Finally, almost useable DNG codec from Adobe

2011-08-19 Thread Thibouille
Just noticed it, maybe I just missed it before. http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Codec Almost useable because metadata isn't supported (bummer!), because it won't work with Vista. It'll work with Win7 including 64bit version, though. -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs

Re: Finally, almost useable DNG codec from Adobe

2011-08-19 Thread Jos from Holland
Finally! It works, I am happy! Thanks for posting. Jos On 19-8-2011 14:02, Thibouille wrote: Just noticed it, maybe I just missed it before. http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Codec Almost useable because metadata isn't supported (bummer!), because it won't work with Vista. It'll work

Re: Finally, almost useable DNG codec from Adobe

2011-08-19 Thread Thibouille
You're welcome ;) Still, 3 years (or about) that DNG's there and Adobe still can't make a complete codec but third parties can (and not for free of course)... sometimes Adobe really are a bunch of morons :( 2011/8/19 Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu: Finally! It works, I am happy!

Re: Finally, almost useable DNG codec from Adobe

2011-08-19 Thread Darren Addy
Looks like the current version has been there since May 3rd of this year. Still, with the metadata issue, the performance issue, and the additional functionality, I'm not sure why THIS wouldn't be worth the $15 measly bucks: http://www.fastpictureviewer.com/codecs/ -D -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Finally, almost useable DNG codec from Adobe

2011-08-19 Thread Thibouille
I agree Darren, it's just that it is IMO unacceptable that Adobe does not provide this for free. Just because they want M$ to support it is no justification and their stupid game is pissing me off. 2011/8/19 Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com: Looks like the current version has been there since

Re: Finally, almost useable DNG codec from Adobe

2011-08-19 Thread Alastair Robertson
Picasa has a nice viewer that works in windows explorer instead of the default viewer, can display dng and pef and the whole thing is free why wait for a codec? Alastair On 20 August 2011 06:06, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote: I agree Darren, it's just that it is IMO unacceptable that