On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:40:29PM -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Feb 26, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
the people on PDML who think that getting one or two acceptable images
makes them a pro sports photographer is laughable.
Oh dear... I hope that's not directed at me.
Well, without getting into violence which I suppose most artists would try to
avoid. I probably would have complied to erase the
fotos of her child and then just walked away. If she pursued me or held me back
physically I would have asked her to call the police
immediately or to just drop it.
Cotty wrote:
On 25/2/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
He reads like he is a bit of a wimp.
Artist. Same thing.
You and Hemingway would have had a lot to discuss.. 8-)
Were you filming the demo in Oxford?
m
On 26/2/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Were you filming the demo in Oxford?
Not today - a couple of colleagues on duty. No trouble at all.
Did Tipu Aziz on Friday in the run-up. He's an amazing bloke - virtually
a photographic memory - always says to me 'ahh yes you're the one who
On 26/2/06, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not today
I mean not yesterday.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:41:33 -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I don't see it in CS2. Remember, too, that RAW is a generic term. For
Nikon you'd have to save the file as a (non-demosaiced) NEF file. For
Pentax it would be a PEF file.
Exactly, 'RAW' usually means it is pretty close to the internal
Hi Aaron,
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:45:17 -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
What you're asking is not possible. Once a file has been saved in
another
form, like TIFF, JPEG, PSD, it cannot be reconverted back to RAW.
Just for my own curiosity, is it because of nature of the file itself
(as in, is
Aaron
I'm sorry you are taking things personally.
Accusing me of lying isn't getting you or anybody else anywhere.
I'm not even sure that I should honor your mail with an answer.
Don't bother to answer this mail, Aaron, 'cause I won't be reading it.
Here are some FACTS on the subject:
Fact:
You
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
As I mentioned before, DXO Labs software *can* manipulate lighting,
which I take to mean brightness/contrast/highlight/shadows, and
save in
RAW format.
If so, that's the first I've heard of it. It
On Feb 26, 2006, at 6:15 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Fact:
The write speed - 8 secs per RAW file IS slow compared to the
competition,
which have been pointed out many time by others in this forum as well.
snip
That's not lying. That's my OPINION.
When you insist again that the photographer
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
When you insist again that the photographer must pause 37 seconds after
firing off a burst (and suggest he should have a cigarette) after I have
privately conveyed to you that the real number is two seconds, what are
you doing if not lying?
Aaron, I think Jens is
On Feb 26, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Carlos Royo wrote:
Aaron, I think Jens is writing about his *ist D, and you about the DS.
Yes, I'm writing about the DS2, because it is a current camera. As far
as I know, the DL / DL2 also have the faster write speed. The D is
very old camera by digital
I think a point is being missed here. Any digital file can be edited!
Just because there is not a readily available cheap commercial product
for that particular file does not mean the file can not be edited by an
expert. In the old days when software was sold on floppy disks, and the
Hi graywolf,
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:37:29 -0500, graywolf wrote:
I think a point is being missed here. Any digital file can be edited!
Of course it can, I did not say otherwise ...
I am a system programmer (like you I think), and actually
reverse engineering data-formats and data-recovery
is
Aaron
I'm sorry you are taking things personally.
Accusing me of lying isn't getting you or anybody else anywhere.
I'm not even sure that I should honor your mail with an answer.
Don't bother to answer this mail, Aaron, 'cause I won't be reading it.
Here are some FACTS on the subject:
Fact:
You
Hi Jan, Sorry you took it as criticism. My comments were intended more
as clarification, and were not aimed at refuting anything you said.
I did some systems programing a long time ago when if you wanted your
toy microcomputer to do anything but word processing you pretty much had
to write
: Oy vey, Jens - was *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Aaron
I'm sorry you are taking things personally.
Accusing me of lying isn't getting you or anybody else anywhere.
I'm not even sure that I should honor your mail with an answer.
Don't bother to answer this mail, Aaron, 'cause I won't
them a pro sports photographer is laughable.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 6:01 PM
Subject: RE: Oy vey, Jens - was *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Aaron
I'm sorry you are taking things
On Feb 26, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
the people on PDML who think that getting one or two acceptable images
makes them a pro sports photographer is laughable.
Oh dear... I hope that's not directed at me.
Because if it is, it's kind of funny.
-Aaron
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:26:48PM -0800, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Jens,
One thing really surprises me - why would anyone ask for your advice
concerning sports photography?
You know, that's the question I was asking myself.
Then, when I saw the example photographs he posted, which
to newspapers and magazines. With a Pentax *ist D
at the stadium, there's never really a dull moment.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. februar 2006 00:30
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High
.
Others are of course most welcome to advice differently.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. februar 2006 09:35
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
On Fri, Feb 24
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
I mostly shoot action (cycling, Cyclocross in particular), here's my
humble thoughts.
1) If you know the sport well enough you prefocus to where you expect
action then you track your subject. This doesn't seem to be a Pentax
only thing, I've watched
On 24/2/06, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
I guess if someone said, I want the equipment to do all the work for
me and don't really need any skill or knowledge of what I am shooting,
so what equipment is best? For them, then sure, the top end Canon or
Nikon is easy to recommend.
Come
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. februar 2006 09:37
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
I mostly shoot action (cycling, Cyclocross in particular), here's my
humble thoughts.
1) If you know the sport well enough you prefocus to where you expect
action then you track
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
If IRC the guy was taking about shooting skaters.
They hardly follow many predictable patterns. I was envisioning
photographing at very close range -. not at a distance, using AF and Wide
Angle Zooms
Alright, I've had to momentarily de-lurk again because I cannot stand
it when misinformation persists. It drove me crazy with you can't
hand-hold a Pentax 67 and now it's this.
Jens, I e-mailed you off-list to correct some misapprehensions you had.
Instead of taking that information in,
So, it seems some (even professionals) prefer using fast AF, some prefer
auto AF-tracking - from AF point to AF point (Contax), others prefer using
MF, and some even prefer shooting in manual mode, when is comes to
photographing action like skating and skaters. It seems that almost
anything goes.
Message-
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: RE: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Date: Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:26 am
Size: 632 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
http://www.geartekcorporation.com/texts/essay_skatermom.html
Perhaps I should not recommend shooting skaters at all - except
Hi everyone,
I never thought my post would trigger such a flame war.
Just for the record I am not a pro sports photographer nor do I aspire
to be one it is just that certain types of sports interest me from a
photographic perspective. I also just so happens that I have contacts
in the right
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 10:25:26AM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
I never blamed anybody or anything.
I was declineing from recommending the *ist D for action photography.
If that was all you were doing - merely pointing out that there
were other, better solutions available for that task, I don't
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Patrick Genovese wrote:
I never thought my post would trigger such a flame war.
Anything posted to the PDML is capable of triggering a flame war.
In the mean time I have been shooting some of this stuff with my MZ-S
some of the comments posted here are quite
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:37:04AM -0800, David wrote:
I mostly shoot action (cycling, Cyclocross in particular), here's my
humble thoughts.
. . . .
3) Find me one action photographer that wastes his space with raw
files. They require lots of extra time to process. Most action
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For the record, I have some very nice sets of action photographs taken
of motorcycle road racing made over the years with a Leica M, a Mamiya
1000S, and a Sony F707. None of these cameras is what I'd consider to
be a speed demon ...
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:37:04AM -0800, David wrote:
6) I don't have a single AF lens with a faster f stop than 3.2. Guess I
can't shoot action anymore :-(
That's the most ridiculous complaint in the diatribe
(although, I admit, there's some pretty tough competition).
Once you get out
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For the record, I have some very nice sets of action photographs taken
of motorcycle road racing made over the years with a Leica M, a Mamiya
1000S, and a Sony F707. None of these cameras is
Jens Bladt wrote:
So, it seems some (even professionals) prefer using fast AF, some prefer
auto AF-tracking - from AF point to AF point (Contax), others prefer using
MF, and some even prefer shooting in manual mode, when is comes to
photographing action like skating and skaters. It seems that
From my experience in various press venues, I'd say that magazine
photographers shoot RAW, newspaper photographers shoot jpeg.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:24 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:37:04AM -0800, David wrote:
I mostly shoot action (cycling, Cyclocross in
I shot some swish pans of hot rods with my 67. No problem.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For the record, I have some very nice sets of action photographs
taken of motorcycle road racing made over the years with a
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From my experience in various press venues, I'd say that magazine
photographers shoot RAW, newspaper photographers shoot jpeg.
Probably depends on the newspaper. When there was all that fuss about
digitally altered images in the Charlotte Observer a
On Feb 25, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From my experience in various press venues, I'd say that magazine
photographers shoot RAW, newspaper photographers shoot jpeg.
Probably depends on the newspaper. When there was all that fuss about
Good point. I hadn't thought about the legal implications. That well
could be changing things. Of course, motorsport shooters generally
aren't held to a high standard of absolute authenticity.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From
Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some links to the original controversy:
http://www.newmediamusings.com/blog/2003/08/charlotte_obser.html
http://poynteronline.org/content/content_view.asp?id=47867
http://www.zonezero.com/editorial/octubre03/october.html
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Can you not make adjustments to a RAW file and save it?
No. Not yet...
So you'd convert it to a different format, do the alterations, then
save that file as RAW? Is that not possible?
RAW has been a save-as option in Photoshop for as
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point. I hadn't thought about the legal implications. That well
could be changing things. Of course, motorsport shooters generally
aren't held to a high standard of absolute authenticity.
That'll change as soon as someone gets a photo of a fatal
What I see in your post is an open mind. An ability to learn. And the
willingness to make the effort to turn that new knowledge into skills
(most people are not willing to take that step, it is too much work).
The result of that kind of mindset is usually called success.
Good for you,
Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Can you not make adjustments to a RAW file and save it?
No. Not yet...
So you'd convert it to a different format, do the alterations, then
save that file as RAW? Is that not possible?
Not as far as I
I'd agree with that. My experience is biased towards motorsports,
which gets very little US newspaper coverage if it isn't NASCAR,
so I see more of the magazine shooters than those from newspapers.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:24:48PM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
From my experience in various
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:34:40PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
BTW: In regards to PJ's being required to shoot RAW, most of teh high
end PJ cameras will shoot RAW and full-res JPEG simultaneously.
So does the D (and siblings), actually - there's a full-res JPEG
hidden in that PEF file, and
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
RAW has been a save-as option in Photoshop for as long as I can
remember.
I don't see it in CS2. Remember, too, that RAW is a generic term. For
Nikon you'd have to save the file as a (non-demosaiced) NEF file. For
Pentax it would be a PEF
Hi Aaron ...
What you're asking is not possible. Once a file has been saved in another
form, like TIFF, JPEG, PSD, it cannot be reconverted back to RAW.
There is an option to save a file as Photoshop RAW, but it's nothing like
the camera raw files. Try it with a JPEG and you'll see the obvious
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
RAW has been a save-as option in Photoshop for as long as I can
remember.
I don't see it in CS2. Remember, too, that RAW is a generic term. For
Nikon you'd have to save the file as a
Or to put it another way, whether to shoot jpegs or raw depends upon the
intended quality of the final image.
I kind of doubt that many advertising photographers shoot Jpegs, or the
gal shooting Santa photos at the mall is shooting in raw mode. Also I
doubt that there are many truly serious
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What you're asking is not possible. Once a file has been saved in
another
form, like TIFF, JPEG, PSD, it cannot be reconverted back to RAW.
Just for my own curiosity, is it because of nature of the file itself
(as in, is it theoretically
Sure you can save a maniplated image as a raw file. However, I think
Mark is refering to camera-raw files (as they come from the camera). I
believe that Photoshop raw indicates that the file was run through it in
the information section.
Of course any digital information can be edited, that
Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What you're asking is not possible. Once a file has been saved in
another form, like TIFF, JPEG, PSD, it cannot be reconverted back to RAW.
Just for my own curiosity, is it because of nature of the
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
What you're asking is not possible. Once a file has been saved in
another form, like TIFF, JPEG, PSD, it cannot be reconverted back
to RAW.
Just for my own curiosity, is it because of nature of the file itself
(as in, is it theoretically
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang
Subject: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
http://www.geartekcorporation.com/texts/essay_skatermom.html
That is one sad story. He is very calm, though.
He should have decked the bitch and kept on doing what he was legally
entitled
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Derby Chang
http://www.geartekcorporation.com/texts/essay_skatermom.html
That is one sad story. He is very calm, though.
He should have decked the bitch and kept on doing what he was legally
entitled to do.
Or at the very least, run image
Most of the art fair guys I speak with are shooting digital and making
their own prints. Cost control, quality control.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:46 PM, graywolf wrote:
Or to put it another way, whether to shoot jpegs or raw depends upon
the intended quality of the final image.
I kind of
On 25/2/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
The really difficult part, however, seem to be handling the legal issues.
This quite interesting article is about just that:
http://www.geartekcorporation.com/texts/essay_skatermom.html
Why am I not surprised? Looks like being a photographer
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
http://www.geartekcorporation.com/texts/essay_skatermom.html
That is one sad story. He is very calm, though.
He should have decked the bitch and kept on doing what he was legally
entitled
On 25/2/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
He reads like he is a bit of a wimp.
Artist. Same thing.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 25/2/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
He reads like he is a bit of a wimp.
Artist. Same thing.
Now now, Cotty, some of us have been in bar brawls.
-Aaron
. Straightforward, easy-to-use cameras are what I like.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 2/23/2006 7:01:44 PM
Subject: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
On 2/23/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax don't want to be at the stadium
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Yes, you can. If you have enough time. Pre focusing at the point where you
GUESS the athelete will be in 10 secs.
But when the action actually happends, using a 2.5 FPS camera is like
going
to Las
. Usually it's a burst of
two or three, followed by another.
FWIW
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 2/24/2006 10:08:37 AM
Subject: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject
: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Exactly. And straightforward, easy-to-use cameras are capable of
anything most photographers might attempt. The lone exception might be
top-level sports journalism. But even for motorsports or the occasional
sporting event
Jens,
Nikon's 'Pro' bodies are the D2x and D2Hs (And the nearly identical film
F6). The D200 is a semi-pro body (although it's closer to a full-on pro
body than any other non-pro body currently on the market), it's a step
up from the 5D and 20D in terms of build and AF performance but is
. februar 2006 12:16
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Exactly. And straightforward, easy-to-use cameras are capable of
anything most photographers might attempt. The lone exception might be
top-level sports journalism. But even for motorsports
: 24. februar 2006 12:16
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Exactly. And straightforward, easy-to-use cameras are capable of
anything most photographers might attempt. The lone exception might be
top-level sports journalism. But even for motorsports
On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I would prefere a 5-8 FPS DSLR camera, featuring correspondingly
fast AF.
Most photographers would agree with me, I'm sure.
I find it virtually irrelevant to my photography. Probably 99.9% of
the time I have my camera set to single shot
Sounds rather contradictory ... and that you really don't know what you're
talking about.
Maybe most photographers would agree with you, but would most sports and
action photographers agree with you?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jens Bladt
.
But when somebody asks, if it is recommendable
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:18:24PM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
A 5 FPS camera from Pentax (Autumn 2006) is a little late, isn't it?
I am speaking from experience, you know. I have shot almost 30.000 frames
with a *ist D. I believe I know very well, what I'm talking about.
I don't really do
I always wonder how those oldtime racing shots were taken with a Graflex
5x7 SLR back around 1910 or so. Maybe 100mph was slower back in those days?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
John
recommend the *ist D, I could have recommended using ANY camera
with no shutter lag.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. februar 2006 20:31
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High
Sure was. And 1/30 of a second froze the action much better.
Mind you, you also had to lug that heavy camera equipment
around - uphill both ways, of course.
Tell that to the kids of today, and they won't believe you.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 03:44:54PM -0500, graywolf wrote:
I always wonder
: RE: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Sounds rather contradictory ... and that you really don't know what you're
talking about.
Maybe most photographers would agree with you, but would most sports and
action photographers agree with you?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jens Bladt
.
But when
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A 5 FPS camera from Pentax (Autumn 2006) is a little late, isn't it?
I am not whining.
Yes you are.
Constantly.
Har! Actually that focalplane shutter took a 10th of a second to move
the 5 inchs. That is where the idea of those carton cars leaning
forwards to indicate speed came from, those old photos.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Har! Actually that focalplane shutter took a 10th of a second to move
the 5 inchs. That is where the idea of those carton cars leaning
forwards to indicate speed came from, those old photos.
graywolf
http
PROTECTED]
JB Sendt: 25. februar 2006 00:30
JB Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
JB Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
JB Har! Actually that focalplane shutter took a 10th of a second to move
JB the 5 inchs. That is where the idea of those carton cars leaning
JB forwards to indicate speed came from
: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: SV: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/2/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most professional sports photographers have the following set of
equipment:
3 top-of-the-line digital camera
: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Fast lenses? yes. Fast body? not so much. One can shoot action with
Manual Focus gear.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
I'd rather stay an amateur too. And refrain from doing action photography,
BTW.
I was just making a point: Action photography requires fast lenses
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you can. If you have enough time. Pre focusing at the point where you
GUESS the athelete will be in 10 secs.
But when the action actually happends, using a 2.5 FPS camera is like
going
to Las Vegas with just 10 USD in
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. februar 2006 16:05
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Fast lenses? yes. Fast body? not so much. One can shoot action with
Manual Focus gear.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
I'd rather stay an amateur too. And refrain from doing
I vote with Frank. Polish your skin, you red haired debbil.
-Lon
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and polish your skin...
Now that's just *weird*.
Pål
So, it must be a really big mystery to you, why they are not using Pentaxes,
right?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. februar 2006 21:01
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed
I am adamant that our own Mark Roberts can blast Ken away, if Mark
would Just Practise. It's very very important.
grin. -Lon
frank theriault wrote:
On 2/21/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and polish your skin...
Now that's just *weird*.
You ~do~ know to whom I was referring,
?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: P?l Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. februar 2006 21:01
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 23/2/06, Pål Jensen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Actually most pros used those Canons with manual focus and manual
exposureeven sports photographers...
Sorry Pal, but that's a load of festering bollocks.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 2/23/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax don't want to be at the stadium. If they did, they'd make a 5-8 FPS
body and a lot of 1.4-2.8 (digital) lenses. They obviously don't want to.
This is a great thing! There are plenty of options already from Canon
and Nikon. People should
-
Fra: Juan Buhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. februar 2006 03:59
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
On 2/23/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax don't want to be at the stadium. If they did, they'd make a 5-8 FPS
body and a lot of 1.4-2.8
Date: 2/23/2006 7:01:44 PM
Subject: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
On 2/23/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax don't want to be at the stadium. If they did, they'd make a 5-8
FPS
body and a lot of 1.4-2.8 (digital) lenses. They obviously don't want
to.
This is a great thing
My gods, Juan, Shel and I are on the same page! ;-)
Godfrey
On 2/23/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upgrading!
Pentax make very nice entry level and enthusiast cameras, bus is not a
player in the 35mm pro-market (5-8 FPS cameras).
The problem here is the definition of pro. I can very well see a
pro who makes tons of money off her photography
-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
On 2/23/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upgrading!
Pentax make very nice entry level and enthusiast cameras, bus is not a
player in the 35mm pro-market (5-8 FPS cameras).
The problem here is the definition of pro. I can very well
Hi everyone,
Interesting comments and quite illuminating with respect to what's
really important.
I've been shooting some of this stuff with my MZ-S with varying
success rates. for example. Jumps are a no brainer you can easily
pre-focus. panning action is tougher espeically if you're up close
On 2/21/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and polish your skin...
Now that's just *weird*.
You ~do~ know to whom I was referring, don't you? The man with the
shiniest skin in history:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/about.htm
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: *IST-D / DS High speed action!
Hi,
I tend to be a lurker most of the time but I surface every now and
again with a query or two.
I'm seriously considering an ist-d or ist-ds enablement and have a
question i'd like to throw your way.
It concerns the suitability
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
