On 27/06/2011 11:54 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Interestingly, that camera originally came to me with a Tokina 35-105
zoom which redefines the terms 'heavy' and 'bulky'. It weighs in at
about 850 grams and, with it mounted, the camera/lens combination
certainly doesn't qualify for the 'small'
On 28 June 2011 11:43, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
(snip)
I assume you're a flickr members, so that's why the ads are
inconspicuous. They're not inconspicuous for non-members. The same is true of
photo.net for the most part. However, I think photo.net should avoid
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone should run through the thread and tally the votes.
I nominate Tim.
OK:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AogBdTEc87UVdGZqd2tGdjdiZDU5cDJ6cV9ZU2d5c2chl=en_USauthkey=CPSu6bAG
Think I need an
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:05 -0600, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/06/2011 11:54 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Interestingly, that camera originally came to me with a Tokina 35-105
zoom which redefines the terms 'heavy' and 'bulky'. It weighs in at
about 850 grams and,
On 28 June 2011 16:38, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Think I need an FA77... -T
Sure so long as perceived sharpness is preferable to veiling flare in
your list of lens essentials.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter,
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:12 -0700, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
wrote:
the tectonic launch time of
the Pentax Gallery
Mark!
(Rick is obviously a master of understatement...)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:37 -0400, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13563072
Very nice, Dave. I like the slight vignetting. Deliberate?
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
On 6/28/2011 09:43, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 28 June 2011 16:38, Tim Braytb...@textuality.com wrote:
Think I need an FA77... -T
Sure so long as perceived sharpness is preferable to veiling flare in
your list of lens essentials.
I beg to differ, Rob. My silver FA77 is as fine as any other
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't
want to
be forced to go shopping first.
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see
ads on the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the
interior of the bus as well. And if they
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:08 -0400, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Seen on an ostensible dog-walk this evening. Dog was unimpressed.
http://goo.gl/hovrC (Flickr lightbox)
http://goo.gl/fKhhW (Flickr plain vanilla)
I like that - a simple composition that works.
As an aside, if
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:26 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
My wife has a flip phone and likes to cradle her phone on her shoulder
so she can do things while talking.
http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/cellphone/8928/
:))
I have one but I must confess that I don't often use it as it's a bit
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Bob W wrote:
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't
want to
be forced to go shopping first.
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see
ads on the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the
Just for information purposes, I get a pop up window with an ad that I have to
close in order to see the picture. I use a MacBook with Safari.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:35:12
To: Pentax-Discuss
That's actually tempting. She might really like this.
--Original Message--
From: David Mann
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Totally OT: Bluetooth headset for smart phone
Sent: Jun 28, 2011 3:46 AM
On Jun 28,
Sometimes a zoom is just a zoom.
-Original Message-
From: William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:05:16
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT Enablement
On
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Unfortunately, the advertisers don't lose. Pop-ups score more hits than
banner ads. I don't know why. Like you, I click them off immediately.
Maybe some people have bad aim.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Sandy Harris
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch
time of the Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of
Smugmug... it's an annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
From: Bob W
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't
want to
be forced to go shopping first.
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see
ads on the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the
interior of the bus as well.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:40 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I understand what you're saying, but I just don't see the in-yer-face
intrusive nature of the advertising at photo.net.
I am not a member of photo.net, so if it's bad I should be getting the brunt
of it. Right?
I
On 28 June 2011 20:50, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for information purposes, I get a pop up window with an ad that I have
to close in order to see the picture. I use a MacBook with Safari.
Are you referring to Flickr or photo.net? I get an occasional pop up
at photo.net but never at
On 28/6/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, is it 90 imperial or 90 metric?
Years.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 11-06-28 3:16 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:08 -0400, Bruce Walkerbruce.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Seen on an ostensible dog-walk this evening. Dog was unimpressed.
http://goo.gl/hovrC (Flickr lightbox)
http://goo.gl/fKhhW (Flickr plain vanilla)
I like that - a simple
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
... I assume you're a flickr members, so that's why the ads are
inconspicuous. They're not inconspicuous for non-members. ...
Again, if I send you the links to photos like this:
What some of us object to is the big pop-up that appears about 1 second into
the page-load process. The pop-up covers about 80-90% of the window and (for me
at least) is blank. Presumably, if I wait long enough, some advertising pitch
will appear in that pop-up. I have never waited long enough
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=609
J
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 11-06-28 2:38 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Steven Desjardinsdrd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone should run through the thread and tally the votes.
I nominate Tim.
OK:
Good job, Tim. I'm a little surprised by the absence of the DA70.
Maybe no one has one?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone should run through the thread and tally the votes.
It's a bit late but my semi calibrated CRT, (Hitachi SuperScan Elite
761*), shows them as blue. I thought it might be the screen being off
so I tried it on my laptop as well, and the blue elements are blue there
as well.
On 6/14/2011 11:03 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All!
After taking
No big whoop, just a couple of ducklings, but they're hard to resist:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/just-being-cute.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
A month ago we were in Toronto, and I'm just getting around to sorting
through the photos.
The main drag is Yonge St., which often seems a bit of a mob scene.
Daytime:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Both very nice, Rick. Looks like a fun street. Cheers, Christine
Looks can be deceiving.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=609
Wow! ~Very~ cool shot!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:37 -0400, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13563072
Very nice, Dave. I like the slight vignetting. Deliberate?
Yes, playing around with LR
Very nice Jack, but i am no longer looking at your photo's. I don't
see any pop up or banner ads so i'm gone.:-)
Dave
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=609
J
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
A
Dave
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:02 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
No big whoop, just a couple of ducklings, but they're hard to resist:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/just-being-cute.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Thanks for looking, Rick and Steven.
The Pitcher has just released the ball, as the caption tries to
convey. I experimented with shutter speeds, trying to freeze the
pitcher, but not the ball. This one (1/750) worked in that regard,
which is what I was basically trying to do in this image.
Dan
Photographically irresistible. Nice image, Frank!
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO - Just Being Cute
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2011, 8:13 AM
A
Dave
Don't blame you, Dave. ;)
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Let Me In!
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2011, 8:13 AM
Very nice Jack, but i am no longer
looking
Left over May Fly..I guess.
Thanks, Frank!
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Let Me In!
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2011, 8:05 AM
On Tue, Jun 28,
Cool...the screen pattern makes it more interesting than just the insect
alone.
-p
On 6/28/2011 8:54 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=609
J
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
At the Aussie photo show ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln91Hk_gccEfeature=youtube_gdata_player
looks like it's very close to production now.
Someone on DPR suggested it has in-focus confirmation and speculated
it might actually use the lens' RF cam to talk to the body. If so,
this will be
They're just so sweet, until they try to nibble you to death.
On 6/28/2011 11:02 AM, frank theriault wrote:
No big whoop, just a couple of ducklings, but they're hard to resist:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/just-being-cute.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
On 28/06/2011 3:35 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
A wee testy today? That wasn't an attack any more than saying you are an
American from Detroit is an attack.
Well, I suppose that might be an attack.
--
William Robb
--
flickr is way cleaner than photo.net for showing a single photo. just
check out godfrey's examples. habit is another thing tough, your eyes
immediately knowing where to look is always a help. but it usually
takes only a couple dozen visits to get used to any layout.
f
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:03
That's a lot of blur in the ball for 1/750!
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for looking, Rick and Steven.
The Pitcher has just released the ball, as the caption
tries to
convey. I experimented with shutter
We had a great time. Thanks for the tour!
The rest of our trip was really good, too! Maybe one of these days I'll get
more pix up.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Rick
Womer
Interesting it looks like it might even have a 24x36mm sensor. But I
guess it's just a mockup so who knows what it will really have when it's
released.
On 6/28/2011 11:52 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
At the Aussie photo show ...
It must have been a fastball!
Dan
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
That's a lot of blur in the ball for 1/750!
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for looking, Rick and
What a pile of crap to connect to! I had to watch a commercial before
I could get to any content. Godfrey, how can you stand that. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
At the Aussie photo show ...
I didn't see any commercials, Bob. Besides, the whole piece is a
promotional/reportage bit.
Don't be an ass.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
What a pile of crap to connect to! I had to watch a commercial before
I could get to any content. Godfrey,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:16 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting it looks like it might even have a 24x36mm sensor. But I guess
it's just a mockup so who knows what it will really have when it's released.
This is very close to final product. It's due in stores around
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
So I thought I would ask PDML members for their opinions on which lens
(or lenses) they would rank as the sharpest in their stable:
Overall
and
Wide Open
I once had an M28/3.5 that I could have used to shave my beard.
I think my DFA 100 was my sharpest lens, /was/ because I had to sell
it for lack of funds. The DFA 50 will have to go next. Those are/were
the sharpest two in my stable.
=( Ecke
2011/6/28 Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Got a Nexus ad this time thru... :-) Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't see any commercials, Bob. Besides, the whole piece is a
promotional/reportage bit.
Don't be an ass.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Bob Sullivan
On Jun 27, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
G;'day all
Knowing my interest in old cameras, my brother-in-law presented me with
his old SLR. I've always wanted to play with one of these:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/_IGP0567om.jpg
Very cool. When they came out, I was very
On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:38 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone should run through the thread and tally the votes.
I nominate Tim.
OK:
That's very nice. I'm surprised you didn't buy a plane ticket ;-)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
At the Aussie photo show ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln91Hk_gccEfeature=youtube_gdata_player
looks like it's very close to production now.
If you're seeing advertisements, it's a problem on your system with
whatever browser you're using. I've opened it four times, with both
with Safari or Firefox, and not seen a single advertisement .
Can't help such a corrupted system, Bob.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bob Sullivan
On 28/06/2011 12:37 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
She has two lenses, a 50/1.4 and a (IIRC) Vivitar 24/2.8, so it's probably not
worth too much effort trying to find a body to use the lenses with.
The Oly-OM 50/1.4 is an awesome lens.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I don't think I have made enough use of my K28 3.5. JCO swears by it.
I need to just stick it on the K7 so I actually take it with me.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
So I
Oh, yes, If you're using the web mail Google interface to read your
gmail account, and click on the embedded YouTube player, you'll see
advertisements. If you click on the link I provided instead, you
won't. Using their embedded player crap is something I never do ... I
hate the advertisement
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
That's very nice. I'm surprised you didn't buy a plane ticket ;-)
Wish I had. I'd like to visit Australia again anyway!
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:37 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Bob W wrote:
I lose, you lose, photo.net loses, the advertisers lose. How can you think
that works?
Unfortunately, the advertisers don't lose. Pop-ups score more hits than
banner ads. I don't know
On Jun 27, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
I also like those desturated portraits (especially the first 5).
In addition to two WR lenses you need Bong WR. :-)
I was, but after all these years something is
On Jun 27, 2011, at 6:03 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-06-25 10:36 , Charles Robinson wrote:
Pretty!
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2011/rainbow_bridge/index.html
Nice shot, and I suspect very challenging lighting.
Did you shoot from the Midgard end or the Asgard end?
--
Larry
On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:12 PM, David Parsons wrote:
Saw this over at TOP and found it incredibly funny.
http://www.zie.nl/video/opmerkelijk/Meeuw-steelt-camera/m1ezpfqfk1dv
Very funny. I wonder how he got it back, or whether the video was just posted
by whoever found it.
Looking at the
Playing a Dish TV ad now... ;-)
And the computer is a new Sony with IE software preloaded.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're seeing advertisements, it's a problem on your system with
whatever browser you're using. I've
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:20:11PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:12 PM, David Parsons wrote:
Saw this over at TOP and found it incredibly funny.
http://www.zie.nl/video/opmerkelijk/Meeuw-steelt-camera/m1ezpfqfk1dv
Looking at the related links, it seems as if the
I see you insist on being an ass.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Playing a Dish TV ad now... ;-)
And the computer is a new Sony with IE software preloaded.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com
Wonderful shot. It's just a tad dark on my monitor though.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=609
J
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
43 system and m43 system cameras with adapters are the only ones I know
of. I read somewhere that most classic OM system lenses were uncoated,
but I highly doubt that, most were probably single or double coated.
They preform rather well, flare wise, for optics with minimal coatings.
On
They will also work on the Sony Nex system with the appropriate adapters: APS-C
sensor in the Sony.
Paul
On 28 Jun 2011, at 21:07, P. J. Alling wrote:
43 system and m43 system cameras with adapters are the only ones I know of.
I read somewhere that most classic OM system lenses were
Checked your link again Godfrey, still playing the Dish TV ad first... :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I see you insist on being an ass.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Playing a
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
I can relate to Paul Stenquist here, who has great many pictures on
photo.net and re-uploading them may be a big effort for him.
Nice!!
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
Den 28. juni 2011 kl. 15.54 skrev Jack Davis:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=609
J
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Hi listers
If you're not bothered by sailing, look away now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUJfwwtYmoc
A sad day for Gipsy Moth IV.
As Sir Francis Chichester would have said: 'What a to-do' !!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:07 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
43 system and m43 system cameras with adapters are the only ones I know of.
I read somewhere that most classic OM system lenses were uncoated, but I
highly doubt that, most were probably single or double coated.
Your system is obviously possessed by demonic advertisers. Throw it
out, it's affecting your mind.
Does anyone else see advertising in this link?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Checked your link again Godfrey, still playing the Dish TV ad first...
The video begins with a short commercial which can be skipped with a click.
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:30:43
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
The E5 is four thirds and should work. I thought Godfrey had one of these.
Also, my BlackBerry wants to change Godfrey to Cadaver.
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:07:40
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Your system is obviously possessed by demonic advertisers. Throw it
out, it's affecting your mind.
Does anyone else see advertising in this link?
When I clicked on it, I saw an ad for the Nexus phone.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:16
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Checked your link again Godfrey, still playing the Dish TV ad first... :-)
Regards, Bob S.
Ok, Bob. You claim you see advertising when you click on the link I
posted. Here's a direct screen recording when I click on
Thanks, Larry. Yeah, now that you mention it, it's the slightest bit dark on
mine too.
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Let Me In!
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2011,
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Cotty wrote:
Hi listers
If you're not bothered by sailing, look away now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUJfwwtYmoc
A sad day for Gipsy Moth IV.
I'll say. It's too bad that the cameraman missed the impact, that would have
been some impressive footage.
Appreciate it, Dag!
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
From: DagT li...@thrane.name
Subject: Re: PESO: Let Me In!
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2011, 1:21 PM
Nice!!
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
Den 28. juni 2011 kl. 15.54
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Checked your link again Godfrey, still playing the Dish TV ad first... :-)
Regards, Bob S.
Ok, Bob. You claim you see advertising when you click on the link I
Due to the subject matter I will say no more.
http://donspix.posterous.com/sometimes-less-is-more-in-photos-right-photo#!/
Does anyone have objections to Posterous?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On 28 June 2011 21:27, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Hi listers
If you're not bothered by sailing, look away now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUJfwwtYmoc
A sad day for Gipsy Moth IV.
:-(
I've been down in Gosport since saturday doing my day skipper theory.
Stuck in a classroom I'd
Bob S is pestering me because I said that I despise advertising when
I'm trying to look at photos in the discussion about photo.wreck.
He's evidently a lover of advertising and photo.wreck. Well, number
one ... this isn't looking at photos. It's looking at a youtube
video. So he's just being a
Tim Bray wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone should run through the thread and tally the votes.
I nominate Tim.
OK:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AogBdTEc87UVdGZqd2tGdjdiZDU5cDJ6cV9ZU2d5c2chl=en_USauthkey=CPSu6bAG
Bob W wrote:
OK, I'm not forced to read or avoid the ads before I can get on the bus. I
don't strongly object to sites, or buses, carrying ads, what I object to is
the in-yer-face intrusive approach that photo.net have taken with theirs
which spoils the experience of looking at your photos and
On 2011-06-28 15:08 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I know he's looking with a Windows system and I'm looking with a Mac
OS X system. What are you looking with? What browser?
fwiw, using Safari on Mac OS X 10.5.8 w/o Flash (so i get the HTML5
version), i see no ad; but when i load YouTube up in
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:20 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
On 2011-06-28 15:08 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I know he's looking with a Windows system and I'm looking with a Mac
OS X system. What are you looking with? What browser?
fwiw, using Safari on Mac OS X 10.5.8 w/o Flash (so
On Jun 28, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
OK, I'm not forced to read or avoid the ads before I can get on the bus. I
don't strongly object to sites, or buses, carrying ads, what I object to is
the in-yer-face intrusive approach that photo.net have taken with theirs
Yes It's an add that Youtube inserts before the actual clip plays.
On 6/28/2011 4:30 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Your system is obviously possessed by demonic advertisers. Throw it
out, it's affecting your mind.
Does anyone else see advertising in this link?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:16 PM,
Our little friend Zephyr died Saturday ant age 17+
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/
I've always been more of a dog person myself, but since meeting Lisa
and her cats I've come to the conclusion that it's the owner and how
they raise the pet that makes the difference. Zephyr was the
friendliest,
It was, ahem, ad hominem...
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 2011-06-28 15:38 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
That's interesting. How do you have w/o Flash?
there are a few ways to do it, in my case i have the YouTube5 extension,
which sends a user-agent string (i assume) to YouTube and Vimeo that
convinces them Flash is not installed, so that they serve
That is sad to hear Mark. They do grow onus don't they.
Dave
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Our little friend Zephyr died Saturday ant age 17+
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/
I've always been more of a dog person myself, but since meeting Lisa
and
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
