Well, the whole purpose of that shoot was to use A 50/1.2 at exactly
f1.2... But I hear your words, gentlemen...
On 1/19/2010 12:48 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I am about 1,300 messages behind. Duh!
Here is another
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the whole purpose of that shoot was to use A 50/1.2 at exactly f1.2...
But I hear your words, gentlemen...
Well, you didn't tell us that, did you? You merely presented a photo
and asked us to be brutal and honest,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I am about 1,300 messages behind. Duh!
Here is another interpretation of Butterfly for Frank, this time at f1.2...
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/01/peso-2010-01.html
I think Bruce is right - just a smidge
Hi!
I am about 1,300 messages behind. Duh!
Here is another interpretation of Butterfly for Frank, this time at f1.2...
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/01/peso-2010-01.html
Be brutal and honest.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I think it needs more DOF. It is just too shallow - I'd like the
whole butterfly to be sharp and just a bit more definition to the
spokes to give it a better frame of reference.
Close, but not quite there for me.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, January 16, 2010, 9:24:30 AM, you wrote:
BL
5 matches
Mail list logo