On 5/4/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heck, this frees me up to do all sorts of meaningfull things.
Like get my basement cleaned out and build a darkroom and sauna.
That's great. Wish I could have a darkroom but apartments have too
little room as it is.
Cheers,
Gautam
I hope that your immediate plans work out well and that you are
able to work meaningfully in photography again if you choose.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 5/2/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As most of you know, the life of a photofinisher has changed dramatically
over the past couple of years.
The color version does work much better, doesn't it? Georgeous.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 5/4/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick,
I really like the color version--much more of a sense
of presence somehow, certainly more warmth. Lots of
details (especially in the paintings) pop out that
Patrick,
This is a nice photograph but the vertical columns seem to be slightly
bow shaped. Maybe that's the way they are, maybe I need new glasses.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 5/3/06, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments/Critique are most welcome.
Lots of photographs I liked this month.
What I'd like to see in a larger size: No Title by Kenneth Waller.
How did this happen: Green by Adelheid
Funny: Thinking Green by Joseph Tainter
Cheers,
Gautam
On 5/1/06, AvK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
the May PUG is open.
It can be found at
On 4/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, but some of still don't know what it is!
Well, we'll just have guess this one. A gorilla? Doesn't seem like a chimp
for some reason.
Cheers,
Gautam
I came across this article on a Pentax lens expected in
October.
http://www.photoscala.com/node/view/1265
Cheers,
Gautam
I must agree.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/25/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not too big a fan of the web page myself either.
But that's just a minor nit.
You have beautiful photos in that set! An excellent eye. Thank you
for sharing.
Godfrey
On Apr 25, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Francis
Very interesting composition Shel.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/25/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/2cellguys.html
Made using the istDS and the K135/2.5 - converted in PS CS using double
Hue/Sat technique
Shel
The legendary Steve Gibson has an interesting story of his own
experiences.
http://www.grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm
He has some security tools on his site too.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/23/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html
I've been using this free
I'm not sure he claims to be an expert. He certainly knows more than
I do and he's done some interesting stuff.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/24/06, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gautam Sarup wrote:
The legendary Steve Gibson has an interesting story of his own
experiences.
Legendary he may
I like it more with much of the space at the bottom cut out bringing the rocks
to the front. Perhaps a centimeter of grass at the bottom edge. It fills the
frame better to my eye.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/24/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New and improved with URL included...
Dag,
A wonderful photograph but what is this?
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/24/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=232428
Comments are welcome.
DagT
Welcome back. Hope your mom gets better.
Stick around.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll try to be brief. Or as brief as I can be. :-)
Mom had a colostomy operation a week ago. She's been home about two days.
Seems to be doing okay. But the big
tweet the corporation? Indeed, let's tweet the corporations.
Tweet software too.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/21/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?lp=ja_entrurl=http%3a%2f%2fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2fcda%2fother%2f2006%2f04%2f21%2f3690.html
On 4/11/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a psychological thing. Anybody who knows a good shrink ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
On the dumb side but better than nothing:
http://www.manifestation.com/neurotoys/eliza.php3
Cheers,
Gautam
Given that the thread on the Eiffel Tower has morphed into a thread
on Vegas, I though this might serve as a unifying image:
http://static.flickr.com/36/119233767_787bc66308.jpg
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/15/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill,
I used to be a cab driver, and there were
On 4/14/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
watching Dumbo and the
Ah! An old favourite.
Cheers,
Gautam
I like it. Unusual perspective. I think it would have been
nicer if the car had been on the road and there had been some
indication that it was in motion (though not blur.)
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/15/06, Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was given about 25 feet, 8 meters of very expired,
Markus,
Here are some K64 photographs for you to look at. They were
scanned on a Canon 8400F with VueScan using the Kodachrome
setting that it has. Beyond that I haven't done any editing. The
colors on the originals are much better.
http://static.flickr.com/30/62716350_c9fc7d224c.jpg
On 4/13/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's been refrigerated, it will be just fine.
Kodachrome starts life as a BW film (more or less). The colour dyes are
added during processing.
It is a remarkably stable film.
So you could then stop processing at some stage and get BW
trivia
Muybridge was born Edward Muggeridge. He later changed his name to
Muybridge. The horse photography was evidently to settle a bet with
Leland Stanford (of Stanford University fame.)
Among his achievements, other than those Tom mentioned, is that
he took several panoramic photographs of
Jack,
While you're at it, try this too:
http://terraserver.microsoft.com/
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/5/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just learned of this site yesterday, (http://earth.google.com/).
Pulled up a freebie and played with it for a bit.
It's an satilite collage of
The colours and the technical aspects are just wonderful.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/3/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Mike Wilson has already mentioned, we spent Saturday evening
strolling along the river Tyne. Here's one shot from the session, with
the blue arc of the Millenium Bridge in
I like enough of Louis Sullivan and Wright to have taken tours
around Chicago. And I like the Empire State Building.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/1/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:18:44 +0100, Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's right here for people who
Thanks Jostein
The 80-320 changes length still this is the best solution
there is.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/30/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I use this device for macro rigs. It's a good help when you need to balance a
heavy rig. However, if
It's right here for people who haven't seen it:
http://static.flickr.com/41/81262041_a936315f02.jpg
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/1/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The building is not quite in North Beach. It's actually on the edge of
Chinatown, and very close to the Financial District.
Godfrey,
IMO, better the man who hasn't studied all these things
and doesn't have to doubt his eyes when he opens them
in the morning.
Anyway, so much for all that.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/29/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 29, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sad in
On 3/29/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Science today studies much that isn't real. That's a 19th century
definition.
Bob
Bob,
I'd say that if the mystics want to change the definition of science they
can't. Science is still (and always will be) the study of reality. The
study of
Godfrey,
I've heard the term used more and more in software. I guess
it's part of the general trend in the US (*) culture towards using
important sounding words rather than simple words that are
seen as well, simple (and coherent.)
This is the same trend that brought us travesties such as
that bodies, soap and water and
non-existent or their existence is debatable.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/29/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gautam Sarup wrote:
Science is still (and always will be) the study of reality.
I have always thought that science was a *method* of study, rather
than
Collin,
That's a fantastic observation.
I would go further and state that mankind has benefited
greatly in Aristolelian eras.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modern philosophy, since the Enlightenment, has been based on Kant's
view of reality, with
Doesn't mean he's wrong!
On 3/29/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that is your considered opinion, you are not well-educated in the
study of Philosophy.
Godfrey
On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:15 AM, graywolf wrote:
The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the
metaphysics and epistemology), not science.
Godfrey
On Mar 29, 2006, at 9:45 AM, Gautam Sarup wrote:
I'd say that if the mystics want to change the definition of
science they
can't. Science is still (and always will be) the study of
reality. The
study of non-reality if such a thing
I have a fairly good tripod (a Slik butI can't remember the model number)
which has a pan-tilt head.
The problem is that it's difficult to keep long lenses level. The longest
I have a 80-320 zoom and the front end of the lens sags when mounted
on the tripod and left along.
Is there some decent
I'm sure TomC can comment quite well on this himself but on
this I agree with him. Too much of modern knowledge is just
back-space.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/29/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My statement, quoted below, was With these statements, you
demonstrate little study of
Thank you, Bill, Ralf and Tom.
This is just the thing I need. There will be an
enablement in the family soon.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/29/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Subject: Re: Keeping a lens level
Gautam Sarup [EMAIL
Bob Shell wrote:
On Mar 26, 2006, at 2:41 PM, graywolf wrote:
Modern scientists claim there is an underlying reality whatever our
perceptions.
Not all modern scientists claim, or believe, that.
Bob
Science by definition is the study of reality. The study of non-reality
is
Right Tom. Actually, it begs the questions what the hell
are we talking about?
Ultimately, the anti-reality argument ends up denying the
evidence our senses give us by saying that we can no
longer trust either our perception, experiments or theories.
Take this line of argument to it's final
Or else, we all live in the same reality but have different
experiences. Experience changes the knowledge we have
and often how we evaluate things but not what exists
as such.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/26/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Kevin,
I see things as you do. I spend 8-10 hours a day in front
of a computer and I greatly enjoy that. However, for recreation
I prefer to stay away.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/25/06, Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recent times, I seem to have lost the joy of photography.
What
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that increasing the
accuracy of measurement of the position of a particle decreases
the accuracy with which it's momentum can be determined at the
same instance and vice versa. Simply stated:
- More accurate measure of position implies less accurate
On a PC running Windows at that. :)
On 3/26/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 26/3/06, Gautam Sarup, discombobulated, unleashed:
I spend 8-10 hours a day in front
of a computer and I greatly enjoy that.
Mark!
Come on now. I'm not putting anything that perverted
Sorry to hear that.
Gautam
On 3/25/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first attempt at a Powerpoint slide show.
Apologies to those who can't access it. All pictures were shot with Pentax
cameras and lenses.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/rollei.pps
William Robb
Adam,
Using the diagonal as the standard one would expect the
normal for a 8x10 frame to be about 325mm while the practical
standard as you mentioned is only 210mm. That's approx.
only 65% of the diagonal.
Do you know where the large difference comes from?
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/23/06, Adam Maas
Heh! PDML is like that. Everytime I've asked a question there's
been a deluge of answers. It's also the only place I guess where
people get emotional over aperture rings and the like. :)
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/25/06, Russell Kerstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, i think that my question was
Congratulations.
cheers,
Gautam
On 3/25/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we have any Pentaxians in high demo Dallas/Ft. Worth zips, you'll
probably be getting the first volume of Home magazine in the mail. I
have an article in the mag titled The Flora and the Fantasy. I
On 3/23/06, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gautam
thanks a lot for your samples.
The second one looks horrible here, maybe removing the color cast did that,
You're right, my attempt at Photoshop resulted in strange blotches.
As can be seen my skills are rudimentary. I'll try to
Hi Markus,
This is Ilford Delta 3200 shot at 3200 and developed in Rodinal
(at home - perhaps a lab would do better.)
http://static.flickr.com/39/84732059_1ef2d6103d_b.jpg
And this is Superia 1600. (Not much Photoshopping except
I tried to correct the colour cast.)
Sorry to hear about that. Hope you're getting over what aches
and pains this might have caused.
Gautam
On 3/20/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was slowly driving to a friend's house up in the Berkeley Hills. A
woman, seemingly impaired in some way, drove into my lane and crashed
Paul,
Ominous looking but nice.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/18/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fooled around a bit today with a 49mm Hoya R72 filter and the FA
35/2. Here's a shot of a church seen through winter trees. I think I'm
going to enable myself with a 77mm version of that
On 3/13/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See my other posts. The F-22 has already stood up for duty, and taken
the mantle of deadliest aircraft in service from the Su-35.
Very good. I'd hoped it would not be too long coming.
However, because of other advantages the US has (AWACS, the
and developed while I was looking
through a viewfinder. Been interesting!
Thanks!
Jack
--- Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/12/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Understand that the F-15 is about the baddest think in the air.
True?
Jack
Not right now. The USAF needs
On 3/12/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Understand that the F-15 is about the baddest think in the air. True?
Jack
Not right now. The USAF needs an update.
The SU30s and 31s are probably the best planes in the air
right now (and for my taste, the most beautiful.)
A flame war isn't what I wanted when I asked the question.
(Please note the intentions were pure. :)
Actually, the change is technology is giving me quite a few questions.
On the one hand, going digital appears to be inevitable at some
point. On the other, I like slides and digital appears to
On 3/8/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reports of Z-1ps with this failure out there? They are, what 15yo
by now?
Kostas,
Mine is still much in perfect shape. But then, there are ancient lenses
on which the aperture ring still works too. I guess reliability isn't the
Well, at least I'm impressed. :)
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/7/06, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I don't know if anyone else will find this interesting or useful, but
I did - and unexpected as well.
I have a small Konica SLR system which includes several Hexanon lenses
and a
Hmm. Perhaps there is a market for a camera with
eBay mode:
http://www.popphoto.com/article.asp?section_id=5article_id=1806
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/7/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why am I not surprised?
http://www.auctions-registration.com/ebay/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
On 3/7/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be real. The fact is that this is the way all the modern cameras, new
Panasonic L1 excepted, are being designed. If you don't like it,
you're out of luck because you won't be able to buy anything in the
future that works the way you like.
in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Gautam Sarup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28. februar 2006 08:24
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: aquariums
Tom,
I'm leaning more and more towards taking
guitars and violins like
magic wands and expect them to produce sound.
TTYL,
Gautam
On 3/5/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/3/06, Gautam Sarup, discombobulated, unleashed:
Don't think I ever saw Russell Crowe pretending to play
music but I have seen some others trying hopelessly.
Violin
On 3/3/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. Where did this information come from?
Photo.net.
Maybe if it had been at the bottom of a fjord but I'm extremely
sceptical. Could have been in a sealed container.
There must be some conditions attached.
Still, I found it
Don't think I ever saw Russell Crowe pretending to play
music but I have seen some others trying hopelessly.
TTYL,
Gautam
On 3/3/06, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean, like, Russell Crowe?
Gautam Sarup wrote:
Hah! Actors do equally strange things with musical instruments
Hah! Actors do equally strange things with musical instruments.
On 3/2/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's funny how fashions change. I just visited the outlaws and, for my
sins, had to endure about 20 minutes of one of our worst ( is there a
good one?) television soaps. Part of
From another list:
My Leica I A was rescued from the sea - been down a long time during
WW II - and it only took a general clean up - and a chemical clean of
the lens - and new curtains - to get it back in working order.
Jack,
The strangeness may be because perhaps you installed
Acrobat Reader and installed Photoshop after that.
To see the file better start Acrobat and open the pdf file
from the application - File - Open - select the file you want.
Let me know how it goes.
Gautam
On 3/2/06, Jack Davis wrote:
.
Definately take your fastest lens with you.
-Lon
Gautam Sarup wrote:
Tom,
I'm leaning more and more towards taking the Provia and pushing it
as you suggest.
I have a few more questions by now:
1. What lenses? I don't have too many choices. The fastest Pentax
lens I have is a 50
it, the subjects are moving as well. That's why I suggested
something that can be pushed significantly
Tom C.
From: Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: aquariums
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:51:39 -0800
Thanks
Hey Bruce,
This helps.
Since I don't have any digital gear I'll have to try pushing Provia 400F to
3200 as TomC recommended. Better get the DOF I guess than open
the lens up and get a faster shutter speed. Though those decisions will
have to wait till I get to see the inside of the place.
Way out groovy, Dude! :)
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/26/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Something different.
All comments solicited, yeah, nay, and/or otherwise.
What would you do differently?
Thanks in advance
Paul,
On my low-res monitor I had to scroll to see the whole of the image.
At one point there was an effective crop from a little above the eye-
brows to the bottom of the picture. Made it look very powerful
to my eyes.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/25/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A
I'm planning a trip to the Monterey aquarium and would like advice on what
slide film to use. The only colour film I use regularly is K64 and
that's likely to
be too slow.
Suggestions will be appreciated.
Cheers,
Gautam
lighting once and everything
came out green.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/26/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gautam Sarup wrote:
I'm planning a trip to the Monterey aquarium and would like advice on what
slide film to use. The only colour film I use regularly is K64 and
that's likely
Thanks Adam. K200 is still on the market. I am getting tempted
to try some E6 films though.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/26/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Gautam Sarup wrote:
I'm planning a trip to the Monterey aquarium and would like advice on
what
slide film
On 2/25/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not buy it without SR. In fact I do not own a digital camera and a
camera need a another feature than simply digotal in order to tempt me. I'm
happy with film. Mind you, if someone stole all my gear I would certainly
not buy film cameras
Paul,
Very nice.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/25/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A profile. The venerable K 85/1.8 on the *istD. f1.8 @ 1/60th, ISO 400.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4159763
On 2/23/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I change the autofocus spot manually in respect to what I'm shooting.
[...]
Paul,
That makes sense. Unfortunately, on the MZ-S you have to
push a little switch and rotate a knob. That was too difficult
for me to manage especially given the
On 2/21/06, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I find 45 focus points laughable: the CPU must spend a huge amount of
time analysing the optimum focus distance from all those inputs!
I may be missing something there though and I'd be happy for someone to
explain the benefits to me...
On 2/22/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your input. I believe that I can make better photos than the
fellow who put up that gallery, and that I'll be able to get better shots,
and better quality shots. Nothing like a little hubris first thing in the
AM, eh LOL
'Tis
Bruce,
Nice pic. but I'm glad we cancelled our Monterey plans
this weekend. :)
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/20/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over this weekend I took the family down to Monterey, CA to see the
beach and aquarium. The big issue was the forecast. There was
supposed to be
Brian,
I think of it as a good value for money lens. I don't use it a lot
and didn't pay a lot. It does nicely enough what I do use it.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/18/06, Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's $99.95 right now at BH. Thoughts on this lens, folks, both in absolute
terms and
On 2/15/06, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in fact, religious intolerance has always been limited to
western christians and islami
The Hindus too. All religious groups that manage to
get their paws on power behave the same way. Faith
is the antithesis of reason and force is the only way it
Hey Frank,
No offense taken. It was just a matter of fact reply.
I think people who get offended or demeaned by things that
happened centuries ago should wake up.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/15/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/14/06, Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/14
Marnie,
Firstly, I didn't mean to come across as aggressive though I might have.
Secondly, there's a lot more to prices and wages than safety laws. As an
example, computer programming is a safe occupation. Having worked
in this profession in multiple countries I do not find a difference in
Boris,
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=11013
Simply great.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/13/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
I bought 43 Ltd and 77 Ltd from fellow PDMLer last year... They are
quite *amazing*. Suffices to say, I've put my FA 50/1.7 to the shelf
and haven't
On 2/14/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It ruled the part of the world that mattered...
It was a different part that mattered then...
Cheers,
Gautam
Paul,
Would be be able to tell me if you know any adapters for mounting
R lenses?
Thanks,
Gautam
On 2/11/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know the R lenses can be adapted, but Shel was speaking of an M
lens. Lenses designed for use with a bellows or the Visoflex housing
On 2/11/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, Cameraquest does not have something similar. The photo I presented was
of a special 43mm lens made by Pentax in a Leica screw mount.
[snip]
Ah!
Gautam
On 2/11/06, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outsourcing is a natural consequence of globalization. The fact is
that if we averaged the resources of the world among its population,
our nice American standard of life would not be sustainable.
Juan,
What prevents the rest of the world from
On 2/12/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. You might want to read some of John Gray's books. He torches the
comfortable idea that we are on an irresistible path towards liberal
democracy. Unfortunately.
It's not comfortable or irresistable but it's not non-existent either.
For example:
On 2/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip The path of globalization tends to lead downward to the lowest
common denominator. [snip]
How so?
Cheers,
Gautam
Camera Quest has something similar. Said to fit all M bodies except the
M6 TTL. Bummer. I'd actually be more interested if it were possible to
use Leica lenses on Pentax bodies.
Cheers,
Gautam
http://www.cameraquest.com/adaptslrRFM.htm
On 2/9/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You
Boris,
I like this more than the other one you posted recently because the
liner created a center of interest for me and the rest of the picture
falls very well around it.
Congratulations on getting a really good one.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/5/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Mike Wilson:
AFAIR, the Z1-p does not use IR for film measurement.
and
Dave Brooks:
My GFM roll of HIE was shot using my PZ-1, 28-105 and #25 Red..
So there is hope for me yet. Thanks. I'll probably process that roll
next week.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Epiglottitis with Laryngitis
Not one my favourites. Glad you're better.
Cheers,
Gautam
Ann,
My favourite after trying out a few is Kodachrome 64.
Takes about 2 weeks for processing though.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/4/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI gang,
I've hardly been here - though didn't actually unsub -
but it looks like I might have a job where I will need to
Jay,
I hope your daugher has a swift recovery.
Best Wishes,
Gautam
On 2/2/06, Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PDML'ers,
Please say a prayer for my daughter Nicole. Some of you may remember
the photos I usually post of my grandson; she is his Mom. She was
admitted to the hospital this
Definitely a Yeah! I like the intersecting lines of the dunes and the people
to add the scale. Not sure about the trees at the top.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/1/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All comments
Scott,
You're not the only one around. I have a roll to which I've
done exactly the same thing in a PZ-1p. Tell me how
the results turn out.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/2/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've had this roll of HIE in the fridge for a while and finally
decided to expose
Thanks Godfrey.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/1/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Gautam Sarup wrote:
http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg
It's a bit too much of a jumble for me. Too many intersecting and
disturbing masses, some in focus
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
