On Sep 12, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cool! Orange tabby females are very uncommon.
Male calicos are even rarer.
How about fluorescent cats?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14882008
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 9/13/2011 12:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You might consider taking that approach when you disagree with my
histrionics in the future.
BTW, I've never read Walt Gilbert's comments in the past, he's not
participated in any useful way in this discussion between me and
Anthony Farr, so he
To me, high-ISO performance and dynamic range are paramount and are the
single most important feature in choosing a SLR these days. Here are some
typical pictures I had to take two days ago:
ISO 12,800, FA 24-90mm @ 35mm f/4, 1/13s:
www.dariobonazza.com/public/K5_23830x.jpg
As you can see, above
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Doug Franklin
Anyone know of a lighter weight, modern materials version of the old US
Army A.L.I.C.E. load bearing harness that was made out of
twenty-million denier cotton (circa the Stone Age thru the 1970s)?
Either
On 9/13/2011 12:21 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
To me, high-ISO performance and dynamic range are paramount and are the
single most important feature in choosing a SLR these days. Here are some
typical pictures I had to take two days ago:
ISO 12,800, FA 24-90mm @ 35mm f/4, 1/13s:
John,
Thanks for the insight.
I went back to the old laptop to see the pug.
That machine got it fine.
I don't understand the problem with the new laptop.
Nice gallery.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:11 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:24:27AM +1000,
Saw steam driven farm tractors made in Racine Wisconsin in local 4th
of July parades there. They looked a lot like the video.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:31 PM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 11/09/2011 21:19, Larry Colen wrote:
Very cool. I've never seen a
Doug,
I think your best bet, and cheapest by far, is an army surplus store.
Go and buy some auto seatbelt webbing.
Anybody with a sewing machine can turn it into the rig you want.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
On 2011-09-13 7:33, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I think your best bet, and cheapest by far, is an army surplus store.
Go and buy some auto seatbelt webbing.
Anybody with a sewing machine can turn it into the rig you want.
BobS, thanks! That's something that hadn't occurred to me! I'll poke
around
On 12/9/11, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2011/IMG_0780.jpg
My that's a big lens you have there sir.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
Nice Peter. Good title. ;)
Jack
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 8:54 PM
Subject: PESO -- Bored
Not that urgent, but this didn't seem to get to the list. If it does I
apologize for the double post.
thank me too -
very nice - of course, in this crowd, I didn't expecte the literal
caption ;-)
ann
On 9/12/2011 22:12, Christine Aguila wrote:
Thanks, Bob S., Dave, and Dan! Cheers, Christine
On Sep 12, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Great image. I think it works well in
On Sep 13, 2011, at 7:28, Cotty wrote:
On 12/9/11, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2011/IMG_0780.jpg
My that's a big lens you have there sir.
(ahem) Why, thank you!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
From: Steven Desjardins
Amusement aside, I actually meant it. I can't imagine anything that
heavy on my belt. Not being well endowed in the hip department, I'd
be hiking up the pants all day I wonder if they make a suspender
version?
American suspenders or English suspenders?
--
PDML
Okay, I'll bite. How are they different?
Marnie the soon-to-be akaless
In a message dated 9/13/2011 6:53:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
From: Steven Desjardins
Amusement aside, I actually meant it. I can't imagine anything that
heavy on my belt. Not being
From: Doug Franklin
On 2011-09-12 21:54, David Parsons wrote:
You can clip it onto something else. Some people clip onto the
shoulder strap of their camera bag.
On 9/12/2011 4:48 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Just what I need, another thing trying to pull down my pants.
Anyone know of a
This suddenly turned in a Monty Python routine.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:53 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
Amusement aside, I actually meant it. I can't imagine anything that
heavy on my belt. Not being well endowed in the hip department, I'd
be
T answer your question Marnie, what the Brits call suspenders
Americans would call garter belts. Although that might work pretty
well with a clip.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
This suddenly turned in a Monty Python routine.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011
He has a great deal of dignity; that accounts for the pained
expression on his face. He just does anything my wife tells him to
do, as she has control of the dinner bowl.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:26 PM, P. J. Alling
This is a big problem facing manufacturers. Some folks never shoot at
those isos and don't want to pay, either in money or size/weight, to
have that capacity. OTOH, it makes sense for many enthusiasts to have
a DSLR and a MSC for the appropriate occasions. What is miss most
when using my mu43
From: Bob W
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Doug Franklin
Anyone know of a lighter weight, modern materials version of the old US
Army A.L.I.C.E. load bearing harness that was made out of
twenty-million denier cotton (circa the Stone Age thru the 1970s)?
Dario, I'm not participating of the high ISO discussion, but those
first two shots are awesome.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
To me, high-ISO performance and dynamic range are paramount and are the
single most important feature in choosing a SLR
Great catch and well executed!
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/6140581211/in/photostream/lightbox/
Comments and evicerations welcome.
Darren
On 13/9/11, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
T answer your question Marnie, what the Brits call suspenders
Americans would call garter belts. Although that might work pretty
well with a clip.
You can shove it in your fanny pack.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
The fact that some people desperately need/want higher sensitivity
cameras to achieve the photographs they want to make is not in
question.
The statement I made is that the *obsession* with ultra-high
sensitivity as single point of focus for whether a camera is good or
bad is ridiculous. I stand
Ditto and ditto!
On 11-09-13 10:29 AM, Fernando wrote:
Dario, I'm not participating of the high ISO discussion, but those
first two shots are awesome.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
To me, high-ISO performance and dynamic range are paramount
The English seem to be into this Island of Dr. Moreau stuff. Quite a
lot actually. Someone should inform them that Wells wrote a cautionary
tale, not a handbook.
On 9/13/2011 2:04 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Sep 12, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cool! Orange tabby females are very
Larry Colen wrote:
I photograph a lot of dancers in low light, fortunately they seem to move
slower than the ones that you photograph.
I usually shoot performers, rather than dancers. In this case, she was doing
a roll.
And often you are allowed to use flash, it seems.
ISO 10,000, DA*
Steven Desjardins wrote:
This is a big problem facing manufacturers. Some folks never shoot at
those isos and don't want to pay, either in money or size/weight, to
have that capacity.
There are plenty of cameras where pixel count prevail against dynamic range
and high-ISO performance. 99%
Fernando wrote:
Dario, I'm not participating of the high ISO discussion, but those
first two shots are awesome.
ISO 12,800, FA 24-90mm @ 35mm f/4, 1/13s:
www.dariobonazza.com/public/K5_23830x.jpg
As you can see, above shooting data were not enough for freezing action
and
getting the subject
I'm unsure who this 'you' in your message is. Perhaps everybody commenting
on your posts? However, I'm going to post my opinion on this topic, since I
didn't that before. As I wrote before, I consider the high-ISO performance
the single most important factor/field of improvements for my
Tritto!
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: When high ISO performance matters (was: Pentax K-Q adapter
andsuch)
Ditto and ditto!
On 11-09-13 10:29
You'd think the different camera approach would work, but companies
are afraid of creating a camera that sacrifices high iso performance
for some other feature and then have the reviews clobber them for not
having high iso performance.
I would really like high iso performance because sometimes I
America has cyborg kittens that shoot lasers from their cute little third eyes.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:33 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
The English seem to be into this Island of Dr. Moreau stuff. Quite a lot
actually. Someone should inform them that Wells wrote a
Okay, I'll bite. How are they different?
Marnie the soon-to-be akaless
In a message dated 9/13/2011 6:53:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
From: Steven Desjardins
Amusement aside, I actually meant it. I can't imagine anything that
heavy on my belt. Not being
I'm sorry, Steven, but I can't find a reference to what MSC stands
for. Can you elucidate? Thanks!
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
You'd think the different camera approach would work, but companies
are afraid of creating a camera that sacrifices
Mirrorless Still Camera, or something alike? Whatever it means, Steven meant
that.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: When high ISO performance matters
From: P. J. Alling
The English seem to be into this Island of Dr. Moreau stuff. Quite a
lot actually. Someone should inform them that Wells wrote a cautionary
tale, not a handbook.
On 9/13/2011 2:04 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Sep 12, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cool! Orange tabby
On 2011-09-13 01:21 , Dario Bonazza wrote:
To me, high-ISO performance and dynamic range are paramount and are the
single most important feature in choosing a SLR these days. Here are some
typical pictures I had to take two days ago:
cool examples; i am still in the old world equipment-wise,
Except for London, I think they are all small venues.
On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:34 AM, mike wilson wrote:
On 11/09/2011 19:42, Stan Halpin wrote:
Meg's nephew Dave Harding and his Alt Country rock band (Richmond
Fontaine) will be back in the UK Sept 15-27, then across the channel for
another
Good, I thought that was the case. Hadn't heard that particular acronym before.
(MILC, EVIL, LIVE, etc are the commonly used current acronyms for this
type of camera. I tend to use LIVE :: Lens Interchangeable,
Viewfinder Electronic. I feel it a clean and descriptive reference,
related the
On 9/13/2011 2:04 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Okay, I'll bite. How are they different?
Marnie the soon-to-be akaless
In a message dated 9/13/2011 6:53:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
From: Steven Desjardins
Amusement aside, I actually meant it. I can't imagine
I have no idea who she was.
Nevermind.
Marnie
In a message dated 9/13/2011 11:04:21 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
Okay, I'll bite. How are they different?
Marnie the soon-to-be akaless
In a message dated 9/13/2011 6:53:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
On Sep 13, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
I photograph a lot of dancers in low light, fortunately they seem to move
slower than the ones that you photograph.
I usually shoot performers, rather than dancers. In this case, she was doing
a roll.
And often you
Mirrorless System Camera. Sorry, I thought I had written it out at
some point but I didn't. It's the acronym that BH has settled on for
mu43, Nex, etc.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, Steven, but I can't find a reference to what MSC
On Sep 13, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The fact that some people desperately need/want higher sensitivity
cameras to achieve the photographs they want to make is not in
question.
The statement I made is that the *obsession* with ultra-high
sensitivity as single point of
Just another pet picture.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20bored.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax F 70-210mm f4.0~5.6
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily
On 11-09-13 2:51 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
for some reason in low light even my K-5 has a really tough time
focusing the Sigma 20/1.8. Which is annoying because I got it because
I needed a fast/wide lens for low light.
I believe this is a generic focusing issue, ie not limited to Pentax.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Bettie_Page
On 9/13/2011 2:45 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I have no idea who she was.
Nevermind.
Marnie
In a message dated 9/13/2011 11:04:21 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
Okay, I'll bite. How are they
Anyone here ever converted a Pentax DSLR into a straight BW, i.e.
remove the tricolor filter?
I was thinking of trying this with an old Pentax DSLR if it was possible.
--
-- Reduce your Government Footprint
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I don't think that it would make the camera BW. The circuitry in the
camera/raw processor interpolates the luminance data into colors and
assigns a color based on the strength of the light. The color filters
simply filter light.
I'd be interested to see what the results would be if you can get
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Gonz rgonzoma...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone here ever converted a Pentax DSLR into a straight BW, i.e.
remove the tricolor filter?
I was thinking of trying this with an old Pentax DSLR if it was possible.
My understanding is that the Bayer color filter array is
Marnie, Bettie Page was probably the most famous 1950's pinup model. Her
iconic shots in Playboy were taken by Bunny Yeager, herself a former model.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunny_Yeager
The Bettie Page story is rather charmingly told in the film The
Notorious Bettie Page which I can
The Bayer filter is under the micro lenses. I don't think that what you
want to do is possible.
On 9/13/2011 3:22 PM, Gonz wrote:
Anyone here ever converted a Pentax DSLR into a straight BW, i.e.
remove the tricolor filter?
I was thinking of trying this with an old Pentax DSLR if it was
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=133
Comments are appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
steve harley wrote:
as an example of this going the other way i note your later message that
focus is your next most important factor after ISO/d-range, but you don't
elaborate ... in my case i have almost abandoned autofocus -- not just
macro work but most of my shooting now relies on manual
Great work, Dario!
HIgh ISO performance and low noise are important to me as well. What's more,
the low noise levels of the K5 also yields a better image at ISOs as low as
400. As I'm sure you know, excellent noise control isn't all about low light
shooting.
Paul
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 AM,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
steve harley wrote:
as an example of this going the other way i note your later message that
focus is your next most important factor after ISO/d-range, but you don't
elaborate ... in my case i have almost
Here are some 'old' new pics in the same series:
1/13s is not enough for freezing action during a roll:
www.dariobonazza.com/public/K5_23830x.jpg
(ISO 12,800, FA 24-90mm @ 35mm f/4, 1/13s)
Then I tried a slightly higher speed, thanks to higher ISO:
www.dariobonazza.com/public/K5_23835x.jpg
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
It's very interesting to hear others' take on this. I have found over
and over again that when I disable AF my photos are far more
consistently in-focus, regardless of camera and regardless of how low
the light I'm working in might be or whether the subjects are moving
or
Ok, I didn't buy this.
But a shop here just got in a nice Super Takumar 85/1.9.
The only imperfection that I can see is black-out over Takumar
and that tells me that it probably came from 'Nam or some other import venue.
Anyway, $350 gets it shipped.
Also, a clean PZ1p, with cheapie 28-80 for
Has anyone yet set their computer to Speak Aussie? That might be the problem.
On Sep 13, 2011, at 04:08 , Bob Sullivan wrote:
John,
Thanks for the insight.
I went back to the old laptop to see the pug.
That machine got it fine.
I don't understand the problem with the new laptop.
Nice
On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
It's very interesting to hear others' take on this. I have found over
and over again that when I disable AF my photos are far more
consistently in-focus, regardless of camera and regardless of how low
the light I'm
Well, you still have to convert it to BW from the raw data. The
difference is that you take the values as they are, and per pixel, no
array computation.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that it would make the camera BW. The circuitry
This is the only place I remembered mentioning something like this. I
don't think they do pentaxes though:
http://www.maxmax.com/bw_conversion.htm
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Gonz rgonzoma...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, you still have to convert it to BW from the raw data. The
difference is
Yeah, maybe not for Pentax. Someone has done it for Canon T series
and is selling them. Very cool, but not willing to pay $2000 for it.
It sounds like yanking out the filter and microlenses would destroy
the CCD.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, I think thats the place that does the Canons.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Fernando fer.p...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the only place I remembered mentioning something like this. I
don't think they do pentaxes though:
http://www.maxmax.com/bw_conversion.htm
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at
On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Gonz wrote:
Anyone here ever converted a Pentax DSLR into a straight BW, i.e.
remove the tricolor filter?
I was thinking of trying this with an old Pentax DSLR if it was possible.
For low light photography, I'd love to have a K-5 with that conversion.
--
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
It's very interesting to hear others' take on this. I have found over
and over again that when I disable AF my photos are far more
consistently in-focus, regardless of camera and regardless
On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
It's very interesting to hear others' take on this. I have found over
and over again that when I disable AF my photos are far more
consistently in-focus, regardless of camera and regardless of how low
the light I'm
Dan,
I love the contrast between the girl in high heels and the guy in
jeans and sneakers.
Maybe not the date that either was hoping for.
Is that your puppy sitting there?
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I'm pretty good at manual focus, but there are times when I can't see well
enough to focus, even with a katzeye, and the autofocus will work. I've seen
reports, which I believe, that autofocus consistently outperforms
On 9/13/2011 14:45, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I have no idea who she was.
Nevermind.
Marnie
hehe - google is our friend...
actually there was a wonderful cable movie made about her... kind of
fascinating
ann
In a message dated 9/13/2011 11:04:21 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
I shot an album cover for my friend, Paul Miles, a well-regarded Detroit
bluesman: It's a large image. Click to make smaller.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14205591size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
A great portrait of a very interesting subject.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I shot an album cover for my friend, Paul Miles, a well-regarded Detroit
bluesman: It's a large
Thanks to Don and Christine for your comments on my Harvest Moon PESO, as well
as to the others who had previously looked and commented.
I went back out to the same location last night. The conditions were about the
same, though I swear that the corn must have grown another 12 inches. This time
I really like the first moon shot.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Thanks to Don and Christine for your comments on my Harvest Moon PESO, as
well as to the others who had previously looked and commented.
I went back out to the same location last
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Dammit you're too good!
they are WONDERFUL and a lovey shot it is...
it will be shared :-)
ann
On 9/13/2011 22:39, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
You got them to pose! And a nice composition. Well done.
Paul
On Sep 13, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
By the way: The FA*28-70/2.8 absolutely rocks for pet photos. 70mm
lets you get close without getting close enough to spook the cats
and the image quality of this lens is outstanding.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
On 9/13/2011 21:55, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I really like the first moon shot.
So did everyone.. oh - you meant.
stan _ I like the vertical one even though the moon is so far to the right.
ann
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Thanks
Unusually posed. Creative patience.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: Dammit! Another cat photo!
Mark Roberts wrote:
On 9/13/2011 16:15, Bruce Walker wrote:
Marnie, Bettie Page was probably the most famous 1950's pinup model. Her
iconic shots in Playboy were taken by Bunny Yeager, herself a former model.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunny_Yeager
The Bettie Page story is rather charmingly told in the film
fraid I find this one a bit busy nothing stands out .. a bit too
much going on on the same focal plane.
ann
On 9/13/2011 16:48, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=133
Comments are appreciated.
Dan Matyola
Stan, I prefer the composition of the third image. It does have a lighter sky
and, therefore, a somewhat reduced contrast, but that may be fun to work with.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent:
Hey, be sure to forward these to Mike Johnston.
On 9/13/2011 10:39 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I still prefer the original one you posted before (PESO: Harvest Moon)
I remember it showed nicer colours. From these new ones, probably the
first, but I'm not convinced about the location of the moon.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Thanks to Don
Very nice capture. Crisp colorful.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: PESO - Healing Vibrations
I shot an album cover for my friend, Paul Miles, a well-regarded Detroit
Very nice album cover, well balanced, he must be happy.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I shot an album cover for my friend, Paul Miles, a well-regarded Detroit
bluesman: It's a large image. Click to make smaller.
Like I said - cute, cute, cute !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
Subject: Dammit! Another cat photo!
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20troika.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax F 70-210mm f4.0~5.6
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML
There is more than enough pussy on the net with you having to add to it.
:-P
On 14/09/2011, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Good shot of Paul, Paul. He's been on my friend list for years now. Follow him
on his journey's around the country.
On Sep 13, 2011, at 17:12 , Paul Stenquist wrote:
I shot an album cover for my friend, Paul Miles, a well-regarded Detroit
bluesman: It's a large image. Click to make smaller.
On Sep 13, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
You can even make pictures of cats look good. I hate you.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sep 13, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties2.jpg
By the way: The FA*28-70/2.8 absolutely rocks for pet photos. 70mm
lets you get close without getting close enough to spook the cats
and the image quality of this lens is
Comments are very welcome.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/dM57FDPp4MiAe1OmIOcyEFqTO0pzBLUsAIQ-VSzvgHs?feat=directlink
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
On Sep 13, 2011, at 10:50 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
Comments are very welcome.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/dM57FDPp4MiAe1OmIOcyEFqTO0pzBLUsAIQ-VSzvgHs?feat=directlink
Very nice! And the photo's good too.
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
98 matches
Mail list logo
