I'm having an awful time reading the numbers on the
bag. It looks like 1F640-245, or IK6Y0-245 or some
combination thereof. Terrible handwriting. Please let
me know if you have some insight into this even if
your not interested in buying the screen. Many thanks.
--- smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED
the screen number, please.
No way to know unless we can compare that with
literature...\
keith whaley
smcforme wrote:
Hi, I have a brand new Maxwel Bright-Screen that I
would like to sell. It fits all Spotmatics and I
believe K1000,K2,KX,etc. It is a matt screen with
a
micro prism
I came across a web-page describing a factory conversion of Spotmatics to MLUI
just about passed out. How did this slip by me until today?
It is basically another stop down meter switch mounted on the opposite side of the
mirror box that locks the mirror up.
So, now I _must_ know, can
Could I please have his contact info ?
J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hes being doing my spotmatics for years
with
great results.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:28 PM
To:
I have a Gossen Luna Pro SBC and am thinking about finding a Multibeam spot meter
attachment for it. Has anyone used one of these? Does it work well enough that you
could recommend buying one over buying a separate spotmeter for travel use? Obviously
size and weight are a consideration.
Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the end of the day, it was an expensive attachment
that I had to have and it provided no useful help at all.
Bummer...
What specifically made you dislike it so much that you bought a proper spotmeter
instead?
Marcus
New! SBC Yahoo! Dial - 1st Month
Hello,
Has anyone had the their SP F's meter replaced with the K1000 meter conversion? I'm
curious if the metering remains average or is it also converted to center weighted as
in the K1000?
Now for the stretch. If a K1000 meter will go onto a Spotmatic, and a K1000 is
mechanically near
Can you imagine the excitement Neipce must have felt during this process and on it's
completion. It must be right up there with finding a K 85/1.8, maybe even better!
Oliver Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi - There's an article on msnbc that I
thought you all would be interested in:
I don't think there is any doubt that the camera obscura predates Neipce's heliograph.
Neipce just developed the first photochemical process.
Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
surely the first photo was Leonardo da Vinci's self-portrait, which is
now doing the rounds as the Shroud of
As you can see below, when I reply to an E-mail the little g automatically gets
removed by the Yahoo fairies. Don't ask me why
Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
Of course. I make no claim otherwise.
I'm curious as to why you removed from your reply the smiley that
was
Oh yeah... And to add to what you were saying. I remember reading somewhere that the
Mayans would did a big pit and with a sort of pinhole lens would view such things as
eclipses and such. Central American camera obscura?
Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
surely the first photo
I'm trying to decide whether to take a second Spotmatic F or a Leica CL as a backup
for a 3+ month trip later this year to Jordan and Egypt. I am a little concerned that
having both a SLR and a rangefinder may be distracting. Taking a second SLR body
offers the ability to use two lenses at the
smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to decide whether to take a second
Spotmatic F or a Leica CL as a backup for a 3+ month trip later this year to Jordan
and Egypt. I am a little concerned that having both a SLR and a rangefinder may be
distracting. Taking a second SLR body offers
I would like to know what brands to look for in a 1.4x or 2x tele-coverter to
compliment a SMC 200mm screw mount lens. I've never seen a SMC Takumar converter, does
such a creature exist? If you can recommend one, can you please comment on it's
performance? If I find a good one and use it with
Sorry if this is a duplicate. I sent it out a couple of days ago, but I don't think it
went through
smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to try pushing K200 1 1/3 and 2 stops. But I'd like to hear from others who
have already tried this before I invest the time and effort. Have
a Soligor 7
element that is pretty good, but I`ve heard Vivitar made a 7 element one
too. The only
ones I have seen are 2X. If you ever find a 1.4 or 1.5 TC in M42, let me
know.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
smcforme wrote:
I would like to know what brands to look for in a 1.4x or 2x tele
I guess the subject bar pretty much sums it up. Did Pentax make a 28mm f2 in screw
mount? Or was it added at the time of the switch to K-mount?
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Hopefully this makes someones day. Or maybe no one cares, who's to know? Anyways,
there is a brand new 1:1 macro adapter for the Vivitar Series 1 90mm f2.5 macro lens
in Pentax screw mount on Ebay. Starts at $30.00.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1359583198
Sign-up for
I have been casually looking out for a SMC 35/3.5 in K-mount for months, and have not
seen hide nor hair of it. I bought one in M42, and have seen 3 others for really
decent prices. But in K-mount this thing must be fairly rare. Same story for the SMC
85/1.8. I just bought one of those in M42
I wonder what calculations the photographer used to get the nearly pefect spacing of
each exposure?
Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a great photo of this
week's eclipse on today's Astonomy Picture of
the Day:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
--
Daniel J.
seconds.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: smcforme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Eclipse Photo
I wonder what calculations the photographer used to get the nearly pefect
spacing of each exposure?
Daniel J. Matyola wrote
You'll notice that the actual image of the sun is completely blown. So no filter
needed if you don't mind that. As far as eye protection, you could easily compose the
photo by shielding the sun with your hand in front of the lens. It also appears to be
a fairly wide angle lens. So if you did
I actually like the effect of the sratches on Moon and Stars.
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
I have a Pentax M 150mm F3.5 SMC lens that I would like to sell. It is beautiful
condition. I can confidently say rate it as EX+. Even the inspection sticker looks
good. The coating on this lens is amazing as expected. I'd like $145.00. If you're
interested I can E-mail you a some pics
Uh... I've got to start proof reading my messages. Sorry to anyone who had to wade
through the grammer of my last message!
smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a Pentax M 150mm F3.5 SMC lens that I
would like to sell. It is beautiful condition. I can confidently say rate it as EX+.
Even
I have heard that there are optical differences between some screw mount lenses marked
SMC and those marked Super-Multi-Coated. Is this true? I have never actually seen a
screw mount lens other than a 50mm or 55mm that was marked SMC, but I remember reading
somewhere that there was a 200mm SMC
I was subscibed to the list a while back, when I suddenly stopped getting messages. I
never got a majordomo message saying I was unsubscribed. Does this just happen
sometimes?
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
-
From: smcforme
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:20 AM
Subject: M42: SMC or Super-Multi-Coated?
I have heard that there are optical differences between some screw mount
lenses marked SMC and those marked Super-Multi-Coated. Is this true? I have
never actually seen a screw mount lens
28 matches
Mail list logo
