How many pennies did it cost you, Boris?
Thanks!
Jack
--- On Thu, 11/4/10, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Boris Peso #47 - Topaz Cat (technical)
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, November 4, 2010, 10:25
On Nov 5, 2010, at 0:24, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Here is the follow up blog entry with unprocessed and LightRoom noise
reduction crops. Sorry, Miserere, for the prints which I am happy to show,
you're going to have to come here in person *broad grin*.
On 11/5/2010 3:14 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
To my eyes, the difference is negligible. LR3.2's noise-reduction is
such a huge improvement over LR2.x that I was just floored when I
first noticed the difference.
-Charles
It very well may be the case, Charles. It seems that Topaz has more
Everyone keeps saying that Topaz was a french Jazz singer, but I'm sure
she was a New Orleans Stripper
On 11/4/2010 2:52 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 4 November 2010 14:27, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Just bought Topaz Denoise. Here is an image I processed with it. K-5 is
good,
P. J. Alling wrote:
Everyone keeps saying that Topaz was a french Jazz singer, but I'm sure
she was a New Orleans Stripper
I thought it was a French burlesque artist, and I wasn't too far:
http://www.ambertopaz.co.uk/
Warning: not too safe for work?
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi!
Just bought Topaz Denoise. Here is an image I processed with it. K-5 is
good, but I am not buying it - there is no need, really.
Have a look:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/11/peso-2010-47-topaz-cat.html
Please be brutal and honest, especially those of you who have experience
That works for me, Boris! I'll wait for the K-3(?) to upgrade.
Jefery
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Just bought Topaz Denoise. Here is an image I processed with it. K-5 is good,
but I am not buying it - there is no need, really.
Have a look:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Just bought Topaz Denoise. Here is an image I processed with it. K-5 is
good, but I am not buying it - there is no need, really.
Have a look:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/11/peso-2010-47-topaz-cat.html
Please be brutal and honest, especially those of you who
Wouldn't one need to see a before/after Denoise comparison to make a
meaningful comment?
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
(Looking forward to making my first meaningful comment on this list, one day.)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Nov 4, 2010, at 13:27, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Just bought Topaz Denoise. Here is an image I processed with it. K-5 is good,
but I am not buying it - there is no need, really.
Have a look:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/11/peso-2010-47-topaz-cat.html
Please be brutal and
On 4 November 2010 14:27, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Just bought Topaz Denoise. Here is an image I processed with it. K-5 is
good, but I am not buying it - there is no need, really.
Have a look:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/11/peso-2010-47-topaz-cat.html
Please
Hi!
Here is the follow up blog entry with unprocessed and LightRoom noise
reduction crops. Sorry, Miserere, for the prints which I am happy to
show, you're going to have to come here in person *broad grin*.
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/11/peso-2010-471.html
Boris
--
PDML
On 11/4/2010 8:41 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
That works for me, Boris! I'll wait for the K-3(?) to upgrade.
Jefery
I am glad if I saved you some pennies...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
13 matches
Mail list logo
