RE: Living Large

Thanks to John for the ID, and Alan C for the comment. John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sent: Tuesday, 1 August 2017 4:24 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Living Large 1960 Cadillac Coupe

RE: Living Large

Thanks Jack - the guy in shades is driving, it's the angle which places the blonde, in the back seat, apparently close to him. She may also have been leaning forward. John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Jack Davis Sent: Monday,

Re: Lens hood for Viviter S1 600mm Solid Cat.

A vernier caliper can achieve a measurement of the inside diameter accurate to a tenth of a mm or better. It's an inexpensive measuring tool that I wouldn't be without. Paul via phone > On Jul 31, 2017, at 8:54 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > I don't remember if I

Lens hood for Viviter S1 600mm Solid Cat.

I don't remember if I ever posted this to the list, but I've been trying to find a lens hood for this lens, since I acquired it many years ago. When it was originally released sometime in the late 70's early 80's it was shipped with a lens hood, and has a large diameter front filter ring,

Re: (large) GESO, Oregon Ospreys

P. J. Alling wrote: Alright, a lot of those, and I haven't looked at more than a few, are very, very good. Thank you. I think I hate you. Spend some time with me, that'll remove all doubt. On 7/27/2017 4:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:

Re: (large) GESO, Oregon Ospreys

Alright, a lot of those, and I haven't looked at more than a few, are very, very good. I think I hate you. On 7/27/2017 4:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157686751461986 I apologize for the size (about 100 frames), I'm trying to work through a large

Re: Living Large

1960 Cadillac Coupe DeVille would be my guess. They changed the parking lights mounted in the bumper to a single unit each side in 1961 and made some changes to the grill. The tail-fins aren't big & flashy enough to be a 59. On 7/31/2017 04:26, Alan C wrote: Very cool. My guess is a Cadillac

Re: Solar photography filter

https://www.astrozap.com/scripts/prodList.asp?idCategory=30 On 7/30/2017 22:47, Larry Colen wrote: Has anyone done research for a good, and relatively inexpensive solar photography filter? I'd probably want 82mm for the bigma. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion

Re: PESO: Country Lane

Rick, I've found that Dan's links often append the 'K-5' from the next line into the URL for some reason. That may be the case here, in which case you can go to the address line of your browser and just delete those characters from the end and hit ENTER. -- Rich On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:25

Re: PESO: Passage

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > For some reason I'm getting error messages whenever I try opening your > Squarespace photos, Dan, whether on Safari or Firefox. For some reason Gmail is treating the "K-5" on the next line as part of the URL. -- PDML

Re: PESO: Passage

For some reason I'm getting error messages whenever I try opening your Squarespace photos, Dan, whether on Safari or Firefox. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > Thanks for looking, Paul! > > Dan Matyola >

Re: PESO: Country Lane

404 error. http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > Another from Auvers-sur-Oise: > http://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2017/7/29/country-lane > K-5 IIs, DA 18-135 F3.5-5.6 Zoom > Comments are invited > >

Re: PESO - Sunset on the Chicago River

Nice composition. J Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 31, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Very nice! > > Paul via phone > >> On Jul 30, 2017, at 10:58 PM, Christine Aguila wrote: >> >> That’s beautiful, Mark! And you’re right—Q image

Re: PESO - Sunset on the Chicago River

Very nice! Paul via phone > On Jul 30, 2017, at 10:58 PM, Christine Aguila wrote: > > That’s beautiful, Mark! And you’re right—Q image quality is not bad at all! >Cheers, Christine > > >> On Jul 30, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Mark C wrote: >>