Good. Just to clarify. The back must cover the full 4x5 frame; not a
small portion of it. So as not to be picky, let's say it must cover at
least 90% of the frame.
Any larger back, say 10x8, would of course also count.
And by selling, we mean a single back on sale to the public. Not the
:
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
Sheet film is actually selling really well around here.
I think there's probably two places in Sydney that would have it in
stock on a regular basis, they are still film oriented otherwise it's
On 9/1/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My comment was not meant to be taken seriously! In fact, I suspect that
LF will be the last bastion of film, simply because it will be
prohibitively expensive to produce large sensors for a small user base.
Let's hope that producing film for the
On 31.08.2006, at 23:20 , Peter Fairweather wrote:
Given that the new K10D is rumoured to make the 67II obsolete, surely
Pentax will just drop the 645D??!!
I don't know :-) But it would be interesting to see what is (2x
bigger than Canon's FF) sensor used in 645D capable of with 22-bit
ADC
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 09:13:30 +0100, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 9/1/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My comment was not meant to be taken seriously! In fact, I suspect that
LF will be the last bastion of film, simply because it will be
prohibitively expensive to
On 9/1/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31.08.2006, at 23:20 , Peter Fairweather wrote:
Given that the new K10D is rumoured to make the 67II obsolete, surely
Pentax will just drop the 645D??!!
I don't know :-) But it would be interesting to see what is (2x
bigger than
Jostein Øksne wrote:
On 9/1/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31.08.2006, at 23:20 , Peter Fairweather wrote:
Given that the new K10D is rumoured to make the 67II obsolete, surely
Pentax will just drop the 645D??!!
I don't know :-) But it would be interesting to see what
On 01.09.2006, at 14:20 , Mark Roberts wrote:
How about if we add in-camera image stabilization, too?
;-)
Then even before starting using such a camera we should have hi-
absorbent pants on ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
: But what about the 645D?
Sheet film is actually selling really well around here.
I think there's probably two places in Sydney that would have it in
stock on a regular basis, they are still film oriented otherwise it's
thin on the ground.
It's not ever been in really high demand here. At one
On 01/09/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Large format digital cameras have been used by pro shooters for many
years. They tile the image from multiple sensors. They're used in
conjunction with a computer.
Or they literally scan the frame in a linear fashion over the period
of a
Stenquist
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
Large format digital cameras have been used by pro shooters for many
years. They tile the image from multiple sensors. They're used in
conjunction with a computer.
To expensive to be practical for anyone outside of the very small group
that you think
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
Large format digital cameras have been used by pro shooters for many
years. They tile the image from multiple sensors. They're used in
conjunction with a computer.
To expensive to be practical
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I can see a tiled back of APS-C sensors selling for less than 2K
in a couple of years.
Two APS-C sensors side-by-side would be 23.5mm x 31.4mm.
Close enough for me. (In fact, it's almost exactly the 3:4 aspect
ratio that I prefer over the traditional 2:3 of 35mm film.)
On Sep 1, 2006, at 6:55 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I can see a tiled back of APS-C sensors selling for less than 2K
in a couple of years.
Two APS-C sensors side-by-side would be 23.5mm x 31.4mm.
Close enough for me. (In fact, it's almost exactly the 3:4 aspect
ratio that I prefer over the
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:29:25 +0100, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Large format digital backs won't always be too expensive. I can see a
tiled back of APS-C sensors selling for less than 2K in a couple of
years.
Would you be interested in a little wager of $100 on that?
We'll take
I'll take 5 years and $500.
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:29:25 +0100, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Large format digital backs won't always be too expensive. I can see a
tiled back of APS-C sensors selling for less than 2K in a couple of
years.
Sure. But it's a back, not a camera. As long as that is understood,
you're on.
Paul
On Sep 1, 2006, at 7:02 PM, John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:29:25 +0100, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Large format digital backs won't always be too expensive. I can see a
tiled back of
???
Any news, Rumors???
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
No news at all on my side.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:36 PM
Subject: But what about the 645D?
???
Any news, Rumors???
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Press release date is around the 15. September.
And no, I'm not in the know of anything on this one. :-(
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
???
Any news, Rumors???
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
But it does mean that there are news about it in the press release?
- Original Message -
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
Press release date is around the 15
: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
Press release date is around the 15. September.
And no, I'm not in the know of anything on this one. :-(
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
???
Any news, Rumors???
Pål
--
PDML
that there are news about it in the press release?
- Original Message -
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
Press release date is around the 15
@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
Press release date is around the 15. September.
And no, I'm not in the know of anything on this one. :-(
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
???
Any news, Rumors
On 31/8/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
The 645D will make field cameras obsolete.
Digital mole!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
The 645D will make field cameras obsolete.
Ummmno.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 01/09/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
The 645D will make field cameras obsolete.
Ummmno.
Exactly, lack of film will make them obsolete :-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
The 645D will make field cameras obsolete.
Ummmno.
Exactly, lack of film will make them obsolete :-)
Sheet film is actually selling really well around here.
William Robb
--
PDML
On 01/09/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheet film is actually selling really well around here.
I think there's probably two places in Sydney that would have it in
stock on a regular basis, they are still film oriented otherwise it's
thin on the ground.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: Re: But what about the 645D?
Sheet film is actually selling really well around here.
I think there's probably two places in Sydney that would have it in
stock on a regular basis, they are still film oriented otherwise it's
30 matches
Mail list logo
