On Tue, Feb 28, 2017, at 09:28 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
> Mark C wrote:
>
> I like a larger camera but a small camera and grip can wind up being a
> very
> comfortable size. I really like the Mz-S plus grip and like the film *ist
> (even smaller than the Mz-S) and grip. It might be worth a try.
>
I really liked this one:
http://odlp-staging1.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2017/02/e8f5f1f6ee9c76c0c4c030ed6de52b56.jpg
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:12 PM, John Coyle wrote:
> Not Pentax - don't even know the camera used, but just plain great photography
> .
>
>
On 2/27/2017 11:48 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
My God, the thing is hge!!
Must be a Trump lens.
Will it make America GREAT again?
I think they are working on making Vietnam great again.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Not Pentax - don't even know the camera used, but just plain great photography
.
http://www.loeildelaphotographie.com/en/2017/02/27/article/159939913/nicolas-dhervillers-detachment/
John in Brisbane
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark C wrote:
I like a larger camera but a small camera and grip can wind up being a very
comfortable size. I really like the Mz-S plus grip and like the film *ist
(even smaller than the Mz-S) and grip. It might be worth a try.
+++
Noted. The only grip I'm familiar with
Undoubtly they kept these with FF in mind. Both lenses are very useful
on the K-1.
Henk
Op 2017-02-27 om 16:21 schreef Collin Brendemuehl:
It's been how many years and they're still displaying the FA50/1.4 &
FA35/2AL?
Old tech. Good tech, but old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Whether you need to worry about CRI or not depends on how fussy you
are. If you are shooting products (including fashion) for a living you
would (or should, anyway) be fussy and CRI is critical. Also if you
shoot people and like your skin tones to be well rendered, or natural.
So if you find that
I like a larger camera but a small camera and grip can wind up being a
very comfortable size. I really like the Mz-S plus grip and like the
film *ist (even smaller than the Mz-S) and grip. It might be worth a try.
On 2/27/2017 11:35 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
I thought you might be amused to
I'm pretty sure it's the bus speed of the camera. Everything I've read
about it implies that the K-1 can only take advantage of a middling fast
card. I think the best high speed Pentax is the K-3 or K-3II maybe the
KP will clear it's buffer faster, or equal the K-3 with better
autofocus, but
APS-C mode is lower resolution and the buffer doesn't fill rapidly. I don't
machine gun critters but I frequently shoot more than a dozen shots in rapid
succession. But even in full frame mode I can shoot at a pretty good pace. I
use two 95 mb/s sandisk extreme pro 64 gb cards with the camera
Does anyone here have advice about selecting LED lights for studio work?
I've tried several consumer bands with mixed results. I understand that
the color rendering index (CRI) rating is supposed indicate how well
the bulb displays colors, but my experience so far has not shows any
strong
I'd be happy if they would just do some sort of binning where they
added/averaged two or four pixels together, and gave me a lower
resolution mode that could keep up with the action. There may be
photographers that can photograph a swing jam where people are dancing
and showing off to 200 BPM
Very nice. Ginger and Hawaii are a classic pairing. I like th shape.
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Thanks, Malcolm and Alan.
>
> Yes, most red ginger grow straight as an arrow (or an arrow head.). Most
> grow in the sun. This plant was in a
Thanks, Malcolm and Alan.
Yes, most red ginger grow straight as an arrow (or an arrow head.). Most
grow in the sun. This plant was in a shaded area between a condo building
and a covered walkway. Still, most of the ones growing in that location
were still quite straight. This was an
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 11:00 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> On 2/24/2017 7:37 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Bill wrote:
>>> It looks like Ricoh is serious. Now they are planning a D FA★ 85mm F1.4.
>>> Fun times.
>>>
>>>
My God, the thing is hge!!
Must be a Trump lens.
Will it make America GREAT again?
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 2/25/2017 10:00 PM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 2/24/2017 7:37 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill wrote:
>>>
It looks
Interesting, Dan. Something must have interfered with the development of
that raceme. All the ones I have seen are straight.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Curvaceous
Alpinia
I thought you might be amused to hear I got an e-mail telling me that a grip
for said camera will shortly be available at £259. A practical item, but
rather makes the small camera sales pitch redundant, and yet another camera
specific part.
Only the large grip works for me. Despite comments,
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Alpinia purpurata specimen on the grounds of the Kamaole Sands Resort on
Maui.
There were many red ginger blooms, but the graceful curves on this one
caught my eye.
https://www.photo.net/photo/18355680/Ginger
K-5 IIs, smc FA 100mm Macro F2.8
Comments are invited and
Well they all have internal focusing motors and probably internal
aperture motors. Those will take up a certian amount of room. Then
there's the extra lens elements to correct for sharpness robbing
aberrations. So be careful what you ask for I guess. Face it lenses
will be bigger. Sure it
Alpinia purpurata specimen on the grounds of the Kamaole Sands Resort on
Maui.
There were many red ginger blooms, but the graceful curves on this one
caught my eye.
https://www.photo.net/photo/18355680/Ginger
K-5 IIs, smc FA 100mm Macro F2.8
Comments are invited and appreciated.
Dan Matyola
As a developer I understand this. However there is a certain amount of
leeway allowed.
On 2/27/2017 10:30 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Tell it to Marketing.
Developers only do what they're told. :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Wow, what the hell happened? I think I'll stick with the smaller
lenses, even if manual.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 2/25/2017 10:00 PM, Bill wrote:
>>
>> On 2/24/2017 7:37 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill wrote:
It looks
I think they've been assembling it from the parts bins. Much as they
were building a lot of FA F and A lenses in the past.
On 2/27/2017 10:21 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
It's been how many years and they're still displaying the FA50/1.4 &
FA35/2AL?
Old tech. Good tech, but old.
--
Well the current metaphor in lenses is you must aim for ultimate
sharpness. If you look at all the new normal lenses from Sony, Canon,
Nikon, Zeiss, Sigma, even Samyang. Their new fast 50mm f1.4 lenses are
much larger than older designs. Because it takes a lot more correction
to make them
Thanks, Malcolm.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Malcolm Smith
wrote:
> Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Another Flower from the Orchid Wall at the Kamaole Sands resort, Kihei,
> Maui:
>
>
The new D FA lenses are large. The 24-70, 15-30 and 150-450 are all bigger than
what we’ve come to expect from Pentax. But they’re also superb performers. That
is much more important to me than size. My K-1 is big anyway, with a battery
pack and a quick release plate always attached. A large
Tell it to Marketing.
Developers only do what they're told. :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/55001392@N08/3233553/in/dateposted-public/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
When I see the phrase "Large Aperture Wide-Angle Single Focus Lens" on their
chart I think they're ignoring Sigma.
If such an offering would maintain the apparent (yes, assumed) quality
characteristics of the DFA*1.4/50 then they won't need Sigma.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It's been how many years and they're still displaying the FA50/1.4 &
FA35/2AL?
Old tech. Good tech, but old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
That DFA* 1.4/50 is obscenely large.
Of course that's just a mockup they showed as the distance window is
plugged.
Still, makes me wonder if Pentax is going to pull a Sony and go for the
prosumer market & less targeting the enthusiast.
I say that b/c the form factor / styling is reminiscent of the
"soon both the KP and K-1 will have access to sensor-shift stabilization in
video via a firmware update."
"At the show, Pentax released a new full-frame roadmap and announced plans
to soon launch premium D FA★ 50mm F1.4 and D FA★ 85mm F1.4 lenses. In
addition, a telephoto zoom (70-300mm or
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Another Flower from the Orchid Wall at the Kamaole Sands resort, Kihei,
Maui:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18357502/showy-orchid
K-5 IIs, smc FA 100 mm MACRO F2.8
Comments are invited
Fabulous Dan.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Richard Klein
wrote:
>
> https://books.google.com/books?id=rd0DMBAJ=
> PA84=beanstalks_pt=MAGAZINES=PA133#v=onepage=beanstalks=false
Hang on, you're on this list too??
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
35 matches
Mail list logo