Re: *istD Raw Converter

2004-06-11 Thread Mark Roberts
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Pentax converter is just fine, although a bit of a nasty interface, providing you want to make prints, rather than look at pixels at 72 DPI. Hear hear. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com

Re: *istD Raw Converter

2004-06-11 Thread alex wetmore
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Mark Dalal wrote: I haven't really been playing close attention to the discussion on converting RAW files from the *istD. The little bit I have read has given me the impression that people aren't totally pleased with the Pentax converter and have been happier with the

Re: *istD Raw Converter

2004-06-11 Thread Herb Chong
the Pentax converter works OK for small prints, and only if they need minimal processing. Herb - Original Message - From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 1:30 AM Subject: Re: *istD Raw Converter The Pentax converter is just fine

Re: *istD Raw Converter

2004-06-11 Thread Herb Chong
, 2004 10:53 AM Subject: Re: *istD Raw Converter There was some angst over at the dpreview site over the intentional hobbling of the functionality so that it (the LE version) only worked in 8 bits, but apparently they got so much flak over this and several other disabled features (over

Re: *istD Raw Converter

2004-06-11 Thread Christian Skofteland
: *istD Raw Converter the Pentax converter works OK for small prints, and only if they need minimal processing. Herb

Re: *istD Raw Converter

2004-06-11 Thread Herb Chong
that only tells me how much better they would be if you processed them in Photoshop CS. Herb - Original Message - From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:12 PM Subject: Re: *istD Raw Converter I'll disagree. I have

*istD Raw Converter

2004-06-10 Thread Mark Dalal
Hey Folks, I haven't really been playing close attention to the discussion on converting RAW files from the *istD. The little bit I have read has given me the impression that people aren't totally pleased with the Pentax converter and have been happier with the Photoshop CS converter. Has anyone

Re: *istD Raw Converter

2004-06-10 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Mark Dalal Subject: *istD Raw Converter Hey Folks, I haven't really been playing close attention to the discussion on converting RAW files from the *istD. The little bit I have read has given me the impression that people aren't totally pleased

Re: *istD Raw Converter

2004-06-10 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Mark, I just started playing with it a bit yesterday. I ended up downloading the middle version, but would probably buy the LE version. I haven't done any extensive tests yet, but the first look is promising. It seems to be less harsh in it's sharpening and seems to preserve subtle tones