On 23/09/2007, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also I've been playing around with Gran Paradiso (aka Firefox 3.0
alpha 1). It does support colour profiles. Here is a quick test I did
comparing Firefox 2 3:
Firefox 2.0.0.7 (~240kb)
On 24/09/2007, Debra Wilborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some nameless coward dropped my SMC 28-70 f4 for me
and now it's all fogged up. (Shattered a perfectly
good filter too but at least the body's alright.) Now
I'm wondering if I should have it repaired or just get
another one (or something
On 24/09/2007, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could be the dreaded aspheric lens separation, the jolt of the drop
may have caused it to happen...
I agree, it could well be the result of inter element separation or
de-lamination of a plastic aspheric element (though I don't recall if
On 23/09/2007, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You misread my comment, I am not saying that the Red Camera is not worth what
it
costs, but that compared to an ENG (Electronic News Gathering) Camera it is
not
a complete camera, hence the seemingly low price. It is only one module of a
On 21/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wait, if you could decrease the distance between the sensor and the
film, would the average be more accurate? What if pixels were a
different shape, like hexagons? Would it look better?
The little device bellow may ease the grain pain:
Hi Team,
I've started on my next series project (between nappy changes and hair
styling that is), Saturated Abstract Found-object Sub-macro
Landscapes:
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO/photo#5112558970543468546
For EXIF details see more info, lens was the trusty A50/2.8 macro:
On 22/09/2007, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the things that folks may not be realizing is that except for its high
resolution this thing is more like a security camera than an ENG camera. You
can
buy a color security camera the size of a pack of cigarettes these days for
$50-100.
On 22/09/2007, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems like a photographer rather than a lawyer, but he's definitely
right about this: *Intent* is crucial. Unless the plaintiffs can prove
that, Virgin is pretty safe. (At least in Australian courts, I'd wager:
If the truly frivolous action
On 22/09/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exquisite.
Wherever did you come up with the concept?
Thanks Godfrey, I've been toying with the concept since about age 11
when I got my first Kodak 126 Instamatic, the one with the mechanical
flash cubes that you could fire with the
On 22/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you had a chance to try that on someone else's scanner? That
looks interesting
No, only on my scanners to date.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 22/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, only on my scanners to date.
oh I didn't realize you had more than one...hmm
I have three currently in fact, I'm just not strong willed enough to
actually hook them up and start ploughing though my film backlog.
Apart from a distinct lack of
On 22/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL!! Procrastinating can be fun. Why do you have three scanners?
Are they each for different things, or are they different models as
you've accumulated them?
They are all for different purposes, it's no accumulation over time,
I've already
On 22/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
beautiful!
Ah thanks, beauty is definitely in the eye of the bee holder.
that's quite a specific category.
Well you have to set your bounds and stake your place these days.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10
On 20/09/2007, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the generic rule is no announcements. This applies to new
product as well as discontinued and also includes changes in specification.
Sometimes word leaks out but I'm fairly sure that it is either accidental or
as a result of
On 20/09/2007, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm out of digestives.
Got the plain and dark chocolate topped ones here if you're in the area ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
On 20/09/2007, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the case mentioned earlier the information seemed to coincide with
the removal of the lens from the lists at the Pentax Japan website,
however. And their statement that the 1.4 variant was still current also
coincided with that version
On 21/09/2007, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answer: Because no individual DSLR owner wants to pay what it would
cost, nor carry what it would weigh!
(That's my best guess anyways)
I didn't read the article, but what does equipment with that kind of
capabilities cost?
Not too
On 21/09/2007, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It can't be as compact as it appears, the camera itself may be small,
but I'll bet reasonable storage and power will have you tied down with
anchors.
No more so than a pro 35mm movie cam or a pro video tape cam set-up IMO, Cotty?
--
Rob
On 21/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run a photo mini-lab. I've mentioned that before.
I had a customer come in yesterday, wanting re-prints from some
negatives. They'd been processed by another store in our chain, and she
had the index print. I wrote down the frame numbers
On 20/09/2007, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did get a pretty firm the f/1.7 variant has been discontinued when I
asked the local distributor about the availability of normal lenses
before I bought the one mentioned earlier. I'm not sure, however, that
such responses are the rule, or
On 20/09/2007, John Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about that..I have an M4...the last of the bench built
Leicas. It also is a fantastic machine as well as a great camera. The
sound of a Leica going off is delicious just by itself. I think that
bringing any Leica to your
On 20/09/2007, Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take a look at the quotes on the home page. One of the
guys is inter-cutting film with digital. Everything is
changing.
Of course they've been doing this for a while just not at this type of
res. I visited their page in Oct 06 and all
On 18/09/2007, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recall reading this manual, and found it accidentally when
shooting a show one night.
Set the K10D to digital preview, and take a preview shot. Then use the
up/down button to toggle between full histogram and RGB histogram. That
On 19/09/2007, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now he quotes some pretty obscure material with no links. Nobody knows the
real source. He could be making it up, for all we know. I'm not saying it is
all BS, but it sure can be.
I have the source documents, what he has posted are verbatim
On 19/09/2007, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've said this many times before (it's a pet peeve of mine around here
you, may say), but it seems to me that the rumours of the death of the
old Pentax line-up are highly exaggerated. If you check the Pentax Japan
website you'll find that a
On 19/09/2007, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With eBay I wouldn't bet on that, when LX accessories were still
available at BH photo, used FF1 viewfinders regularly sold for more
than twice what BH was asking for them...
Actually it was the other way around, the used prices were
On 13/09/2007, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To anyone familiar with 3200TMax - is this just the
effect of a high speed film being ultra sensitive to
expiration, or is the D76 a poor choice as a
developer? I'm wondering if it might be better to try
the other roll in either Rodinol
On 17/09/2007, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't that about what he make in advertising fees every time a bunch of you
look at his website? I find it amusing that you guys laugh at him while you
are helping him make money. I suspect he finds that amusing as hell too.
My visits to his
On 15/09/2007, Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems an excellent ISO 3200 sample, but if you look at the face of
the girl closely, it has the typicla plastic look that results from
applying heavy noise reduction. Perhaps it has something to do with the
CMOS image sensor.
I think
On 14/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm wondering about is when anyone is going to manufacture a sensor
that actually capture sharp images
Indeed, I think it's appalling that people will have to put up with
ISO3200 images of this quality:
On 15/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing that's sarcasm, although I did get a crick in my neck
trying to turn sideways to actually look at it. Gotta get me one of them
monitors that has the swivel arm so you can rotate it for vertical shots.
Sarcasm? Indeed, at its
On 15/09/2007, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a good chuckle out of that one!
Thanks for the comments guys, glad it got a few chuckles, that
validates my amusement ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15/09/2007, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0SbVFxl64A
LOL, methinks you watch way too much YouTube Bob, you know what it'll
do to your eyes ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15/09/2007, MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would the K10 be recommended as an all purpose travel camera?
It depends what you deem as all purpose I suppose. The W series Optios
are far better under water or if size is an issue so I often take one
to complement my K10D when I'm traveling.
--
On 13/09/2007, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those prices don't seem so out of line, if I assume that the Australian
price includes a 17% VAT. Maybe it's your government you should be
complaining about. In the US sales taxes are on the order of 4-10% and
are assessed by a State
On 13/09/2007, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who upload photos are looking forward to comments. Tastes vary,
obviously, and it's with that variable in mind that reactions are
sought.
As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, if the posting photog has
the result they like, all
On 14/09/2007, Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A one-time charge, thankfully. Although don't say that too loud - our
government might hear you and decide they like the idea... Then again,
it's election time, so this would probably get buried. For now.
Oh no, sales tax was once off
On 14/09/2007, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interestingly enough I do not believe any state here in the US taxes service,
only goods. That was one of the reasons that after my first attempt as a
commercial photographer I changed my rate structure to a pure service one of
time + a
On 14/09/2007, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, and suggested changes really have no reference.
It seems most people have missed this rather less than subtle point.
Ohhh, is that a booger on my screen!
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
On 14/09/2007, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I say is art, IS art.
If it has a frame around it.
I say a dog shit with a frame around it is still a dog shit.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..did you brush my hair like this dad?
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/Thomas/photo?authkey=pzmnlsD2ZJI#5109850268572191650
Before school this morning.
evil grin
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14/09/2007, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People keep confusing the question of is it art? with is it any
good?. They're separate issues.
Of course it can concurrently be art and a dog shit but practically
I'd tend towards labeling it the latter if that's what it is.
--
Rob
On 13/09/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gads, Tom. How could they make such an egregious error?
Sheesh. It seems you always something to be critical about, even when
someone has been gifted with a very nice prize unexpectedly. I guess
for some people the glass is always half
On 13/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the impression they're supposed to look like that to give an
accurate rendition of the light.
I'd love to know what everyone else is using to view these images or
whether it's just the expectations that images like this have to be
On 13/09/2007, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those look like typical Velvia, or as I like to call it Velveeta, (Kraft
Corporation's processed Cheese Food, since it has the same
relationship to natural color that Velveeta has to natural cheese), to
me.. I still have a hard time
On 13/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They have not been touched! Only the new images are and two of the old ones.
If you have a different reaction to them, its you, not the images
I have not boosted saturation on the images displayed now.
So if you aren't working on a
On 12/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After all, they are supposed to look colorful and vibrant. Thats why I shot
them! They are mostly shot under spectacular lighting conditions with very
vibrant colors. Velvia helps as well.
Whatever you are trying to acheive it's not working,
On 12/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean apart from the Velvia look? :-)
I'm not due much with the scans. Some level adjustments; perhaps a slight
contrast and brightness adjustment; rarely any saturation adjustment.
So is your scanner calibrated to a reference Velvia film
On 12/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I admit I am a novice when it comes to photoshop. I hate it!
I really don't know how to help you there, I think it's great but then
I've made sure that I understand what it's doing so that I have full
control of it.
Anyway, many of the
On 09/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
crazy stuff. Nikon cameras confuse me; every time I've ever held one
I couldn't figure out where various buttons were, and if I did find
them, I couldn't understand the logic behind their placement. They
get my hands all contorted and my brain
On 10/09/2007, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just put an old Vectra estate, a 6x17 camera, two microphones, and a WAV
recorder next to the most notoriously accident-prone stretch of a road
and watch hordes of dangerous speed junkies instantly turn into
law-abiding citizens. ;-)
On 08/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whoa, bad idea! It's hard to start eating spicy stuff because you
don't want to feel the burn when you come off the endorphine high...if
choclate was included, you'd get so fat so fast...man...I think it's
capsicum by the way...
I've had
On 08/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds delicious! If you have the recipe, will you send it to me
off-list please? I add a bit of cayenne pepper powder to my hot
chocolate, it heats things up pretty fast ;)
I've never actually made a fudge, not my thing really, the one I
On 08/09/2007, Paul Ewins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe they're nutjob collectors that want the perfect *used* specimen and
are buying every one they can just to make sure. Are they selling any of
these lenses (i.e. the rejects)?
There are a multitude of reasons why someone might be doing
On 08/09/2007, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wait 'til one of them needs to go in for repair ...
I don't know exactly what's wrong with my FA* 80-200, but it's going to
cost $380 to fix it so it focusses at the wide end of the zoom range :-(
That's value, it sounds like a screw
On 06/09/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This AM my wife told me there was a pretty pink sun rising.
I shot it as a lark, really, but am surprised to see the degree of
vertical banding accross the frame.
Thought that was dealt with through a firmware download some time back.
This is
On 03/09/07, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feral animals are merely animals returned to the natural wild state in which
they once belonged before so-called 'domesticating' took place.
The pejorative is applied by humans, who have little bragging room, truth be
known.
Just that it's the
On 03/09/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently it's quite difficult to keep
kangaroos down.
It's not too hard if the kill and cook them first ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
On 03/09/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/09/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently it's quite difficult to keep
kangaroos down.
It's not too hard if the kill and cook them first ;-)
Try again,
It's not too hard if you kill and cook them first ;-)
--
Rob
On 01/09/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
I picked up a package from the post office today that contained
(largish page ~ 880kb):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/V125/V125.htm
I have to say I'm very impressed.
LOL., it looks so, don't forget to try it wide open,
On 01/09/07, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Impressive, except it hasn't been written for the Mac yet.
I guess I should have been more specific in that I don't believe that
the concepts are new but more so the idea of combining all these
processing systems in one tool. For the Mac a similar
On 02/09/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked about that when I bought my K10D, thinking I could use the
adapter for my *ist-D.
The guy at the camera store told me they weren't very reliable.
And I wonder if they'd work with SDHC cards?
Mine certainly hasn't been unreliable
On 02/09/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately you can't vary the input for focal length in your
formulas, which is the whole point to comparing different AOVs of
particular focal lengths on different formats. It's complicated by the
fact that different nominal focal lengths
On 02/09/07, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was starting to get a little nervous when I did not receiver it
after ten days. I thought the seller figured out he could have gotten
a lot more for it and was not going to complete the deal. However it
arrived today via US mail in
On 01/09/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by creative framing, Jack?
I assume he means boarders/virtual frames.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
On 01/09/2007, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone recommend a small, fast SDHC card reader? My ex-gf got me a 4gb
SDHC and naturally it won't work with my older readers. What I'd like is
something very small that I can carry around in my camera bag. I've already
got a multi-card
On 31/08/2007, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it's actually Uranus.
Which reminded me of this clip I saw recently:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qIg3gzcCxw
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01/09/2007, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very striking and unusual!
Strange to see buds on trees, but of course it's
spring there in Oz!
Thanks Rick, it wasn't meant to be a work of art but I found it
unusual too. I looked at the tree earlier this morning and there are
no flowers
A fun tee shirt:
http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/generic/78c6/
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
http://www.photoacute.com/studio/index.html
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
PDML
On 01/09/2007, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Just out of curiosity, what's the formula for fisheye lenses? It
would be neat if there was a check box for that)
From a spread sheet I wrote a while back:
VAOV (in degrees) =image height /(image width^2 + image height^2)^0.5x180
HAOV (in
On 01/09/2007, Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard that you can get an adapter that will take SD cards and place
the adapter in a camera (*ist D) that only takes CF cards. If
true, does it affect the write speed to a SD card.
I have one and it slows them considerably, however it's
Hi Team,
Last night well after the lunar eclipse had finished I went out to
retrieve my tripod and noticed how bright the moonlight was and I
thought it would make for some interesting low light SR tests.
I mounted my A50/1.2, set the camera to ISO1600 and opened up the lens
and ran around like
On 29/08/2007, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent. It's actually almost the same plane as mine. A
slightly newer year, but the same basic model. I've found fisheyes about
the only way to really get wide enough to get a feeling for flying in a
small plane like that.
On 30/08/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally I leave
the review function off as a consequence and review what I've
achieved at appropriate times after a moment of shooting passes. I
might shoot one or two exposure tests prior to a moment to test my
ideas on exposure,
On 29/08/2007, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
My attempts at photographing last night's eclipse seem to have struck similar
problems to others - noisy images that, in my case, looked abysmal at full
totality.
The only answer was to reduce the size of the images and make a
On 26/08/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Just for chuckles:
http://picasaweb.google.com.au/OzSavage/ViewfinderFreeZone
(all shot with the K10D DA 16-45)
Show 'em if you've got 'em.
Shots made with cameras with live LCD view don't count.
I made a few overhead shots
On 28/08/07, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I spent the entire day getting one of the 320 gig drives working.
As usual it turned out the problem was my skipping a step in the
reinstall. Then Just after I got it to working the darn $12 ebay
workstaion video card goes by-by, so here I am
On 25/08/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think a calibration target is going to help as much as a scanner
with a longer range and higher bit depth.
My LS-8000 and AF-5400 II both have problems with Kodachrome,
particularly in the really dense areas.
--
Rob Studdert
On 24/08/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 15mm is a superb piece of optical engineering as many of you will
know. On a 1.3 crop camera it still gives a very usable wide image, and
with no vingetting due to said crop. I don't even focus it - set it to
f8, set the focus accordingly and
On 29/08/07, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On of my favorite fisheye self-portraits.
http://filebox.ece.vt.edu/~papenfuss/PESO/7/
Definately viewfinder-free.
LOL, I can identify with that:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/EDDIE2.jpg
--
Rob
On 29/08/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So there we were, minding our own business by the lake
in New Hampshire, when this critter started marching
across our picnic table.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6357916size=lg
None of us had ever seen anything like it before. I
On 29/08/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quit your whining.
Just be glad you got to see it.
There was solid overcast here during the eclipse. About an hour after
it was all over, the sky cleared.
We actually had pretty clear skies here, I made a few shots, nothing
that I'm too
On 24/08/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the ISO rating (of the sensor) directly linked to the
signal-to-noise ratio?
Indirectly.
Isn't wanting a lower ISO like wishing the sensor
was noisier?
No, the sensors effective native ISO has more to do with its
saturation level, the
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax
On 24/08/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported...
Wasting bandwidth or your time am I?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
On 24/08/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Wikipedia says:
ISO Standard 12232:2006
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=3
(Photography — Digital still cameras — Determination of exposure
index, ISO speed ratings,
On 25/08/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html
Hey, in May they announced that the 645D had been scrapped! No longer
a priority is an improvement!
;-)
The board
On 25/08/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case, doesn't the real point still remain? Doesn't a lower native
ISO mean that you have to amplify the data more at a given higher ISO
setting? If it does, asking for a lower ISO is in reality asking for
more noise at higher ISO
On 23/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was a facetious response to the familiar SOS.
LOL, I'm sticking around for the 645D, should be here for a while ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 24/08/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you got cheated by the seller. Rechargeable D cells are now up to
5000mah to 15000mah (why are they still using milli-amp-hours when such
capacities are better expressed in amp-hours?), no way you will get that out
of a AA cell. You can
On 24/08/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Godfrey, nice to meet you...
Brad
:-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user
On 24/08/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well it's better than the Canon 6D he reviewed last week based on a
online forum rumor.
Poor sod, he seems to be getting some slaps from the Nikon forumites
and he's Nikons biggest flag waver, it's just not fair. I must confess
after his name
On 22/08/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This'll make some purists puke here, but I got fed up with dust spots on
my Darkside 1D so I just wiped the sensor a few times with clean cotton
buds and all my stubborn dust blotches disappeared in one go. This the
first time in nearly three years.
On 22/08/07, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a question for the technically curious.
Do you think it will be worthwhile to use fibre optics to lead light
from an ordinary flash (eg. Pentax 540 FGZ) into various
configurations for macro flash purposes?
I can't get the idea out of my
On 22/08/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those who frequent DPReview:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0708/07082201seamcarvingimageresizing.asp
I thought it was pretty neat.
Mmm, I don't know if I like that, much like some systems I had to deal
with in broadcast that made up and
On 23/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm one of ten winners in the Detroit News Dream Cruise Photo Contest. My
winning entry is a pic of my own '55 Chevy in front of a diner on Woodward.
It's been seen here before. I shot it several years ago with the 6x7 and
Pentax SMC
On 23/08/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more and more I think about it, the more it becomes apparent that
regardless of how things look on my monitor I can be almost guaranteed it
won't look the same on someone else's, regardless of calibration, etc.
If contrast is adjustable, doesn't
On 23/08/07, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.wisebread.com/the-40-hidden-inside-a-12v-battery
That one is funny.. even usefull for some, maybe ;)
LOL, not quite groundbreaking. I was doing this to power my little
projects in my early teens, when the alkaline 9v cells become more
On 23/08/07, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's probably what I'll do eventually, but I have serious problems
getting rid of the fibre optics idea... :-)
Have you seen this?
http://www.ringflash.cz/
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 1760 matches
Mail list logo
