Thank you for your input. It looks great as for DSLR to me either.
Perhaps I shall buy one with other ebay offer (from another european
seller).
regards,
Roman.
K20D, DA 10-17mm, DA* 16-50mm, FA 50mm, DA 50-200mm,
Is that the re-branded Tamron lens? I've got the Tamron version and I've
never been satisfied with it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Then it's obvious the Tamron name plate must be the source of the problem.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:15 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Is that the re-branded Tamron lens? I've got the Tamron version and I've
never been satisfied with it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Is that the re-branded Tamron lens? I've got the Tamron version and I've
never been satisfied with it.
Yep, it's a Tamron. I had one and it was OK at wider focal lengths but
not very good at longer ones. Stopped down and at 28mm it was quite
decent. I
Funny story: I was in Savania GA using that self same 28-200mm on an
LX, (sometimes convienecne trumps quality), and managed to lose the
Pentax branded lens cap. Pissed me off, but lo what appeared before me
but the Tamron lens cap of the same size, in the middle of a sidewalk.
Well I guess
From: Tom C
Then it's obvious the Tamron name plate must be the source of the problem.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:15 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Is that the re-branded Tamron lens? I've got the Tamron version and I've
never been satisfied with it.
Unless the Pentax
I was making a joke.
I found the build quality to be a little sloppy as well and I
certainly wished for a zoom lock to prevent it from extending when I
pointed the camera down. But I never had a real problem with it
optically and many of the photos I took with it and the Pz-1p
(purchased
Speaking from your own experience, how do you like that lense. Hope its
worth to bid
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemnextitem=190374025449.html
many thanks,
Roman.
K20D, DA 10-17mm, DA* 16-50mm, FA 50mm, DA
At 11:13 PM +0200 2/24/10, Roman Melihhov wrote:
Speaking from your own experience, how do you like that lense. Hope its
worth to bid
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemnextitem=190374025449.html
I bought one of them soon after buying my ZX-5N in 2000. At first I
did not care too
Hated, (Ok, hate is too strong a word, so), despised it with film,
pretty damned good on a digital.
On 2/24/2010 4:13 PM, Roman Melihhov wrote:
Speaking from your own experience, how do you like that lense. Hope its
worth to bid
Well I generally occur with P.J.
Back when I was using it on film, 8+ years ago, not having the
experience I do now, I thought it was OK-to-pretty good. But even
then I started scanning my film and having a bit more control.
On a DSLR, I hate mounting it as opposed to a prime, but given the
11 matches
Mail list logo
