Re: D76

2004-04-25 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: David Miers Subject: RE: D76 I'm certainly not an expert in this field and offer this link only for your examination. Draw your own conclusions. I have. The old fashioned way. Running sensitometric tests of T-Max 100 and 400 film in both developers. I

RE: D76

2004-04-24 Thread David Miers
PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 7:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D76 - Original Message - From: David Miers Subject: RE: D76 According to a site that I recently subscribed to T-Max developer and D76 are actually chemically the same even though from what I

Re: D76

2004-04-24 Thread Norm Baugher
I have to agree, this has been my experience as well. Also, T-Max developer seems to give bettter results at a higher temperature. Well, that's just me, could be the smoke from the incense Norm William Robb wrote: Except that they give entirely different characteristic curves to

RE: D76

2004-04-23 Thread David Miers
According to a site that I recently subscribed to T-Max developer and D76 are actually chemically the same even though from what I understand one is a powder and the other is a liquid. I'm not at home on my home systems, so I can't access the info right now, but will post a link tomorrow night

RE: D76

2004-04-23 Thread Jens Bladt
PROTECTED] Emne: RE: D76 According to a site that I recently subscribed to T-Max developer and D76 are actually chemically the same even though from what I understand one is a powder and the other is a liquid. I'm not at home on my home systems, so I can't access the info right now, but will post

Re: D76

2004-03-17 Thread Mark Cassino
At 11:12 AM 3/17/2004 -0600, you wrote: From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only developer that I found worked well with T-Max film is T-Max developer. Unfortunately, yes. That's why I'm moving to Pan F. I'm no expert on BW chemistry, but I get fine results using D76 1:! and TMax. - MCC

Re: D76

2004-03-17 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:37:35 -0500 From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] * *I'm no expert on BW chemistry, but I get fine results using D76 1:! and TMax. * *- MCC *- * *Mark Cassino Photography * Sometimes the simplest, most essential things are forgotten D76 is great for many films

Re: D76

2004-03-17 Thread Andre Langevin
Sometimes the simplest, most essential things are forgotten D76 is great for many films. Excellent for Plus-X. D76 1:1 also fine for 3200 films (at iso 800-1000) The only real developer issue I've ever heard of is Rodinal in some water suppies (specifically, Cleveland, OH) doesn't work well

Storing and using D76 1+1

2003-01-25 Thread Rodelion
G'day folks, I'm working on gathering the stuff I need to develope BW films, mostly Tri-X and HP5, perhaps Delta (does it matter?) Anyway, since it's what I've always used, I'll go for D76 1+1 and I'm having a hard time deciding what to store it in, how often and long to use it before I get

RE: Storing and using D76 1+1

2003-01-25 Thread tom
-Original Message- From: Rodelion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] G'day folks, I'm working on gathering the stuff I need to develope BW films, mostly Tri-X and HP5, perhaps Delta (does it matter?) Yes. No. Maybe. Anyway, since it's what I've always used, I'll go for D76 1+1 and I'm

Re: Storing and using D76 1+1

2003-01-25 Thread Mike Johnston
I'm working on gathering the stuff I need to develope BW films Rod, Good man. Anyway, since it's what I've always used, I'll go for D76 1+1 [...] I've heard the dark brownish glass flasks are the way to go, only opening it when you use it. How many times can D76 1+1 be re-used with good