2010/11/5 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
He then left in a snit.
Was that a 2 or 4 door snit?
Hatch-back I thought, but I really wasn't paying that much attention.
no use re-hatching the matter over and over anyway =)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
Subject: Re: On behalf of William Robb
From: Ken Waller
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
From: Tom C
It was Godfrey's consititutional right
2010/11/5 Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com:
Was that a 2 or 4 door snit?
Hatch-back I thought, but I really wasn't paying that much attention.
It was a new 1 door model that only swung one way.
a BMW with the door at the rear? the Arsetta?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: eckinator eckina...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: On behalf of William Robb
2010/11/5 Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com:
Was that a 2 or 4 door snit?
Hatch-back I thought, but I really wasn't
On 11/3/2010 7:52 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Boris Liberman
On 11/3/2010 1:09 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
J. Random Foreigner's country can do what they will with him. They're
going to anyway.
The laws of the list server's host nation apply to the list server
itself.
Does this highly
On 11/2/2010 4:27 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:55 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
If the PDML were a school bus, you'd all be sitting up front right now.:-)
If the PDML were a school bus, it would be one of the short ones.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
So you're
No, the space aliens, they're already among us...
On 11/2/2010 3:18 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/11/2 Jeffery Smithjsmith...@bellsouth.net:
Hey! Everyone should pack heat! To protect ourselves against
let me guess - people packing heat? oh yeah that makes sense =)
--
His lack of
: Re: On behalf of William Robb
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 10:16 AM
I used the term constitution loosely,
and in direct response to the
prior poster that used the term, and my post was largely
tongue in
cheek.
A bit bossy?
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12
eckinator wrote:
2010/11/5 Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com:
Was that a 2 or 4 door snit?
Hatch-back I thought, but I really wasn't paying that much attention.
It was a new 1 door model that only swung one way.
a BMW with the door at the rear? the Arsetta?
Now, THAT’s clever! :-D
Cotty wrote:
Pity Bill isn't around, I'm filming at Auschwitz on Tuesday - I could
really get my chance to justify the holocaust...
Give me a shout if you need any contacts over there. At least one list
memeber in Krakow, also.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 4/11/10, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Give me a shout if you need any contacts over there. At least one list
memeber in Krakow, also.
Thanks. On a coach straight from Krakow to Auschwitz and then return
some hours later. 5am flight from Gatwick, so hotel night before and
next
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: John Francis jo...@panix.com
Subject: Re: On behalf of William Robb
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:12:50PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, eckinator eckina
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
Subject: Re: On behalf of William Robb
From: Tom C
It was Godfrey's consititutional right to act in such a way to provoke
Bill, who exercised his
2010/11/5 Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com:
Was that a 2 or 4 door snit?
I believe it was a snitchback
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
From: Ken Waller
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
From: Tom C
It was Godfrey's consititutional right to act in such a way to provoke
Bill, who exercised his constititional right to use a word that some
found offensive, who then tried to suppress that constitutional right.
I
Pity Bill isn't around, I'm filming at Auschwitz on Tuesday - I could
really get my chance to justify the holocaust...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Nov 3, 2010, at 1:27 AM, Cotty wrote:
Pity Bill isn't around, I'm filming at Auschwitz on Tuesday - I could
really get my chance to justify the holocaust...
WTF?
While I don't know what the connection is, I'm pretty certain that you were
just trying to be shockingly offensive, could you
On 11/3/2010 10:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Besides, I'm the annoying jewboy on the list, not Bill.
I thought the word was kike...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
From: Charles Robinson
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:15, Tom C wrote:
He called Godfrey a faggot. That made Godfrey happy, but it made
a lot of other list members angry because they think Bill
shouldn't call Godfrey that. So they hyperventilated and got all
over Bill's case in some idiotic guise of
From: Tom C
It was Godfrey's consititutional right to act in such a way to provoke
Bill, who exercised his constititional right to use a word that some
found offensive, who then tried to suppress that constitutional right.
I think you go too far characterizing it as tried to suppress.
He
From: Charles Robinson
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:52, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Religion, politics, sexual orientation, and race are not good
topics for any forum, and generally ignite a purposeless day or
two of hostility. Inasmuch that they have nothing to do with
Pentax or photography, they are best
From: Tim ?sleby
Pardon me for pointing at the obviouis.
But this aint USA, it is PDML, a multicultural email list.
So. There is no THE Constitution here, at least not as I am aware off.
For the record:
I'm not atacking the constitution. You Tom, and others may, may
practise the constitution as
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Pity Bill isn't around, I'm filming at Auschwitz on Tuesday - I could
really get my chance to justify the holocaust...
Wow.
That one really went over my head. I really don't understand what
you're getting at. Maybe it's just as
From: Jack Davis
The constitution notwithstanding, let's hear it for servility.
Do you perhaps mean civility?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
From: Scott Loveless
I guess a more applicable question might be if J. Random Foreigner
writes something that could be considered illegal speech in his own
country, but sends it to a list server in a country where his words
would be protected, who's laws apply? Or rather, who's laws should
On 11/3/2010 1:09 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
J. Random Foreigner's country can do what they will with him. They're
going to anyway.
The laws of the list server's host nation apply to the list server itself.
Does this highly disputable matter really belong to the open discussion
on the list? May
On 2010-11-03 4:40, Larry Colen wrote:
On the subject of bigotry, here is George Takei's commentary on Clint McCance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UACK93xF-FE
Larry the Cable Guy
Now I don't care who you are, that's funny!
/Larry the Cable Guy
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML
From: Boris Liberman
On 11/3/2010 1:09 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
J. Random Foreigner's country can do what they will with him. They're
going to anyway.
The laws of the list server's host nation apply to the list server itself.
Does this highly disputable matter really belong to the open
On 11/3/2010 2:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I don't understand what's disputable about it?
United States law says that for a list server physically located within
the borders of the U.S., the U.S. government cannot prosecute the
listmiester for something a list member posts on the list. Under
Now, that's the third bladder-like object used to describe someone that I have
seen on this forum in the past week.
(1) [pompous] gas bag
(2) whoopee cushion
(3) douche bag
Amy I missing any? g
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:48 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-11-03 4:40, Larry Colen
Try extraditing someone from Canada to the US. It's a PITA. We had a hell of a
time getting Charles Ng to come home.
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Oh, it is then that you and I were looking at it from different angles. I
wasn't worried about Doug, as he was not
On 11/3/2010 3:05 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Try extraditing someone from Canada to the US. It's a PITA. We had a
hell of a time getting Charles Ng to come home.
Jeffery
Well, I really don't want to get any deeper into this other than
repeating myself that either we have to have some kind of
I agree that ad hominem attacks should be strongly discouraged. If someone
wishes to attack another personally, he should do it off-list. As they say in
saloons, take it outside, guys. When ad hominem attacks happen on-list, they
invariably disrupt the forum and the function for which this list
There are those who don't want to perform without an audience.
Jack
--- On Wed, 11/3/10, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
From: Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: On behalf of William Robb
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, November 3
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Now, that's the third bladder-like object used to describe someone that I
have seen on this forum in the past week.
(1) [pompous] gas bag
(2) whoopee cushion
(3) douche bag
Amy I missing any? g
It's just a
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:15, Tom C wrote:
... He called Godfrey a faggot. ...
Let's put this long stream of nonsense together with some shred of
accuracy in the facts of how it developed:
WR objected to the statement wherein I opined that I was uninterested
in meaningless brand bashing posing as
Godfrey,
This recap is just stiring the pot.
Be a grown-up and let it pass.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:15, Tom C wrote:
... He called Godfrey a faggot. ...
Let's put this long stream of nonsense together
Replying off list...
Let's put this long stream of nonsense together with some shred of
accuracy in the facts of how it developed:
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On 3/11/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
While I don't know what the connection is, I'm pretty certain that you
were just trying to be shockingly offensive, could you please explain it
to me so that I'll understand what I'm supposed to be offended at?
Certainly.
Some months ago
On 3/11/10, Jeffery Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
When ad hominem attacks happen on-list, they invariably disrupt the
forum and the function for which this list was made (discussion of
Pentax photography).
Why Jeffery (for it is you) is this your way of saying - stay on topic?
in awe
--
On 3/11/10, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
This recap is just stiring the pot.
Be a grown-up and let it pass.
Be fair - facts are sometimes glossed over but G has every right to set
the record straight ?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
That's why I filtered Hitler.
On 11/3/2010 1:31 PM, Cotty wrote:
Congratulations, you've just
justified the holocaust.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
On Nov 3, 2010, at 6:38 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I agree that ad hominem attacks should be strongly discouraged. If someone
wishes to attack another personally, he should do it off-list. As they say in
saloons, take it outside, guys. When ad hominem attacks happen on-list,
they invariably
On 3/11/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
As this interminable thread is such a perfect example of.
And that you are being forced to read --- ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
Another country may choose to prosecute its own citizens for what they
post
on this list or may choose to block access to the list within their own
borders,
but they can't do anything to the listmiester here in the U.S.
they could send a team of ninja cyclists to ride really, really slowly
Pity Bill isn't around, I'm filming at Auschwitz on Tuesday -
that should be a barrel of laughs. Is that for Remembrance Day?
I could really get
my chance to justify the holocaust...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Another country may choose to prosecute its own citizens for what they
post
on this list or may choose to block access to the list within their own
borders,
but they can't do anything to the listmiester here in the U.S.
And 'set the record straight' again and again and again...
Enough already. Bob S.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 3/11/10, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
This recap is just stiring the pot.
Be a grown-up and let it pass.
Be fair - facts are
On 3/11/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
that should be a barrel of laughs. Is that for Remembrance Day?
Party of 200 school children visiting in the lead up to same.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 3/11/10, Cotty Cottington, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm on it.
Har! The doppleganger makes an appearance!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
2010/11/3 Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com:
Godfrey,
This recap is just stiring the pot.
Be a grown-up and let it pass.
Regards, Bob S.
we've all had our say in this so why not? and I doubt he'll stir the
pot much because this discussion wasn't about him all that much. it
was about
that should be a barrel of laughs. Is that for Remembrance Day?
Party of 200 school children visiting in the lead up to same.
that should be very interesting indeed. Although you may need a waterproof
housing for your camera.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 3/11/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
that should be very interesting indeed. Although you may need a waterproof
housing for your camera.
Indeed. I filmed a holocaust survivor giving a talk to teenagers once
and there wasn't a dry eye in the house, including mine.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
: On behalf of William Robb
I have to admit, I am very embarrassed by that outburst from me the
other day.
There were many ways I could have put my thoughts forward without being
offensive.
For the offence to the list, I apologize.
For the insult directed towards Godfrey, I apologize most sincerely
www.lovebytes.com.au
m: 0458 006 740
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Tuesday, 26 October 2010 6:37 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: On behalf of William Robb
I have to admit, I am very embarrassed by that outburst
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:15, Tom C wrote:
He called Godfrey a faggot. That made Godfrey happy, but it made a
lot of other list members angry because they think Bill shouldn't call
Godfrey that. So they hyperventilated and got all over Bill's case in
some idiotic guise of 'moral' enlightement and
IMO, Godfrey was being his annoying arrogant self and irritated Bill.
It's cause and effect.
If Godfrey provoked it, and he didn't care about the response, and
moreover accepted the acclaimation, then I don't quite see why anyone
else should or did.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Charles
On Nov 2, 2010, at 8:59, Tom C wrote:
IMO, Godfrey was being his annoying arrogant self and irritated Bill.
It's cause and effect.
If Godfrey provoked it, and he didn't care about the response, and
moreover accepted the acclaimation, then I don't quite see why anyone
else should or did.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO, Godfrey was being his annoying arrogant self and irritated Bill.
It's cause and effect.
If Godfrey provoked it, and he didn't care about the response, and
moreover accepted the acclaimation, then I don't quite see why anyone
LOL... that probably sums it up.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO, Godfrey was being his annoying arrogant self and irritated Bill.
It's cause and effect.
If Godfrey provoked it, and
I don't understand why people think it is their right to use the the
word faggot and then get all hurt when someone exercises their right
to call them a jerk. Bill wasn't banned, he left on his own. I
wish he had stayed because I often liked what he had to say. But you
can't call people names
Because it was gratuitously offensive? Because its sole purpose was to offend?
If Robb wanted to call him that, he could have done it offlist, but wanted an
audience to see it. The audience saw it. If this list were entirely composed of
racist, sexist, homophobic members, then that sort have
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: On behalf of William Robb
I have to admit, I am very embarrassed by that outburst from me the
other day.
There were many ways I could have put my thoughts forward without being
offensive.
For the offence to the list, I apologize.
For the insult directed towards Godfrey, I
Steve, this wasn't in response to your post. It was in response to the previous
ones that saw no fault in the ft post. Our two posts went out at about the
same time.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Because it was gratuitously offensive? Because its sole purpose
I'm not condoning name-calling or derision of any list member, however
I didn't find it as gratutiously offensive as you apparently did, and
the one called that is certainly public about it.
There's been plenty of other deriding comments on the list in the
past, including regarding people with
Religion, politics, sexual orientation, and race are not good topics for any
forum, and generally ignite a purposeless day or two of hostility. Inasmuch
that they have nothing to do with Pentax or photography, they are best avoided.
On the other end of the spectrum, there are photography forums
2010/11/2 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
Seems a double standard exists.
instead you /could/ - note: not /should/ - be glad that someone cares.
by the way the idiots who care are the same people who are respecting
your exercise of your constitutional right to call them idiots as a
matter of opinion
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/2 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
Seems a double standard exists.
instead you /could/ - note: not /should/ - be glad that someone cares.
by the way the idiots who care are the same people who are respecting
your
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:52, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Religion, politics, sexual orientation, and race are not good topics for any
forum, and generally ignite a purposeless day or two of hostility. Inasmuch
that they have nothing to do with Pentax or photography, they are best
avoided.
You
It was Godfrey's consititutional right to act in such a way to provoke
Bill, who exercised his constititional right to use a word that some
found offensive, who then tried to suppress that constitutional right.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/2 Tom C
I have no dog in this fight (apologies to PETA for the expression) but
don't confuse Constitutional Rights with freedom from consequences or
accountability for what one says when exercising such rights.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:31 PM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no dog in this fight (apologies to PETA for the expression) but
don't confuse Constitutional Rights with freedom from consequences or
accountability for what one says when exercising such rights.
I'm offended that
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:12:50PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/2 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
Seems a double standard exists.
instead you /could/ - note: not /should/ - ?be glad that someone cares.
by the way
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:12:50PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/2 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
Seems a double standard exists.
instead you
Hey! Everyone should pack heat! To protect ourselves against
Oh, never mind.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:52, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Religion, politics, sexual orientation, and race are not good topics for any
forum, and generally
Pardon me for pointing at the obviouis.
But this aint USA, it is PDML, a multicultural email list.
So. There is no THE Constitution here, at least not as I am aware off.
For the record:
I'm not atacking the constitution. You Tom, and others may, may
practise the constitution as mush as you like,
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com wrote:
You Tom, and others may, may
practice the constitution as mush as you like, but please don't take
it for granted here.
Doing so, could be interpreted as, how do I put
this? A bit self centered?
Wait. You mean...
What?! The rest of the world isn't following our lead?!
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Pardon me for pointing at the obviouis.
But this aint USA, it is PDML, a multicultural email list.
So. There is no THE Constitution here, at least not as I am aware off.
For the
I used the term constitution loosely, and in direct response to the
prior poster that used the term, and my post was largely tongue in
cheek.
A bit bossy?
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon me for pointing at the obviouis.
But this aint USA, it is
I know Tom. But never the less ;-)
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/11/2 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
I used the term constitution loosely, and in direct response to the
prior poster that used the term, and my post was largely tongue in
cheek.
A bit bossy?
On Tue, Nov 2,
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
What?! The rest of the world isn't following our lead?!
That's offensive.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
__o
_'\,_
(*)/ (*)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Indeed,
Bill's actions are protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
not the Constitution. Godfrey's are protected by the First Ammendment
to the US Constitution, other list members' speech is protected (or
not protected) by the laws of where they live.
-Adam
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:51
The constitution notwithstanding, let's hear it for servility.
Jack
--- On Tue, 11/2/10, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Tom C caka...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: On behalf of William Robb
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 10:16 AM
I used the term
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
Indeed,
Bill's actions are protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
not the Constitution. Godfrey's are protected by the First Ammendment
to the US Constitution, other list members' speech is protected (or
not protected)
If the PDML were a school bus, you'd all be sitting up front right now.:-)
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It seems to me that without a written set of rules that we click to
agree before we proceed with subscription, the issue is slightly moot.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
The constitution notwithstanding, let's hear it for servility.
Also civility. They are both foreign concepts (and by foreign, I mean
of another planet).
Darren Addy
Kearney, Ne
--
Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes.
LOL!!!
Leave it to Dave to put this all in perspective. Case closed.
Paul
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:55 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
If the PDML were a school bus, you'd all be sitting up front right
now.:-)
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
Seems a double standard exists.
instead you /could/ - note: not /should/ - ?be glad that someone
cares.
by the way the idiots who care are the same people who are
respecting your exercise of your constitutional right to call them
idiots as a matter of opinion - as you can see
Religion, politics, sexual orientation, and race are not good topics for
any
forum, and generally ignite a purposeless day or two of hostility.
Inasmuch
that they have nothing to do with Pentax or photography, they are best
avoided.
On the other end of the spectrum, there are photography
Perhaps some of us are offended not because we find the offense
offensive, but because we're concerned our neighbor might be offended to
see us not being offended.
Good offences make good neighbours.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:47:30PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Are they? The list server is, I think (please slap me around if I'm
wrong), located in the US. I'd like to think, and if it were up to me
they would, that anyone within the borders of the United States would
enjoy the same
Mark!
--- On Tue, 11/2/10, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
If the PDML were a school bus, you'd
all be sitting up front right now.:-)
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:19 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
It depends on the jurisdiction where the server is located.
That would make sense.
In the US it is generally held that ISPs, list service providers, c.
are protected by common carrier rules. This means that as long as
they
The one with the closest prison or firing squad takes precedence.
It's called the Law of Proximity.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess a more applicable question might be if J. Random Foreigner
writes something that could be considered illegal
2010/11/2 Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net:
Hey! Everyone should pack heat! To protect ourselves against
let me guess - people packing heat? oh yeah that makes sense =)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Or vigilante group.
Down here in the lower 48, we're far more concerned about the cell phone images
of Brett Favre's pee pee.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Tom C wrote:
The one with the closest prison or firing squad takes precedence.
It's called the Law of Proximity.
On Tue,
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Down here in the lower 48, we're far more concerned about the cell phone
images of Brett Favre's pee pee.
Whew. Thanks for not saying penis.
g
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
__o
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:55 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
If the PDML were a school bus, you'd all be sitting up front right now.:-)
If the PDML were a school bus, it would be one of the short ones.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2/11/10, Jeffery Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
Religion, politics, sexual orientation, and race are not good topics for
any forum
Hang on mate, that's why I joined the PDML !?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
