RE: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-18 Thread Dave Madsen
Yeah, I throw all of my crap away, too, but I don't have anything left when I'm done. Dave -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style *blush

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-18 Thread John Forbes
, September 14, 2004 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style *blush* Thanks Dave! That is so cute, but remember, you guys have never seen just how much crap I also throw away! Well, tv has, but he insists that it is normal... -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-17 Thread Caveman
Did some testing too after the discussion. I couldn't see any advantage to the many step approach - except the adition of artifacts (or maybe this is the whole advantage - if you can mistake them as being details). Leon Altoff wrote: I tried this with Photoshop CS and I have to say I prefer the

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-16 Thread Leon Altoff
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:30:00 -0400, Graywolf wrote: Repeatedly increasing or decreasing the size by about 10% until you have an image the size you want. -- Illinois Bill wrote: And the trick is? I tried this with Photoshop CS and I have to say I prefer the single step enlarged image to the

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-16 Thread Frantisek
Just use Genuine Fractals trial version, good up to 20 images (then it stops). For really big prints (and even upsizing to e.g. 400 dpi Noritsu prints at 30x40cm), it works better than just plain bicubic. Or at least use Lanczos interpolation (in freeware IrfanView), it's quite better than just

BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
I have been receiving back a few orders this week. I was very apprehensive when I had three separate brides all order 20x30 inch prints from me, and was really worried about the results. Well, tv talked me through the resizing process, and I am happy to say that these are quite possibly the

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Christian
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote on 9/14/2004, 2:12 PM: I have been receiving back a few orders this week. I was very apprehensive when I had three separate brides all order 20x30 inch prints from me, and was really worried about the results. Well, tv talked me through the resizing

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Caveman
If it were about my own wedding, I would definitely have preffered William Robb's Tachihara instead of sharpened phony pixels. But as long as your clients are happy, more power to you ! Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: Who would've thought? 20x30 inch, 300 dpi prints from a 6.1mp camera?!?! Larger

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Keith Whaley
I thought it was cute, looked at it several times, determined I didn't know what to think about it, or DO about it, so I put it on my desktop. A couple of weeks later I opened it up again, and it did the same thing it did before, inexplicably expand to an ever larger object, always with sharp

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, tv talked me through the resizing process, and I am happy to say that these are quite possibly the best prints I have ever produced. What process did you use? Kind regards Kevin - __

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Caveman
Well, the lesson was that you can print it as large and sharp as you want, but it won't have more real information than 4 pixels could have. Keith Whaley wrote: I thought it was cute, looked at it several times, determined I didn't know what to think about it, or DO about it, so I put it on my

RE: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Dave Madsen
Tan, it helps that your photos are amazing to begin with. Dave -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:12 PM To: Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BG prints - *istD style I have been receiving back a few orders

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Keith Whaley
Caveman wrote: Well, the lesson was that you can print it as large and sharp as you want, but it won't have more real information than 4 pixels could have. Okay, I got that right off... That I was supposed to derive something more out of it! Okay, I thought my brain took a vacation! (It's been

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
I read it, I cared, and I believe I thanked you for posting it. Thanks again. Dan M Caveman wrote: I also remember posting some time ago a 4 pixels image that enlarges well to any size, all with nice sharp edges. Nobody cared. So maybe I should sign Cavewoman, then you guys will pay attention.

RE: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
September 2004 6:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style Tan, it helps that your photos are amazing to begin with. Dave -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:12 PM To: Net [EMAIL

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Paul Sorenson
: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:56 PM Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style *blush* Thanks Dave! That is so cute, but remember, you guys have never seen just how much crap I also throw away! Well, tv has, but he insists

Re: BIIIIG prints - *istD style

2004-09-14 Thread Gonz
, Australia www.tanyamayer.com Ph +61 (07) 49831247 Mobile +61 0429831247 -Original Message- From: Dave Madsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2004 6:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style Tan, it helps that your photos are amazing to begin