Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote on 7/18/18 8:31 PM:
?? 200 dpi ?? A 200 dpi scan of a 6x7 negative is barely a 0.2 Mpixel output
file.
You're right, I slipped a decimal place, a common hazard with slipsticks.
A typical good scan of a 6x7 negative in a proper film scanner should be at
between
?? 200 dpi ?? A 200 dpi scan of a 6x7 negative is barely a 0.2 Mpixel output
file.
A typical good scan of a 6x7 negative in a proper film scanner should be at
between 2400 and 4000 ppi, netting approximately 5480x6330 pixels (35Mpixel) to
9130x10550 pixels (96 MPixel) resolution.
"...the
Just using the camera is a great experience. Enjoy!
Paul
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 11:02 PM, l...@red4est.com wrote:
>
> Interesting. The price was right, I'm borrowing it from my next door neighbor.
>
>> On July 18, 2018 7:24:38 PM PDT, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> A clunker. The primes are largely
Interesting. The price was right, I'm borrowing it from my next door neighbor.
On July 18, 2018 7:24:38 PM PDT, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>A clunker. The primes are largely excellent.
>
>Paul
>
>> On Jul 18, 2018, at 10:19 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul Stenquist wrote on 7/18/18 6:58
A clunker. The primes are largely excellent.
Paul
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 10:19 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote on 7/18/18 6:58 PM:
>> What lens was mounted? With the better 6x7 lenses image quality is superb.
>
> 55-100 f.4.5
>
> --
> Larry Colen
Paul Stenquist wrote on 7/18/18 6:58 PM:
What lens was mounted? With the better 6x7 lenses image quality is superb.
55-100 f.4.5
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612824732477/
--
PDML
What lens was mounted? With the better 6x7 lenses image quality is superb.
Paul
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Last year I was given a Pentax 67, it took me until a couple weeks ago to
> finish the first roll of Porta 400. Unfortunately, when Bay scanned it, they
>
Last year I was given a Pentax 67, it took me until a couple weeks ago
to finish the first roll of Porta 400. Unfortunately, when Bay scanned
it, they scanned it square, so I need to bring it in for rescanning.
Here are the photos with the horizon straightened, color balance and
exposure
Jostein wrote on 7/17/18 4:42 AM:
http://www.alunfoto.no/innhold/hageeitermaur/
Great job
Jostein
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612824732477/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hmm how close did you look to determine the sex?
ann
On 7/18/2018 5:58 PM, Jostein wrote:
Thanks Jack, Subash, Steve, Ann and Dan.
Steve, it's indeed a mug shot. I needed to get a really close look at
its facial features to determine the species. :-)
Ann, this is a male ant. It's the
Thank you very much
On July 18, 2018 3:13:08 PM PDT, Mark C wrote:
>These latest images, along with your earlier posts, are outstanding.
>The pano showing the arc of the milky way is particularly impressive.
>
>Mark
>
>On 7/17/2018 6:13 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> First few are the ones I've
On 7/18/2018 3:01 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Does the pentax software that comes with the k=5 lls do a decent job of
converting
the RAW .pef files to jpgs?
If not, what do you recommend?
i cant use photoshop as i use adobe CS2 ACR
which isnt compatible with the camers's files.
jco
John,
These latest images, along with your earlier posts, are outstanding.
The pano showing the arc of the milky way is particularly impressive.
Mark
On 7/17/2018 6:13 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
First few are the ones I've already shown, taken from the town of
Mount Shasta.
The next few are shot from
Try setting the camera to output DNG files, or using Adobe DNG Converter to
convert the PEF files to a DNG format supported by the CS2 version of Camera
Raw.
G
—
No matter where you go, there you are.
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 2:01 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> Does the pentax software that
I think she is s secret subscriber to the list just for moments like this.
Anyway I appear to be under an NDA for a couple of days so please forget
you read this.
bill
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 3:15 PM Steve Cottrell, wrote:
> On 18/7/18, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Now I need
Thanks Jack, Subash, Steve, Ann and Dan.
Steve, it's indeed a mug shot. I needed to get a really close look at
its facial features to determine the species. :-)
Ann, this is a male ant. It's the females that are stingers, just
sayin'. :-)
Jostein
Den 17.07.2018 13:42, skrev Jostein:
Coming through loud and clear, JC.
> On 18 July 2018 at 21:04 "J.C. O'Connell" wrote:
>
>
> Larry, could you please forward this email to the list?
>
>
> To list administrator: why do my posts keep bouncing off the server
> and are being returned to me unposted?
> jco
>
> hifis...@gate.net
Hi Jos,
You are deeper into the code than I have ever ventured, but I know that
Adobe needs to decode the so-called Makernote-tags in EXIF to extract
info about lenses.
I know from experience that some lens codes between Sigma and Pentax
overlap, so maybe the .dll contains code to try to
I use Lightroom 6
On July 18, 2018 2:01:54 PM PDT, "J.C. O'Connell" wrote:
>Does the pentax software that comes with the k=5 lls do a decent job of
>
>converting
>the RAW .pef files to jpgs?
>
>If not, what do you recommend?
>
>i cant use photoshop as i use adobe CS2 ACR
>which isnt compatible
I've not used CS2 but if it will read DNG files just set your new camera
to save your raw files as DNG instead of PEF. If all you want to do is
convert to JPGs or TIFFs, Faststone or Irfanview will do that for you
and they're free. OTOH, the latest version of Photoshop Elements is
probably
On 18/7/18, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Now I need to figure out how to sneak it into the house.
Rest assured, she will find out. You know it's just a matter of time.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live Broadcast News
--
Does the pentax software that comes with the k=5 lls do a decent job of
converting
the RAW .pef files to jpgs?
If not, what do you recommend?
i cant use photoshop as i use adobe CS2 ACR
which isnt compatible with the camers's files.
jco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Its here!
Now I need to figure out how to sneak it into the house.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention, the istDS was a CCD sensor, the K-5 IIs
is a CMOS sensor, more refined.
jco
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:18:04 -0400, Darren Addy
wrote:
Congrats on the K-5IIs, J.C.
An excellent choice. You are gonna be DELIGHTED with the images you
get, compared to your istDS!
J.C. O'Connell wrote on 7/18/18 1:04 PM:
Larry, could you please forward this email to the list?
Sure thing.
To list administrator: why do my posts keep bouncing off the server
and are being returned to me unposted?
jco
hifis...@gate.net
sorry for the off topic post
--
Larry Colen
Forwarded Message
Subject: bouncing messages
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:04:43 -0400
From: J.C. O'Connell
To: pdml@pdml.net, Larry Colen
Larry, could you please forward this email to the list?
To list administrator: why do my posts keep bouncing off the server
and are
ann sanfedele wrote on 7/18/18 11:56 AM:
You know me, I like others in the series better than the sun in your
face one... :-)
where it is more about the water than the sun - like this.
20180708-LRC93290
and
20180708-LRC93255
As it turns out, 255 is the one I just started uploading to
Larry, could you please forward this email to the list?
To list administrator: why do my posts keep bouncing off the server
and are being returned to me unposted?
jco
hifis...@gate.net
sorry for the off topic post
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
J.C. O'Connell wrote on 7/18/18 12:26 PM:
Thanks. And beauty part is, I didnt have to sell off any of my many
choice prime K and A
lenses to finance it. The only way I could have swung a K-1 would have
been by doing just that.
jco
The improvement in image quality between the ist and the
Thanks. And beauty part is, I didnt have to sell off any of my many choice
prime K and A
lenses to finance it. The only way I could have swung a K-1 would have
been by doing just that.
jco
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:58:31 -0400, Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
I love my K-5 IIs, and I think and
Congrats on the K-5IIs, J.C.
An excellent choice. You are gonna be DELIGHTED with the images you
get, compared to your istDS!
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Should be a nice competent rig, JC.
> Sounds like a lucky find.
> Hope so!
> J
> Sent from
Thanks, Larry and Paul.
That is one of the background cloths from my "Photo Studio in a Box."
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> That is a really cool shot. Also a nice use of the background.
>
> Daniel J.
That image should be blown up and hung on a wall.
You should be drawn and quartered.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Daniel J. Matyola wrote on 7/18/18 6:41 AM:
>
>> That image needs to be blown up and
I love my K-5 IIs, and I think and hope you will like it very much as well.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:51 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
> They also offered me a five year parts and labor warranty
> with no deductable for $32 which
You know me, I like others in the series better than the sun in your
face one... :-)
where it is more about the water than the sun - like this.
20180708-LRC93290
and
20180708-LRC93255
These made me go and look at what you put in the July PUG.. to discover
that you didn't put one in
ann
They also offered me a five year parts and labor warranty
with no deductable for $32 which seems like a good deal on
an electronic camera. Assuming the camera checks out ok when
I get it, I just might take em up on that deal too.
jco
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:24:25 -0400, Jack Davis
wrote:
Excellent!
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> That is a really cool shot. Also a nice use of the background.
>
> Daniel J. Matyola wrote on 7/18/18 6:50 AM:
>> Thanks, Eric.
>> Here is the correct link:
>>
That is a really cool shot. Also a nice use of the background.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote on 7/18/18 6:50 AM:
Thanks, Eric.
Here is the correct link:
http://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2018/7/18/metamorphosis
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On
Daniel J. Matyola wrote on 7/18/18 6:41 AM:
That image needs to be blown up and hung on a wall.
Thank you. It's nice when people say my photos should be hung and
blown up rather than me. :-)
I was told that the trick for photographing Thor's well is to get there
when the high tide is
They do resemble the Monarchs of North America. That is because they
belong to the same genus, danaus.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote:
> i just looked up tiger swallowtails and that is not what we have here.
>
Should be a nice competent rig, JC.
Sounds like a lucky find.
Hope so!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 8:09 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> Well after 12 years of service, I finally upgraded my istDS body.
> I just ordered a like new (under 100 shutter count) K-5 IIs in the box.
> I
Well after 12 years of service, I finally upgraded my istDS body.
I just ordered a like new (under 100 shutter count) K-5 IIs in the box.
I will be getting wider ISO range, higher usable ISO, better AF, larger
color LCD, shake reduction, live view, movie mode, and nearly triple the
resolutiion
i just looked up tiger swallowtails and that is not what we have here.
i was referring to the striped tiger:
http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/sp/699/Danaus-genutia
and a variation common plain tiger:
http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/sp/744/Danaus-chrysippus
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:53:12 -0400
super shots
Dave
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> First few are the ones I've already shown, taken from the town of Mount
> Shasta.
> The next few are shot from an I-5 vista point just after entering
> California.
> The last few are from Louise road a few miles north of
theyre all very nice imho. jco
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:15:51 -0400, Ken Waller
wrote:
Nice captures Larry.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Subject: final set from 3 milky way + mount shasta shoots
First few are the ones I've already shown, taken from the town of Mount
Nice captures Larry.
-Original Message-
>From: Larry Colen
>Subject: final set from 3 milky way + mount shasta shoots
>
>First few are the ones I've already shown, taken from the town of Mount
>Shasta.
>The next few are shot from an I-5 vista point just after entering
>California.
Thanks, Subash.
Monarchs are much different from Tiger Swallowtails, if that is what you
have there. They migrate to Mexico on the East Coast of North America and
to Central California on the West Coast, spend the winter there, and then
fly North, spawning several generations before their
Thanks, Eric.
Here is the correct link:
http://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2018/7/18/metamorphosis
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Eric Featherstone <
eric.featherst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18 July 2018 at
That's a very fine collection!
91387 is absolutely stunning. My favorite, however, is 90230; the
textures are excellent. I also really like 90518; simple, well-composed
and surprisingly pleasing to the eye.
You had a great month, dude!
Dan Matyola
That image needs to be blown up and hung on a wall.
Just a perfect sunset shot.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> From Cape Perpetua in Yachats Oregon, four miles South of where my Mom
> lived until we needed to
very nice. looks a bit like the striped tigers found here...
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 7:09 PM Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
> My monarchs have emerged from their chrysalises. Most of it happened while
> I was at work, but I did get to enjoy the first moments of their lives as
> butterflies.
>
> As I
Dear group,
I was looking into the cameraraw.dll file to correct the lensname of
some of my SIGMA lenses.
I noticed that there are lensnames for Pentax, Sigma, Tamron and some
more brands, but not for Canon or Nikon.
My question is: how is the lensnaming for Canon and Nikon applied in
On 18 July 2018 at 05:27, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> In this image, one can see the butterfly's wing developing within the
> Chrysalis:
>
> http://danmatyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolaspesos/2018/7/18/metamorphosis
>
> K-5 IIs, FA 100 mm Macro F 2.8
> Comments are invited.
Two missing hypens
All your tests arrived in my spam folder. Probably more of an issue here than
there but you were never one of the regulars until now. Replies appear in the
inbox, except the ones from you.
> On 17 July 2018 at 01:52 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
> revised config
> test again
>
> G
>
> --
54 matches
Mail list logo
