Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Just renewed my sub to the 37th. Frame - at least it's a sensible read!
How many issues is Mike up to now?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Not sure, William - he asked if I had safely received No.7, which I
haven't, and confirmed I'm subscribed up to No.15
Wow. I got issue 7 last October 12th, but nothing since.
You got a better deal than
I just came across a recent issue (possibly the latest?) of Popular
Photography and saw an article titled 10 Secrets if the ist-DS or
something similar. Besides being great to see such a great plug for
Pentax, I was fascinated to note that the DS has one feature I commented
would have been nice
I just came across a recent issue (possibly the latest?) of Popular
Photography and saw an article titled 10 Secrets if the ist-DS or
something similar.
Yes - August 2005.
Fred
available for download as a PDF file.
Godfrey
On Aug 2, 2005, at 7:38 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I just came across a recent issue (possibly the latest?) of Popular
Photography and saw an article titled 10 Secrets if the ist-DS or
something similar. Besides being great to see such a great plug
On 2/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
The thing that pisses me off about this article is the fact that none
of the ten things written about are secrets at all. All you have to
do to find them and understand all about them is read the freekin'
manual, where they are
I was fascinated to note that the DS has one feature I commented
would have been nice to have on the ist-D: spot white balance (whereby
you can set custom white balance and the camera only reads the area
within the spot metering circle rather than averaging the entire frame).
Nice.
--
Mark
On Aug 2, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Andre Langevin wrote:
I was fascinated to note that the DS has one feature I commented
would have been nice to have on the ist-D: spot white balance
(whereby
you can set custom white balance and the camera only reads the area
within the spot metering circle
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
The thing that pisses me off about this article is the fact that none
of the ten things written about are secrets at all. All you have to
do to find them and understand all
On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:24 AM, William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
lol ... What I don't understand is why people would waste their time
reading Pop Photo when the manual is free and has so much more
information in it. '-)
Godfrey
Have to be a lot more than that, each advertiser gets a least one free
copy...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Godfrey DiGiorgi Subject: [Norton
AntiSpam] Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
The thing that pisses me off about this article is the fact that
none
should all be
thankful that Pentax is getting some ink. Remember the old PR adage: Good ink
is good ink, bad ink is good ink, no ink is bad ink.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
The thing that pisses me
William Robb grumped:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
I did read the manual and I still subscribe. I'm not sure if you counted me
in that three or not.
You can't ask for too much at a US dollar per issue. I've found enough
content to keep by subscribing
There are other things in the magazine. Sometimes (a few times a year)
I'll pick up a copy, mostly to read the ads and see if there's anything new
out in the world that may be interesting. Mostly I read it for free at a
book shop while enjoying a cuppa Joe. It's certainly not one of those mags
As Jimmy Durante sang: Ink-a-dink-a-doo
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember the old PR adage: Good ink is good ink, bad ink is good ink,
no ink is bad ink.
As I said before, I think we share a lot more curmudgeonly behaviors
than is often apparent. ;-)
I bought this issue ... first time in years I've purchased a Pop
Photo ... because I didn't have time to read it at the magazine
stand. I should have taken the time: it cost me $5 or so and
BTW, I waste my time reading it because, at that time, I've got some time
to waste.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
What I don't understand is why people would waste their time
reading Pop Photo
Pop Photos's in color! ;)
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:29:37 -0700
On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:24 AM, William Robb wrote:
If everyone read
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Have to be a lot more than that, each advertiser gets a least one free
copy...
Readers, Peter.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Since we're bitching about magazines, I dropped Outdoor Photographer
because they pissed me off by putting all that Photoshop content in there.
They print too much stuff that has
I haven't read it yet, but I just received the Sept.
issue of Shutterbug and on the cover is listed the
*ist Ds under the heading of Test Reports.
This only an alert for any non-subscribers who might
soon walk by a magazine stand.
Checked the review's bottom line. ..ISO 200 image
quality
I find Practical Photography (printed in UK) much better than
the Popular Photography.
I used to be reading it (some parts of it) regularly several years ago
(1999-2000 or so),
but then I found that I see less and less new material in it.
I concluded that on one hand the content of that magazine
My input on photographic magazines:
In used to subscribe to Amateur Photographer (UK) until about 18 months
ago. Dropped it because the news pages were always 4 weeks out of date.
The internet is much quicker, specifically DPR. The rest of it was
basically tosh, and since the advent of eBay, the
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do, however, subscribe to two of the best (IMO) photographic
periodicals on the planet:
National Geographic and Foto8.
Thanks for the heads up on Foto8. I do subscribe to National Geographic and
Nature's Best.
Lewis
William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
Why so many?
P. J. Alling wrote:
Have to be a lot more than that, each advertiser gets a least one free
copy...
William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
He wrote readers not recipients.
Oh I'm sure some advertising people can read...
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Have to be a lot more than that, each advertiser gets a least one
free copy...
William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
He wrote readers not
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
Why so many?
Two would be Canadians (one a Nikon user, the other a Canon shooter), the
other would
On Aug 3, 2005, at 4:43 AM, Cotty wrote:
I found one excellent tip on the internet that is mentioned nowhere
in my
camera owner's manual - it's possible to actually take some pretty
decent
pics with the derned thing ;-)
Do you mean I have to buy the DS to take good pics?
I'll trade the
Subscribers get their copy before it hits the newsstand, usually.
I haven't subscribed in years.
Godfrey
Is the August issue of Popular Photograpy already out ? if not
where did you get that info ?
Here in Denmark, the current issue of Popular Photograpy is July.
OK, thanks.
/Jorn
Subscribers get their copy before it hits the newsstand, usually.
I haven't subscribed in years.
Godfrey
Is the August issue of Popular Photograpy already out ? if not
where did you get that info ?
Here in Denmark, the current issue of Popular Photograpy is July.
Another Ack! for the three of us that actually have an *ist. While
the *ist screen is removable, there are no replacements. A very
prompt individual from Pentax USA sent this in response to my query:
While you can remove the focusing screen for cleaning, there are not
other focusing screens for
are correct, sir. The screen in the *ist is not user replaceable.
On 7/8/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joaquim Carvalho
Subject: Pentax *ist DS / D
Dear William,
Do you also sell split image + microprism screens fot the *ist and *ist
Jaume, I think that even if they discontinue the Ds now, and I don't
think they are doing it at the moment, you will be able to find it for
some time, just as it happens with the D.
By the way, if I were to buy a DSLR, I'd choose the DS again. I think
that the DL is a downgraded DS, and the
So, the situation is as follows:
There are full page advertisements of the new *ist-DL
in nationals Spanish newspapers. On Monday I call
Reflecta, the local distributor, in order to know its
availability. 'It is just about to hit the shelves, we
already have the product and have just started to
Anything new is always going to be priced close to retail. Let the
buyer beware. Meanwhile the knowledgeable few can snap up those DS
cameras, not to mention the remaining D models.
Paul
On Jul 9, 2005, at 7:24 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
So, the situation is as follows:
There are full page
Paul,
I see the price lowering on the Ds model here in the USA,
but no lowering of price on the D. Thank You DL!
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/9/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anything new is always going to be priced close to retail. Let the
buyer beware. Meanwhile the knowledgeable few
Sure, my point this time was not about the price but
about the fact that it seems that they don't want to
keep the Ds anymore, and just sell the DL when it
finally arrives.
(who knows, maybe thay already have it and hide it,
just in order to sell the few remaining Ds...
conspirancy theory here
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
(who knows, maybe thay already have it and hide it,
just in order to sell the few remaining Ds...
conspirancy theory here ;-))
Given the chance to buy either at the same price, would you buy the
DL? Who would? These two don't compete with each-other.
Pentax's timing is always so exquisite. However do they do it so
consistently?
The August issue of Pop Photo has a three-page spread on the DS -- just
in time for the camera to be discontinued.
Joe
Dear William,
Do you also sell split image + microprism screens fot the *ist and *ist DS?
If so, please give me a price for 1, for 5 and for 10.
Regards,
Joaquim Carvalho
- Original Message -
From: Joaquim Carvalho
Subject: Pentax *ist DS / D
Dear William,
Do you also sell split image + microprism screens fot the *ist and *ist
DS?
If so, please give me a price for 1, for 5 and for 10.
Hi, I was able to aquire a few screens for the istD through
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Re: Pentax *ist DS / D
The original message from Joaquim ended up in my in box as well ... odd,
since it wasn't addressed to me.
And I try to be so careful about who my replies go to these days...
b
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: Pentax *ist DS / D
You are correct, sir.
Every time someone calls me sir, I am looking around for my dad.
It makes me sad, since he is no longer here.
William Robb
Your mail software is probably filtering using the To: field.
As Kostas has guessed I BCCed the list.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The original message from Joaquim ended up in my in box as well ... odd,
since it wasn't addressed to me.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
It wasn't
I'm not William ...
Joaquim Carvalho mused:
Dear William,
Do you also sell split image + microprism screens fot the *ist and *ist DS?
If so, please give me a price for 1, for 5 and for 10.
Regards,
Joaquim Carvalho
On Jul 8, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
Thanks for the reply but I meant William Maxwell from Precision Optics
How is Bill? He made me custom focusing screens for three
Rolleiflexes and a Hasselblad in years gone by. A good guy, if
sometimes a bit slow on delivery.
..I was
Sorry for the confusion I caused a while ago with the BCCing to the list
that made your filters fail.
Anyway, here is the reply from precision optics. I'm now contacting
Keoptics and will keep you informed.
Dear Joaquim,
I am currently involved in a cooperative venture to produce manual
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The D and DS models both have user interchangeable focusing screens.
Pentax does not offer a screen with a split image focusing aid ...
there are reasons for this. A German company, http://www.tekade.de,
offered such a screen (custom made by taking a screen from
On 8/7/05, Joaquim Carvalho, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry for the confusion I caused a while ago with the BCCing to the list
that made your filters fail.
Are you bill?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I got a reply from Keoptics:
Hi Joaquim,
Thank you very much for your inquiry. I do not have Katz Eye(tm) focusing
screens available for the Pentax *ist DS at this time. It is certainly be a
model I'd be willing to develop a screen for, however. Since each model
requires individual
On Jul 3, 2005, at 6:36 AM, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
Anyone knows how? I tried and I'm confused, it only fires some of
the times.
Making your own should be easy, but I'm lazy.
Canon Remote Switch RS-60ES3 is a perfect substitute for the Pentax D/
DS Cable Switch CS-205, and is cheaper ($26
Here is the link to Rob's answer and pictures to his remote.
http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss@pdml.net/msg256824.html
Dave
Asked by me and answered by Rob Studdert a
little
while ago, as well. Do an archive search for this
thread:
Why the
I just put up something similar on my website if it's of any help to anyone.
http://www.sunny16.net/cable-release-istD.htm
Amita
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the link to Rob's answer and pictures to his remote.
Amita.Yes this is very helpfull
I just realized something today gang. Thus the thread change.
Back in the early 70's my Dad was a BIG CB freak.(I was aminor freak lol) Made
my sister's
room into
his radio room after she moved out to explore the world.He also dabbled in
SW,never did
get his
Dave,
The parallels with radio are striking.50 years ago, Short Wave radios were high
tech stuff.A ham radio license meant you knew electronics and Morse Code.The
hobby involved equipment, local clubs, and talking to peoplearound the
world.Often the conversation was about equipment...
Now this
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 23:57:40 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now here in the 05's i'm sitting infront of a computer,
essentially doing what he did in the 70's-80's with his CB
only now with 000111001110's.LOL
Interesting how the world changes, but we still do the same
thing. Talk to
PM
Subject: Re: Ok this is plain weird:Was LINK: Was DIY *ist DS remote cable
shutter
The hams are doing something I find pretty interesting ... hooking to
the internet repeaters for frequencies that typically wouldn't go
around the world. I've use it to talk from Atlanta to the St Lawrence
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax *ist DS firmware
On Jul 2, 2005, at 5:45 AM, Jorn Ostergaard wrote:
What is the newest firmware for *ist DS ?
v1.02
Godfrey
Anyone knows how? I tried and I'm confused, it only fires some of the times.
Joaquim Carvalho a écrit :
Anyone knows how? I tried and I'm confused, it only fires some of the
times.
Same as *istD (Canon)
My (french) page:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/trucs/telecommandes.htm
Jorn Ostergaard wrote:
What is the newest firmware for *ist DS ?
v1.02
anyone who now often Pentax update their firmware. There's nothing wrong
with firmware 1.02, but maybe they would add new functions, like C. AF
in all modes (except manual). For now its only presented i sportsmode
Asked by me and answered by Rob Studdert a little
while ago, as well. Do an archive search for this
thread:
Why the istD wired remote is so large or harebrained sch [eme]
The part in brackets got truncated, I'm just
including it for clarity. I'd leave it out of the
search.
It occurs to me
Hey All
What is the newest firmware for *ist DS ?
Greetings Jorn
--
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 852 spam-mails.
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent gratis SPAMfighter her: www.spamfighter.dk
On Jul 2, 2005, at 5:45 AM, Jorn Ostergaard wrote:
What is the newest firmware for *ist DS ?
v1.02
Godfrey
Hi Guys
When using the ist-Ds with K and M series lenses do I have aperture priority
(AV) mode as well as manual available. If so, do I need to press the AE lock
button to correctly meter in AV and is there any way to tell if my setting
is correct in manual? I have set the PF to allow non
Well you kind of have AV mode, but only at full aperture. The lens will
not stop down nor will the camera know what the lens aperture is set
to. I'd avoid using AV mode with K or M lenses.
Butch Black wrote:
Hi Guys
When using the ist-Ds with K and M series lenses do I have aperture
Welcome to the world of 001001000100010g
Some nice first samples Butch. I really like the mill and the BW bird.
I have the A28 and it has become the standard lens so to speak for my istD.
Dave
Hi guys
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds
and the BW bird.
I have the A28 and it has become the standard lens so to speak for my istD.
Dave
Hi guys
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds. The bird pix were taken with
the FA*300/4.5 at 4.5. The flower pix was with the M100/4.0 macro The mill
] wrote:
Welcome to the world of 001001000100010g
Some nice first samples Butch. I really like the mill and the BW bird.
I have the A28 and it has become the standard lens so to speak for my istD.
Dave
Hi guys
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds. The bird pix were taken
Hi guys
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds. The bird pix were taken with
the FA*300/4.5 at 4.5. The flower pix was with the M100/4.0 macro The mill
was with the K 28/3.5 all hand held. The close up bird and mill were with
minimum manipulation just slight curves and sharpening
Very nice. The last image with the bird silhouette is interesting; what was
the background actually like?
Tim
On 6/29/05 13:48, Butch Black wrote:
Hi guys
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds. The bird pix were taken with
the FA*300/4.5 at 4.5. The flower pix was with the M100/4.0
http://image48.webshots.com/49/4/12/80/382241280esmOPi_ph.jpg
Nice. I particularly like the bird silhouette ... that's very special.
Godfrey
On Jun 29, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Butch Black wrote:
Hi guys
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds. The bird pix were
taken with the FA*300/4.5
I'm being told I'm forbiddent to enter the sites
because I don't have authorization.
??
Rick
--- Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds. The
bird pix were taken with
the FA*300/4.5 at 4.5. The flower pix was with the
M100/4.0 macro
Very nice. The last image with the bird silhouette is interesting; what was
the background actually like?
Tim
The yard next door. I kicked up the contrast on curves to take it out of
medium gray.
Butch
in the upper left center. I think this image
with those components could be a great image.
Just my $.01 worth
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 4:48 PM
Subject: ist Ds photos
Hi guys
As promised
You forgot to ask may I.
Works fine for me
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: ist Ds photos
I'm being told I'm forbiddent to enter the sites
because I don't have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds. The
bird pix were taken with
the FA*300/4.5 at 4.5. The flower pix was with the
M100/4.0 macro The mill
was with the K 28/3.5 all hand held. The close up
bird and mill were with
minimum manipulation
Very nice, Butch. I especially like the bird and the mill.
Paul
As promised Some photos from the new ist ds. The
bird pix were taken with
the FA*300/4.5 at 4.5. The flower pix was with the
M100/4.0 macro The mill
was with the K 28/3.5 all hand held. The close up
bird and mill were
Shel...
What's important: how the camera delivers the 'original' files or how
a photographer can make photographs with a camera?
Some of the photos I've presented here that have gotten the best
comments have been ones that really didn't look like much coming out
of the camera, but they
A lot of my wife's shooting is for business purposes, and her images are
displayed at 640x480 or less (approximately). Givn that she reduces
them so greatly once they come out of the *ist-DS, I'm fairly certain
that there is no need for her to shoot at 6mp. Yet of course she
wants/needs
On Jun 25, 2005, at 8:57 AM, David Oswald wrote:
A lot of my wife's shooting is for business purposes, and her
images are displayed at 640x480 or less (approximately). Givn that
she reduces them so greatly once they come out of the *ist-DS, I'm
fairly certain that there is no need
David Oswald wrote:
Is there any advantage to her continuing to shoot at 6mp, or should I
teach her how to switch to 4mp or 1.5mp?
It is always better to have more data in my opinion. If you have bigger
image you can always crop more, noise from high ISO settings will be
more reduced in
). Givn that she reduces
them so greatly once they come out of the *ist-DS, I'm fairly certain
that there is no need for her to shoot at 6mp. Yet of course she
wants/needs the best possible quality reductions within the limits of
reasonable amounts jpeg compression for web display. Is there any
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED switched
off (an option on the settings menu)
How is that? I'll try it, but I'm just wondering how it's
easier... less distraction while you twiddle to find the green hex?
-Cory
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED switched off
(an option on the settings menu)
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
How is that? I'll try it, but I'm just wondering how it's
easier... less distraction while you twiddle to find the green hex?
Right
-Cory
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED
switched off
I usually turn off the red focus indicators on the screen when doing
manual focus too.
I don't like having the central focus indicator pop up in the middle
of my trying to see the sharpest focus point. I usually ignore the
green indicator too. ... It seems to me that one sometimes lights
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my D, TTL flash only works at 200-400 ASA (800ASA) - after that, the
images get overexposed. No matter which flash I use.
Who wants a flash at 1600-3200 ASA anyway?
I do!
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/redbird.jpg
Taken last night for my Nature Guides
Thanks to everybody who suggested what to try.
Unfortunately I had tried that before..
Since that I tested my flash with 3 (*ist DS x 2 and film body) other bodies,
and found that TTL works fine. So this must be the
problem of the new body I purchased :-(
Strange, that everything else works
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin
Subject: Re: TTL with AF500FTZ and *ist DS ?
Strange, that everything else works in a brand new camera, except for
the flash TTL. Who would think?
TTL flash is not one of Pentax's strong points.
William Robb
://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Igor Roshchin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 18. juni 2005 22:40
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: TTL with AF500FTZ and *ist DS ?
Thanks to everybody who suggested what to try.
Unfortunately I had tried that before..
Since that I
Hi All,
I finally purchased (and received a day ago) a brand new *ist DS
(thanks to those who helped with the answers - mostly implicitely).
I was surprised that it came without the warranty card.
So, I called the Pentax (in the US), and they told me that some
products come without such a card
Hello!
I am confused..
I just tried to play with my new *ist DS and mny old AF500FTZ flash.
I have tried ISO of 200 and 400 with lenses Pentax F 50/1.7
and Tokina ATX PRO 28-70/2.6-2.8.
The aperture setting on the lense was set to A.
I found that TTL just does not work, and the flash seems
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 2:40 PM
Subject: TTL with AF500FTZ and *ist DS ?
I found that TTL just does not work, and the flash seems to fire
to the full power.
I thought the TTL should work
I have an AF500FTZ and it works, didn't you forget to put the flash in
TTL mode?
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 18:40, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hello!
I am confused..
I just tried to play with my new *ist DS and mny old AF500FTZ flash.
I have tried ISO of 200 and 400 with lenses Pentax F 50/1.7
I went to the Arboretum at 7 AM this
morning.
Put the A400/5.6 on the camera.
Cranked the ASA up to 800 as it was a bit overcast.
Was quickly rewarded with this...(warning, big for dial-up readers)
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Deer41.jpg
This
other sources of information. In that process, I have
read the PDF manuals for both the *ist D and DS present in some Pentax
websites.
Today, when reading the manual of the *ist DS, I have found the
following text about how AF works when using Continuous shooting:
The focus is locked
Dave,
Still feeling my way here, so I don't exactly know what to expect
'Out of the camera' with the *ist Ds.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went to the Arboretum at 7 AM this
morning.
Put the A400/5.6
Thanks to all who responded on the RAW conversion issue.
I've bought a copy of Photoshop Elements 3.0 and will load it up soon.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/13/05, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:24:43PM -0500, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Jens,
Thanks, I am going to try
701 - 800 of 1670 matches
Mail list logo
