At 07:58 AM 11/18/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I have writen a little report about:
Using the F 3.5-4.5/17-28 Fisheye-Zoom plus the freeware program PTLens
gives a lens of about 15-26/3.5-4.5
A detailed explaination with pictures (sorry, up to now only in
German, but look at the pictures or use
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Sigma 14mm f3.5 works fine, but by it's nature (front
element is a semi-sphere) it picks up all sorts of flare. The 17-28 fisheye
loses too much of the fisheye effect - at 17mm it seems to have the AOV of
a 20mm (judging by the finder) but has too much
I got my *ist-D over a week ago, but between having to log in some serious
hours getting ready for an art fair later this week, and the utterly crappy
/ gloomy weather, I haven't really had the time to do much with it. I
_have_ managed to shoot about 900 images though - my last surviving cat is
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip nice stuff about the *istD
I've very happy with it with the A*200mm macro.
I really gotta get me one of these (or the FA* EDIF 200/4 macro) Why do
they have to be so expensive? Why? WHY?
Christian
Those IR shots are inspiring. I've gotta try one of those filters on my
*istD. Did you use a ring flash for the bug or just a regular flash?
I agree with you that the instant feeback is one of the greatest things
that digital has to offer. I played with the lighting setup for an ebay
sale
5 matches
Mail list logo
