Re: Boris PESO 2010 #01

2010-02-09 Thread Boris Liberman
Well, the whole purpose of that shoot was to use A 50/1.2 at exactly f1.2... But I hear your words, gentlemen... On 1/19/2010 12:48 AM, frank theriault wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I am about 1,300 messages behind. Duh! Here is another

Re: Boris PESO 2010 #01

2010-02-09 Thread frank theriault
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: Well, the whole purpose of that shoot was to use A 50/1.2 at exactly f1.2... But I hear your words, gentlemen... Well, you didn't tell us that, did you? You merely presented a photo and asked us to be brutal and honest,

Re: Boris PESO 2010 #01

2010-01-18 Thread frank theriault
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I am about 1,300 messages behind. Duh! Here is another interpretation of Butterfly for Frank, this time at f1.2... http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/01/peso-2010-01.html I think Bruce is right - just a smidge

Boris PESO 2010 #01

2010-01-16 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! I am about 1,300 messages behind. Duh! Here is another interpretation of Butterfly for Frank, this time at f1.2... http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/01/peso-2010-01.html Be brutal and honest. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Boris PESO 2010 #01

2010-01-16 Thread Bruce Dayton
I think it needs more DOF. It is just too shallow - I'd like the whole butterfly to be sharp and just a bit more definition to the spokes to give it a better frame of reference. Close, but not quite there for me. -- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, January 16, 2010, 9:24:30 AM, you wrote: BL