Re: Vs: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-13 Thread Bob Blakely
If a filter is coated, it's coated on both sides. Not much point, otherwise. Yer right, plastic filters are not coated. Using uncoated filters on premiere quality glass is like putting cheap tires on a Lamborghini - just my opinion. Regards, Bob...

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Rob Studdert
On 11 Feb 2003 at 22:00, Alan Chan wrote: IMHO, if you use 1 filter only and use a deep hood, it doesn't make any practical difference. At least none of PLs is coated and I haven't seen any lost of sharpness. A hood can't exclude reflections generated by light sources within the angle of

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Herb Chong
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IMHO, if you use 1 filter only and use a deep hood, it doesn't make any practical difference. At least none of PLs is coated and I haven't seen any lost of sharpness. regards, Alan Chan one of my circular polarizers is multicoated and one

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Matt Greene
I’ve got to comment here. After reading Bob’s post, I went outside (Wednesday, February 12, 2003) with my camera and Gossen Luna Pro light meter, # 4D51102. I shot a few scenes to check both instruments, then shot them in tandem against a solid tan/light brown/stucco exterior for my own

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Pat White
Putting an uncoated or single-coated filter on an SMC lens is like putting all-season tires on a Ferrari. Or, to put it another way, putting any filter in front of the lens will cause _some_ image degradation (loss of contrast or sharpness). An SMC filter will cause the least degradation. In

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Mike Johnston
Any filter that has some color tint to it does not pass all the light entering it. The color tint is due to absorption of some color light. Your light meter does not measure the difference because it is not sensitive enough for these small differences. If you had a color temp. meter it

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Mike Johnston
Or, to put it another way, putting any filter in front of the lens will cause _some_ image degradation (loss of contrast or sharpness). ...Allegedly. However, Ctein's Law applies: If you can't see it, it doesn't count. --Mike

Re: Vs: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Matt Greene
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Päivä: 12. helmikuuta 2003 18:10 Aihe: Re: Coating on Filters? snip some skylight filters stop UV and some pink/red rays. snip Yep! = Matt Greene I get it done with YAHOO! DSL!

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Rob Studdert
On 12 Feb 2003 at 9:09, Matt Greene wrote: Pure (Clear) optical grade glass has no color and is Gamma neutral. And will if not coated reflect approximately 5% of the light hitting it's surface, a single coated piece of glass will reduce this reflection to 1-2%, SMC will reduce it to a mere

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Franklin Stregevsky
I seldom check a lens's rear element for cleanliness. One of my recurring fears is that in the year 2030, I'll discover that on each of my lenses, the rear element has a big smudge that has been degrading my results for decades. Pat White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or, to put it another way,

Re: Vs: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Herb Chong
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok, regular Tiffen B+W filters are uncoated. Regular HOYA filters are double-coated, but some of their special effect filters are uncoated, including CPL PL. regards, Alan Chan i have a Hoya Multicoated Circular polarizer and am thinking of

Re: Vs: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Franklin Stregevsky
Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, regular Tiffen B+W filters are uncoated. Regular B+W filters are single-coated. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-12 Thread Bob Blakely
Check those rear elements! When I bought my used SMCP 135/1.8, I was dismayed to find that the rear element had on it what appeared to be cleaning marks that looked just like circular scratches. No amount of normal cleaning with commercial lens cleaning fluids removed these scratches, and I was

Coating on Filters?

2003-02-11 Thread Gregory L. Hansen
How important is it to have a coatings on all your filters? A plain UV filter might cost $10 while an SMC filter would cost $35. I can't see how it would matter much on the outer surface, a little bit of light would just be lost. But on the inner surface? -- A nice adaptation of conditions

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-11 Thread Rob Studdert
How important is it to have a coatings on all your filters? A plain UV filter might cost $10 while an SMC filter would cost $35. I can't see how it would matter much on the outer surface, a little bit of light would just be lost. But on the inner surface? Outer surface reflections could

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-11 Thread Michael Cross
Hoya's multicoated filters are about $20. Maybe a good compromise? I would always prefer a multicoated filter, but I use the Tiffen 812 all the time with no apparent ill effects. I do use a hood. Tiffen doesn't make a multicoated version of the 812. Gregory L. Hansen wrote: How important

Re: Coating on Filters?

2003-02-11 Thread Bob Blakely
All air/glass interfaces are an abrupt change in impedance for the electromagnetic energy impinging on/passing through the interface. A portion of the light must be reflected at each interface. In fact, the same amount of light will be reflected at the inner interface as from the outer interface.

Coating on Filters?

2003-02-11 Thread Herb Chong
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] How important is it to have a coatings on all your filters? A plain UV filter might cost $10 while an SMC filter would cost $35. I can't see how it would matter much on the outer surface, a little bit of light would just be lost. But on the