Re: Anyone for a PDML Glasgow meet in August?

I'll be in Edinburgh for the festival with some friends 9-14 August. We'll mostly be rushing between shows, or at shows, but if your plans overlap we may be able to grab a coffee or something. Bob > On 20 Feb 2020, at 03:12, Mark Roberts wrote: > > Lisa's just been invited to speak at a

Re: Current Camera Line

> On 19 February 2020 at 22:16 ann sanfedele wrote: > > > I found his reference to be a /British /Sci_fi TV show from the > 1960's..  What I read about it just now informed that it would continue > to be a lacuna.. too creepy for me these days.   I don't know if I would > have watched it in

Re: Anyone for a PDML Glasgow meet in August?

> On 20 February 2020 at 03:12 Mark Roberts wrote: > > > Lisa's just been invited to speak at a conference in Glasgow in late > August so it seems we're doing a trip to Scotland this year. Details > to follow. But I'm really looking forward to it. No detailed plans > yet. Entirely feasible.

Re: Current Camera Line

> On 20 February 2020 at 00:31 Bob Pdml wrote: > > > It was one of those era-defining TV programmes. In 1967/8, when I was 10 and > surrounded by images of Vietnam, the Beatles and flower power, the year > before I went away to school when my older brother and my sister were already >

Re: PESO bok choy

Now that I’m home and have a real computer rather than my phone. > On Feb 19, 2020, at 10:29 AM, Stanley Halpin > wrote: > > Of the set I prefer the original (not B) 19976. Thanks. > > However, I am too analytical sometimes. When I see a quasi abstraction, I try > to figure out what I am

Re: Anyone for a PDML Glasgow meet in August?

> On Feb 19, 2020, at 7:12 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > > Lisa's just been invited to speak at a conference in Glasgow in late > August so it seems we're doing a trip to Scotland this year. Details > to follow. But I'm really looking forward to it. No detailed plans > yet. And to bring this back

Anyone for a PDML Glasgow meet in August?

Lisa's just been invited to speak at a conference in Glasgow in late August so it seems we're doing a trip to Scotland this year. Details to follow. But I'm really looking forward to it. No detailed plans yet. -- Mark Roberts - Photography and Multimedia www.robertstech.com 617-522-0174 --

Re: Current Camera Line

It was one of those era-defining TV programmes. In 1967/8, when I was 10 and surrounded by images of Vietnam, the Beatles and flower power, the year before I went away to school when my older brother and my sister were already away, my parents used to go out on a Friday evening leaving me to

Re: Current Camera Line

I found his reference to be a /British /Sci_fi TV show from the 1960's..  What I read about it just now informed that it would continue to be a lacuna.. too creepy for me these days.   I don't know if I would have watched it in the 60's .. I did fancy some sci-fi books. Between 1960 and 1980

Re: Current Camera Line

On February 19, 2020 1:24:04 PM PST, ann sanfedele wrote: >Mike showed  he got it... but I'm only seeing his mail because Mark >replied to it ... h > >I had to ask Google what Mark was quoting...  not in my data bank. > One of the best tv shows ever, definitely worth borrowing the DVDs to

Re: PESO bok choy

It's the grid on a soft box for my flash On February 19, 2020 10:29:43 AM PST, Stanley Halpin wrote: >Of the set I prefer the original (not B) 19976. > >However, I am too analytical sometimes. When I see a quasi abstraction, >I try to figure out what I am looking at. And get lost in that quest,

Re: Current Camera Line

> On 19 February 2020 at 21:15 Mark Roberts wrote: > > > mike wilson wrote: > > >> On 19 February 2020 at 19:40 ann sanfedele wrote: > >> > >> NUmber 5 is ALIVE! :-) > >> extra points if you get the cinematic reference) > > > >Short Circuit. From someone who is definitely not a number. >

Re: Current Camera Line

> On 19 February 2020 at 21:24 ann sanfedele wrote: > > > Mike showed  he got it... but I'm only seeing his mail because Mark > replied to it ... h It's OK. _I_ don't get to see my own posts. More gmail madness, I believe. > > I had to ask Google what Mark was quoting...  not in my

Re: Current Camera Line

Mike showed  he got it... but I'm only seeing his mail because Mark replied to it ... h I had to ask Google what Mark was quoting...  not in my data bank. ann On 2/19/2020 4:15 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: mike wilson wrote: On 19 February 2020 at 19:40 ann sanfedele wrote: NUmber 5 is

Re: Current Camera Line

mike wilson wrote: >> On 19 February 2020 at 19:40 ann sanfedele wrote: >> >> NUmber 5 is ALIVE! :-) >> extra points if you get the cinematic reference) > >Short Circuit. From someone who is definitely not a number. I AM NOT A NUMBER, I AM A FREE MAN! -- Mark Roberts - Photography &

Re: Current Camera Line

> On 19 February 2020 at 19:40 ann sanfedele wrote: > > > NUmber 5 is ALIVE! :-) > extra points if you get the cinematic reference) Short Circuit. From someone who is definitely not a number. > > MY K-5, a refurbished one, yet - is still performing nicely after almost > 7 years.  Ed, take

Re: Current Camera Line

NUmber 5 is ALIVE! :-) extra points if you get the cinematic reference) MY K-5, a refurbished one, yet - is still performing nicely after almost 7 years.  Ed, take Paul's ofer :-) ann On 2/19/2020 12:37 PM, Alan C wrote: K5's go on for ever! Alan C On 19-Feb-20 06:21 PM, Ed Keeney wrote:

Re: Test II - Sending from Yahoo to see if it comes back to Road Runner

I c u 2 On 2/19/2020 1:31 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote: It’s making it this far… On Feb 19, 2020, at 1:12 PM, John Sessoms wrote: Test, test, test ... thump thump thump ... 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... Is this thing on? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must

Re: Test: Is my email hosed again?

I see it. Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:11 PM John wrote: > I'll look to see if this gets back to Yahoo. > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never

Re: Test II - Sending from Yahoo to see if it comes back to Road Runner

It’s making it this far… > On Feb 19, 2020, at 1:12 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > > Test, test, test ... thump thump thump ... 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... > > Is this thing on? > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > > > -- > PDML

Re: PESO bok choy

Of the set I prefer the original (not B) 19976. However, I am too analytical sometimes. When I see a quasi abstraction, I try to figure out what I am looking at. And get lost in that quest, lose to an extent the chance to take in the whole image. So, in this case I get lost in trying to figure

Re: Test II - Sending from Yahoo to see if it comes back to Road Runner

John, I can see your message along with a note from Google (gmail) saying that it might be spam. Bulent. - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/

Test II - Sending from Yahoo to see if it comes back to Road Runner

Test, test, test ... thump thump thump ... 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... Is this thing on? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the

Test: Is my email hosed again?

I'll look to see if this gets back to Yahoo. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: Current Camera Line

I have a K-5 with battery pack that you can have for $200 plus shipping. Paul > On Feb 19, 2020, at 11:21 AM, Ed Keeney wrote: > > My K-50 has been acting up lately (again) and I figured I would look > at the current options for a replacement. > > Anyone have inside information if/when Pentax

Re: Current Camera Line

K5's go on for ever! Alan C On 19-Feb-20 06:21 PM, Ed Keeney wrote: My K-50 has been acting up lately (again) and I figured I would look at the current options for a replacement. Anyone have inside information if/when Pentax will be updating their line of cameras? The K-70 will be 4 years

Current Camera Line

My K-50 has been acting up lately (again) and I figured I would look at the current options for a replacement. Anyone have inside information if/when Pentax will be updating their line of cameras? The K-70 will be 4 years old this year The KP is 3 years old The K1 II is out of my price range