Oh yeah, I forgot to mention, the istDS was a CCD sensor, the K-5 IIs
is a CMOS sensor, more refined.
jco
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:18:04 -0400, Darren Addy
wrote:
Congrats on the K-5IIs, J.C.
An excellent choice. You are gonna be DELIGHTED with the images you
get, compared to your istDS!
J.C. O'Connell wrote on 7/18/18 12:26 PM:
Thanks. And beauty part is, I didnt have to sell off any of my many
choice prime K and A
lenses to finance it. The only way I could have swung a K-1 would have
been by doing just that.
jco
The improvement in image quality between the ist and the
Thanks. And beauty part is, I didnt have to sell off any of my many choice
prime K and A
lenses to finance it. The only way I could have swung a K-1 would have
been by doing just that.
jco
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:58:31 -0400, Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
I love my K-5 IIs, and I think and
Congrats on the K-5IIs, J.C.
An excellent choice. You are gonna be DELIGHTED with the images you
get, compared to your istDS!
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Should be a nice competent rig, JC.
> Sounds like a lucky find.
> Hope so!
> J
> Sent from
I love my K-5 IIs, and I think and hope you will like it very much as well.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:51 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
> They also offered me a five year parts and labor warranty
> with no deductable for $32 which
They also offered me a five year parts and labor warranty
with no deductable for $32 which seems like a good deal on
an electronic camera. Assuming the camera checks out ok when
I get it, I just might take em up on that deal too.
jco
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:24:25 -0400, Jack Davis
wrote:
Should be a nice competent rig, JC.
Sounds like a lucky find.
Hope so!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 8:09 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> Well after 12 years of service, I finally upgraded my istDS body.
> I just ordered a like new (under 100 shutter count) K-5 IIs in the box.
> I
Well after 12 years of service, I finally upgraded my istDS body.
I just ordered a like new (under 100 shutter count) K-5 IIs in the box.
I will be getting wider ISO range, higher usable ISO, better AF, larger
color LCD, shake reduction, live view, movie mode, and nearly triple the
resolutiion
When I adjusted the focus on my K10D, I used the
middle of the zoom range on my DA 16-45. I then
checked both extremes of the zoom range on it, and on
my 50-200, 10-17, and 24-90, and all were spot-on.
Rick
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's good information. I had wondered at
My gear came back from Pentax--K20D, DA* 16-50 and DA* 50-135.
Turnaround was just over three weeks, but it took me nearly another full
week to pick up the package after UPS messed up the delivery.
I sent all this stuff in because on the K20D the DA* 16-50 would not
autofocus to infinity at 16
That's good information. I had wondered at what focal length the
focus adjustment should be set on zoom lenses. It's obvious that it
wouldn't be absolutely consistent throughout the range. But I would
hope it would always be close. My lenses seem to show only minor
variation in this
From DPReview:
Sinar has today announced the development of a digital back (for medium
format cameras) with an amazing 1-shot resolution of 22 million pixels.
Even more interesting is that the sensor used by the camera is the Kodak
KAF-22000CE CCD sensor which has a pixel area of 4080 x 5440 and
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 6 September 2002 6:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New 120 Digital sensor - not Pentax but a step in the right
direction from Kodak...
From DPReview:
Sinar has today announced
maybe the Pentax 67D isnt that far off after all
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New 120 Digital sensor - not Pentax but a step in the right
direction from Kodak
14 matches
Mail list logo
