I saw this one.
On 11/11/2023 11:49 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
replies and messages I've sent don't seem to be getting to the list. I'm
testing both my email addresses to see if either of these get there.
G
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to
If it's all 4x6 prints, the low end Epson would probably be the best bet
(lowest cost).
The software bundled with the scanner should also be good enough.
The main thing is scanning takes time.
On 11/10/2023 8:41 PM, Ed Keeney wrote:
Long time lurker.
My sister has been asking me about how
I have used ScanCafe for slides, no complaints.
But also I do have the Epson v 39 that has been mentioned, I use it mostly for
documents. But I think it is ok for old family prints. Tomorrow I’ll scan and
post an old family print which I’ll do at 100, 200, 300, 600, 1200, 2400, 3600…
We’ll see.
Only about 4-5 members get dumped in SPAM, including myself. Have tired all
ways of whitelisting and suchlike but no luck. It's clearly something outside
my control. I suspect it might be because the addresses have been spoofed at
some time. I know mine has because I used to get quite a few
I have also had good results with ScanCafe. They provided timely,
quality service exactly as I requested on my orders. Over time, I've
had them process my complete holdings of slides and negatives plus a
some prints I didn't 'have time to scan myself.
Otis Wright
On 11/11/2023 11:43,
This showed up in my gmail account Godfrey
Dave
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 12:53 PM Godfrey DiGiorgi
wrote:
> Thanks mike. Shows that this is the email address that gets through, even
> if Mail puts it into the spam folder … like it does for 80% of all the
> active PDML posts. Wish I knew the
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 09:32:25AM +0100, Henk Terhell wrote:
> I agree a cheap Epson model photo scanner (like the $100 Epson V39II) will
> do the job.
> However, I don't think scanning of ordinary prints at higher than 300 dpi
> is worthwhile as results will not become better.
> This in
Thanks mike. Shows that this is the email address that gets through, even if
Mail puts it into the spam folder … like it does for 80% of all the active PDML
posts. Wish I knew the cause of that… it's a PITA.
G
> On Nov 11, 2023, at 8:56 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
> No, you're in my SPAM
No, you're in my SPAM folder, as usual...
> On 11/11/2023 16:49 GMT Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
> replies and messages I've sent don't seem to be getting to the list. I'm
> testing both my email addresses to see if either of these get there.
>
> G
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail
thanks larry. the print scanner reply and the original test 1 made it through
here too, finally. huge delay on the print scanner reply for me. And PDML mail
from me and other people always goes into my Junk Mail folder for some reason.
No idea why.
G
> On Nov 11, 2023, at 8:51 AM, Larry
This is the second email in about 10 minutes that I've gotten from you through
the list.
> On Nov 11, 2023, at 8:49 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> replies and messages I've sent don't seem to be getting to the list. I'm
> testing both my email addresses to see if either of these get there.
replies and messages I've sent don't seem to be getting to the list. I'm
testing both my email addresses to see if either of these get there.
G
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
I would recommend using a service instead of buying a scanner. If your sister
is like most people, the scanning is a one time task .. to do good scanning
take time and practice … a *lot* of practice and a *lot* of time … and then,
once done, the scanner is of limited value and you have to put
I agree a cheap Epson model photo scanner (like the $100 Epson V39II) will
do the job.
However, I don't think scanning of ordinary prints at higher than 300 dpi
is worthwhile as results will not become better.
This in contrast with scanning of negatives or slides.
Henk
Op za 11 nov 2023 om
14 matches
Mail list logo
