On 10/19/2010 9:48 PM, Bob W wrote:
буржуазия
Жизнь господина де Мольера
בורגנות
;o)
You got it right, Bob... Well done!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
буржуазия
Жизнь господина де Мольера
בורגנות
;o)
You got it right, Bob... Well done!
of course!
I hope you don't think I was criticising your English. You yourself pointed out
your difficulty with a very complex sentence construction, and I offered a
version which is correct,
Of course not. I know that my English is easily recognized as that of a
foreign man and I welcome any correction as far as I can understand it,
adopt it and use it. I even wrote specific request for corrections on
the front page of my blog, but likely because my blog is not read by too
many
Cesar has a MZ-S?
Snake-skinned? :-)
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Fear not, Boris. Even native born speakers here are known to butcher the
language. I think you do very well.
Jerry
Subject: Re: Film and cameras
Message-ID: 4cbeb1c5.7050...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Of course not. I know that my English is easily
Actually Boris your English is very ambitious and you can generally put
together complex sentences better than perhaps the majority of native English
speakers.
Bob
Of course not. I know that my English is easily recognized as that of a
foreign
man and I welcome any correction as far as I
Better than the average on this list, but then Brooks tends to drag that
down a bit.
On 10/20/2010 2:13 PM, Bob W wrote:
Actually Boris your English is very ambitious and you can generally put
together complex sentences better than perhaps the majority of native English
speakers.
Bob
Of
Hell, my typing alone can do that.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jerry in Arizona glewis4...@yahoo.com wrote:
Fear not, Boris. Even native born speakers here are known to butcher the
language. I think you do very well.
Jerry
Subject: Re: Film and cameras
Message-ID: 4cbeb1c5.7050
On 10/21/2010 3:14 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Better than the average on this list, but then Brooks tends to drag that
down a bit.
On 10/20/2010 2:13 PM, Bob W wrote:
Actually Boris your English is very ambitious and you can generally
put together complex sentences better than perhaps the
On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:07 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
The big ergonomic plus of the MZ-S for me was the the way that flat
body-grip combo fit in my hand. I suppose that is the same thing Bob
was alluding to.
I don't think I've ever held an MZ-S but I did find the Z-1p handled
exceptionally
Dave,
The MZ-S with battery grip has the curves of a Ferrarri versus
the Z-1p with battery and grip strap has the lines of a Ford.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:55 AM, David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz wrote:
On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:07 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
The big ergonomic
On 10/19/2010 4:12 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
The MZ-S with battery grip has the curves of a Ferrarri versus
the Z-1p with battery and grip strap has the lines of a Ford.
Regards, Bob S.
Bob, personally I don't care about curves of which car my camera is
resebmlant of... Gosh, what a
On 10/19/2010 4:12 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
The MZ-S with battery grip has the curves of a Ferrarri versus the
Z-1p with battery and grip strap has the lines of a Ford.
Regards, Bob S.
Bob, personally I don't care about curves of which car my camera is
resebmlant of...
You
On Oct 19, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Bob W wrote:
On 10/19/2010 4:12 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
The MZ-S with battery grip has the curves of a Ferrarri versus the
Z-1p with battery and grip strap has the lines of a Ford.
Regards, Bob S.
Bob, personally I don't care about curves of which car
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Film and cameras
Dave,
The MZ-S with battery grip has the curves of a Ferrarri versus
the Z-1p with battery and grip strap has the lines
I like to think of the MZ-S as the last Pentax film camera, even though it
wasn´t really. I still use my MZ-S once in a while. I shot 10 films this
summer. It's a very nice camera. Lovely balanced too. I sold my first one, but
to finance myd *ist D. But I ended up regretting this nad bought
Bob, personally I don't care about curves of which car my camera is
resebmlant of...
You write like a fine bourgeois gentleman, Boris!
MAÎTRE DE PHILOSOPHIE.- On les peut mettre premièrement comme
vous
avez
dit: Belle Marquise, vos beaux yeux me font mourir d'amour. Ou bien:
On 2010-10-19 15:29, Jens wrote:
I like to think of the MZ-S as the last Pentax film camera, even though it
wasn´t really. I still use my MZ-S once in a while. I shot 10 films this
summer. It's a very nice camera. Lovely balanced too. I sold my first one, but
to finance myd *ist D. But I
I do own an MZ-S, my second most favorite camera - next to the LX :-)
- the PZ1-P I have is the one that used to belong to Hugh Morton. I got
it at Grandfather Mountain after his death...
Talking about camera feel and such...
Funny thing is that when the PZ1-P came out I ended up at a camera
the closest, followed by the PZ-1p).
The funny thing is that the K-7 is one camera I love the ergonomics
on. IMHO it's FAR better than any of the Pentax 35mm film cameras (in
fact it handles very similarly to the Maxxum 7, which it also
distinctly resembles).
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
, followed by the PZ-1p).
The funny thing is that the K-7 is one camera I love the ergonomics
on. IMHO it's FAR better than any of the Pentax 35mm film cameras (in
fact it handles very similarly to the Maxxum 7, which it also
distinctly resembles).
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
is that the K-7 is one camera I love the ergonomics
on. IMHO it's FAR better than any of the Pentax 35mm film cameras (in
fact it handles very similarly to the Maxxum 7, which it also
distinctly resembles).
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
reason I've just
never really gelled with the Pentax 35mm film camera's (the LX came
the closest, followed by the PZ-1p).
The funny thing is that the K-7 is one camera I love the ergonomics
on. IMHO it's FAR better than any of the Pentax 35mm film cameras (in
fact it handles very similarly
I've just
never really gelled with the Pentax 35mm film camera's (the LX came
the closest, followed by the PZ-1p).
The funny thing is that the K-7 is one camera I love the ergonomics
on. IMHO it's FAR better than any of the Pentax 35mm film cameras (in
fact it handles very similarly
the closest, followed by the PZ-1p).
The funny thing is that the K-7 is one camera I love the ergonomics
on. IMHO it's FAR better than any of the Pentax 35mm film cameras (in
fact it handles very similarly to the Maxxum 7, which it also
distinctly resembles).
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
7, not the MZ-S. For some reason I've just
never really gelled with the Pentax 35mm film camera's (the LX came
the closest, followed by the PZ-1p).
The funny thing is that the K-7 is one camera I love the ergonomics
on. IMHO it's FAR better than any of the Pentax 35mm film cameras
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:28:41PM -0400, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Sensitivity wasn't (a) problem with the MZ-S ;-)
I did actually change the sensitivity on my MZ-S a couple of times.
(Well, more than a couple of times in total, but rarely mid-roll).
The auto film loading was good enough
On 10/17/2010 5:37 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
That film camera, how it feels, how it fits the hand, how it sounds...Wow.
I really miss all that.
I should say that certain Pentax MX camera that I have now amazes me
just as well. It has all the features necessary and nothing redundant.
It screams
The MZ-S with battery grip virtually lept into my hand.
In the mid 80s (way, way back) I was doing some retail work.
My principle for selling cameras was to first have the person
hold the cameras and pick the one that felt most comfortable.
Strange as it may sound, people seemed to gravitate
To: PDMLpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Film and cameras
Like many of you, I have film in the freezer.
I've put some in cameras to see if I could use a bit up.
Today, two cameras rode with me in my van,
the K-7 and the MZ-S, both on the floor behind me.
I
I discovered the MZ-S a couple of years after I'd already decided
that film was dead. It was a lovely design and might have held me in
film for another couple of years, but it was already too late to get
one and enjoy it. I tried that with an MX and sold it after a year and
a half having only put
For me it's the Maxxum 7, not the MZ-S. For some reason I've just
never really gelled with the Pentax 35mm film camera's (the LX came
the closest, followed by the PZ-1p).
The funny thing is that the K-7 is one camera I love the ergonomics
on. IMHO it's FAR better than any of the Pentax 35mm film
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 01:08:48PM +, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that the MZ-S was supposed to be a digital camera.
No - the MZ-S was supposed to be the top-of-the-MZ-line Pentax film body.
I presume you're thinking of the first planned Pentax digital camera
(often referred
John,
I still shoot film, but not the little stuff.
Except this weekend I decided to shoot some PanF
and got my son's Super Program. Just to compare things.
And now I am off to the darkroom.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot
That's what I meant, although I did say it badly. I meant we could
have had the same ergonomics in both cameras since the MZ-S and grip
was basis the Pentax digital camera with the Phillips 6 MP FF sensor.
Here are lots of pics fro those who weren't looking at Pentax 9 years
ago:
According to
BTW, I always wondered how things might have gone if that sensor
hadn't been such a bust (or they had chosen another sensor) and this
camera had been produced. I can hardly blame Pentax for not making it
since the company that went ahead with their version (Contax) has a
horrible failure on their
Yes and no... If the sensor had been any good, Pentax would have been way ahead
with a 24x36 digital SLR right from the start.
BUT...
Let's face it, the user interface of the MZ-S isn't nearly as good as that of
the PZ-1, 1p, ist D, K10, etc. For some reason they had forgotten about the
This (the MZ-D) was when DSLRs cost $5000-6000. When the *istD came
out, it was about $1500 IIRC. I think Pentax may have made a real
impact if their DSLR had cost $2500, but that price was probably out
of the question with that sensor. I can't remember what other sensors
were out then. Kodak?
Like many of you, I have film in the freezer.
I've put some in cameras to see if I could use a bit up.
Today, two cameras rode with me in my van,
the K-7 and the MZ-S, both on the floor behind me.
I could reach around and grab either one.
What surprised me was the feel of the film camera.
The K-7
On 17 October 2010 14:37, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
That film camera, how it feels, how it fits the hand, how it sounds...Wow.
I really miss all that.
Regards, Bob S.
When Igor was out I shot with both my Leica M4 and LX, by the end of
the day the M4 felt quite comfortable
This is just cruel.
-- Walt
On 10/16/2010 10:41 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17 October 2010 14:37, Bob Sullivanrf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
That film camera, how it feels, how it fits the hand, how it sounds...Wow.
I really miss all that.
Regards, Bob S.
When Igor was out I shot with
Film is just something different.
I tried to go back to digital, I just couldn't ... didn't make me feel
the same way film does.
That MZ-S, I always wanted one of those. Surprised now to find them
still going for $800-900. Can't believe they've held their value that
well.
~Nick
Anyone has experiences with Englis folders like Ensign or Agifold?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 09/22/2006
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Sep 24, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Anyone has experiences with Englis folders like Ensign or Agifold?
Regards
Back in my early teens my first camera was a folding Ensign. I
believe it used 120 film. I bought it at a Goodwill store for fifty
cents. It was just like new in
44 matches
Mail list logo
