There were some A lenses with chips IIRC, the later A zoom lenses that
were sold with the ZX/MZ-M cameras, I believe that the A 35-80 4~5.6 was
pretty much the same as the F version electronically without an
autofocus motor, the same for the A 80-200 f4.7~5.6. I could be wrong
but I seem to
They've relaxed their laws recently but I doubt they'd let a non
Canadian carry a pistol suitable for self defense against wolves. A
rifle if you had the proper hunting permit, but that seems like
something most bicyclists would eschew.
On 7/16/2013 6:17 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
FWIW
Viewing the full size crop at 72 DPI on my Ancient Hitachi SuperScan
Elite 751 is the reason I don't think I need more more megapixels or a
bigger sensor at this time, though I do need a good tripod.
On 7/16/2013 4:22 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Aahz Maruch
Quoting Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com:
I spent a few days up North on Lake Vermilion this past weekend.
Near our cabin (really a house) was a loon who pretty much hung
out near our dock - much more social than your common hermit-like
bird. I only had to sit on the dock for 5 minutes
Quoting Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
From the Basilica in Dinan, a small, old Brittany town:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17464298
Fantastic light and reflections. I agree with Ann that the
composition is spoiled by the pamphlet stand underneath the window.
Nothing you
Quoting Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16998957
Comments are invited.
I guess it would have been challenging to get the shark in sharp focus
but the beams of light certainly add dramatic effect to the image.
--
Cheers
Brian
Quoting David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/9291433381/
IR version, part of my 4 seasons flolder
Definitely one of your best IR images. The composition makes it work.
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney
Dramatic image, Dan.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: PESO: SHARK!
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16998957
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
Still want to part with that nice looking K-7? ;)
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Joe J. Wilensky jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
FS: Pentax K-7 body, low shutter count (2,295), EX- condition. Purchased from
a list member (but I don't remember who!). Includes printed manual, original
box, strap,
Ditto for me.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Gerrit Visser gerrit...@gmail.com wrote:
The reflections on the pillars are a lovely effect
Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Rick Womer
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:24 PM
To: Pentax
ugh - sorry ... put that in the category with Dave's wondering about the
shoeless blackbird.
ann
On 7/17/2013 00:03, P.J. Alling wrote:
You said you were going to shoot yourself, so what lens?
On 7/16/2013 10:20 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/16/2013 22:03, P.J. Alling wrote:
What lens?
Phew! Sh** yeah, that's it... I was going to experiment with that
thanks, Bri
ann
On 7/17/2013 00:17, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
at the moment I'm shooting rawjpg in camera... and I rather like it..
what I've lost in the settings is while I extended the
A couple of 'em -
nice - I hope that is an aquarium shot, Dan :-)
ann
On 7/17/2013 01:13, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16998957
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks, Brian and Jack.
Yes, the light is what I like about the image. As for the shark(s)
it's important that they be readily identifiable as such, but the more
prominent shark is not the focus of the shot.
Of course, having the shark in sharp focus would have added a lot to
the image, but
Yes, Ann, it was taken in the Maui Ocean Center shark tank earlier
this year. Besides, my K-r doesn't function as well as I would like
under water.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
A couple of
On 7/17/2013 03:46, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com:
I spent a few days up North on Lake Vermilion this past weekend.
Near our cabin (really a house) was a loon who pretty much hung out
near our dock - much more social than your common hermit-like bird. I
Plus, the brick wall feels so good once you stop beating your head
against it.
On 7/16/2013 5:06 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
I think a brick wall would be a better subject. Objections? The
subject shouldn't matter as long as it is sharp. A static object makes
for the best test IMO.
On Tue, Jul 16,
Right. That's why I put (aka Strobist) in the subject line. ;-D
On 7/16/2013 5:16 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
After reading this a little bit closer, I don't think that this flash
could be used ON a Pentax camera (as I was originally thinking). It is
designed for strobist-style off-camera use.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/17/2013 00:17, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
at the moment I'm shooting rawjpg in camera... and I rather like it..
what I've lost in the settings is while I extended the ISO to 51200 I
don't see where I set it to
It's a nice image. Especially being able to get a cat to just sit still
look at the camera.
But, there's a lot of noise. Looks like some of the under-exposed images
from when I first got my *ist-D tried to rescue them by pushing the
exposure slider in Photoshop. It seems to leach the color
Sure there's a perfect camera. It's just no one is manufacturing it yet.
On 7/16/2013 7:04 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:26:57PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
Well, no, Tom, the situations aren't at all parallel.
I'm very, very happy to be using MRIs and PET/CTs. I'm also very
I'd be careful with that. There *are* flashes out there with trigger
voltages high enough to fry the circuitry even on cameras with circuitry
as robust as those Pentax makes.
And, I know they make an adapter to allow you to use regular hot-shoe
flashes on that weird Minolta/Sony abomination
Yeah, could be. I thought it was fairly settled (for now) that Ricoh
does want to keep the Pentax brand name alive.
On 7/16/2013 8:04 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Rumor has it that *SOMEDAY* there's going to be a FF Pentax DSLR.
Shouldn't that be Rumor has it that *SOMEDAY* there's going
And perhaps the even tinier sliver along the left edge.
On 7/16/2013 9:45 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
second presentation for me - I might lose the extra sliver of window top
right
Nice to be there with that certain slant of light ... too bad about the
clutter under the window.. bet that wasn't
There's an 800/4 currently on offer down in South Carolina - $2700. Ad
posted back in February.
Don't know if it's still there or not, but if anyone is interested,
contact me off list I'll send you the URL.
Or just Google Pentax 800mm f4; that's how I found it.
On 7/16/2013 11:32 PM, Paul
Good. Wouldn't want to have to kill you. :P
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
My lips are sealed.
Sent from my iPod
On 2013-07-17, at 10:13 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
whoops. meant to be private.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:05 AM,
whoops. meant to be private.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Still want to part with that nice looking K-7? ;)
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Joe J. Wilensky jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
FS: Pentax K-7 body, low shutter count (2,295), EX- condition.
My lips are sealed.
Sent from my iPod
On 2013-07-17, at 10:13 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
whoops. meant to be private.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Still want to part with that nice looking K-7? ;)
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM,
Henry Repeating Arms sells the AR-7 through Canadian dealers.
On 7/17/2013 2:14 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
They've relaxed their laws recently but I doubt they'd let a non
Canadian carry a pistol suitable for self defense against wolves. A
rifle if you had the proper hunting permit, but that seems
On 7/17/2013 3:46 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com:
I spent a few days up North on Lake Vermilion this past weekend.
Near our cabin (really a house) was a loon who pretty much hung out
near our dock - much more social than your common hermit-like bird. I
From: Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
Well, no, Tom, the situations aren't at all parallel. ?
I'm very, very happy to be using MRIs and PET/CTs. ?I'm also very happy to be
using a K-5 instead of an istD or Super Program.
The technology has its place, though. ?I don't get an MRI on every
Remember, you have no privacy.
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on these days are set that way, precisely
because the failure mode is worse with reply-to list (screw up with
reply-to sender and you only send something private
From: Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on these days are set that way, precisely
because the failure mode is worse with reply-to list (screw up with
reply-to sender and you only send something
On Jul 17, 2013, at 09:25 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on these days are set that way, precisely
because the failure mode is worse with reply-to list (screw up with
reply-to sender
On 17/07/2013 8:38 AM, John wrote:
Henry Repeating Arms sells the AR-7 through Canadian dealers.
The AR-7 is classed as a restricted weapon in Canada due to it's barrel
length. As such, it is of limited use to a sportsman, since it cannot be
freely transported (you must notify the local
I've seen online that people who compare the 50-200 to the 55-300 universally
proclaim that the 55-300 is much better.
I am not a HUGE zoom user, but I discovered this weekend that the 50-200
doesn't really cut it for anything other than casual use - I kept cranking it
down to f/11 to get
On 7/17/2013 3:46 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com:
I spent a few days up North on Lake Vermilion this past weekend.
Near our cabin (really a house) was a loon who pretty much hung out
near our dock - much more social than your common hermit-like bird.
I
I can't tell you for sure that the 55-300 is better than the 50-200, I
use an old F 70-210, my second after the first jammed solid and self
destructed, which is very good, (not as good as the first unfortunately,
which is an important thing to remember).
I've heard that the the 55-300 is
On Jul 17, 2013, at 10:25 , P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/17/2013 3:46 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com:
I spent a few days up North on Lake Vermilion this past weekend. Near
our cabin (really a house) was a loon who pretty much hung
I get a lot of good use from my 160 LED light too, Bipin, but one
comment you made cannot be left uncommented. :-)
it is quite bright - dispenses the need for expensive powerful flash guns
mounted on the camera or away from it.
Um, no, not even close, says both my experience and my meter.
OK, so you have a hungry, (but stupid wolf, because obviously it mistook
a man on a bicycle for a deer), chasing you, your survival rifle is
disassembled stored in it's stock in your backpack. Do you a.) while
riding as fast as you can, reach into your back pack, somehow extract
the rifle
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 08:40:26AM -0600, Tom C wrote:
From: Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
Pentax is in an unenviable spot, being widely perceived as a bargain
brand. That's of course good for those that either can't or don't wish
to spend more money. It's not so good for Pentax (Ricoh).
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:19:28AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
I've seen online that people who compare the 50-200 to the 55-300 universally
proclaim that the 55-300 is much better.
I am not a HUGE zoom user, but I discovered this weekend that the 50-200
doesn't really cut it for
I'd love to see a comparison between a tamron 60-300 sp and the
55-300. The tamron is razor sharp up to 200mm and is quite decent at
the long end too. Stop down to f8 and its really sharp, at least up to
200-250mm. Too bad color rendition isn't nearly as nice nor is
contrast.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013
The problem is that there is a different perfect camera for every
photographer.
jm
--
From: John johnsess...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:52 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Any new flagship camera rumors?
Have experience with the DA55~300 only. Very impressive!
Often when voting on the PPG I spot an especially clean crisp image and upon
checking find it's a DA55~300 shot.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
I'd like to thank every one who replied, and especially whoever
suggested sending it to Erik Hendricson, I'd dealt with him before, but
discounted using him since the equipment wasn't made by Pentax. After
emailing him he's replied that he'll look at the lens so maybe it'll get
fixed. I'm
Looks like Joe is off in LA LA land anyways. Earth to Joe! :P
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Good. Wouldn't want to have to kill you. :P
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
My lips are sealed.
Sent from my
Charles -
most of these in my Feathers calendar were taken with the *istD with the
55-300
(small GESO )
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Calendars-in-Print/Feathers/19261415_nN7VmR
I love it...
ann
On 7/17/2013 11:19, Charles Robinson wrote:
I've seen online that people who
The k-5 is nearly perfect to me. If it had 24mp and faster AF I
probably wouldn't want anything more.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:05 PM, John Mullan k...@hotmail.com wrote:
The problem is that there is a different perfect camera for every
photographer.
jm
on 2013-07-16 21:32 Paul Ewins wrote
You won't stumble across one every day but they are readily available on eBay
if you really want one.
no, no! i do not want one; it is clearly not for me
only thought it was interesting to see it, and i know there are others in
Denver lurking on the list
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
I don't think the problem is quite as bad you you think. Yes, people
who know that Pentax exists, or even still exists, and who pay attention,
recognize it as a bargain brand. However, I think that half of the 87
people that even know that Pentax cameras
On 7/17/2013 11:54 AM, Tom C wrote:
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
I don't think the problem is quite as bad you you think. Yes, people
who know that Pentax exists, or even still exists, and who pay attention,
recognize it as a bargain brand. However, I think that half of the 87
people
PJ,
I met Eric as he was winding down his career in camera repair.
He was in west suburban Chicago working part-time(?) in a business he sold(?).
I'd take my old Pentax gear to him in the mornings before work.
He 'retired' to Tennessee, but still does cameras when the farm(?) allows.
Nice guy,
Well, hopefully no one's going to screw around and change the settings
now that I've finally figured them out.
On 7/17/2013 10:25 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Remember, you have no privacy.
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on
I like the reply-to where it is. Can't we just keep things like they
are? They are good right now. :)
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, hopefully no one's going to screw around and change the settings now
that I've finally figured them out.
On 7/17/2013
Thanks for the comments Ann, Dan, Bob.
Bob, I agree about the darkness of the eagle exposure. I've cranked it up a
bit, overall and shadows, and reloaded.
http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p769975649/e633301d4
I've also added another eagle shot from today; this guy wasn't as close so I
had to crop
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 17, 2013, at 09:25 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on these days are set that way, precisely
because the failure mode is worse with
I don't know anything about that.
It was just Bob's comment about the woman carrying the pistol shooting
the wolf pack in Romania (was it Romania?). And the reply that guns are
illegal in Canada with the response that rifles are NOT, but that you
wouldn't want to carry a rifle on a bicycle.
I wish I had a hovering dragonfly, but I don't.
There are, however, eels in my hovercraft...
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Sent: July 17, 2013 7/17/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Loon
On 7/17/2013 03:46, Brian
ok AAHZ, fess up - what did you send to list that you meant to be
private? and just how much trouble did you get into? ;-)
ann
On 7/17/2013 13:44, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 17, 2013, at 09:25 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
More
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ok AAHZ, fess up - what did you send to list that you meant to be
private? and just how much trouble did you get into? ;-)
Not me! It was Zos!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
*
ooops - make that _Stan's_ overying dragonfly --
did I mention I'm _still_ recovering from sedation?
(Now I wonder how long I can get away with using that as an excuse!)
ann
On 7/17/2013 13:48, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish I had a hovering dragonfly, but I don't.
There are,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:44:03AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 17, 2013, at 09:25 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on these days
I plead the 5th!
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ok AAHZ, fess up - what did you send to list that you meant to be
private? and just how much trouble did you get into? ;-)
Not me! It was Zos!
--
Hugs and
On 7/17/2013 11:21 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
OK, so you have a hungry, (but stupid wolf, because obviously it mistook
a man on a bicycle for a deer), chasing you, your survival rifle is
disassembled stored in it's stock in your backpack. Do you a.) while
riding as fast as you can, reach into your
On 17/07/2013 11:44 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 17, 2013, at 09:25 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on these days are set that way,
On 7/17/2013 12:54 PM, Tom C wrote:
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
I don't think the problem is quite as bad you you think. Yes, people
who know that Pentax exists, or even still exists, and who pay attention,
recognize it as a bargain brand. However, I think that half of the 87
people
I have bought from Joe before, good to deal with, he'll be back
Dave
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like Joe is off in LA LA land anyways. Earth to Joe! :P
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Good. Wouldn't
He's older, I'm not semi retired, I'm under employed, and I'd like to
say I'm curmudgeonly from years of dealing with a--holes in software
development racket, but actual, I was born that way.
On 7/17/2013 1:15 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
PJ,
I met Eric as he was winding down his career in camera
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
I've seen online that people who compare the 50-200 to the 55-300 universally
proclaim that the 55-300 is much better.
I only have the 50-200 and feel it is better.
I am not a HUGE zoom user, but I discovered this
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, P.J. Alling wrote:
[...] I'm not semi retired, I'm under employed, and I'd like to say
I'm curmudgeonly from years of dealing with a--holes in software
development racket, but actual, I was born that way.
How many of us resemble that remark?
raises hand
--
Hugs and
on 2013-07-17 13:09 Aahz Maruch wrote
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, P.J. Alling wrote:
[...] I'm not semi retired, I'm under employed, and I'd like to say
I'm curmudgeonly from years of dealing with a--holes in software
development racket, but actual, I was born that way.
How many of us resemble
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I first read the subject line as ... on a Cat's tail :-)
...and I read it as Swallowing a cat's tail...
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
Help a
and someday, if I live long enough, I'll learn to type.
On 7/17/2013 2:55 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
He's older, I'm not semi retired, I'm under employed, and I'd like to
say I'm curmudgeonly from years of dealing with a--holes in software
development racket, but actual, I was born that way.
On
Very nice collection of birds etc. I like the mood of the BW boat, I
like the 4th one with duck clear water and appreciate the eagle photo
after my many failures.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:51:28 -0400
From: Stan Halpins...@stans-photography.info
To:
Very nice especially thru glass unless you've taken up scuba. Shafts of
light add a lot of interest.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 01:13:20 -0400
From: Daniel J. Matyoladanmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: SHARK!
And plus one for me. Love the light.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:20:40 -0400
From: Bruce Walkerbruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Stained Glass and Stone
Message-ID:
I've found that the combitation of having met a number of the members of
this list combined with the fact that anything I send will be read by
them tends to keep some of my less savoury posting habits in check.
bill
You have savoury posting habits also then, I take it?
:)
Tom C.
--
PDML
Tom, you have to ask, even after meeting Bill in person?
On 7/17/2013 3:34 PM, Tom C wrote:
I've found that the combitation of having met a number of the members of
this list combined with the fact that anything I send will be read by
them tends to keep some of my less savoury posting habits in
Lens Repair Rates (per hour):
If you watch us.. $55
If you give us advice$65
If you help or assist us$75
If you worked on it before...$150
Frankly, my first thought is that this can't be that pricey or hard to
find of a lens and that replacement would be
On 17/07/2013 1:34 PM, Tom C wrote:
I've found that the combitation of having met a number of the members of
this list combined with the fact that anything I send will be read by
them tends to keep some of my less savoury posting habits in check.
bill
You have savoury posting habits also then,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:43 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
My experience with handguns is somewhat limited.
When I first joined the National Guard I was in an aviation unit the
issue side arm was a SW .38 cal revolver.
I transferred out of the aviation unit when we got back from
On 7/17/2013 13:54, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ok AAHZ, fess up - what did you send to list that you meant to be
private? and just how much trouble did you get into? ;-)
Not me! It was Zos!
So does that mean you are totally guilt free?
ann
--
PDML
But we do have the archives, ya know
ann
On 7/17/2013 13:58, Zos Xavius wrote:
I plead the 5th!
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ok AAHZ, fess up - what did you send to list that you meant to be
private? and just
Gee was that supposed to be off-list???
ann
On 7/17/2013 15:47, Bill wrote:
On 17/07/2013 1:34 PM, Tom C wrote:
I've found that the combitation of having met a number of the members of
this list combined with the fact that anything I send will be read by
them tends to keep some of my less
The, relatively beat up cosmetically, copy that Boris found on Pentax
fora had an asking price of $200.00. Even having suffered a drop to a
concrete floor the version I have /looks/ like it's in better shape.
The entire problem seems to be that it struck the floor mount first, the
rear lens
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/17/2013 13:54, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ok AAHZ, fess up - what did you send to list that you meant to be
private? and just how much trouble did you get into? ;-)
Not me! It was Zos!
So does that mean you
This is a list. Posting has been this way for 10+ years.
Show me another list that doesn't respond to everyone.
Pentax Forum sure doesn't post your reply only to the original sender.
We like the way this works. Get used to it!
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Aahz Maruch
Caught this guy on my deck looking for lunch
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17465095
K20D 300mm FA 800 ISO
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
on 2013-07-17 11:44 Aahz Maruch wrote
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
reply-to-list is preferred when it's... a list!
Then why have almost all lists switched to reply-to-sender?
i'm not aware that they have … it is still pretty common in some realms, but
reply-to-sender is
One of those opportunities for which you're skillfully prepared.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: kwal...@peoplepc.com kwal...@peoplepc.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:14 PM
Subject: PESO - 'Sharp-shinned Hawek
Caught this guy on my
Ken,
Very nice. Did you add grain to the background?
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:14 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Caught this guy on my deck looking for lunch
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17465095
K20D 300mm FA 800 ISO
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
Thanks, Don.
Well, I am a scuba diver, but my K-r isn't water-tight enough to use
it down there. G I have a SeaLife Reef Master Digital that I use
when diving. I may have shown a few of my sea turtle images here that
were taken with that camera.
This image was taken from the tunnel inside
What do you me us kimo sabe?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: Help request, who knows a lens repair service that will
evenlook at older third party lenses?
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, P.J.
Thanks Jack, but actually not - I didn't have my 600 set up for a tight head
shot!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Sharp-shinned Hawek
One of those opportunities for which
Last week, I had the opportunity to shoot newborn twins. As a
photographer, as a mother of 3, I thought I was up to the challenge...
HA!
My visions for smooshy faces, peaceful swaddled bundles, teeny bare
bottoms... were no match for fussy 2 week olds with tummy trouble
(reflux, milk allergies)
Very nice. Did you add grain to the background?
Thanks Bob. The grain was automatically added by using the K20D @ 800!
The background was rendered that way by using the 300 FA @ f/4.5
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bob
On Jul 16, 2013, at 21:51 , Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Just added a couple more portraits to my gallery of shots from my ongoing
vacation - had both a bald eagle and a loon come by for a sitting along
with the usual families of ducks passing through.
Stan,
I don't know if you have enough detail for this, but you could push
that eagle farther.
Bob
Subject: Pentax K-5 II s handles back lit situations...
Pentax K-5 II s handles back lit situations nicely. ISO 200 and
DA60-250 and 250mm @ f11 and 1/100. see original and adjusted in LR5
by 1.55
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
