From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has KonicaMinolta released any digital-only lenses, or is their
lineup strictly 35mm still?
Herb Chong wrote:
three yesterday.
From the KM press release:
2. Effective Anti-Shake compensation equivalent to a shutter speed 2 -
3 stops slower*1 with Dynax/Maxxum
-)
- Original Message - From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: In-Body Image Stabilization
That's interesting. I imagined that for the in-camera stabilisation to
work properly, the lenses would have to have a larger
I remain sceptical about the image quality one can get using the edge of
many lenses. Recall the review I posted a few days ago of the DA 50-200.
Overall it is pretty good for the price, and I would recommend it for
most uses. It is, however, consistently just a bit weak at the edges.
What
which do you think is greater, a blurred shot from camera movement, or a
blurred shot from using the edge of the lens?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 1:24 PM
Subject: In-Body Image
, a blurred shot from camera movement,
or a blurred shot from using the edge of the lens?
Herb...
- Original Message - From: Joseph Tainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 1:24 PM
Subject: In-Body Image Stabilization
I remain sceptical about
Image Stabilization
I remain sceptical about the image quality one can get using the edge
of many lenses. Recall the review I posted a few days ago of the DA
50-200. Overall it is pretty good for the price, and I would
recommend it for most uses. It is, however, consistently just a bit
weak
three yesterday.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: In-Body Image Stabilization
Has KonicaMinolta released any digital-only lenses, or is their
lineup strictly 35mm still?
@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: In-Body Image Stabilization
three yesterday.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: In-Body Image Stabilization
Has
: Saturday, July 16, 2005 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: In-Body Image Stabilization
That's interesting. I imagined that for the in-camera stabilisation to
work properly, the lenses would have to have a larger-than-sensor image
circle. Maybe that's a wrong assumption?
PM
Subject: Re: In-Body Image Stabilization
That's interesting. I imagined that for the in-camera stabilisation to
work properly, the lenses would have to have a larger-than-sensor image
circle. Maybe that's a wrong assumption?
Joseph wrote:
I assume that the forthcoming high-performance telezoom will be better
out to the edges. Perhaps Pentax's better lenses will be suitable for
image stabilization, but less so the lower-quality lenses.
Edge definitions is one of the parametres the D FA lenses are optimized
Perhaps that's one reason why the KM D7 feels so enormous in the hand.
Godfrey
On Jul 16, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
this article quotes the KM General Manager of Development when he
says that the sensor moves more than 1cm if necessary http://
the 7D and the 7 are both large cameras. i have a friend who has both. the
*ist and *istD are both smaller.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: In-Body Image Stabilization
I'm not crazy about the idea of IS, in body or lens based. Sure, it
would be useful for some situations, but it has its limitations from my
point of view. What I would *much* rather be able to do is push shutter
speed up by having better performance at high ISO. The advantages of
this over an
14 matches
Mail list logo
