I did some IR work with the R-72 on an *istD as well. It was a nice
combination. Now I have that very expensive filter sitting in a drawer.
On Sep 14, 2013, at 9:44 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
I really liked the IR images that the *ist-D took. I mostly used an RM-90
filter
I've never seen a dslr torn down to the sensor and pcb board before.
quite honestly, an ist conversion doesn't look that hard if you take
great pains to put everything back together in the same order. that
said, I don't think I will be trying this. I guess the ist didn't have
shake reduction, so
I see dust
Dave
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never seen a dslr torn down to the sensor and pcb board before.
quite honestly, an ist conversion doesn't look that hard if you take
great pains to put everything back together in the same order. that
Considering that Ann has an *ist D for sale right now, I thought this
post might be of interest.
Make her an offer quick before she decides to keep it and do this herself.
:)
(PS.. *ist DL and DS are going from $119-125 on KEH, but they have NO
*ist D for some odd reason. That odd reason may be
On 9/14/2013 10:03, Darren Addy wrote:
Considering that Ann has an *ist D for sale right now, I thought this
post might be of interest.
Make her an offer quick before she decides to keep it and do this herself.
:)
Zero chance of that - you would not be surprised to learn :-)
Thanks for
I should add that the *ist D and a filter makes a great infrared
camera WITHOUT conversion too, as our own Mark Cassino shows:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/cat49/
The only disadvantage is that you have longer shutter speeds so it
normally needs to be tripod mounted. Doing the
about
doing
something similar with a K110D before I unload mine?
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Darren Addy
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:03 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: *ist D: Complete step by step conversion to infrared
Considering that Ann has an *ist D for sale
look like in Phalaborwa! Now, what can you tell me about
doing
something similar with a K110D before I unload mine?
Alan
-Original Message- From: Darren Addy
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:03 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: *ist D: Complete step by step conversion
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that the *ist D and a filter makes a great infrared
camera WITHOUT conversion too, as our own Mark Cassino shows:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/cat49/
The only disadvantage is that you
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:00:06PM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that the *ist D and a filter makes a great infrared
camera WITHOUT conversion too, as our own Mark Cassino shows:
I really liked the IR images that the *ist-D took. I mostly used an
RM-90 filter (since I inherited oen - my father used to use it with
Kodak HIE) but I later used an R-72. Very long shutter speeds with the
RM90, better with the R-72. I now have an IR converted K-1)D, but I use
it much less
11 matches
Mail list logo
