Here's one:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8147015170/in/set-72157631909131126
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly a
My favourite composition structure is a D cup. It's natures cantilever.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 01/11/2012 8:49 PM, Tom C wrote:
One of these days I'll sort through the reams of transparencies boxed
away and find out. Am I better or am I simply changed?
You've been democratized. One of the advantages us darkroom guys had
over hand it over to the lab for a picture guys was that w
John, I am sorry but you have a little mistake here. K10D was 10MP not 12.
I have upgraded from K10D to K-7 and then to K-5. Here are the
advantages that K-5 has over K10D in my personal view (in random order
with only very partial sense of priority):
1. Dynamic range/High ISO performance/14-
How did YOU miss it?
:-P
On 02/11/2012, Tom C wrote:
> How come no one told me there was a stinkin' piece of dust in this
> image? Almost center frame.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Tom C wrote:
>> Taken over the Columbus Day weekend from the Paradise trail at Mt.
>> Rainier National P
How come no one told me there was a stinkin' piece of dust in this
image? Almost center frame.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Tom C wrote:
> Taken over the Columbus Day weekend from the Paradise trail at Mt.
> Rainier National Park.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16555015&size=lg
Or, come to that, ever found yourself limited by the mere 12MP of the K10D?
Discounting a K5 because it only offers an additional 1.7MP over a K20D
implies that the extra megapixel count is a valuable feature, which I question.
I'd happily have bought my K5 even if it didn't offer more MP than the
Fibonacci Spiral
http://mathnexus.wwu.edu/mathpix/fibonaccihair.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Have you actually tried using a K-5 instead of just reading the specifications?
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:21 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
>
>
>> On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:25 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>>
What, specifically, are you looking for in a DSLR? Other than that
it c
From: Larry Colen
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:25 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
What, specifically, are you looking for in a DSLR? Other than that
it costs less than $800? In bright light it's pretty hard to see any
effective difference in image quality of just about any DSLR this
side of the K100.
Wh
Speaking for myself, the "rules" I cited were the basic boilerplate nearly
everyone reads or is told when beginning to learn photography.
They are only a guide that can be of benefit if the chosen scene allows. The
complete opposite is a better option in many cases.
Jack
- Original Mess
My favorite composition is that which looks good to my eye. No rules, no
measurement.
Paul
On Nov 1, 2012, at 10:57 PM, David Parsons wrote:
> Why? There's nothing wrong with centering your subject. If it suits
> your vision, do it.
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
>
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Tom C wrote:
>
> I'm pained by the necessity to somehow adjust every image that I think
> meets my standards. Luckily or unluckily that's 1% or less of the
> images I take. It used to be zilch. I either made the shot or I
> didn't. There was no cropping, exposure a
I use the golden mean instead of the rule of thirds, especially when
cropping in post.
I'm also a fan of cropping to square (still using the golden mean).
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Obviously off center horizontally and vertically. I find that "thirds" are
> often a bit
I realize the subject line is a misnomer.
Do you remember in the late 90's early 2K's when things like this were
considered a possibility, at least by some? I know this example is a
deliberate joke...
http://re35.net/
I've been thinking about how much and little photography has changed
in the pa
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:29 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
The K-5's 16MP Sony sensor is a huge improvement over the 14MP Samsung
one. With the K20D, details in shadows were pretty much covered by
huge amounts of noise; with the K-5, one
From: "J.C. O'Connell"
You can get a k5 for $900 not $1200.
If it's worth that much to you buy it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
> From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
> Let's see...
> - 1.5 GHz dual core processor needed, to avoid lag in menus and simple
> applications
> - battery will last ~2 hours with intensive use
> - applications are written in Java, i.e. slow so don't even think
> about image processing
> - an useless touc
I generally do not like street people or beggar photos because of the
"exploitation" factor. There seems to be a fine line between legitimate social
commentary and "hey, look at the funny bag lady." However I really like this
shot Frank. I wouldn't want to hang it on my wall, but think it would
Warning, spiders:
November bestof photo set.
Warning, spiders:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157631688451606/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from t
Actually that's a bike cop and his bike. Have to admit I was looking at the
firefighter in the foreground and the fellow behind him, along with the tangle
of hoses. Didn't even notice the officer and his bike...
Thanks for the comment, Dan!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: "Daniel
Thanks, Steve, and thanks to everyone who commented and to those of you who
took a look.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Steven Desjardins
Sent: October 31, 2012 10/31/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: PESO - Aftermath
Good shot. The hoses make a great foreground.
Funny...
But I think you're supposed to buy the magazine for a more in depth how-to.
On 2 November 2012 05:10, Darren Addy wrote:
> I'm sorry, I couldn't resist after seeing this fantastic
> tutorial on "How do I shoot the moon?" which is subtitled
> "Discover how to shoot the moon using your e
Good stuff. Nice website.
B
> -Original Message-
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Luka Knezevic-
> Strika
> Sent: 01 November 2012 16:03
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: GESO: Istanbul
>
> http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (first thumbnail op
Thanks. I've been doing it all the wrong way round.
B
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Darren Addy
>
> I'm sorry, I couldn't resist after seeing this fantastic
> tutorial on "How do I shoot the moon?" which is subtitled "Discover how
> to shoot the moon using your existi
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:57:08PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Joseph McAllister wrote:
>
> >On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:17 , Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> >
> >> http://static.themetapicture.com/media/funny-Nikon-big-lens-camera.jpg
> >
> >I guess surfing photography pays well!
>
> Surfing photography?
Thank you, Tim!
Very kind of you to say. :)
-- Walt
On 11/1/2012 3:56 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
Wow, that’s an outstanding shot, made my eyes happy -T
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Walt wrote:
I don't know what kind of plant it is, but it's across the street in my
neighbor's front yard and i
Beautiful images.
Liked the smell of film ;)
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun
2012/11
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I'm sorry, I couldn't resist after seeing this fantastic
> tutorial on "How do I shoot the moon?" which is subtitled
> "Discover how to shoot the moon using your existing camera kit in just
> 3 simple steps."
> http://news.dphotographer.co.uk/n
Wow, these days, you can tell instantly when something’s film not
digital. Not sure what the give-away is. Nice pictures! -T
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
wrote:
> http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (first thumbnail opens
> the slideshow)
>
> A good chunk of t
Joseph McAllister wrote:
>On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:17 , Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
>> http://static.themetapicture.com/media/funny-Nikon-big-lens-camera.jpg
>
>I guess surfing photography pays well!
Surfing photography? This guy's at a road race track. There are
several cornerworkers right behind hi
Nice. Maybe crank the saturation just the tiniest bit? -T
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> A pretty post-Sandy detail, and the Q was handy:
>
> http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/i-jrmt2vz/0/XL/wet-web-XL.jpg
> --
> Steve Desjardins
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss
Wow, that’s an outstanding shot, made my eyes happy -T
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Walt wrote:
> I don't know what kind of plant it is, but it's across the street in my
> neighbor's front yard and it was really luminous just before sundown
> yesterday.
>
> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/w
I guess surfing photography pays well!
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:17 , Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> http://static.themetapicture.com/media/funny-Nikon-big-lens-camera.jpg
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pd
Quoting "Daniel J. Matyola" :
http://static.themetapicture.com/media/funny-Nikon-big-lens-camera.jpg
The interesting thing is that he's got another one, almost as big,
draped over his other shoulder. Obviously he spends his spare time at
the gym...
--
Cheers
Brian
Don't really have one !
For me it all depends on the subject & how I want to portray it.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl"
Subject: Poll: Your favorite composition structure
We are probably all familiar w
Funny, I don't see a tripod or monopod or the sherpa that's supposed to come
with it!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Subject: OT: Big Lens
http://static.themetapicture.com/media/funny-Nikon-big-lens-cam
Thanks, Jack!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Terrific moment, Dan!
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Daniel J. Matyola
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 1
Obviously off center horizontally and vertically. I find that "thirds" are
often a bit much.
I seem to prefer off center to the right. Alsop, I find it comfortable if
the scene flows from the lower left to the upper right. Have herd it referred
to the "eye channel." (??)
Jack
- Original M
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>> So you do understand that if PRIC needs to start from a clean slate on a
>> project, it's going to take a while to get the job done? And that in the
>> mean time if they can address som
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:25 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>> What, specifically, are you looking for in a DSLR? Other than that
>> it costs less than $800? In bright light it's pretty hard to see any
>> effective difference in image quality of just about any DSLR this
>> side of the K100.
>
> What I w
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> So you do understand that if PRIC needs to start from a clean slate on a
> project, it's going to take a while to get the job done? And that in the
> mean time if they can address some of the key problems with the K5 without
> taking too mu
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> What I want is to buy a camera (if/when one ever comes along) that
> offers me sufficient improvement over what I have now to be worth the
> price - whatever that price might be. I hope that camera will be offered
> by Pentax.
>
> K-5 ain't it
From: Luka Knezevic-Strika
http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (first thumbnail opens
the slideshow)
A good chunk of these shot with a spotmatic sp II
I can't get a slide show. I click on the thumbnail & I get only one
larger image.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:38 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> Larry,
>
> Yes, I have done embedded systems and have also taken products from concept
> to market. Been there, done that.
So you do understand that if PRIC needs to start from a clean slate on a
project, it's going to take a while to g
On 31/10/2012 6:41 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 5:31 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
John Francis wrote:
I'm still trying to wrap my mind around the idea of the K-5 not being a
worthwhile upgrade from a K10D.
Ain't that the truth! The K20D was a significant upgrade from the K10D
in
makes my 1000mm takumar seem like a pentax-M series lens.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:17 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Larry Colen
That's not what I want. My point is that the Vette is a fairly
expensive car, just as the K-5 is a fairly expensive camera. However,
it outperforms cars that cost quite a bit more than it does, and for
that matter, the vast majority of people who own one. Feel free to
draw an
You can get a k5 for $900 not $1200.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sessoms
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:30 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: After reading the K5xxx
Terrific moment, Dan!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 10:28 AM
Subject: PESO: Father and Daughter
Taken at the Steeplechase Races:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16543035
Comments are app
I generally do not like street people or beggar photos because of the
"exploitation" factor. There seems to be a fine line between legitimate social
commentary and "hey, look at the funny bag lady." However I really like this
shot Frank. I wouldn't want to hang it on my wall, but think it would
There are a lot of homeless who can't work even though they have no
major physical limitations. Many, especially war veterans, suffer
from severe psychological problems. Most have addictions of one sort
or another. Still others can't find employment in this very difficult
market because of a cri
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
The K-5's 16MP Sony sensor is a huge improvement over the 14MP Samsung
one. With the K20D, details in shadows were pretty much covered by
huge amounts of noise; with the K-5, one can easily recover images
underexposed by several stops.
And you're getting not only a
Taken at the Steeplechase Races:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16543035
Comments are appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, p
He might not be able to work. From the expression of his eyes, it
appears to me that he's blind.
From: Paul Sorenson
Frank -
What I see here appears to be a homeless, out of work man who is
virtually invisible to the passers-by. He may be down on his luck, but
still retains a shred of dignity
Thanks, Frank.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:53 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Fun candid snap.
>
> ;-)
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
> Sent: October 29, 2012 10/29/12
> To: "Pentax-
Thanks, Frank!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:50 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Terrific casual portrait.
>
> Btw, the glasses must stay! They look like a part of his personality.
>
> Cheers,
> frank
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
>
I really like the composition of the image with the girl looking
towards the Mosque in the distance.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
wrote:
> http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (first thumbnail opens
>
http://www.petapixel.com/2012/10/31/an-incredibly-detailed-halloween-camera-pumpkin/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly abo
Frank, it is a slice of life that we often seek to ignore or avoid. I
think it is important to recognize the existence of people who are in
this condition, and to think about what we can and should do about it.
I am involved with several programs that reach out to the homeless
and the hungry. I
I don't think it's exploitative in the least, Frank. I like it a lot, in
fact.
Panhandlers/beggars as a rule *want* to be seen. You don't pick up much
change in the dark corners of alleyways, after all. And they *should* be
seen, if only to remind those of us who've been blessed with more in
Thanks for commenting and looking Jack, Christine, Dan, Don, Paul,
Darren, Frank, Bruce, and probably some I forgot.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
The man is in a public place doing what he does. I don't think it is
exploiting to take and post the photo.
That said I don't think the picture works for me as a because I see
people but I don't see their reaction to him.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 03:01
I agree with Paul: well put. And I agree that this is an excellent shot.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Any photo can be exploitive. We're all taking advantage of what the world
> reveals when creating our images. Every photo exploits something. Sometimes,
> the homel
Any photo can be exploitive. We're all taking advantage of what the world
reveals when creating our images. Every photo exploits something. Sometimes,
the homeless are easy targets and not much beyond their pitiful condition is
revealed. But here, the figures rushing past in the foreground that
First, I'd like to say that I think that is a very powerful photograph.
I puzzled for a while over Frank's question of exploitation and then
puzzled a while longer on whether the question of whether something
was exploitation could ever be properly judged by oneself, or others,
or a poll. I decide
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Reply interspersed...
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Paul Stenquist
> wrote:
>> A couple of points in response:
>> My DA* 60-250 failed after more than 30,000 frames and was repaired for
>> $183.00. It's a fabulous lens, and , I believ
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:01 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Well, I have a dilemma here and your opinion would help me. I do take photos
> of beggars from time to time but I try not to exploit them and do try to show
> them in a very "human" way.
>
> So here's today's PESO:
>
> http://k
This and like photos stir emotions which I would think could range from
sympathy to disgust. Whether that justifies the taking of it would be personal
to each viewer. As for me, in this particular case, I'm open to a message I've
yet to receive.
It does remind me of the phrase; there but for the
Reply interspersed...
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> A couple of points in response:
> My DA* 60-250 failed after more than 30,000 frames and was repaired for
> $183.00. It's a fabulous lens, and , I believe, at least the equal of
> anything available in that range.
Op
Oops a little too quick on the trigger there, your second message covered it.
Basically a scientific lens from memory, made to order and now highly
collectible.
On 01/11/2012, at 11:10 PM, Paul Ewins wrote:
> On on the right is one of the ultra-rare quartz lenses.
>
> Here is someonelse dis
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/55001392@N08/sets/72157631902109998/
>
>The one on the left is easy.
>But what exactly is the one on the right
A Takumar 85mm f/3.5 quartz glass lens (for shooting under ultraviolet
light - ordinary glass blocks most UV). My friend in NC has
On on the right is one of the ultra-rare quartz lenses.
Here is someonelse discussing that exact shot:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sashavasko/5612410202/
On 01/11/2012, at 10:58 PM, "Collin Brendemuehl"
wrote:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55001392@N08/sets/72157631902109998/
>
> The o
Someone else pointed to You Only Live Twice.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sashavasko/5612410202/
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
http://www.flickr.com/photos/55001392@N08/sets/72157631902109998/
The one on the left is easy.
But what exactly is the one on the right
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On 10/31/12 11:16 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Excellent. I hear it's quirky, but you've been using Pentax so it's
just a question of getting use to a different kind of quirky. ;-)
As long as it doesn't fight me every step of the way, I'll be good. But
yeah, sometimes the stuff I read make m
On 10/31/12 10:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I hope you enjoy it! I'll be interested to hear what you think of it
after you get a chance to use it for a while.
Godfrey
Thanks. Will do. I'm hoping the excitement of new stuff will give me a
little boost, get me out of the photo rut I feel like
On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:40 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 4:39 PM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
>> Such conclusions are premature; the product we saw so far (from
>> October 2011) are "Pentax-Hoya" projects. There simply wasn't enough
>> time (less than a year, including analyzing th
Collin,
I agree, those "context switches" weren't easy on them, and roller
coaster corporate ride is a good way to describe what it happened (the
founder family lost control when Pentax become publicly owned, which
allowed Sparx to push Pentax into Hoya's arms, and finally Hoya sold
them to Ricoh
Larry,
Yes, I have done embedded systems and have also taken products from concept to
market. Been there, done that.
What I have not done is taken part is the corporate shift that saw Pentax move
from (1) Family Owned, to (2) Public Ownership, to (3) Hoya, to (4) Ricoh. I
think that transiti
You can always recognize people who use complex spreadsheets to make decisions
that are best left to the heart.
K-5… Sigh… It's a thing of beauty.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 00:21 , John Sessoms wrote:
> Y'all keep harping on how much "improvement" the K-5 has and keep ignoring
> the "justify the e
On Oct 31, 2012, at 10:11 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
>
>> A couple of automotive analogies occur to me.
>>
>> First of all, complaining that the K-5 isn't full frame is like
>> complaining that the Corvette doesn't have a V12.
>>
>> It also seems to me that the folks who buy a
On 31/10/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
>you've been using Pentax so it's
>just a question of getting use to a different kind of quirky
Gotta be a MARK!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--
_
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> knarftheria...@gmail.com
>
> This group is at this intersection every weekend (right next to the
> Muslims, as I showed in an earlier photo) and what strikes me about
> them is that they are very negative, very "fire and brimstone" in thei
>
> From: Larry Colen
>
> > A couple of automotive analogies occur to me.
> >
car analogies are like photographs of ducks. Easy, boring and never
enlightening. If you find yourself tempted to make one, you should always
strongly resist the urge, and if you succumb, never, ever share them with
ot
Y'all keep harping on how much "improvement" the K-5 has and keep
ignoring the "justify the expense" side of the equation. Gotta' have both.
It's $1200 for an APS-C sensor 1.7MP larger than the K20D. Or $850 for
the version that doesn't have the improved improvements.
When I bought the second
86 matches
Mail list logo
