AFFIRMATIVE ! And add one new rule - The cavemen are allowed to post digipics
taken with canons. lol. ;-)
SIR,
YES SIR!
-frank the subservient
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Oops, it's too late now, will call Sunday. I need you to show me the good
places ;-)
i know this is a long shot, but if yer on-line this weekend and see
this post, call me if you want to go out for a beer.
Yeah, I know that, but since the french are troubling again the waters with the
Qc independence et all (I've just read the press, seems that Bloc Quebecois
wants to make the St. Laurent river independent too lol), I preffer to look at
the process from a distance. Hey we'll import Unibroue beer
Hi Mike,
I have now more pieces than ever, and a brand new terminator series titanium
spine. Now I'm wiser and drive a Hummer out of the city. F**k them mooseheads.
cheers,
caveman
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/10/15 Sat AM 09:39:30 EST
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Hi,
What's up, guys?
Cheers,
Caveman
Yeah, older and wiser ;-)
Holy crap! It's the cavedude! :-)
Christian
ROFL !
Hey Knarf turn out from under your rock, I'm in Toronto right now and in
desperate need for beer. Where do you guys buy it from, no stores are selling
anything with alcohool (except the rubbing variety), WTF, was prohibition
declared in Ontario or what ?
Oh
my
GAWD
William
William Robb wrote:
I just read it while inebriated.
Me too. Nice feeling. I don'r give s**t. Life is cool.
Definitely.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
I should really read these thing before I hit send.
Why do you want to reduce file size ? Storage space is so cheap now. It
doesn't really matter.
William Robb wrote:
If my 77 is a good indicator, it is an effect of good bokeh (hard to
define, I realize)
Now we really started it. M maybe Alan could give us again the links
to his bright ring bokeh photo collection.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
The Pentax cameras feel like quality
devices, weather they are or not may be another story.
Alan Chan knows.
;-)
We don't have the capacity to resist...
Peter J. Alling wrote:
No, no, NO NOT AGAIN...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations, you've just joined the resistance...
DagT
fra: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that anything like DANGER!! 2 MILLION OHMS!
keith whaley
Rob Studdert wrote:
[...]
The 3D effect is fantastic.
William Robb wrote:
http://www.photo.net/equipment/lensbaby/
Finally, a decent lens
Hmmm... reminds me the good old days of waist level finders.
Mh on second thought I just noticed some great fakezine material ;-)
Cotty wrote:
I've been messing with some street stuff - this time shooting completely
blind. Intro and 12 pics here
It means that you can't describe it as being particularly good in any
traditional metrics (sharpness/distortion/contrast/etc).
Don Sanderson wrote:
What is meant when a lens is described as having
a great 3 dimensional quality?
Unlike their competitors, they decided that with a fastly changing
technology there should be some serious money spent in RD. It's a
moving target game and it's Canon who ownz it.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Canon is the Evil empire,
http://tinyurl.com/3qlfp
H just a question, what do you guys think that would happen if
e-bay were offering sniping services themselves ? i.e. at the moment
you want to place a bid, you get a menu asking:
a) place the bid now so that everybody can see it
b) place the bid now but do not show it to anyone and
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0411/04110803canonnikon_slrrebates.asp
So, where to keep the films ?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TRAVEL/11/09/bt.xray.reut/index.html
Yeah, we had a sale, custom order to his specs. Basically Kaori with a
2X sized Charlie's gun. Willie said it was for some photo project
heheh like we didn't know, but a sale is a sale, who am I to judge his
taste ?
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Bill Robb seems to know more about them than I do! It must be
While you guys were busy killing each other on e-bay, Caveman just
bought an A* 85/1.4 from a garage sale. Looks like it has seen little
use, only problem was some dust and fingerprints, gone after sonme
careful cleaning. But hey I got it for $50 canuck. Complete with case.
Jens Bladt wrote
BTW, could you repost the link to that lens mount adapter you're using ?
Or better yet, may I convince you to sell me one of those adapters ?
Cotty wrote:
On 7/11/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed:
While you guys were busy killing each other on e-bay, Caveman just
bought an A* 85/1.4
frank theriault wrote:
You must love rubbing it in our faces, eh Mr.
I-Love-Canon-Pentax-Sucks-and-Is-a-Dying-Company Guy! vbg
Since you've long since repudiated all things Pentax,
Just for the record. I did not badmouth anything preceding and including
the PZ1p. IMHO it was after the PZ1p era
Yeah. Norm you have to tell us what you're up to.
Cotty wrote:
Yo Norm. Long time no read ;-)
Bah. Try this:
http://rotfl.pl/img.php?nigerians2.jpg
Bob W wrote:
Indeed. Even scarier for me was one day walking through a village in
Maramures County to find myself being stalked at the centre of a
triangle of 3 dogs, all snarling and baring their gums in a very
alarming way. I was not carrying
I suggest living room, and using a Cat bulldozer to push it there.
Christian wrote:
Ever since then if I find dog
crap in my yard I put it on the owner's doorstep.
Maybe next time I'll put it in
their mailbox.
The curious might try
http://www.angenieux.com/
to see a current production 17-80mm/2.2 zoom. For 35mm format.
(m this might give Cotty some ideas).
Andre Langevin wrote:
Angenieux stil makes a lot of lenses but for cine and scientific purposes.
Andre
Apparently no moulded plastics, eh ?
Rob Studdert wrote:
OUTSTANDING COMPACT SIZELength 336 mm - 13, and lightweight : 5 kg - 11
lbs hmmm..
Never works. Land mines do.
Doug Franklin wrote:
My dad talked to her politely
Hey, that page is fun, I suspect it was written by a democrat !
It has a big How Bush Won The Election title, with a link to an
article Computer Scientists Cautious of E-Voting.
Then we have a Tell Us! Why Did Kerry Lose? section. Reading the first
post is a very rewarding experience.
Problem is when you got only one kind of extremists.
DagT wrote:
With a population of
200 million they have extremists of all kinds.
Not exactly. You would probably end up using nearest neighbour/
bilinear/ bicubic interpolation. What you'd really want would be a
weighted average of groups of 4 pixels.
Rob Studdert wrote:
You could of course
reduce the image dimensions by 50% and desaturate, this would have a similar
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos20d/
...
http://beingornothingness.blogs.com/living/2004/10/welcome_to_red_.html
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nice.
Caveman wrote:
CNN has mapped the rednecks:
That's also what the muslim say.
;-)
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
And we are not generally (a) snake handlers, (b) isolationists, (c) pursuing a theocracy, (d) or any of the other slanderous statements made about us (like Nazi or Fascist).
Maybe next round the yankees will realize they're supposed to elect a
president not a pope.
;-)
Bob W wrote:
George Soros described it as faith vs. reason.
No, but you want to enforce *your* laws to everybody else. Laws that
have nothing to do with protecting your own liberty. Like those on
pot/abortion/gay_whatever.
Bob Blakely wrote:
have different
laws for others than for ourselves,
Looking for something to kiss and can't find your way ?
Lewis Matthew wrote:
Perhaps next CNN will map the anal orifice
Hmmm... wasn't this Limited thing supposed to be all metal and glass ?
Or is it molded plastic afterall ?
Alan Chan wrote:
I have reason to believe that part is defective during the molding
process because it is a plastc tube which cannot be bent. I would
never expect such problem however.
Now *this* is a political statement.
;-)
frank theriault wrote:
I'm going to eat 6 Tim Horton's donuts and sing The Maple Leaf
Forever
Yeah sure it's the Caveman, he's the root of all evil. WTF did I say
except posting a link, in a properly labeled message ?
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Nah, that's just the Caveman trying to slam Pentax as usual
Seems that I need to repost my 4 pixels pic that can be printed stadium
size, all with perfect sharp edges.
;-)
Mishka wrote:
something doesn't add up -- great 11x14 prints and 30 lpmm system resolution
cannot be true at the same time.
The votes are not that important, what's really important is how you
count them. Bush knows. Bwahahahaha.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's looking like slightly less than half.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 11:29 PM, Peter J. Alling wrote:
You see about 1/2 of the US population would agree with them.
William
Bwahahahaha ! Did you do that yourself or is it the new Limited
concept at work ?
Alan Chan wrote:
Am I luck or what? LOL!!!
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/fa77.jpg
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
CNN has mapped the rednecks:
http://tinyurl.com/3vt65
;-)
From Pentax US web site:
PENTAX remains dedicated to creating innovative products into the 21st
century.
ROFLMAO.
David Nelson wrote:
Good to see you're still laughing (-:
Alan Chan wrote:
Am I luck or what? LOL!!!
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/fa77.jpg
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
On 1 Nov 2004 at 11:01, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Of what is it composed?
Marketinium.
Cool !
I can't post mine, it's taken with a hmmm.. errr... Canon.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Here's mine:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/red.jpg
HAR ! Alan Chan is not alone ! ;-)
Don Sanderson wrote:
The rearmost element, which has just a slightly different
curvature on the front than the back.. was reversed!
I'll second that ! Nice one !
Cotty wrote:
On 31/10/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?album=8pos=0
Christian
Sweet!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Right, I think they're a démodé concept
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Cavo don't need no stinkin' SLRs...
Cotty wrote:
On 31/10/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I can't post mine, it's taken with a hmmm.. errr... Canon.
Hey Cavo, I might have an EOS-K50mm f/1.2 for sale soon, you
Oh, s**t, it's already done:
http://www.toiletmuseum.com/
Nothing new under the sun, eh ?
Jerry Todd wrote:
I, for one, will be looking for your essay.
Say Jerry, interesting coincidence, both you and Shel are using the same
ISP ? And the e-mail originating IP address is 4.243.x.x too ? Or might
it be that
Jerry Todd wrote:
something
OK, you guys convinced me. Now just let me know, who is better, Bush or
Kerry ?
Tom, I've told ya I'm reading pdml while driving
Tom Reese wrote:
look extremely close and try to find 3 differences between the
two pictures... I only found 2!! where is the third??
http://members.home.nl/saen/Special/zoeken.html
Tom Reese
I'd say that the Pentax will do a great job for 4x6 prints.
Jens Bladt wrote:
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/c97627.html
Comments are welcome
Like in the PDML FAQ, Graywolf ?
Graywolf wrote:
If we say no one should show cat
photos, or talk about guns, we are trying to force our political agenda
on the list. Usually very loudly.
Absolutely boring. No novel subject, no interesting framing, point of
view, lighting or postprocessing whatsoever.
The only interesting part is that you are attracted to do this every so
often.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/b-in-b.html
Oh the mighty Chong.
Herb Chong wrote:
a couple here on the list have.
I don't have the $5000.
Wanna bet ? A case of Quebec beer ?
William Robb wrote:
, i think 10% of today's volume would be about where Kodak and
Fuji may well decide to exit the market entirely.
Fuji will exit the market as soon as they deem it to be not profitable
enough.
Where that profit % lies is anyone's guess.
We're all in awe.
Herb Chong wrote:
i spent the money on the A* 400/2.8.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Tokina AT-X 80-200 2.8 manual focus with 2X teleconverter
Oh the mighty Chong.
It is most evident now that you post these pics here with the purpose of
starting social/political debates and not artistical/technical ones
related to photography. May I suggest some other controversial subjects
like guns/abortion/religion. This would help make the list perfectly
unreadable.
William Robb wrote:
Wanna bet ? A case of Quebec beer ?
Are you going to deliver it?
Yep DHL first class.
Look at Fuji's marketing strategy over the past couple of decades.
They don't service any part of the industry that is not volume/ high
profit.
When film hits their predefined profit wall,
Decorate his livingroom ?
Joseph Tainter wrote:
This is good by itself, but strongest in combination with your other
photos.
What are you going to do with these? An exhibition? A book? A magazine
spread?
I hope you'll do something with them.
Joe
frank theriault wrote:
snip Rules are one camera, one lens, one roll of film, and 30 minutes
with the model.
I guess that's why they were using film cameras... vbg
Exactly.
frank theriault wrote:
Whatever you think of Shel's photo, that's all it is: a photo.
I objected to his social/political rant, not to him taking photos.
I don't understand why it is that Shel is accused of starting debates,
or having political motives, or of having an agenda. Why is it that
no
frank theriault wrote:
Caveman,
If Wheatfield wins, send him the beer. Just make sure you send it UPS...
ROFL. Sounds painful!
May I suppose they'll also make some film for them until then ?
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Medium Format still rules! (in some circles)
Sobering text (2002?) from the Fujifilm site:
Although Fujifilm professional camera bodies will be
William Robb wrote:
Check out:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/IMGP5434.jpg
Caution, partially clothed girl in sensual pose alert.
LOL. I just love it on TV. They put that The following movie contains
scenes of violence, nudity, adult matters, coarse language etc etc.
disclaimer first.
Except when we want to post here:
http://tinyurl.com/2j58
William Robb wrote:
In our world, the sun is always over our right shoulder, and there are
nice fluffy clouds, dancing and playing at making interesting shapes.
The girls are always wholesome and beautiful, the boys are manly and
heroic.
Looking for some fisting, Jerry ?
I have *very* large hands.
Jerry Todd wrote:
May I humbly suggest you put on
a pair of proctologist's gloves.
them and I
think this is the right place to discuss it.
Jerry Todd wrote:
What about my other points, Caveman? I was just having a little fun and
attempting to provoke you, as you've been doing here with Shel and others
for quite some time.
in both digital and film flavours, what about large
format, Pentax needs a flagship camera, and, around Xmas, we'll count
the survivors.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1098912717.html
There ya go Caveman. Now i can shoot my E100vs and make it Velvia
I still wonder where you focused. Or didn't you ? Oh these lazy
youngsters.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Which just go's to show how bad it is technically, since the dog was a
relatively small Cocker Spaniel...
Keith Whaley wrote:
Awww, that's precious!
The big ol' Poodle saw the sign, and
I have no complaints on LX + 280T combo, including for macro distances
(if I remember to add a diffuser, that is).
William Robb wrote:
It's typical Pentax TTL flash control, just worse.
NASA sez it's at the 238,855 miles mark.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
actually, I THink when you are using big glass it ISNT at infinity - but I know it
sounds odd.
Film is declining, now digital too. Maybe people just got bored of
taking pics. What's the fad now ?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0410/04102801camera_production.asp
:11, Caveman wrote:
Film is declining, now digital too. Maybe people just got bored of
taking pics. What's the fad now ?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0410/04102801camera_production.asp
But mostly out of the frame
;-)
Peter J. Alling wrote:
The dog is nice and sharp...
Caveman wrote:
I still wonder where you focused. Or didn't you ? Oh these lazy
youngsters.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Which just go's to show how bad it is technically, since the dog was
a relatively small
Hey kids stop it. Time to post this again:
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 1:56 AM
Subject: Re: F24-50
I knew that I had to stop before raising all this nonsense again.
Keith Whaley wrote:
Or worse - a woman using an electric shaver
Now that would probably cause accidents among the observant males in
the vicinity
Depends on what she was shaving, doesn't it... g
Depends if the male is using lipstick. g
The model ?
;-)
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dario,
Not to be rude, but aren't you the guy who said the image quality on
the *istD was terrible. And didn't you just recently show and rave
about the detail you got in a *istD photo (eye of model). So what
made you change your opinion?
Regards, Bob S.
Keith Whaley wrote:
Guiness Draught Stout,
Yuck. Sick.
Halloween deco:
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/50301
Mark Roberts wrote:
(For once it's *not* cloudy in
Pittsburgh! Who'da thunk?)
Something's wrong. RUN !
Now rotate it 90 degrees, dress it with a nice Halloween hat, paste a
cat somewhere and give us a nice fakezine ;-)
Mark Roberts wrote:
Quick 'n dirty:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/red_moon.jpg
Cropped a bit.
It's more rewarding to carry a snowmobile instead
William Robb wrote:
http://www.smart.com/
I am pretty sure I could carry one in the back of my truck.
If you also take into account the mileage, they're not that bad.
frank theriault wrote:
There are a lot of reasons that North America and the USA have bad
accident statistics,
With the camera connected to the computer:
1. Start Canon ZoomBrowser
2. Click Camera Memory Card
3. Click Upload images
4. Select the images
5. Click Open Camera Window
Ann Sanfedele mused:
That is,
can I download stuff from my memory card in my
digicam, edit the files,
saving in jpg and upload
It's the place where Dr. Lecter gets his lunch.
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
popcorn? sizzling steaks? rice krispys?
lol...
Oysters snapping shut?
Meow'ing of cracking sausages?
Bubbling french fries? Or donuts?
Okay, I'll succumb. The fabulous sounds of coffee-making. sigh.
the cracking of the ice as
Jostein wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/coltsfoot.html
Comments?
Critisim?
Please? :-)
No. Nyah nyah nyah !
;-)
You may also take a look at the 90mm macro lenses out there.
Jon M wrote:
I've been looking for a while at getting a portrait
lens in the 70-85 range. The A85/1.4 is prohibitively
expensive, the K85/1.8 is also out there, and even the
lowly M85/2 tends to go for more than I can swing at
this
Do you folks realise that your multi-thousand dollar DSLR systems have
about the same megapixels number as a cell phone ?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0410/04102001samsung_schs250.asp
;-) ;-) ;-)
For those that were not aware of the b-wagon denomination:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/10/25/nj.suv.drownings.ap/index.html
Now you'll understand why many people panic when noticing they're
tailgated by one. Especially when the gals are obviously looking in the
vanity mirror while talking on
Hey, I put about three smileys there.
John Francis wrote:
I don't see why anybody is surprised by the 5MP cellphone camera, anyway.
No way cavemen would brush teeth while driving, they're too busy
watching DVDs, reading PDML on the laptop, tailgating the punk with the
riced Civic and making signs to the blonde on the next lane.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, well, I noticed in my rear-view mirror one day that the *male*
I hope you guys realize that you're providing some great fakezine cover
material ?
;-) ;-) ;-)
The candles are distracting.
;-)
1 - 100 of 904 matches
Mail list logo
