Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-08 Thread Sylwek
Hi, for me, Pentax could change left side mode/WB/ISO wheel to the thingy in style of the one found in Z1P and Z1. It would be just superb for digital camera, as you would always be in shutter priority - even during changing ISO, WB, image quality, you could always back to photographing by just

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-08 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
Hi, for me, Pentax could change left side mode/WB/ISO wheel to the thingy in style of the one found in Z1P and Z1. It would be just superb for digital camera, as you would always be in shutter priority - even during changing ISO, WB, image quality, you could always back to photographing by just

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-07 Thread Nick Clark
From what I've seen of the *ist-D and my experience with other Pentax bodies including the MZ-S, *ist, etc. I'd like them to take the whole camera and put it in an MZ-S style body. That camera feels just right. They should put back the mechanical aperture mechanism, and perhaps they could

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-07 Thread Leonard Paris
Pentax will probably do that when they find a good full frame chip that doesn't price them completely out of the market. They were close to producing the MZ-D, you know. They actually announced it and showed a prototype. The MZ-S is their current Flagship film camera. I don't think the *ist

Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread mapson
Steven Desjardins wrote 2. The idea about replacing the rocker switch with distinct buttons (5?) is a good one. It's way too easy to rock it the wrong way. Let's talk about points to improve for *istD MkII the buttons is one, then we have: * the card door/flap catches on strap * the green

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Bill Owens
- Original Message - From: mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:32 AM Subject: Ergonomics of *istD * central hotshoe - unables use of rtf and external flash This is not a problem using the AF360 in wireless mode anything else? Return

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
mapson wrote: * camera too small - with grip is OK - my wife says the same thing This was one of the concerns I have wondered about, I do love my camera to be big and chunky and to look like a professional camera rather than a toy version. tan.

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Mark Roberts
mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steven Desjardins wrote 2. The idea about replacing the rocker switch with distinct buttons (5?) is a good one. It's way too easy to rock it the wrong way. Let's talk about points to improve for *istD MkII the buttons is one, then we have: * the card door/flap

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: mapson Subject: Ergonomics of *istD Let's talk about points to improve for *istD MkII the buttons is one, then we have: * the card door/flap catches on strap * the green button too far from trigger, actually to be used by wrong finger! * ISO/WB

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Cotty
On 6/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Let's talk about points to improve for *istD MkII the buttons is one, then we have: * the card door/flap catches on strap * the green button too far from trigger, actually to be used by wrong finger! * ISO/WB program settings on the same wheel * camera

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread alex wetmore
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote: I'm not sure I agree with the too small part. I probably wouldn't have bought the *ist D if it was larger. The major reason that I have stuck with Pentax cameras is their small size, excellent ergonomics, and the number of affordable high quality

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Christian
- Original Message - This was one of the concerns I have wondered about, I do love my camera to be big and chunky and to look like a professional camera rather than a toy version. tan. Is it time to start THAT thread again? So small is definately non-proffessional regardless of

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Bruce Dayton
Agree on the CF card door. Agree on the green button location I would like to see WB setting in viewfinder Camera size is fine for me. I always use the grip I have no problem with RTF - I don't use it. Always a big flash when I need flash. When I had the PZ-1p and flash on the side, I didn't

Re[2]: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Tanya, With the grip on, it looks professional. The grip is a necessary option in my book. More battery life, better handling both portrait and landscape and more professional looking, to boot. Bruce Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 5:53:13 AM, you wrote: TMP mapson wrote: * camera too

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
Christian said: This was one of the concerns I have wondered about, I do love my camera to be big and chunky and to look like a professional camera rather than a toy version. tan. Is it time to start THAT thread again? So small is definately non-proffessional regardless of feature

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Christian
- Original Message - From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] My main point was that *I* have tiny, weeny hands (people comment on how small they are all the time), and scrawny little arms, and yet even *I* find some of the MZ range feeling as though I am wielding not much

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
Christian asked: What DO you like about larger cameras? In true, fairygirl fashion, Christian, I have no bloody idea! I just know that I DO like them. Not huge like a MF camera or such, but at least something that feels as though I am working when I use it. I don't know why it is, I just

Re[2]: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Tanya, I used a PZ-1p for quite a while and then MZ-S with vertical grip and then 67II with wood grip (that is way big) and now the *istD. With the vertical grip, it feels just great. More in size like a PZ-1p but feels more ergonimic to me. The real nice thing about it is that if/when

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Kenneth Waller
- Original Message - From: mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ergonomics of *istD Let's talk about points to improve for *istD MkII anything else? 1- Twelve vs six MP 2- Price I'm sure we can come up with more. Kenneth Waller

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Steve Desjardins
First, after unpacking the box, he threw out the bubblewrap that held the camera thinking it was just packing filler. LOL. I did the exact same thing and so did my friend who bought the S as well. Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Herb Chong
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:32 AM Subject: Ergonomics of *istD Let's talk about points to improve for *istD MkII * camera too small - with grip is OK - my wife says the same thing

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Herb Chong
i bought the ZX-5n strap. it doesn't look as nice, but that is besides the point. Herb - Original Message - From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Ergonomics of *istD Return to the strap with the pockets

Re: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Stan Halpin
A minority opinion: I like the green button location. I don't like the strap interfering with the CF flap. I have no problem getting the CF card to eject. The grip is a POS compared to the very fine MZ-S. Of the 4 grips I have used, in order of comfort and utility, I put MZ-S 1st, PZ-1p

RE: Re[2]: Ergonomics of *istD

2004-01-06 Thread Bucky
:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: Ergonomics of *istD Not useless if you want wireless flash.