Ryan Brooks wrote:
Just picked up the M8. First impressions (pictures will have to wait
until tomorrow):
First test pics here:
www.hack.net/m8
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Just picked up the M8. First impressions (pictures will have to wait
until tomorrow):
- Really solid.
- Very nice user interface (mechanical and software)... especially the
menus. Super easy to navigate and work with; everything is very obvious.
- Lowest ISO is 160 (1/8000th top shutter
Tom Reese wrote:
We had a good time and it was a worthwhile stop on our tour since we were
going through there anyway. I don't know that it's worth a visit by I
definitely recommend it in combination with the National Parks that are
within a day's drive.
I've been there three times
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
My experience with JCO was not a pleasant one, and, because of that, I will
not do business with him again. As an eBay buyer - especially one dealing
with a fellow list member - I don't want confrontational and accusatory
emails. Sh!t happens, and there's no reason not
Actually, make sure you get a CardBus reader instead; physically
compatible with PCMCIA, but much faster transfers. (A USB2.0 reader
will be much faster than just a normal PCMCIA reader.)
-Ryan
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) Can I get that or older versions as a free download?
Someone wrote (on our list) I could download 7.1 and I can't find that
email now
I want to start using my road runner email account but would definitely
not like to
use outlook.
thanks
j wrote:
Ann, why not use Eudora for your e-mail and Opera for your browser. I
have been using them both for a long,long timeJ
Eudora is also switching to Thunderbird:
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS7305911803.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a mate telling me a high res drum scan of a 6x7 neg would only be
10MB in
TIFF format. Surely it would be in the hundreds of MB neighbourhood wouldn't
it?
Yes.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Gonz wrote:
I have alot of Kodachrome slides taken with my trusty ME-Super all the
way up to my PZ-1. I have been attempting to scan these with my Epson
4990, which is a pretty decent scanner from what I've read. But the
slides always seem to scan very dark, even though I can put them on
Boris Liberman wrote:
Third.
On 10/9/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
second
Here here. Go ahead and add $100 to the MSRP for this function, Pentax.
I guess we're past the only three people care point.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You are getting more DOF with the 70mm though.. it would be nice if it
was faster to make up for this.
-R
Adam Maas wrote:
At f2.4, the 70 is about perfect for me. Essentially the same length and
speed as the legendary Nikon 105 f2.5, which is a superb portrait lens.
-Adam
Bob Sullivan
Is it the official camera of the Internet though?
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Christian wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
That's damned near the slickest brochure I've ever seen from pentax.
I'm tempted to ask who are these people and what did they do with the
real Asahi?.
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 9/12/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 9/11/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I've got a couple machines that I expect to climb in value over the next
10 years, but they're working
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I've got a 4-processor Onyx with RealityEngine2 here that I'd love to
sell...
Space-heater? ;-)
No kidding! I measured the draw and decided not to run it at home.
Neat system, was better in a colo where I didn't have to pay for power.
--
PDML
Adam Maas wrote:
No, you're changing the conversion curve and levels. ISO is normally set
at the ADC stage.
No, it's set by the amplifier(s) before the A/D.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
For fun, I added it to my cart and got a much earlier delivery date.
-R
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
But November 20 availability. Sigh.
On Sep 13, 2006, at 9:45 PM, Gonz wrote:
For those who tried to get it at BH and were not able:
http://tinyurl.com/jg7aj
rg
--
PDML
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Interesting. Is it not also true that the CF to PC card adapters are
basically passive adaption? The PCMCIA specification is very adaptable.
Yes, it is not true. PCMCIA is more like ISA, so an adapter would have
electronics.
--
PDML
Charles Robinson wrote:
..for those of you who haven't already read the PDF file circulating
around.
http://www.steves-digicams.com/pr/pentax_09132006_k10d_pr.html?AType=0
Great camera!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Matt Kelch wrote:
Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
part of
why its still around.
I'm not sure about CF using or being a modified IDE.
It is. In fact, there are even passive adapters for CF-IDE
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Kind of hard to miss the focus on a moon shot, it's infinity
Agreed. But if the lens was focused short of infinity ?
Or past infinity, which most long lenses will do.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Mark Roberts wrote:
This limit is believed to be 4 per pixel?
Who believes this and why?
I do.
It's all about the well size, Rob posted the chart earlier.
-R
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Jack Davis wrote:
This is why I ask for a review. Glad I did!
More bits doesn't lower noise or increase dynamic range (unless you're
talking about s/n electrically- which isn't applicable here).
As Rob pointed out, full well capacity of these sensors is 65k
electrons, so anything more
in film.
I'm sure this will be figured out eventually, but it's been this way for a
long time- interesting time to be alive, that's for sure.
Whatever the next sensor technology is, I wonder if more dynamic range
will mean more film look.
-R
--- Ryan Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack
I've been using one; works great for native apps... still prefer the G5
for photoshop and any MS Office work.
Absolutely flies w/ CaptureOne compared to the G5.
-R
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, David J Brooks wrote:
Any one here running the new Mac desktops with the dual chips. If so,
any comments.
The team at Apple predicted this result as far back as 1999 (maybe a
little earlier ... that's when I became involved in the effort) and
much of Mac OS X's inner workings were architected to provide a good
degree of processor independence and a reasonable schema for moving
forward through a
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Doug Franklin wrote:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
Even two seconds may not be long enough for a large heavy well damped
rig, think very low frequency oscillations as a function of depressing
the shutter.
Two seconds is /not/ enough when I'm trying to get moon photos
I'll take 5 years and $500.
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:29:25 +0100, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Large format digital backs won't always be too expensive. I can see a
tiled back of APS-C sensors selling for less than 2K in a couple of
years.
You absolutely need a drive at that magnification and shutter speed.
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Doug Franklin wrote:
ryan brooks wrote:
I would think that at that kind of focal length you would need a drive to
compensate for the Earth's rotation.
What shutter speed are you using?
I wouldn't
At 1/30th of a second, at your focal length, the moon will move through
about 40 sensor pixels. (this is back of the envelope- I'll do it again
tomorrow).
-73s, n9ybx
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Doug Franklin wrote:
ryan brooks wrote:
You absolutely need a drive at that magnification
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Nielsen Bainbridge sells 8-ply museum matts in precut sizes. It's a
This is something that has always confused me. Does 8-ply just mean
thick or are there actually 8-lines within the cut that are visible?
-Ryan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
You can always hold the power button down for a few seconds to force a
power off. The filesystem is journalling by default, so you won't hurt
anything.
(I assume you've already tried to kill anything still running).
-R
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, David J Brooks wrote:
Sent a bunch of files to
Thanks for the recommendation.
An English friend recommended a BBC film called Shooting the Past- hard
to describe, and certainly English, but hits home- recommended.
-R
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
www.brickmovie.net
If you havn't, and you like film noir/detective films
,
but they've gone and changed my favorite frame (for the worse, of course)-
but I'm hooked on the thick mats.
Im just looking for a normal white core, with a white face. Thanks for
any pointers,
Ryan Brooks
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Thanks- it looks like Crescent Select 3/32 is what I'm after. -Ryan
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, William Robb wrote:
Crescent Select is a thick board. Any online supplier shoild have it.
http://www.americanframe.com/catalog/matboard/matboard.html?-session=sAFshop:184888CE1443e0133Brkyp359F8B
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The '1.5x crop' sensor format was chosen as a reasonable compromise
Nah, not chosen. Dictated by economics.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Adam Maas wrote:
The only complaints about crop factors and telephoto's I've run acros
are about 85's. Not many people are happy that their uber-pricey
portrait tele's are now too long for general use and the 50's don't have
the bokeh of those 85's. The biggest complainers seem to be the
graywolf wrote:
Internet paths are a drunkard's walk. One email may go directly from a
to b, another may go from a to z to h to g to y to k to e to r to b.
Obviously the first message would arrive sooner than the second. It
works amazingly well unless some server along the way accepts the
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Huh?
On Aug 27, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
The difference of a 50mm crop of a ~31mm lens versus a 50mm full-frame
shot.
My complaint is about normal lengths, ala 50mm. A 31mm perspective is
fine, but the 31mm focal length doesn't look normal
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
The only complaints about crop factors and telephoto's I've run acros
are about 85's. Not many people are happy that their uber-pricey
portrait tele's are now too long for general use and the 50's
don't have
Anthony Farr wrote:
My point is that the profile needs to be applied before the data enters the
digital domain, early in the a/d conversion. It needn't matter that the
voltage rise is squared (if that's what you mean) as the brightness rises,
as long as it's a constant and predictable
Anthony Farr wrote:
Oh. I see. Why?
Because, you've obviously figure out something that electrical engineers
and physicists have missed for 20 years. Congrats!
-Ryan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Anthony Farr wrote:
You need to click the DETAILS tab under the image to show the caption.
PhotoNet would rather show you an advertisement when the page first loads.
What the scales show is that an unmanipulated linear greyscale produced by a
digital camera has considerably darker shadows
It's all about how our eyes see versus how sensors see. The sensor may
technically be correct, but I want to photograph things the way that I see.
Me too. But the data coming from the _physics_ of the CCD is linear.
Nothing you can do about that unless you change the sensor technology.
.
References:
http://www.normankoren.com/digital_tonality.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_correction
-R
-R
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ryan
Brooks
Sent: Friday, 18 August 2006 1:22 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Anthony Farr wrote:
Yet another observation. Every time anyone adjusts curves or tweaks the
levels in Photoshop, what they are really doing is changing their digital
image from a linear rendition to a non-linear rendition.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
Even before
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 16/08/06, Ryan Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ya got a tough on there- I can't find it either.
I found some vague references such as:
http://www.hqew.com/stock/searchic.asp?keyword=ULA2G131E2
It may be custom, or it may just be a few mosfets
Mark Roberts wrote:
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Aug 15, 2006, at 15:59, Cotty wrote:
I suppose if you
have shale reduction in the body, then it would allow the photographer
to buy a cheaper, slower lens and hand-hold at a slower speed.
And it would simplify the task of
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 16/08/06, Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't find reference to it in any databook or online resource. Is there
any other marking, or manufacturer?
Is it possible its a programmable gate array chip of some sort? ULA is a
common abbreviation
I love this lens, but I think I'd prefer a prime because of size. It's
a truly amazing optic, but I'd like to see if anyone would like to trade
a late 55mm prime + cash? for it. It's in perfect shape, with the hood,
caps and a Pentax SMC filter.
Contact via private email, Thanks!
-Ryan
Gun control argument thread in 3.. 2... 1...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The Fuji F30 I ordered just arrived. I haven't read the instruction
manual yet to figure out the settings and options, but on first
glance and a couple of quick snaps with it, it is fast responding,
the image quality looks excellent at ISO 200 and 400, and it fits
Tom C wrote:
Mr. Robb wrote:
There aren't a lot of 24x36mm DSLRs out there, so get used to the new
format.
There's alot! Maybe only one model. ;-)
Tom C.
Current: 5D, 1DsM2
Not-current: 1Ds, DCS-14n and -14c
-Ryan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
graywolf wrote:
Electric motors and generators are about 30% effective. 30% of 30% is
about 10%, so regenerative breaking gets back is about 10% max! That is
better than a kick in the pants*, but not much. RB is mostly a feature
that cost little to implement and sounds good in the
Tom Reese wrote:
I'm putting a tour together and Monument Valley is one of the places we want
to visit. I understand that we'll need to rent a 4 WD vehicle and hire a tour
guide?
Does anyone have any advice they'd care to pass along?
Just show up at the visitor center and hire a local
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think someone asked this a while back, but i can find nothing on it.
I'm not a fan of iphoto to do customer slideshow views on my ibook, don't
like having to
load into a
folder and then load into iphoto.
Can anyone recommend a viewer other than PS browser, for
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Here's another question for those on the list who are more
PC-knowledgeable than I am. Apologies to everyone else.
My two-month-old Dell laptop has acquired the odd quirk of showing the
message End Program...System Shell Extension...End Now when I shut it
down. I
Bob W wrote:
I would expect we'd be advised by that Moslem pdml'er as to
local customs if
it affected him/her.
Let's try it. I have converted to Islam. I no longer wish to see any
photographs that depict human beings. Please do not post any more to
the list, otherwise I could get
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/20/06, Ryan Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a religion where pictures of cats aren't allowed?
Johnstonism
I tried to join, but I never got the book.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Some images taken of the 21mm on the *istD:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/pentax.php
Anything through instead of on ?:-)
-Ryan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well done. Nice detail in the highlights, good bokeh. Like it.
Paul
What's up with the area to the left of the bird? Distracting...
something cloned out?
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At least I
Ryan Brooks wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well done. Nice detail in the highlights, good bokeh. Like it.
Paul
What's up with the area to the left of the bird? Distracting...
something cloned out?
right that is.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Doug Brewer wrote:
Godfrey and anyone else,
I've been sorely tempted to try out Aperture for my Mac at home, as
it looks to be a pretty good program. Have any of you run it through
any sort of testing?
thanks,
Doug
I've used it on and off in the original version (1.0) and a
skye wrote:
On 7/14/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/7/06, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
still not
interested in photographing road kill, graffiti or the misery of the
human condition.
That about wraps it up for London then
--
hah! Rubbish. I
Amita Guha wrote:
Does anyone here have any experience with the Epson P-4000 image tank
or its predecessor? I think I might finally buy one. Right now I'm
trying to figure out if the battery is removable. I'd love to hear
from anyone who has it or has used one.
Thanks,
Amita
I've got
Amita Guha wrote:
Thanks, Ryan! How often do you recommend recharging the batteries? I
am looking at taking it on a 2-week trip abroad, and both my husband
and I will be using it, and maybe transferring about 3-4 GB to it
daily.
I should also say the Epson is built like a tank; feels
Amita Guha wrote:
Thanks, Ryan! How often do you recommend recharging the batteries? I
am looking at taking it on a 2-week trip abroad, and both my husband
and I will be using it, and maybe transferring about 3-4 GB to it
daily.
From microdrives or something solid state?If the
Amita Guha wrote:
On 7/13/06, Ryan Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita Guha wrote:
Thanks, Ryan! How often do you recommend recharging the batteries? I
am looking at taking it on a 2-week trip abroad, and both my husband
and I will be using it, and maybe transferring about 3-4 GB
Christian wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
I'm sorry to hear that. I'm even sorrier to see you use obsolete as a
verb. 8-)
Ah, a holdover from my days in Components Engineering, I'm afraid.
I'm probably scarred for life!
As long as you don't use architect as a verb... As
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Here are few shots to support my anti-rant earlier today...
31 Ltd:
http://boris.isra-shop.com/temp/005A.jpg
http://boris.isra-shop.com/temp/012A.jpg
http://boris.isra-shop.com/temp/024A.jpg
You should post these to the Leica board, everyone would comment
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Here are few shots to support my anti-rant earlier today...
31 Ltd:
http://boris.isra-shop.com/temp/005A.jpg
http://boris.isra-shop.com/temp/012A.jpg
http://boris.isra-shop.com/temp/024A.jpg
You should post these
Adam Maas wrote:
Most electronic goods are shipped by sea in containers. Pentax cameras
fall into that category, as does most of Canons stuff. Only expensive,
low volume sales items would be shipped by air (Like a Canon 1Ds or
Hasselblad H2D, and the former likely gets sent by sea anyways,
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
I am not sure if this has been discussed, sorry if it
has, but I found it really interesting:
The other day I discovered this site that let’s you
publish a photo book and share the benefits with them:
http://www.lulu.com
BTW, I discovered it looking to ‘our’ Juan
Jens Bladt wrote:
Dear list
Does DL have special/new RAW-file formats. My Phase One LE won't rede the
RAW-files
Regards
Bladt
They are exactly the same, except for the camera identifier :-).
Capture One, et al will read them now, but you need the latest version,
which is a free download.
It's possible to do even better than that - if the motion detectors
include accelerometers then the stabilization logic could smooth out
wobbles while maintaining the same average pan rate.
The motion sensors are accelerometers. That's really all they could be.
I'd love to see that, and
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I won't use a filter on any lens, not matter how valuable, unless I
require filtration. I figure there's not much point in buying superior
lenses and then shooting through a piece of inferior glass. Even if the
filter is of optimum quality, it's adding an unnecessary
Bob Rapp wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong.
jpeg files are compressed 8-bit image files.
Tiff (from the camera) are 8-bit image files that have not been
compressed.
RAW contains 12-bit information from each sensor site that can be
converted to 16-bit TIFF in a raw converter
P. J. Alling wrote:
It blocks malicious, and sometimes not particularly malicious,
contact from the web
Not web... let's say Internet.
It's been suggested that I install a fire wall, but I don't really know
what one is or how they work. So, what's a fire wall, how does it work,
what are the
Ah, Puffins now. Here's my version:
http://www.rkbrooks.com/albums/rkb/Puffin.jpg
-Ryan
I have no problem imagining the bird on the right telling a hell of a
fishing story: It was _this_ large.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=235384
*istDS, Tokina AT-X 150-500/5,6 @
DagT wrote:
No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
person in the background.
DagT
Ditto here. The story was the CIA guy, not the President. Excellent
timing on the shot too- sums things up well.
-Ryan
Den 7. mai. 2006 kl. 19.47 skrev Igor Roshchin:
graywolf wrote:
Interesting. Last night I rolled back all the XP Pro automatic updates
back to mid December. Now my computer seems to run faster and my
Internet connection is measurably faster (3x by the tests on
broadband.com), and I am getting more PDML posts too. However I still
have the
Powell Hargrave wrote:
On 2006-04-29 20:21, Bob W wrote:
Sure. In that case, North America is tiny compared with Europe. As long as
you forget everything except Maryland.
Check the globe or an area-true map to compare north america vs. africa...
- Martin
I find a globe works
Anyway, thanks for the help, everyone! I think I will stick with NimHs
for now. It's still more economical than LIs. I just need to find the
best place to buy good ones online.
I've had great luck here:
http://www.thomas-distributing.com/
Really good info.
-Ryan
Thanks,
Amita
graywolf wrote:
Mark is probably running the XP webserver option on his system. It
comes with XP Pro but is not automatically installed.
He'd have to install a lot more than that to run Gallery, Methinks
he's running something else called gallery. Gallery doesn't generate
static html
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Ryan
this is a real and dangerous misunderstanding of the purpose of Raid
technology IMHO.
Raid keeps your system running if one drive fails at a time but would not
help against software corruption,
(user) deletion of files, fire, theft and many more.
greetings
Tom C wrote:
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages fron
the list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML
list inner workings. Is is in general aggravating.
I am curious though... Sometimes I'll reply to an existing PDML e-mail
in order to have
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
A few years ago I worked with a man from Scotland.
When he'd go down to London they'd give his money a close visual
inspection.
Hold it up to the light. Make sure it's real. (This is apparently a
common insult to the Scots.)
So when he got a bill in return the
Butch Black wrote:
Hi Guys;
Any recommendations on an FTP program, preferably shareware or
freeware. I could have used one a few weeks ago. I doubt that I would
use it often so I don't want to spend much money on it.
Butch
note to self. Never assume that because is educated that they will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What caused this phenomenon? Is it simply an effect of the petals being out of
focus?
Yeah- I think so. I think the out of focus (and esp. in front of the
focus) area is just plain strange looking. Very shallow depth of field,
but since you captured that in
2. When do you use sharp/unsharp filters in the PS or
other software? (any hints on how to judge a reasonable level?)
Keep in mind your target. Sharpening for the web is different than
sharpening for a printer, for example. I believe some of the
sharpening plug-ins available keep this
Rick Womer wrote:
Sooo...I bought a 16-45 to go with my ist D. Sent in
the form, the receipt, and the bar code from the box
as instructed.
Today I get an email from the Express Group Rebate
Service Center alleging that I did not include the bar
code, therefore they won't send my rebate.
No moire, the tranny is held just out of contact with the glass in a
plastic frame.
It's actually Newton Rings that you're getting when you touch the glass
with the negative.
-R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the link. Look at the hikers on the mountain's ridge.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.equipment.large-format/browse_frm/thread/1ce1471b125dc7d9/31020ee691ea0e6f?hl=en#31020ee691ea0e6f
And given some recent ng discussion, many seem
Adam Maas wrote:
The one sad thing about teh digital PS market is there is no
replacement for a Yashica T4 or Oly XA.
I'd love a pocketable PS with a moderately fast wide-angle (24-28
equivalent) prime. If it had decent ISO 200 and 400 performance I
suspect it would find its way into many
Adam Maas wrote:
The one sad thing about teh digital PS market is there is no
replacement for a Yashica T4 or Oly XA.
I'd love a pocketable PS with a moderately fast wide-angle (24-28
equivalent) prime. If it had decent ISO 200 and 400 performance I
suspect it would find its way into many
I'm considering an EF 16-35 2.8L but can't afford it unless I sell some
other gear, or maybe some pics...more on that soon!
Good news on Alamy?
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So if I understand all this correctly, if I wanted to run Aperture on
my old G4 dual 867, the best upgrade I could make would be a kickass
video card?
No. You need a new computer. The minimum requirements are a 1.8GHz
G5, which is dog slow running aperture. You
http://www.hack.net/cottied.jpg
-Ryan
On the DL, my procedure for metering and using an A* lens:
- Set M mode
- Frame picture (make attempt at composition)
- Pick aperture (choose how much pudding around subject :-)
- Stop down with DOF preview and hold
- Adjust wheel to appropriate exposure (indicated by 0.0 in finder).
- (still
K. Brooks wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
Ryan Brooks wrote:
On the DL, my procedure for metering and using an A* lens:
- Set M mode
- Frame picture (make attempt at composition)
- Pick aperture (choose how much pudding around subject :-)
- Stop down with DOF preview and hold
- Adjust wheel
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Maybe it will if you update the firmware?
Been there, no firmware from Pentax.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Ryan K. Brooks
With an A* lens, you can just set the lens to A, and adjust aperture
on the body with the wheel and +/- button. With a K or
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
