John Francis wrote:
not to display some of the pixels if they were available, and there's
no reasonable way to get some of the pixels from an image without
getting all of them (except, as noted, if it were a progressive JPEG).
how is that?
you can give an order to address and read every 4th
John Dallman wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob W) wrote:
I've got artificial hearing bones in one ear (and none in the other).
Next time I see my consultant I shall have to ask him if they're Pentax.
My spectacles are Nikon. Pentax don't seem to do spectacle
Boros Attila wrote:
Interesting, but I can't find lpmm specifications for films on the
manufacturer's site. Did a google search for lpmm for site:
some days ago i found thiz:
http://creekin.net/films.htm
maby thats what you are lookin for
Viljar
Pentax does not do glass.
All the best!
Raimo K
hmm a little google and...
http://www.eyeglasses.com/lenses/pricelist.page
ofcourse the pentax mentioned there is not the one we are talkin about??
Viljar
oh maby its mixup of terms..
glasses frames lenses.. its all the same for me:)
not my main language english is:P
Viljar
Raimo K wrote:
It´s the same Pentax allright - but Pentax do not make their own glass.
In Japan only Nikon and Minolta seem to make glass.
Pentax have been making spectacle
someone once explained to me that its not linear anymore its bettter to
visualize it like a 2d aka plane maby its 3d already but 10 years back
they thought the axises are
horizontally is the ideology and vertically the way to achive it:D
Liberals
hope its my mail reader only that messed up character spacing..
vr wrote:
hmm like slashdotting?
pdml'ing
:D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob
My sentiments exactly.
'A fool and his money are soon parted'. Well, if two hundred of you haven't
already mailed the buyer, I suspect that a further hundred of you will.
Kind regards
Peter
8 matches
Mail list logo
