On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 02:10:42 -0400, J.C. O'Connell
wrote:
Reading the lens reviews in Pentax forums, I came across an interesting
lens I just had to buy as
the cost is absurdly low (under $45 shipped ). It also has the
distinction of being the smallest
zoom lens Pentax ever made ( it's
oops sorry
here...
https://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Calendars-in-Print/National-park-Pano/
for future ref...
this covers'em all
https://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Calendars-in-Print
ann
On 10/13/2016 3:49 PM, Gonz wrote:
The link takes me to the flower calendar.
On
see above
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Yup I turned it off and pulled the power cord for about 7 hours... lo an
behold - put paper in and it printed right away.
Thanks!
ann
On 8/15/2016 4:44 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Makes a lot of sense to me actually - since Con-ed might well be
holding back a bit with what it is doling out
At least I can work here until the HP arrives and I can take my time
adjusting to it ...
This is how I got back... opened up AVAST page where it had said You are
unprotected and started scrolling through the side bar - clicked on
upgrade - it let me do it. Then I opened old firefox and went
And...don't forget...I have a licensed version of PSE 10 in the box that
you can have. It should run very nicely on the HP with Win7.
-p
On 5/2/2015 9:56 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
At least I can work here until the HP arrives and I can take my time
adjusting to it ...
This is how I got
thanks , Paul!
I might have to accept that now :-)
ann
On 5/2/2015 15:53, Paul wrote:
And...don't forget...I have a licensed version of PSE 10 in the box that
you can have. It should run very nicely on the HP with Win7.
-p
On 5/2/2015 9:56 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
At least I can work here
YUP - it still works :-)
ann
On 7/13/2014 10:53, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
POssibly terms are messing me up... all I want to do is
for it to NOT open a new tab/window - want is set to replace anything
that was open with whatever my new link goes to.
I think this still works
I was at an Alleycat bike race last weekend (illegal street race). It was for
single speed bikes only so it attracted lots of non-messenger fixed gear
afficionados.
They dress like messengers, wear messenger bags and ride brakeless fixies
around town. They're called fakengers (fake messengers
fixed gear
afficionados.
They dress like messengers, wear messenger bags and ride brakeless fixies
around town. They're called fakengers (fake messengers, get it?) a name
even the poseurs have adopted with pride.
I thought this fakenger's bike looked cool:
http
Sorry about that wrong link..Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16563460
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Great Hallowe'en Image!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:35 AM, jn289 jn...@verizon.net wrote:
Sorry about that wrong link..Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16563460
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Looks like you're a shadow of your former self.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: jn289 jn...@verizon.net
Subject: PESO fixed link PESO Self Portrait Black Walnut Tree
Sorry about that wrong link..Joe
http://photo.net
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
P. J. Alling
Sales price might be a bit prohibitive unless your companies name is
Leica, or maybe Hasselblad.
And speaking of Hasselblad, anyone want to over pay an outragious
amount of money for a Sony NEX?
From: J.C. O'Connell
As long as the megapixels arent too great, say 24MP, I dont know
why a larger sensor is more expensive to make, it should be cheaper
than a small one intuitively. limiting the resolution would keep cost
down while still allowing for many advantages of larger format sensor.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
If your gonna put a fixed lens on a camera, why not have the
sensor even bigger than 24x36? Quality could increase substantially
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
You mean like a 645D?
J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
If your gonna put a fixed lens on a camera, why not have the
sensor even bigger than 24x36? Quality could increase
substantially
--
Sent from my Android
On Sep 19, 2012, at 2:01 PM, l...@red4est.com wrote:
You mean like a 645D?
Oops, didn't notice the fixed lens bit until after I hit send.
J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
If your gonna put a fixed lens
NO, I mean a fixed lens digital camera with very large sensor
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
l...@red4est.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 5:01 PM
Like a digital version of a Fujifilm GSW 6x7 or 6x9 camera? That would
be swt
Mark
On 9/19/2012 5:48 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
NO, I mean a fixed lens digital camera with very large sensor
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message
: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 7:34 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Fixed lens digital cameras : Why not go larger than 24x36?
Like a digital version of a Fujifilm GSW 6x7 or 6x9 camera? That would
be swt
Mark
On 9/19/2012 5:48 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
NO, I mean a fixed lens
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
Like a digital version of a Fujifilm GSW 6x7 or 6x9 camera? That would be
swt
It would be grand, but it would be very very costly. A big sensor like
that is the most expensive component of the camera.
I'd love a true
Subject: Re: Fixed lens digital cameras : Why not go larger than 24x36?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
Like a digital version of a Fujifilm GSW 6x7 or 6x9 camera? That would be
swt
It would be grand, but it would be very very costly. A big sensor like
...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 8:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Fixed lens digital cameras : Why not go larger than 24x36?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
Like
8:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Fixed lens digital cameras : Why not go larger than 24x36?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
Like a digital version of a Fujifilm GSW 6x7 or 6x9 camera? That would be
swt
It would be grand
.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 8:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Fixed lens
... Eventually, someone will make it, I'm
sure.
Granted, they aren't fixed lens cameras, but in their configuration
some of the Alpas are functionally like fixed lens cameras. They
don't look like they'd be very handy for quick change of lenses, and
extra lenses on their boards would be very
just for the new term).
On 9/19/2012 7:34 PM, Mark C wrote:
Like a digital version of a Fujifilm GSW 6x7 or 6x9 camera? That would
be swt
Mark
On 9/19/2012 5:48 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
NO, I mean a fixed lens digital camera with very large sensor
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis
Nice to have the chatter back. :-)
Thanks to whomever the responsible parties were!
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Thanks Doug.
Dave
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:11 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
thanks Doug, and/or other parties involved
i don't know if it was a big or a small hassle, whether it was related to
yesterday's FBI shutdown or what, but i know that when an internet service
goes down
On 10 July 2012 21:11, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
thanks Doug, and/or other parties involved
i don't know if it was a big or a small hassle, whether it was related to
yesterday's FBI shutdown or what, but i know that when an internet service
goes down there is usually someone who
I certainly agree.
On 7/10/2012 11:11 PM, steve harley wrote:
thanks Doug, and/or other parties involved
i don't know if it was a big or a small hassle, whether it was related
to yesterday's FBI shutdown or what, but i know that when an internet
service goes down there is usually someone who
thanks Doug, and/or other parties involved
i don't know if it was a big or a small hassle, whether it was related to
yesterday's FBI shutdown or what, but i know that when an internet service goes
down there is usually someone who has a stressful few minutes or hours ahead of
them
--
PDML
Quoting steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
thanks Doug, and/or other parties involved
i don't know if it was a big or a small hassle, whether it was
related to yesterday's FBI shutdown or what, but i know that when an
internet service goes down there is usually someone who has a
stressful
It's the contrast that enhances the appreciation. :-)
Thanks, Doug and whoever else!
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
yep, thanks! :-)
DagT
Den 10. juli 2012 kl. 22:11 skrev steve harley:
thanks Doug, and/or other parties involved
i don't know if it was a big or a small hassle, whether it was related to
yesterday's FBI shutdown or what, but i know that when an internet service
goes down there is
Message ---
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com
Sent: July 10, 2012 7/10/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: thanks to whomever fixed the list
thanks Doug, and/or other parties involved
i don't know if it was a big or a small hassle, whether it was related to
yesterday's FBI
More Thanks here. Anything to do with that virus?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:55 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
yep, thanks! :-)
DagT
Den 10. juli 2012 kl. 22:11 skrev steve harley:
thanks Doug, and/or other parties involved
i don't know if it was a big or a small hassle, whether it
to earlier internet days)
ann
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com
Sent: July 10, 2012 7/10/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: thanks to whomever fixed the list
On 7/10/2012 19:07, Steven Desjardins wrote:
More Thanks here. Anything to do with that virus?
Helluva a coincidence if not I'd guess... but I'm curious as well
ann
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:55 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
yep, thanks! :-)
DagT
Den 10. juli 2012 kl. 22:11 skrev
I'll bet it was a cyber attack from the Pentax Forums. They envy our Mojo.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 7/10/2012 19:07, Steven Desjardins wrote:
More Thanks here. Anything to do with that virus?
Helluva a coincidence if not I'd guess... but
Steven Desjardins wrote:
More Thanks here. Anything to do with that virus?
Nope.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Couldn't have been PF. Everything is still in the same place here.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll bet it was a cyber attack from the Pentax Forums. They envy our Mojo.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 1/22/2012 01:24, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
just reinstalled the old firefox - 3.6.25 over the new one...
no more problem phew!
I didn't ignore your previous post but as I had no useful advice to
offer I just thought it best to keep quiet.
Aw, Didn't
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:24:18 +1100
Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
I'm still
using Firefox 4.0.1 and while it still works, I'm staying with it.
they have gotten very generous with whole numbers I am off at 9.0.1
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
9.0 sucks in a bunch of ways. apparently it's upgrades have a lot to do
with being able to use it on hand-held devices of which i have none.
Unfortunately (because you are a photographer) 9.0 is very superior to
3.6 in that it recognizes version 4 ICC profiles (version 3.5 -
On 1/22/2012 13:54, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
9.0 sucks in a bunch of ways. apparently it's upgrades have a lot to do
with being able to use it on hand-held devices of which i have none.
Unfortunately (because you are a photographer) 9.0 is very superior to
3.6 in that it
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 1/22/2012 13:54, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
9.0 sucks in a bunch of ways. apparently it's upgrades have a lot to do
with being able to use it on hand-held devices of which i have none.
Unfortunately (because you are a photographer) 9.0 is very
just reinstalled the old firefox - 3.6.25 over the new one...
no more problem phew!
ann
On 1/21/2012 18:36, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
it killed all my Words with friends games on facebook (they may be still
there somewhere) and Starting a game didnt work either.
DIdn't occur to me the java stuff
Quoting Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
just reinstalled the old firefox - 3.6.25 over the new one...
no more problem phew!
I didn't ignore your previous post but as I had no useful advice to
offer I just thought it best to keep quiet.
Glad you managed to fix it yourself. I've opted
My camera has been repaired, it's in QA. They could ship it overnight, but
that would be $65, so I won't have it for the event on Saturday, but it should
be here early next week.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
My camera has been repaired, it's in QA. They could ship it overnight, but
that would be $65, so I won't have it for the event on Saturday, but it
should be here early next week.
So, what they are saying is, its in the
On 12/15/2011 2:40 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Larry Colenl...@red4est.com wrote:
My camera has been repaired, it's in QA. They could ship it overnight, but
that would be $65, so I won't have it for the event on Saturday, but it should
be here early next
in, it
would drive a sane man insane. Maybe it already did.
Joseph
On Nov 11, 2011, at 16:14 , Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Hi Gang,
I just got an email from PPG folk which said they believed they fixed the
problem... and I'm happy to report they did.
The size of my file was larger than the base
they fixed the
problem... and I'm happy to report they did.
The size of my file was larger than the base requirement and it was smooth
sailing. I clicked the Manual enter exif thing and filled everything in that
I knew and left other info blank... almost immediately my scanned photo
they believed they fixed the
problem... and I'm happy to report they did.
The size of my file was larger than the base requirement and it was smooth
sailing. I clicked the Manual enter exif thing and filled everything in
that I knew and left other info blank... almost immediately my scanned photo
On Nov 12, 2011, at 10:00 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
On the Sandisk site, I downloaded the free RescuePro data recovery software
for the Mac. Says to run it and put in the activation code. The little
snipperequirementt App that let you input that code crashed every time the
main app
Hi Gang,
I just got an email from PPG folk which said they believed they fixed
the problem... and I'm happy to report they did.
The size of my file was larger than the base reuqirement and it was
smooth sailing. I clicked the Manual enter exif thing and filled
everything in that I knew
and found an
excellent technician right here in Vancouver, and it's all fixed up.
I was moved to photograph the returning prodigal and muse about what
things in life are worth fixing:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/10/20/Worth-Repairing
This silver lining's dark cloud is that I have
Some may remember that my 40mm Limited was busted back in July in a
trip to Brazil. I finally followed some pointers and found an
excellent technician right here in Vancouver, and it's all fixed up.
I was moved to photograph the returning prodigal and muse about what
things in life are worth
an
excellent technician right here in Vancouver, and it's all fixed up.
I was moved to photograph the returning prodigal and muse about what
things in life are worth fixing:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/10/20/Worth-Repairing
This silver lining's dark cloud is that I have no plausible
Some may remember that my 40mm Limited was busted back in July in a
trip to Brazil. I finally followed some pointers and found an
excellent technician right here in Vancouver, and it's all fixed up.
I was moved to photograph the returning prodigal and muse about what
things in life are worth
Some strange formatting issues going on with that intro post ... try
andrewallenphoto.com (nothing after the .com). Glad to see a few
DA*55 users here as well.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
G'day Andy. Welcome.
You've got a nice looking website there and, on my brief look around,
it's apparent that you have an eye for the unusual - some great shots of
subjects that I probably wouldn't have given a second look.
By the way, if you wonder about the various acronyms that appear on the
Welcome Andrew.
Some nice photos there.
Dave
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Andrew Allen andrewdall...@gmail.com wrote:
Some strange formatting issues going on with that intro post ... try
andrewallenphoto.com (nothing after the .com). Glad to see a few
DA*55 users here as well.
--
On 22/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
But since when have we ever associated you with panache?
This is true.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ermmm, thanks, but my wife kindly requests that you leave that to her,
if you don't mind.
With this kind of fanaticism - you're married???
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
On 9/22/2010 6:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Cottycotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
The next best thing:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-finepix-x100-where-the-
Maybe he means panache in the biblical sense...
On 9/22/2010 6:52 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 22/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Perhaps by shag he means the sea bird related to the cormorant...
Indeed. I want to cormorant you senseless just doesn't quite have
He shagged a cormorant?
Dan
On 22/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Perhaps by shag he means the sea bird related to the cormorant...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:45 -0400, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/22/2010 6:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Cottycotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
The next best thing:
I never thought Titanium was all that sexy. Utilitarian, but not
sexy, and the minute that you change lenses it will look a bit off.
On 9/22/2010 5:42 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 22 September 2010 01:38, Misereremiser...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm excited, and for the first time ever a camera has
The K-7/K-5 are very handsome in a traditional boxy way.
On 9/22/2010 7:56 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Oh good. A special edition Leica M9. As opposed to those pedestrian M9's. ;-)
My problem here is that if I could afford the M9 I'd spend a bit more
and get the 645D. (I'm taking the
Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Dan
On 22/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Perhaps by shag he means the sea bird related to the cormorant...
He shagged a cormorant?
With panache, apparently.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
He shagged a cormorant AND a panache?
Dan
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Dan
On 22/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Perhaps by shag he means the sea bird related to the cormorant...
He shagged a
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com wrote:
When the X100 was announced the first thing that got me wondering was
the inscription on the top deck that says,
FUJINON LENS SYSTEM,
and I asked myself,
Why does a camera with a fixed, single focal length lens
...@gmail.com wrote:
When the X100 was announced the first thing that got me wondering was
the inscription on the top deck that says,
FUJINON LENS SYSTEM,
and I asked myself,
Why does a camera with a fixed, single focal length lens describe
itself as having a 'lens system'?
Then, down the page
myself,
Why does a camera with a fixed, single focal length lens describe
itself as having a 'lens system'?
Then, down the page on this latest link, is the statement,
Something I’m sure a few of you will be curious about is the FoV of
the VF. If the central frame is a 23mm FoV, then the whole
a camera with a fixed, single focal length lens describe
itself as having a 'lens system'?
Then, down the page on this latest link, is the statement,
Something I’m sure a few of you will be curious about is the FoV of
the VF. If the central frame is a 23mm FoV, then the whole VF offers a
16mm
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here you go, Cotty, because you asked nicely :-)
http://enticingthelight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Fuji-X100-size-
comparison-2.jpg
Well, I'll be
The R-D1 was almost perfect in size.
Almost.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
2010/9/22 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
Great. Now I have [...] Dildo running through my head.
And things weren't going all that well in there to begin with.
ouch... serious mindfuck... in one ear and out the other?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 22/9/10, eckinator, discombobulated, unleashed:
ouch... serious mindfuck... in one ear and out the other?
Bloody Germans - no decorum!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 22 September 2010 01:38, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm excited, and for the first time ever a camera has made me wet my pants.
This would be the camera of my wet dreams:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1009/10092116leicam9titanium.asp
Alas, I fear it will never be within my reach.
Oh good. A special edition Leica M9. As opposed to those pedestrian M9's. ;-)
My problem here is that if I could afford the M9 I'd spend a bit more
and get the 645D. (I'm taking the pedestrian M9 here.) There are too
many ways to use Leica optics on other bodies and although the camera
is
2010/9/22 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
Bloody Germans - no decorum!
we know nussink! nnussink! that's why =)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
2010/9/22 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
Bloody Germans - no decorum!
but it is the Brits who put it on film
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120735/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On 22/9/10, eckinator, discombobulated, unleashed:
but it is the Brits who put it on film
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120735/
Har!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 22 September 2010 01:37, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/22/2010 7:04 AM, Miserere wrote:
Here you go, Cotty, because you asked nicely :-)
http://enticingthelight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Fuji-X100-size-comparison-2.jpg
Miserere, sir, I suggest you produce another
The more I look at it, and the more I think about it, it's really an
attractive package. The only thing I think would make it better is if it
had interchangeable lenses, even if none are available at first.
So, altogether, I think I'll wait to see if Fuji comes out with an
interchangeable
On Sep 22, 2010, at 3:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
The more I look at it, and the more I think about it, it's really an
attractive package. The only thing I think would make it better is
if it had interchangeable lenses, even if none are available at first.
So, altogether, I think I'll wait
On 20 September 2010 02:26, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Only .5x mag in the viewfinder - I'd need to look through it. Otherwise,
I would buy one unseen. That's much more like it.
The next best thing:
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
The next best thing:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-finepix-x100-where-the-
hell-did-this-come-from/#viewfinder
OMG I'd normally say that I love you and want to give you lots of
babies. But in this case I want to shag you
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
The next best thing:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-finepix-x100-where-the-
hell-did-this-come-from/#viewfinder
OMG I'd normally say that I love you and want to
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
The next best thing:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-finepix-x100-where-the-
hell-did-this-come-from/#viewfinder
OMG I'd normally say that I love you and want to
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
The next best thing:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-finepix-x100-where-the-
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
The next best thing:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-finepix-x100-where-the-
hell-did-this-come-from/#viewfinder
OMG I'd normally say that
On 22/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Perhaps by shag he means the sea bird related to the cormorant...
Indeed. I want to cormorant you senseless just doesn't quite have the
same panache
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
Cotty wrote:
On 22/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Perhaps by shag he means the sea bird related to the cormorant...
Indeed. I want to cormorant you senseless just doesn't quite have the
same panache
But since when have we ever associated you with panache?
--
PDML
://enticingthelight.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-finepix-x100-where-the-hell-did-this-come-from/#viewfinder
When the X100 was announced the first thing that got me wondering was
the inscription on the top deck that says,
FUJINON LENS SYSTEM,
and I asked myself,
Why does a camera with a fixed, single focal length lens
On 22 September 2010 17:14, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 22/9/10, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
The next best thing:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-finepix-x100-where-the-
hell-did-this-come-from/#viewfinder
OMG I'd normally say that I love you and want to give
1 - 100 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
