I've been looking into that and it seems that all Pentax cameras that
have been tested recently have about a 36 mb/s write speed regardless of
how fast the card is, though they can't write faster than the card will
accept the data.
I got curious since I don't shoot Nikon, so I haven't been
The bus write speed on pretty much all recent Pentax cameras tops out at
about ~36 mb/s, maybe a little faster, but closer to rounding down than
to rounding up.
The claimed card speed of 85-90 mb/s is usually the read speed of the
card. Write speed is often less than half that, sometimes a
Nice shots. Couldn't you start a Bungee jumping siseline?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Rick Womer
Sent: 11 October, 2017 3:24 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESOs (2) - Tower Crane
The university is putting up a building next to the one my office is in.
They’re planning
The university is putting up a building next to the one my office is in.
They’re planning to fill it with people wearing suits, and it’s going to block
part of the view from my 10th floor office.
Anyway, it’s not often that one is on the same level as a tower crane. So, here
is a view from a
Brian Walters wrote:
On 11 October 2017 at 09:48 "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
Seems rather stupid to me.
Yeah - Yashica made some fine cameras back in the day. Now someone has bought
the rights to the name and is set on making it a laughing stock. Or maybe I'm a
bit
> On 11 October 2017 at 09:48 "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
>
>
> Seems rather stupid to me.
Yeah - Yashica made some fine cameras back in the day. Now someone has bought
the rights to the name and is set on making it a laughing stock. Or maybe I'm a
bit too old to
Well, OK the K3ii has a thing for mikes. I'd try using a single point
sensor or, at least, one with fewer sensor points.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>> Hi, Larry. In what way is the K1
>> focusing better
I was looking at some photos I'd taken documenting work on the house,
and these four actually seemed kind of nice as photos in their own right
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157686060062362
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML
Seems rather stupid to me.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Brian Walters
wrote:
> The Yashica Y35
>
> https://petapixel.com/2017/10/10/yashica-y35-digifilm-
> camera-faux-film-rolls/
>
> Apparently already
It's just mind boggling how much stupid there is to go around.
And after a pause for a good head shake, back to normal life -- or so I hope.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> The Yashica Y35
>
>
Larry Colen wrote:
Mark C wrote:
FWIW - I just ran some tests with my K1 shooting DNGS and it takes 27 to
28 seconds to clear the buffer. It probably feels like 5 minutes when
Is that 27-28 seconds with a full buffer, or one shot?
Full buffer - about 17 DNGS in continuous shooting mode high
The Yashica Y35
https://petapixel.com/2017/10/10/yashica-y35-digifilm-camera-faux-film-rolls/
Apparently already reached its Kickstarter goal.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Mark C wrote:
FWIW - I just ran some tests with my K1 shooting DNGS and it takes 27 to
28 seconds to clear the buffer. It probably feels like 5 minutes when
things are happening, though. I'm using 64 gig Sandisk Extreme Pro UHS-I
cards, rated for 90 mb/sec write speeds. The are much faster
Mark C wrote:
FWIW - I just ran some tests with my K1 shooting DNGS and it takes 27 to
28 seconds to clear the buffer. It probably feels like 5 minutes when
Is that 27-28 seconds with a full buffer, or one shot?
things are happening, though. I'm using 64 gig Sandisk Extreme Pro UHS-I
Jack Davis wrote:
Hi, Larry. In what way is the K1
focusing better or faster than the
K3ii? Thanks!
The biggest way for me is that it doesn't obsesses over microphones the
way the K-3 does. For example only a few of my musician photos from last
weekend have the microphone rather than the
Doh autocorrect. "I agree about the focus points being too central"
Paul via phone
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> I'll bet your cards are slow. I shoot football, including action sequences
> and have no buffer problems. I use Sandisk Extreme Pro
FWIW - I just ran some tests with my K1 shooting DNGS and it takes 27 to
28 seconds to clear the buffer. It probably feels like 5 minutes when
things are happening, though. I'm using 64 gig Sandisk Extreme Pro UHS-I
cards, rated for 90 mb/sec write speeds. The are much faster cards out
there
Bruce Walker wrote:
Are you quite certain you are using a fast enough SD card, and is
Mostly Sandisk, all of my (regular) cards are 80-95 MB/s.
there any possibility that you might have enabled any processing
feature(s) that could be slowing things up?
Thanks for the clue. I thought I
I'll bet your cards are slow. I shoot football, including action sequences and
have no buffer problems. I use Sandisk Extreme Pro 64 gig cards. And set the
camera to record on both simultaneously. I agree about the focus pound before
BH too central but it's not a big problem with sports work in
Hi, Larry. In what way is the K1
focusing better or faster than the
K3ii? Thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 1:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> In many many ways the K-1 is an amazing camera. If all I did was portraits,
> landscapes and still lifes it would
Are you quite certain you are using a fast enough SD card, and is
there any possibility that you might have enabled any processing
feature(s) that could be slowing things up?
Even with the much larger 645Z files I have _never_ encountered
anything like what you describe. If I had, I would have
In many many ways the K-1 is an amazing camera. If all I did was
portraits, landscapes and still lifes it would be damn near unbeatable,
especially for the price.
However, for action photography, it can really suck donkey balls. The
focusing is a huge improvement over the K-3ii, but the focus
I keep looking at one for my K-5II. They are supposed to be very sharp,
comparable to the newish Zeiss Milvus 15mm optically.
The only problem with the Samyang is it has a bit more distortion.
On an APS-C sensor it's moderate but correctable barrel distortion, but
on FF it's mustache
On 10/10/17, Jos de Fotograaf, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Dear group,
>I am considering Samyang 14/2.8 for my K1.
>Any comments?
I have the 12/2 I use on my Olympus 4/3rds (Pen F) and it's a good lens. The
focus ring is a bit stiff, but I like that as I tend to use it has either a
treet lens
Dear group,
I am considering Samyang 14/2.8 for my K1.
Any comments?
Greetz, Jos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Yes, Jack, it was.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Dan, is that where your son was
> contemplating the terracotta
> carving?
>
> J
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 9, 2017, at 11:12 AM,
One, on the left, is dialing; the other two were definitely taking images
and quite serious about it.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Mazybe they were dialing a friend..
>
> Kenneth Waller
Thanks, Paul, Ken and Larry.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Paul Stenquist
wrote:
> It minimizing DOF is perhaps more important as it can smooth out even
> somewhat busy backgrounds.
>
> Paul via phone
>
>
28 matches
Mail list logo