My thanks to you all for the replies. A number of interesting points made
which I hadn't thought of (reproduction ratio being one) and I will now look
at the lenses individually, check availability, then look at my budget and
make a decision.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi Sam,
You probably get this all the time, so I apologize: are you The
Malcolm Smith (the motorcyclist, racer, On Any Sunday, etc) ?
(Sorry I have no advice for macros. I'm new hear and am listening to
the answer, though.)
I'd never heard of a motorcyclist with the same name and had
What? A K-7 replacement being discussed already?
As someone who rarely buys camera equipment, especially DSLRs, I'd like just
a few moments to reflect in the moment of having something you can still buy
new in a shop. A rare moment indeed for me.
Meanwhile, I leave you to your thoughts of what
John Francis wrote:
Hey, this is the PDML - we were discussing a K-7 replacement before
the first K-7 shipped to a customer, to fix the obvious problems
with the camera. Pretty much everybody agreed that there were some
shortcomings, even if there wasn't quite as much agreement on what
mike wilson wrote:
One worth voting for:
http://www.madcapntom.co.uk/
One for political balance:
http://www.loonyparty.com/index.php?page=manifestoproposals-1
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Any of you come across this problem before and know how to resolve it?
Remembering it is always good to back things up, I have a spare drive which
I back up photos and e-mail too and have done so for months. I now have a
problem retrieving stored e-mail. When I try to open it the following
eckinator wrote:
Hi Malcom
Yes I did get your mail, I just haven't gotten around to saying yes
yet (you'd think it would be easy). I can probably help you with your
computer troubles - do you have MSN messenger? Failing that, we could
still arrange a PCvisit session using offlist mail.
Hi Bob,
I've seen this from time to time but I don't remember it as a big deal.
As
far as I recall it happens either when Windows has been running for
quite a
while and is presumably not freeing up some resources that Outlook
needs, or
possibly when there's some sort of problem on my
Bob W wrote:
Type Repair into the Outlook help box and try some of their
suggestions,
such as the Inbox repair tool - it could be that your .pst file is in
an
inconsistent state for some reason.
I will ask her to have a go at that on her return.
Thanks,
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Just after the postage only for these two if anyone is interested:
Ilford Manual Of Photography: Originally published in Sept' '42, this is the
April 1954 reprint. Hardback 472 pages, cover a little scruffy as the dust
jacket long gone. Many aspects of photography covered including modern film
Her look changes from surprise to an equal mix of confusion and
concern. Do you /really/?
Good grief, that wasn't confusion and concern, that was fear.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Thomas Bohn wrote:
In the end she concluded, that thieves should study literature.
http://www.kulturindustrie.com/struebelundpassig/2001_10_25.html
(German)
Very good! I'd like to say I read the original, but I had to put it through
a translator which gave it a more surreal slant (translator
Ecke wrote:
Did you use the infamous Speck Roberts translator?
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=just+call+me+speckl=p...@pdml.net
Don't go there; this will begin a trip into the PDML 'Twilight Zone'.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Any recommendations for an SD memory card for a K7, largest capacity at best
price?
Thanks,
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Bob W wrote:
I don't know about largest capacity at best price - I wonder if those
are
the best criteria for a memory card. I use Sandisk Extreme III cards,
the
largest available for whatever camera I'm using. The lowest prices
appear to
be from Amazon and 7dayshop.com, both of which
Richard D Bush wrote:
I just bought SDHD memory cards made by ADATA in the 16GB capacity.
These cards are rated as being a class 10 card. So far, they seem to
be doing a good job and they weren't too expensive. I think I paid
slightly more than $28 per card and I bought three. There was also
Richard D Bush wrote:
I was way off on the price. I paid $39.99 per 16GB card and S/H was
$8.32. The total price was $128.28.
I bought them from:
ord...@mydigitaldiscount.com
I'm not sure if this was the best possible price out there, but it
seemed reasonable to me. Hope this helps.
eckinator wrote:
the SDHC standard has a ceiling of 32 or 64 GB. afaik K-7 fully
supports SDHC
Pentax recommends SanDisk Extreme III (it is in the manual and also on
their web page) and my experience with SanDisk since 2003 is only
positive so far. I buy my cards at amazon and best value
eckinator wrote:
oh and there is also the UT330
sorry about all the little bits of info
All useful, thanks again.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Hi Paul,
Sandisk Extreme III have proven the most reliable in my heavy use. I
have several in 8 gig size. The only Sandisk card failure I
experienced was due to physical damage. I've tried Transcend cards as
well. They're top of the line card isn't as fast as the Extreme III,
and I bought
Ecke wrote:
just make sure you buy them from a reputable source rather than the
cheapest - according to sandisk germany (i asked) approx 90% of
sandisk cards sold on ebay germany are fakes
good luck
ecke
7dayshop for this order I think. Used them before some time ago then
completely forgot
Ecke wrote:
good. in that case, I'll go on: 3rd in the list is the GL826 -
measurebators rate it higher for SDHC and lower for CF but digisol
uses it in less products so there may be a reason... I played safe and
got the UT335 which is youngest of the trio and getting rave reviews
and forum
Hi Boris,
I buy SanDisk cards, the fastest variety and from the merchant that I
am
sure won't try to push me a fake. Since this is rather expensive, I
usually buy not the largest capacity card, but one or two steps lower.
Say, approximately a year ago I bought 8 GB Ultra III card for my K-7.
Ecke wrote:
OK in this case I will translate what I found in the meantime (the
chips are gneeric btw as I dunno where digisol ships and at what cost)
UT330 - they call it the vw beetle twin turbo - very fast incl CF
UDMA, no known compatibility issues
UT335 - same as UT330 but with external
Doug Franklin wrote:
It might do to check the rest of your gear, too, though. I just
discovered that all my gear is compatible with 8GB SDHC cards, except
my
stupid card reader. :-(
I can say with some certainty that nearly everything else I own will be
hopelessly out of date. Upgrades
naah, they start at EUR 3.99
From my 0.99, that's a huge percentage increase! Still, I hear what you say
and it doesn't look so bad at that level.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Paul Sorenson wrote:
There's a pretty good discussion of transfer (read/write) speed and
class of SD cards here:
http://shutterbug.com/equipmentreviews/accessories/0210memory/
I don't know what the read/write/class parameters are for the K7 but
they should be in the manual and this
Boris,
Malcolm, I had no intention to frighten you. However let me translate
one of the sayings I learned here: We're not rich enough to buy cheap
things...
That I can't argue with.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Another fantastic gallery and one that seems to improve month on month. All
excellent and a particular mention of Tour Effiel At Night by Carl Gjersem -
wonderful.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Beats a tripod and a long lens to get close to your subject!
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Motors/Boats-marine/Motorboats/auction-274
622678.htm
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
frank theriault wrote:
One of the many things that pisses me off about this is that those
with real cameras aren't what security and cops should concern
themselves with - it's cellphone cameras that they ought to worry
about. They're everywhere, and I see people using them all the time
in
Mark Roberts wrote:
It's definitely *possible* for electronic devices to accumulate enough
gunk from tobacco smoke to legitimately void the warranty. I've worked
as a tech on consumer electronics in the past and, like others, I've
seen it.
The issue here is that one of the parties is
Hi Jostein,
Looking forward to hearing more about the trip and of course, seeing the
pictures.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Scott Loveless wrote:
November PUG is up at http://pug.komkon.org/
Usual high standard - my two favourites; Mum And Dad by Katy and First Dance
by Claire.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Larry Colen wrote:
It seems as if nominal exposure is somewhere between 10-25 seconds at
f/1.8 and ISO 400. However, I just have to bracket the hell out of
each shot, and then pick the best when I get home.
Digital is wonderful though because I can at least get into the right
ballpark by
Scott Loveless wrote:
Sorry for the delay. http://pug.komkon.org/
Another great gallery. My favourite equal three were Chief Captain by
Eckehard Wegner; My First Pose by David Brooks and Showing Off by Christine
Aquila.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Marnie wrote:
It's a nice street portrait. I like.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
So do I. You've come up with some real photographic beauties recently Frank.
I'm also glad to hear I'm not the only one who still likes using film.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Larry Colen wrote:
We got to my camera just as the bracketed set was finishing up, and I
put one of the shots on the display.
Cool!
I've narrowed the myriad of bracketed shots from that session down to
14, I still have some work to do:
Chris Mitchell wrote:
http://www.mitch.myzen.co.uk/MiniPDMLNov09/
Lovely set of photographs, really not sure which I like the best.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
frank theriault wrote:
I love my new neighbourhood (I've been here since April). Lots of
down-and-out types (I live two blocks from Toronto's largest
psychiatric facility), lots of new loft condos and yuppies, and lots
of art galleries. Walking down the street always brings interesting
Marnie wrote:
http://www.mapphotography.com/PAWS/pages/store.htm
Tell me if you agree.
(I've thought about taking the foliage out from under the tree, but
think
that might not be an improvement. I've also thought about adding
vignetting, ditto, might not improve it.)
I'd really
frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/10/all-day-breakfast.html
I love the shadows cast across the pavement.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Two quick points:
Cost. Pure and simple the cost of film purchase and development makes
digital capture right for 90%+ of my photography.
E6 - I've always seen this as a different animal. Whilst it is available, it
is an 'as well as'.
I've always had issues with film or digital for certain uses
Tom C wrote:
Certainly! Whenever I attempt to venture back to film, I can't seem
to seriously do it (regardless of how much I enjoy the smell of a
freshly open film canster).
How interesting. I don't feel anywhere near as confident with a digital
camera as I do with film and I suspect in
frank theriault wrote:
You did well to make that harsh light very nice looking. Scrumptious
looking apple!
Nicely done.
Thanks Frank.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Tom C wrote:
Not being argumentative, just thinking out loud and thinking that
because of the short life cycle of digital products, maybe our
parameters for measuring them should also be changing.
Before the introduction of the *ist D, this was discussed at length and from
memory, most of
Bob Sullivan wrote:
You held out a long time and will be blown away by the K-7.
Anti-shake, more pixels, better rendering,,,you're gonna love it!
Some adjustment of your photo processing software hardware may be
necessary.
I still have my original *ist DS.
It has been superceded by better
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I have an *istD sitting right behind me in my office at work. It's the
official dept. camera. We will continue to use it until it breaks. We
just don't' need more MP or AF speed. Eventually, I think that more
cameras will be like that. $2000 or less, 32 MP,
Is this getting through?
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Well, the test got through so here is a picture I took last Sunday. This is
the first time I've taken a picture for the enjoyment of just being out with
a camera for some considerable time and I had great fun.
The discussion on the K-7 has been fascinating.
Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
the vertical branch is distracting, the focus a little off, or too
shallow, and the white balance simce not entirely correct (it's too
warm i think) the light is well, a bit boring - sun only and all that,
and the subject is also kind of uninteresting. so, your
Jack Davis wrote:
I get it, but those things don't ripen around here 'til fall. Have
already started enjoying this season's production.
Nice scene.
A bumper harvest this year, taken on a warm day with not a cloud in the sky.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
I played with an S2 and an M9 and now I have to win the lottery, or
start
mugging rich old ladies.
I've always fancied owning a Leica and I had to look up how much they were
being launched at, having read your posting.
Gasp! Lottery win territory.
Malcolm
--
PDML
Steve Desjardins wrote:
They have stuff like this in Texas. It's call a rifle. ;-)
Another use for film then. No CCD issue there.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Bob W wrote:
Have you seen my buttocks?
I can't believe you've lost them!
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Unbelieveable. What does it matter what a camera looks like? I like the
manual film quote...It's not too often you hear stories of
people talking down Leicas. What a maroon.
It's funny, but I get the same looks and type of questions about the 67
every once in a
Bob W wrote:
I don't think he knew what a Leica was. Anyway, whaddya mean 'more
expensive
footwear'? What makes you think I was looking at the cheap stuff?
Salesman thinks.he can't even afford a digital camera, I'm not going to
sell expensive shoes to this guy
Malcolm
--
PDML
Scott Loveless wrote:
I've been cranky lately.
Keep up the good work!
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Fantastic; Seeing Eye's first management trainee?
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
William Robb wrote:
Yes.
A very expensive three letter reply. This puts the camera in a short list of
one.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Doug Brewer wrote:
But whatever, I guess everyone was waiting for the real photographers to
get one so they could ask questions about it. I suppose at some point
I'll get the current firmware.
I don't fall into that bracket, I'm just someone who sees the camera as a
fun hobby item, who on
mike wilson wrote:
_Still_ not finished? Are you quarrying the slate?
Ten weeks work, about six in and should be fully watertight and tiled
completely by next weekend. Conversion of chalet bungalow to house - and
then putting a loft conversion over the top. Horrendous to live through (but
Bob W wrote:
Hmm. As I write we're in the middle of a torrential downpour and noisy
electrical storm. It's been hot and muggy all day. While I was walking
home
the thunderclaps were coming about 1 second after the lightning bolt,
so the
storm was more or less overhead, but there were few
David Savage wrote:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2459/3610166223_2e7bdb5b83_o.jpg
Congratulations Dave. Is this also your PUG entry for July, as in 'flying by
the seat of...'?
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Sorry Bill,
No idea what it is - have I missed the identifying post?
On another OT car subject, does anyone know of a website or publication
which lists cars (new and old) by dimension? I really want to find a list of
cars no wider than 66 inches - a Google search proved fruitless.
Malcolm
--
William Robb wrote:
Ford Prefect from the late 40s, early 50s.
John Francis gets the canoe on this one.
Ah! The only one I've seen has been highly modified by a different
generation (V8 Jaguar auto box). So that's what they really look like.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Anthony Farr wrote:
everyone with both a camera and a cat eventually puts a cat-picture on the
web.
I think Cesar may reach a different conclusion, especially if the camera in
question is an LX.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
This is absolutely classic. A must read.
http://www.picstips.com/pentax/pentax-k-7-hands-on-preview.html
Must normally write the instructions for the assembly of flat packed
furniture.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
http://brickfieldterrace.wordpress.com/
Long overdue. Excellent.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Hi Bob,
But having said that I will give some thought to a small but high-
quality
camera that I can leave in my bag with my other day-to-day crap. Any
ideas?
I wanted a digital camera I could leave in the car and forget. I was
recommended the Technika SH340T 3.1MP, takes an SD card (up to
Does anyone remember when this was first available to buy, rather than all
the hype that seemed forever to lead up to it?
Thanks,
Malcolm
PS - As it's April 3rd, better finish on a song:
Who Brings the Cheese on April 3rd?
It's the Cheese Weasel!
He's not a silly bunny or a reindeer or a bird
Thanks John,
Late 2003 IIRC
I think I'm overdue some enablement then.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
John Whittingham wrote:
The K20D is very nice, and the prices have come down quite a bit, but I
still enjoy using the *istD.
I've just spent an enjoyable few minutes browsing the Park Cameras website.
If only I could decide on the lens package...
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi John,
Park Cameras always seem a little pricey to me, I've had very good
service from SRS and cheaper prices for genuine UK products. As an
examle:
DA 15mm f/4 ED AL
Park Cameras £569.99
SRS Microsystems £479.00
Might be worth a look, I generally just go for the body only option
frank theriault wrote:
Who Brings the Cheese on April 3rd?
It's the Cheese Weasel!
He's not a silly bunny or a reindeer or a bird
He's the Cheese Weasel!
He's got a funny little tail and funny buck teeth
and he doesn't bring fish and he doesn't bring beef
so you'd better be good
Hi John,
I'd like to increase my lens collection. I think that's fair enough
after a break of 5 years from buying!
I agree, the first thing I went looking for was something for the wide
end, I can thoroghly recommend the DA 16-45/4 very good lens and not
too expensive. Most of my kit
Bob W wrote:
You know, my husband I have never camped together we've
been together
for almost 18 years. I think we are going to come as the comedy
entertainment. We priced tents sleeping bags the other
day--happy to see
we can get a small Coleman cheap--that should do, shouldn't
Hi Mike,
This is just a thought to try to bump up the proceeds for the charity.
If we send a copy around all contributors to sign, we could then ebay
(or otherwise) it. Each contributor pays (or other wise arranges) to
move the book on to the next signee.
What if each contributor sent a
Frank Theriault wrote:
This kind of shit has to be stopped dead in its tracks.
It's really more of a diarrhoea; this sort of thing has been trickling
through the system for years.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Bob W wrote:
http://www.web-options.com/idlc.jpg
Up to your usual excellent standard. Very nice.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
David J Brooks wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8514555
There were two chains hanging down from the entrance and this one
caught my eye.
Not sure if i like my conversion, or the colour better.
Caught my eye too Dave, I really like this.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/runners.jpg
Mad. Utterly mad. Yet they are great pictures and you all look as if you've
had a great time.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Bob W wrote:
http://www.foto8.com/home/content/view/760/136/
A magnificent set of pictures, the use of light and the focus of a
particular scene is just superb. We've always had pictures on our walls at
home; nothing special, just local artists work of local scenes in
watercolours or oil, and
Peter Alling wrote:
The Prisoner escaped, well sort of...
Ah!
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
My goodness! Is it that time of year already, or is Cotty getting more than
one a year?
Anyway, Happy Birthday!
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Derby Chang wrote:
I'm using that very scanner with Vista 32-bit right now. There is a
Vista driver.
http://support.nikontech.com/cgi-
bin/nikonusa.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=14463
No 64-bit version, though. The Coolscan was the only reason I chose to
stay 32-bit for now (says
Bob W wrote:
I used to watch it on a Friday evening when we lived in Gibraltar. My
older
sibs were away at school, my parents went out for the evening and left
me to
babysit my younger brother, so I must have been 10 and it must have
been
1967-8, and I was an avid fan of The Prisoner. I
Jostein wrote:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2009/01/eagles-day-2.html
Spectacular photography.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/01/takin-it-to-streets.html
I love this, so much going on.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
David J Brooks wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/presentation?presentation_id=434798
Post and Shadow is particularly nice.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
they have much better things to do than bother me. They're too busy
apprehending the real terror suspects:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2094122.ece
That seems fair comment to me Bob, these people are frightening and a clear
terror problem.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Bob W wrote:
http://www.web-options.com/Top12/content/L1030189_large.html
Fantastic. Are you concerned by the unwelcome reaction to photography, that
seems - if to be believed by BBC1 London Local News - the increasing
likelihood of getting asked what you're up to by the boys in blue?
Malcolm
Bob W wrote:
I laugh in the face of Peelers!
People don't usually bother me. A couple of years ago I took some snaps
in
Canary Wharf of the thuggish bouncers on the door of Lehman Brothers,
and
they got a bit stroppy with me, but I put a curse on their bank, and
look
what happened.
I
John Sessoms wrote:
The Coolscan IV ED works fine with Windoze XP.
I use the software that came in the box. It also works as a TWAIN
source
for PhotoShop CS CS2 running on Windoze XP, so you can scan directly
from Photoshop.
I haven't tried mine with Vista 'cause it's working fine
Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8482863
Great shot Paul - as a car magazine customer this cover really stands out,
this issue will fly off the shelves.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Joseph McAllister wrote:
You do have to be careful about connect-ability and software driver
availability.
I have a Coolscan with ICE, but I have to run it on an old Mac G3
computer because it's SCSI.
It does well, but it's slow. I only scan the best slides on it. The
rest I use a
Thanks Adam,
If the Nikon software is not compatible with Vista you can replace it
with VueScan which will support the Coolscan IV under Vista.
The Coolscan IV does as much as I need at a far lesser price, and that would
be ideal.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks Godfrey,
The Nikon Coolscan IV ED... I found one used about two years ago for
around $235 and have been using it since. Excellent scanner. It
connects to your system with a USB 2.0 interface.
I don't use Nikon's provided software. I use Ed Hamrick's VueScan to
drive it, and I know
Ken Waller wrote:
I've hard this scanner for several years and it continues to perfom
extremely well IMHO. With a large number of slides to scan you might
want to
look for the bulk loader that was available for it. Also if you don't
need
the absolute highest resolution, you can greatly
John Celio wrote:
I have a Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 (the big daddy). Nikon has Vista
drivers for that scanner, so it's likely they'd have them for your
scanner too. I just checked the Nikon website and it says they do have
Vista drivers for your scanner. All their drivers and scanning
801 - 900 of 1859 matches
Mail list logo
