Not sure what line the local viaduct was on.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:44 Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Rick Womer wrote:
>
> >Most of the trains are freights, which don't have timetables that I know
> >of, and are more interesting photographically.
>
> I didn't think they
Rick Womer wrote:
>Most of the trains are freights, which don't have timetables that I know
>of, and are more interesting photographically.
I didn't think they ran freight trains on the Settle & Carlisle
Railway at all?
>On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 05:09 Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
Most of the trains are freights, which don't have timetables that I know
of, and are more interesting photographically.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 05:09 Bob W-PDML wrote:
> Somebody ought to invent railway timetables so people don't have to suffer
> like that.
>
> > On 12 Oct
Somebody ought to invent railway timetables so people don't have to suffer like
that.
> On 12 Oct 2017, at 02:38, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> Beautiful shot—I like the curve that the pano gives; it makes it considerably
> more interesting.
>
> On our trip to Yorkshire a few
Ann, we are fairly near a few fires and
dealing with smokey, throat burning
air and burning eyes. Not ideal for
photography either. I'm not really
complaining, in this case we've seen
large area neighborhoods
completely wiped out and small towns emptied ahead of the flames.
Worst we've ever
Beautiful shot—I like the curve that the pano gives; it makes it considerably
more interesting.
On our trip to Yorkshire a few years ago I spent lots of time waiting for a
train to cross a more modest nearby viaduct. It never happened while I was
waiting; only just before I got there and as I
Excellent shot!
Paul via phone
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 9:14 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Yeah, lovely stuff, Alan!
> and Jack -- glad to see you posting... hope that means you are farther away
> from flames than I thought you were
>
> ann
>
>> On 10/11/2017 6:13 PM, Jack
Yeah, lovely stuff, Alan!
and Jack -- glad to see you posting... hope that means you are farther
away from flames than I thought you were
ann
On 10/11/2017 6:13 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Really nice Alan!
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2017, at 1:21 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
Alan C wrote:
A Pano of the Ribblehead Viaduct on the Settle & Carlisle Railway.
440yds long, 104ft high, 24 Arches. Scroll L for a Drone image & an arch
close up. Sorry, no train. The storm eventually got us before we were
able to reach the car.
Really nice Alan!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 1:21 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Excellent Image!
>
> How old is the Viaduct?
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Alan C
Mark Roberts wrote:
>"Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
>
>>Excellent Image!
>>
>>How old is the Viaduct?
>
>1850's, I think.
Oops. Wikipedia says it was completed in 1874.
>>> A Pano of the Ribblehead Viaduct on the Settle & Carlisle Railway. 440yds
"Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
>Excellent Image!
>
>How old is the Viaduct?
1850's, I think.
>> A Pano of the Ribblehead Viaduct on the Settle & Carlisle Railway. 440yds
>> long, 104ft high, 24 Arches. Scroll L for a Drone image & an arch close up.
>> Sorry, no train. The
Excellent Image!
How old is the Viaduct?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Alan C wrote:
> A Pano of the Ribblehead Viaduct on the Settle & Carlisle Railway. 440yds
> long, 104ft high, 24 Arches. Scroll L for a Drone
"Alan C" wrote:
>A Pano of the Ribblehead Viaduct on the Settle & Carlisle Railway. 440yds
>long, 104ft high, 24 Arches. Scroll L for a Drone image & an arch close up.
>Sorry, no train. The storm eventually got us before we were able to reach
>the car.
>
A Pano of the Ribblehead Viaduct on the Settle & Carlisle Railway. 440yds
long, 104ft high, 24 Arches. Scroll L for a Drone image & an arch close up.
Sorry, no train. The storm eventually got us before we were able to reach
the car.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/37590750956
K5
15 matches
Mail list logo