On 11/09/2012 10:22 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
... with Nikon I immediately felt positively certain of its
reliability. With Pentax I have to always be watchful.
Boris, you have summed up my Pentax experience perfectly.
I've pretty much found that if it's automated, it's gonna be wrong.
On 11 September 2012 12:45, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Chris Mitchell chris.mitch...@which.net:
We went yesterday and the undoubted star of the show was the only
Vulcan still flying:
http://www.mitch.myzen.co.uk/Airshows1/Duxford2012/slides/_IMG3159.html
The
Yes, that works out. The takeover of Follands was around 1962 and I
started there in '69.
Chris
On 11 September 2012 06:10, John Coyle jco...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hi Chris - not sure when the takeover took place, I was there 1956-7. Couple
of years
later I was in the RAF and was posted to
Thanks Mark. Yes, it's a pleasure to see the B17 still flying. At
Duxford there's a memorial to all of the US aircrews who were lost
during WW2. There's an image of each aircraft lost engraved on the
glass walls of the walkway leading up to the museum. Very moving.
Chris
On 10 September 2012
On 9 September 2012 16:11, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Chris Mitchell
chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
On 9 September 2012 14:28, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I really enjoyed that gallery, Chris.
I thought that many of these shots
http://maritimtim.blogspot.no/2012/09/says.html
--
MaritimTim
My private photo blog: http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
My photo class blog: http://z-fotokurs.blogspot.com/
To err is human
to arr is pirate
I braced and pulled it up. Wasn't bad at all. In fact, it was unique and very
well done, Tim!
Jack Davis
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jackdavis
http://www.photolightimages.com/
From: Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 2012-09-12 1:11, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Why did it take so long to attain that, as an average?
According to a class I took years ago, the answer is infant mortality.
IIRC, the professor claimed that if, in 1776, you ignored the deaths of
those less than either six or ten years old in
Liquidation? Time to bring in this guy:
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Putin_9ec3a3_2420828.jpg
Cheers
Ecke
in my area liquidated and shut down back when the K-7 was replacing the
K20D, at which time they were trying to still sell K10Ds for full
introductory price as a close out special. I
Putin on a Ritz?
On 9/12/2012 8:42 AM, Underpaid N. Overpentaxed wrote:
Liquidation? Time to bring in this guy:
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Putin_9ec3a3_2420828.jpg
Cheers
Ecke
in my area liquidated and shut down back when the K-7 was replacing the
K20D, at which time they were trying
On 9/12/2012 8:30 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2012-09-12 1:11, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Why did it take so long to attain that, as an average?
According to a class I took years ago, the answer is infant mortality.
IIRC, the professor claimed that if, in 1776, you ignored the deaths
of
On 9/12/2012 1:11 AM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 20:42 , John Sessoms wrote:
On Sep 10, 2012, at 09:54 , Bruce Walker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:11 AM, mike wilson
m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 09/09/2012 09:10, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Excellent image; the composition raises it above the cliche.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Take cover! Hipsters and other ironists need to avert their eyes
double quick:
Effective image; the bird is an especially nice touch. It must be
looking for all those fish . . .
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com wrote:
http://maritimtim.blogspot.no/2012/09/says.html
--
Listening to the outdoor Jazz Festival.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16455292
Comments are always appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I doubt that I will ever get tired of seeing a gorgeous sunrise or
sunset in real life, so I'm not sure why I should get tired of seeing
a good one captured well by someone else. And this is a Good One.
Thanks for sharing!
I believe that calling certain photographic subjects cliché has become
A great example of looking behind for a shot. I love these
on-the-grass outdoor music scenes.
Mississauga, where I live, used to have a fine square where they held
events like this: pop, jazz, indie-rock, orchestral; you name it.
Couple of years ago they decided to spend big bucks to install a
tiny view finder scares me a bit...
My only wish was my ist-d was lots less noisy at 3200 and went up to
6400. seeing the great stuff in relatively low light I was seeing
from youse guys that have the K-5 made for camera lust.
but hey, I'm just dreamin anyway at this point.
thanks for
I agree wholeheartedly and more than a little self-servingly.
-- Walt
On 9/12/2012 9:04 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
I doubt that I will ever get tired of seeing a gorgeous sunrise or
sunset in real life, so I'm not sure why I should get tired of seeing
a good one captured well by someone else. And
As Boris said in the Ricewhine Postmortem thread, it may be wise to
wait until after Photokina to say definitively that ALL the
announcements have been made.
My own predictions did worse than RiceHigh's.
I got the K-mount adapter for the Q right (not too tough, after it was
shown at the last
Boris, you have summed up my Pentax experience perfectly.
I've pretty much found that if it's automated, it's gonna be wrong.
Except for white balance. Auto white balance seems good.
--
William Robb
Bill, you have summed up my Pentax experience perfectly. Actually I
think they get exposure
Thanks, Bruce.
During the summer, our town has smaller Friday evening concerts on the
courthouse steps, where folks sit on the grass, or in a pedestrian
alley, where chairs are set up. This was a larger Jazz Festival
event, and they barricaded three blocks around the Courthouse for
food, beer
Yes Mike, I have one and have mated it with manual focus lenses back
to screw-mounted Pentax Ricoh Canon and and sharp an old Russian-made
using a rather bizarre tilt-shift adapter.
I had the same problems with manual focus that I do with any camera - I
ain't very good at it. If you have
Darren, I don't get at all how you came to the conclusion that Pentax
is abandoning the entry-level market. Just based on no specific new
model at Photokina? Not every product that Pentax has in the pipeline
would be ready to unveil at Photokina. I'm certain we'll see more
entry-level product in
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that calling certain photographic subjects cliché has become
cliché.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
I see what you are saying, Bruce, but I think you are overstating
things a bit. There is a fundamental difference between your entry
level kit being announced (with kit lens) for $679 and eventually
coming down to around $500 (as they did with the K-x:
Ann, the tiny viewfinder, if I've done my math correctly, gives the same
size image as that in the *ist-D, (which seems to be exactly the same
unit used in the K20D), The K-5 differs in showing 100% frame coverage,
with a slightly lower magnification. Compared to the finders in most
mid to
Well, ok.
What level of improvement could we theoretically expect? I've tried out
most of the new currently available camera bodies. Most of 'em are not
much different from K-5 in terms of focusing. Cameras of the same price
range are often even worse, especially in accuracy of focusing. I
From: John Celio
Ritz Camera (big US camera retail chain) is finally dead:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-10/ritz-camera-liquidation-approved-after-second-bankruptcy.html
I will not miss them at all. Terrible stores, terrible selection,
poorly-trained staff, etc.
Hopefully local
On 12/09/2012 10:45 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Ann, the tiny viewfinder, if I've done my math correctly, gives the same
size image as that in the *ist-D, (which seems to be exactly the same
unit used in the K20D), The K-5 differs in showing 100% frame coverage,
with a slightly lower magnification.
On 12/09/2012 11:02 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Well, ok.
What level of improvement could we theoretically expect? I've tried out
most of the new currently available camera bodies. Most of 'em are not
much different from K-5 in terms of focusing. Cameras of the same price
range are often even
Ah, but that's just it. Pentax hasn't make any surprise announcements
at any previous show for quite some time,. In fact I can't remember the
last time they did something like that but it must have been when I was
still selling cameras retail, (which was a very long time ago). I
expect we've
On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Well, ok.
What level of improvement could we theoretically expect?
My biggest complaint about AF is the size of the AF zones and the camera
insisting on focusing on something close to what I want, but not what I want.
Usually it is
I'm a bit behind so apologies for late response.
I love the BW rendering in these. Cemetery #2 is my favourite with
more in the foreground. I just wonder whether the spire should be a
little less central; but I still like it a lot.
Chris
On 5 September 2012 23:35, Don Guthrie
On 8 September 2012 23:08, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
...as a realtor's/estate agent's listing might say. Yorkshire is full of
these, which is a bit sad.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16443672size=lg
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments always welcome.
Rick
Definitely in
You missed my intention here, I was simply reassuring Ann that the K-5
was no worse and was in some ways better than her *ist-D viewfinder.
On 9/12/2012 1:09 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 12/09/2012 10:45 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Ann, the tiny viewfinder, if I've done my math correctly, gives
Ritz did not franchise as far as I know, so they're probably gone. Ritz
bought them out and they'll fold with the chain.
On 9/12/2012 1:06 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: John Celio
Ritz Camera (big US camera retail chain) is finally dead:
A very nice landscape. No more a cliche than is a portrait or other typical
subject.
Paul
On Sep 12, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent image; the composition raises it above the cliche.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: Ritz/Wolf camera chain going out of business,
liquidationstarting now
Putin on a Ritz?
Now that was cheesey
On 9/12/2012 8:42
On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:55 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com kwal...@peoplepc.com
wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: Ritz/Wolf camera chain going out of business,
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: Re: OT: Ritz/Wolf camera chain going out of
business,liquidationstarting now
On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:55 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com
kwal...@peoplepc.com
Still shooting with the K10 here.
K5 was attractive but I haven't been shooting enough to justify
ANOTHER thousand dollar camera. When I bought the used I decided it
was the last PS camera I'd buy because my phone takes decent pictures
and the ease of sharing with the network is just a killer
Thanks Chris, This place can be tough to keep up with. I sure get behind
and have trouble keeping current with my comments. But it never too late
to comment on a picture. So thanks for taking the time.
Yes now I want to covert every picture to BW but that's just wrong. I
have gone back forth
On 9/12/12 5:02 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Apparently, I'm in that 10% minority not having enough a reason for
suddenly polluting the world with each and any piece of crap I take...
Dario
i just post the crap I like.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Oh Dario,
I didn't say anything about posting EVERYthing to the public, did I?
But wouldn't it be nice, in the world of shared data plans, to add
your camera to your account and have it upload your shots to some
cloud vault during your shoot? You'd have all your crap photos
backed-up in case you
On 9/13/12 10:59 AM, Walt wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly and more than a little self-servingly.
-- Walt
hey Walt, what's it like 24 hours in the future?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
When Ritz/Wolf originally went into Chapter 11, as a creditor, Hoya decided
to no longer do business with the chain. Hence very little Pentax equipment.
Larry in Dallas
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:18 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Apparently, I'm in that 10% minority not having enough a reason for suddenly
polluting the world with each and any piece of crap I take...
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: Cory Waters
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 10:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: So... K-5II huh?
On Sep 12, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Cory Waters cbwaters.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh Dario,
I didn't say anything about posting EVERYthing to the public, did I?
But wouldn't it be nice, in the world of shared data plans, to add
your camera to your account and have it upload your shots to some
Hi Cory, I was referring neither to your precise wording nor to PDML in
particular, but rather to a general tendency to share far more pics than you
(I) can withstand via
Flickr/Facebook/Instagram/whatevernewfashionsocialblob...
Oh, yeah, I'm probably just tired of being working 15 hours a day
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Doug Brewer
On 9/13/12 10:59 AM, Walt wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly and more than a little self-servingly.
-- Walt
hey Walt, what's it like 24 hours in the future?
who the hell cares? Just tell us the results
About that cloud vault, I won't say it's bad (actually I think it's a good
idea), but it isn't high in my priorities, sure not enough for being a must
when purchasing a camera.
One next day I could change my mind on this, but now a better
AF/metering/whatever photo-related is much more
on 2012-09-12 14:53 Cory Waters wrote
Another way: Do i ever want another camera that doesn't have network capability?
unless the network connectivity is faster than the SD slot in the side of my
compturer, i don't have a strong desire for a wireless connection in a camera
I mean, what
On 12 September 2012 16:53, Cory Waters cbwaters.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Still shooting with the K10 here.
K5 was attractive but I haven't been shooting enough to justify
ANOTHER thousand dollar camera. When I bought the used I decided it
was the last PS camera I'd buy because my phone takes
Doug Brewer wrote:
On 9/13/12 10:59 AM, Walt wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly and more than a little self-servingly.
hey Walt, what's it like 24 hours in the future?
You'll have to check the archives. Walt answered your question
yesterday.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
On Sep 11, 2012, at 10:02 , a bunch of us wrote stuff, among which was:
I wrote:
But they never say how much better. If it isn't an Industry
Breakthrough it is probably about the same as the K-10 to K-7
improvement. Just a little bit.
Paul wrote:
Ir'a hard to quantify improvements in
I nominate this exchange as the best (and shortest) pun string to date,
including the PS'd illustration.
On Sep 12, 2012, at 13:12 , kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
On Sep 12, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Cory Waters cbwaters.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh Dario,
I didn't say anything about posting EVERYthing to the public, did I?
But wouldn't it be nice, in the world of shared data plans, to
On Sep 12, 2012, at 13:53 , Cory Waters wrote:
Still shooting with the K10 here.
K5 was attractive but I haven't been shooting enough to justify
ANOTHER thousand dollar camera. When I bought the used I decided it
was the last PS camera I'd buy because my phone takes decent pictures
and the
The PENTAX camera always sees the contrast of a dog's bung-hole as a
likely fecal-focal target.
Mark!
I'll have to bring my clicker or dog-whistle to the park this afternoon.
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
It is still true, as was first said many years ago, that people
are the
Some potato flowers in the garden. I was playing with a flash bracket, but I
think the best one was without a flash:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7980973555/lightbox/
from:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157631522670588/
I think the flash setup ended up working well
On Sep 12, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com
wrote:
On Sep 12, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Cory Waters cbwaters.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh Dario,
I didn't say anything about posting EVERYthing to
On 9/12/2012 5:07 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
On 9/12/12 5:02 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Apparently, I'm in that 10% minority not having enough a reason for
suddenly polluting the world with each and any piece of crap I take...
Dario
i just post the crap I like.
Hell, at least half the time I
He looks so sad. Yet a dog with wet paws and a bride are a match, a
match made in hell.
On 9/12/2012 6:44 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Seems a bride in white and a dog with wet paws are no match:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/7980901349/in/photostream
Dave, D200, 18-70, SB800
--
On 9/12/12 6:12 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
On 9/13/12 10:59 AM, Walt wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly and more than a little self-servingly.
hey Walt, what's it like 24 hours in the future?
You'll have to check the archives. Walt answered your question
yesterday.
well,
On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Cory Waters wrote:
Still shooting with the K10 here.
K5 was attractive but I haven't been shooting enough to justify
ANOTHER thousand dollar camera. When I bought the used I decided it
was the last PS camera I'd buy because my phone takes decent pictures
and
On Sep 12, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Sep 12, 2012, at 13:53 , Cory Waters wrote:
Still shooting with the K10 here.
K5 was attractive but I haven't been shooting enough to justify
ANOTHER thousand dollar camera. When I bought the used I decided it
was the last PS
Christine Aguila wrote:
On Sep 12, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think this is yet practical. Assuming the camera has built-in
Verizon 4G LTE, and you shoot 400 RAWs in one outing, your camera will
be pushing files up to the cloud for more than 50
Doug Brewer wrote:
On 9/12/12 6:12 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
On 9/13/12 10:59 AM, Walt wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly and more than a little self-servingly.
hey Walt, what's it like 24 hours in the future?
You'll have to check the archives. Walt answered your question
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/12/2012 5:07 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
On 9/12/12 5:02 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Apparently, I'm in that 10% minority not having enough a reason for
suddenly polluting the world with each and any piece of crap I
From: Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com
But the monthly charges entailed in having a phone embedded in the camera
would be an ongoing expense of several hundred dollars a month. Plus you
would have to design a DSLR that wouldn't look ridiculous holding up to your
ear. PLUS to just have
On 9/12/2012 8:29 PM, Tom C wrote:
From: Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com
But the monthly charges entailed in having a phone embedded in the camera would
be an ongoing expense of several hundred dollars a month. Plus you would have
to design a DSLR that wouldn't look ridiculous holding up
On 9/12/2012 4:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
On 9/13/12 10:59 AM, Walt wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly and more than a little self-servingly.
-- Walt
hey Walt, what's it like 24 hours in the future?
Not so bad. When I finally got back, I had all the yard work done.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Accidentally stumbled on this review of the DA* 55, published yesterday ...
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Pentax-smc-DA-Star-55mm-f-1.4-SDM
It's also compared to other 50mm/f:1.4's including Canon, Nikon and
Pentax's FA 50.
Fares well, chromatic aberration score
Last month a fun fair came to town:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2012/09/bumper-cars.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
More to come, maybe.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2012-09-12 19:12, Bruce Walker wrote:
I don't think this is yet practical. Assuming the camera has built-in
Verizon 4G LTE, and you shoot 400 RAWs in one outing, your camera will
be pushing files up to the cloud for more than 50 minutes.
I'd be happy enough with 802.11b/g, or especially
And the only problem with that is now I have renewed K-5 lust :-)
ann
On 9/12/2012 15:07, P. J. Alling wrote:
You missed my intention here, I was simply reassuring Ann that the K-5
was no worse and was in some ways better than her *ist-D viewfinder.
On 9/12/2012 1:09 PM, William Robb wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
But WHAT IF, the camera phone was shaped like a shoe with a rotary
dial??? That would be smart! get it?
To: Pentax Marketing Dept.
This pic:
Dave, That's a picture of 'forlorn'. Bob S.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:44 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems a bride in white and a dog with wet paws are no match:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/7980901349/in/photostream
Dave, D200, 18-70, SB800
--
Documenting
I would rather have an ethernet port that could be plugged into an external
wifi or phone modem. In theory USB 3 could do something similar. Or a
bidirectional optical port with a pair if IREDs and detecters.
Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org wrote:
On 2012-09-12 19:12, Bruce Walker wrote:
i just post the crap I like.
Yo
Mark!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com
Subject: Re: So... K-5II huh? But without a net work link, Do I want that?
On 9/12/12 5:02 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
But WHAT IF, the camera phone was shaped like a shoe with a rotary
dial??? That would be smart! get it?
To: Pentax Marketing Dept.
This pic:
I really like that building...
I think the bw is a bit _too_ dramatic - doesnt look quite real to me...
Haven't seen the color version of the long shot...
I've missed your earlier posts, I guess...
French church cemetary number2 is what I'm looking at... a tad less
contrast in the clouds maybe
Cool pic. I’d probably crop in a bit to just have pooch screen, and
maybe punch up the contrast a bit. -T
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:44 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems a bride in white and a dog with wet paws are no match:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:07:51PM -0400, Cory Waters wrote:
But wouldn't it be nice, in the world of shared data plans, to add
your camera to your account and have it upload your shots to some
cloud vault during your shoot? You'd have all your crap photos
backed-up in case you drop your card
On 13 September 2012 01:07, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
There are also different market segments. There are people who can and
will pay $3-3.3K for a Nikon D800/E body. There are people who will
pay $2.3K for a Sony A99 full frame body. But I would argue that in
terms of sheer
86 matches
Mail list logo
