It works beautifully with absolutely no glitches at all.
System Summary:
Linux Mint. Chrome and Firefox.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
Thank you very much, Steve. And thank you Alan, Paul, Marco, Larry,
Attila, and all who looked.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
https://500px.com/photo/95981993/gothic-geisha-(bw)-by-bruce-walker
How about you?
YES PLEASE. Fantastic portrait. Love
... just about! This goes way beyond your usual review and (if you
aren't the kind to want to read the manual that came with your K-3)
this guy highlights a lot of the K-3s capabilities (many of which you
may not have realized even existed). 37 minutes, but definitely worth
watching if you own a
I'm sure that changes to copyright law have made all of this quite
complicated, however, if you own the original slide, you have defacto
copyright. If there is no commercial value to the image it won't be in
anyone's interest to challenge it.
On 1/20/2015 1:18 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Odd
Thanks Larry. Easier to show than tell, so here is a graphic I made of
the set-up I used.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/15706498803/
I now also have a SkyView Pro german equatorial mount with dual DC
drives and Intelliscope (push-to) computer, which I hope to get out
with and try
Odd copyright question first.
Some many years ago, my late father was mildly into photography.
A friend of his copied a picture of a mutual acquaintance (no idea who he
was) which dated from the '30s on slide film, sometime in the early '60s.
This friend died about ten years later, and his son
From a walk through Center City Philly:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17950352
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
G'day all
I haven't posted a cat photo for yonks so here's one I came across in
San Francisco in 2013.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP0424-Q-1peso.html
http://tinyurl.com/nqrhle6
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney
I just scanned 30 60-year-old BW prints for a magazine article. Used my Epson
500 then fine tuned them in PhotoShop. Excellent results.
On Jan 20, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding your copying of BW photos (some of which are curling...
If you think that
Nicely seen but for the inclusion of the tree branch at the top and the
proximity of the arch to the top edge.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - No. 325
From a walk through
That's an entrance with character. Well observed, Rick.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote:
From a walk through Center City Philly:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17950352
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 1/20/2015 2:53 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
I'm sure that changes to copyright law have made all of this quite
complicated, however, if you own the original slide, you have defacto
copyright. If there is no commercial value to the image it won't be in
anyone's interest to
Also - If the prints are small you can place a group of them on a
flatbed scanner and scan the bunch as one image. If you have Photoshop
Elements there is a function to divide the group and save them as
individual images.
-p
On 1/20/2015 12:18 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Odd copyright
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17951251size=md
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
This information applies to the United States. Since the image under
discussion was taken in the 1930s, the copyright exists until 50 years
after the photographer’s death. Photographs taken after 1989 are
copyrighted until 70 years after the photographer dies.
Carolyn E. Wright (aka The
John wrote:
For a definitive answer, you really need a lawyer.
But, I'm pretty sure current law is that copyright protection for old
photos is life of the author + 70 years. So whoever took the photo
owns the copyright and/or his heirs own it for 70 years after his
death.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I just scanned 30 60-year-old BW prints for a magazine article. Used my
Epson 500 then fine tuned them in PhotoShop. Excellent results.
Impressive they came up with enough quality for a magazine. OK, I can see
which way this is going
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Paul wrote:
Also - If the prints are small you can place a group of them on a
flatbed scanner and scan the bunch as one image. If you have Photoshop
Elements there is a function to divide the group and save them as
individual images.
That may be the winning point. Having seen a review of
Yolanda Rowe wrote:
This information applies to the United States. Since the image under
discussion was taken in the 1930s, the copyright exists until 50 years
after the photographer’s death. Photographs taken after 1989 are
copyrighted until 70 years after the photographer dies.
Carolyn
Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
I haven't posted a cat photo for yonks so here's one I came across in
San Francisco in 2013.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP0424-Q-
1peso.html
http://tinyurl.com/nqrhle6
I love cat pictures, so I enjoyed this.
What I also
Very engaging image - it has a great sense of depth to it - the
foreground in particular gives the sense of walking right into the scene.
Mark
On 1/18/2015 4:24 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
From Saturday morning's walk in the park ...
https://flic.kr/p/qQV8do
Thanks for looking. Comments
Published works created before 1923 are automatically in the public
domain. For unpublished works created before 1932 and all works
created after 1923, copyright expires 50-70 years (depending on the
country) after the death of the author.
In practical terms, though, no one's going to come after
Regarding your copying of BW photos (some of which are curling...
If you think that scanning would be a long job, I assure you that
copying them with a camera will be just as long, if not longer. For
those that don't lie flat, you will need to position them under glass.
That glass will need to be
Corrected version below (I had to change the middle 1932 to 1923):
Published works created before 1923 are automatically in the public
domain. For unpublished works created before 1923 and all works
created after 1923, copyright expires 50-70 years (depending on the
country) after the death of
Mark Roberts wrote:
Published works created before 1923 are automatically in the public
domain. For unpublished works created before 1932 and all works created
after 1923, copyright expires 50-70 years (depending on the
country) after the death of the author.
In practical terms, though, no
P.J. Alling wrote:
I'm sure that changes to copyright law have made all of this quite
complicated, however, if you own the original slide, you have defacto
copyright. If there is no commercial value to the image it won't be in
anyone's interest to challenge it.
Thanks. I've tried to take a
Darren Addy wrote:
Regarding your copying of BW photos (some of which are curling...
If you think that scanning would be a long job, I assure you that
copying them with a camera will be just as long, if not longer. For
those that don't lie flat, you will need to position them under glass.
27 matches
Mail list logo