it still hasn't
gotten through.
This happens both when I'm sending a new
Pentax: More bang for your buck!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Well, it's claimed to be (by whomever decides these things) the most perfect
form in nature. Based on my memory, I'd vote for Angie Dickinson.
Jack
--- On Mon, 12/6/10, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO: Eggsperiment
The Android group at Google, where I work, announced some new hardware
software today. I photographed the hardware:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/12/04/Nexus-S-With-Gingerbread
-Tim
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Urban perspective:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-59-urban-perspective.html
Upwards: http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-60-upwards.html
Be brutal and honest, as you always are.
Thanks!
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Make certain your post are all in plain text, without and rich formatting.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Occasionally one of my posts to the list of mine doesn't get through and is
eventually
From: Eric Weir
On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I am somewhat new to the low light photography
After seeing what Ralf does it really intrigues me, too. I'll never
get to his level, but I'd like to see what *is* possible. Absolutely
no idea what the subject matter would
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:18 AM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/12/6 David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
Buy a Pentax if you want great pictures, but slow AF speeds.
you mean:
Pentax - high speed semi-automatic manual focus?
Or, Pentax, we leave the quality control to you.
Dave
I really like the patterns of the curves and straight lines, the
monochrome feeling, and the textures. The flags (?) are a bit
discordant and distract from the overall effect in my view, but there
was nothing you could have done about that.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
I think i see some dust on the sensor.
Dave
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/11/photogalleries/101130-best-space-pictures-2010/#/space92-hubble-anniversary_19582_600x450.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
OUCH!
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, Pentax, we leave the quality control to you.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
OUCH!
Dan
I know, but it does seem that their in factory quality control is or
at least was, slack.
Dave
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, David J Brooks
From: Eric Weir
Occasionally one of my posts to the list of mine doesn't get through
and is eventually bounced back to me. That's happened today with a
response to one of the threads I've been participating in. I tried
resending, but it still hasn't gotten through.
This happens both when I'm
Pentax: We screw the other guy and pass the savings on to YOU!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 12/6/2010 12:28 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Boris Liberman
On 12/5/2010 5:09 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Well, it melts doesn't it? ... little, gooey puddles and then it
sort of
just dries up and goes away.
8-D
John, you're supposed to eat your ice cream and not let it go gooey and
the
Jeffery Smith wrote:
Pentax, because you can buy a Canon or Nikon at Walmart.
My favorite so far:)
(Of course, Pentax would love to have their cameras available at
Mal-Wart, but that's another story...)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Second shot has a bit of something.
Jack
--- On Mon, 12/6/10, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Boris PESOs - two tall building shots
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Date: Monday, December 6, 2010, 10:38 AM
Urban perspective:
Pentax..it's the stain.
Jack
--- On Mon, 12/6/10, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Pentax slogan
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, December 6, 2010, 10:52 AM
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:18 AM,
eckinator
After seeing what Ralf does it really intrigues me, too. I'll
never get to his level, but I'd like to see what *is*
possible. Absolutely no idea what the subject matter would
be. And kinda have doubts about what the Atlanta area might
offer in this regard, too. We'll have to see.
don't
David J Brooks wrote:
Or, Pentax, we leave the quality control to you.
I remember someone some time ago suggested:
PENTAX
We get close - You do the rest
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Make certain your post are all in plain text, without and rich formatting.
Ah! Thanks. I indented a paragraph, Mail asked if I wanted to convert to rich
text, I said, Oh, alright.
On Dec 5, 2010, at 11:38 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On the old selenium cell meters, quite often the electrical contacts become
corroded, these can sometimes be cleaned to restore function. This page
shows a partial disassemble, I don't know how useful it will be for you.
From: David Mann
Had a walk around town during my lunch break with the new 16-45
lens.
Seems to be a pretty good lens, I've noticed a bit of CA but the
sharpness certainly seems to be good. I'm not used to such light
weight, especially after lugging all that heavy kit around
yesterday.
On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Urban perspective:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-59-urban-perspective.html
Upwards: http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-60-upwards.html
Be brutal and honest, as you always are.
Well, honestly, seriously,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:45 AM, Miserere wrote:
Dude, quit reading Dilbert and start reading McNally--you need more lights!
Nerds don't read Dilbert, nerds read xkcd.
Seriously, you do :-)
I won't argue with that, I also need a K-5 and various lenses. Unfortunately
what I really need is
On 6 December 2010 15:02, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:45 AM, Miserere wrote:
Dude, quit reading Dilbert and start reading McNally--you need more lights!
Nerds don't read Dilbert, nerds read xkcd.
Ha ha ha, one of the few comics I read and regularly print out to
Any of you guys with a K-5 experiencing any of this?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036thread=37092371
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036thread=37101106
Maybe you K-7 owners could take a look too. No need to transfer test
images to the computer, the
Thanks Margus. Tomorrow I'm going to meet up with Mark and test his
DA* 16-50 on my K10D and the K-5 to confirm the improvement.
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
2010/12/6 Margus Männik
I've decided to go with a Sekonic L398, which is similar to
the Weston, but is still being manufactured. There are used
L398M's for sale on eBay, but given the fundamentality of
exposure, and how much a meter like this could teach me, I
may just bite the bullet and go for a new L398A.
On 2010-12-05 14:36 , Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last night when someone saw my camera she comented:
Pentax, the poor man's Nikon.
What else could we do with this:
Cannon, for the skilful photographer.
Or how about Pentax 645D, Hasselblad on a budget.
perhaps a pangram:
Pentax -
On Dec 6, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Bob W wrote:
After seeing what Ralf does it really intrigues me, too. I'll
never get to his level, but I'd like to see what *is*
possible. Absolutely no idea what the subject matter would
be. And kinda have doubts about what the Atlanta area might
offer in
On Dec 6, 2010, at 14:19, Miserere wrote:
Any of you guys with a K-5 experiencing any of this?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036thread=37092371
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036thread=37101106
Maybe you K-7 owners could take a look too. No
On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Bob W wrote:
I've decided to go with a Sekonic L398, which is similar to
the Weston, but is still being manufactured. There are used
L398M's for sale on eBay, but given the fundamentality of
exposure, and how much a meter like this could teach me, I
may just
On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:50 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I do know a few good Ralf type subject matter in the NC/SC area, but
Atlanta is a little far out from my normal stompin' grounds.
Take a drive around at night in some of Atlanta's industrial areas. I know
that kind of stuff is around there,
On 5/12/10, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you don't like the renderings here, feel free to say so. Not a problem.
http://www.caguila.com/caguila/1stsnow2010/
Like them all but this one is superb:
http://www.caguila.com/caguila/1stsnow2010/content/IMGP4695_large.html
--
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
And by affect the output I mean: can this really be SEEN on something other
than an f/22 shot of a blank grey surface?
That was my initial thought... if you photograph a gray card and the
software (in camera or raw
Pentax. Get over it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
You might save yourself some grief by
getting a L308s, which is what I use now when I need an incident reading.
Thanks, Bob. I'll check it out.
I'm a retard. I want the analog. As you probably know, the L398 has been around
in various guises
From: Bob W
After seeing what Ralf does it really intrigues me, too. I'll
never get to his level, but I'd like to see what *is*
possible. Absolutely no idea what the subject matter would
be. And kinda have doubts about what the Atlanta area might
offer in this regard, too. We'll have to
On 10-12-06 3:33 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 14:19, Miserere wrote:
Any of you guys with a K-5 experiencing any of this?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036thread=37092371
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036thread=37101106
Maybe
On Dec 6, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Bob W wrote:
don't they have quite a few army bases around there? You could try wandering
around outside one of those at dusk in the half light, with a camera. I'm
sure you'd get plenty of good shooting opportunities.
On second thought, might cause security to
I found out I have a group of dots in the center which is barely visible from
f/16. As Charles Robinson wrote, I have to photograph a white paper to see it
and it don't bother me too much. I am currently not doing anything with this,
but instead wait and see what happens.
I also found a lot of
On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 14:19, Miserere wrote:
Any of you guys with a K-5 experiencing any of this?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036thread=37092371
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
