It's a bit late but my semi calibrated CRT, (Hitachi SuperScan Elite
761*), shows them as blue. I thought it might be the screen being off
so I tried it on my laptop as well, and the blue elements are blue there
as well.
On 6/14/2011 11:03 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All!
After taking
On 6/14/2011 18:54, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Purple for me too.
For me three.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 15/06/2011 9:55 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Bill, thank you for your story about the wedding problems.
So, did you find any solution to it back then?
Other than explaining to the customer what went wrong and why, there
wasn't much to do WRT salvaging anything.
I mentioned that I would be
On 14/06/2011 7:25 PM, David Parsons wrote:
That's awesome. Do you have any of them scanned? I'd love to show
them to a MUA friend.
Sadly, no. When I was shooting weddings, never bothered to hold back the
negatives. I just shot the job, charged a bit extra for giving up
potential residual
Thank you, guys for all the responses.
I understand how fluorescence can be responsible for the color change.
(I mentioned that possibility in my original e-mail.)
My question was rather, - how can you deal with that... (if at all).
Bill, thank you for your story about the wedding problems.
So,
PS. Is the back display of the cameras calibrated?
And if not, - (how) can one calibrate it?
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
William Robb wrote:
With a 50% divorce rate, keeping wedding negatives seemed like a bad
business pan compared to selling them when the people were still in love.
Classic!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Igor, K7 and K5 screens can be calibrated if I remember well, at least the K5.
2011/6/15 Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org:
PS. Is the back display of the cameras calibrated?
And if not, - (how) can one calibrate it?
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Two other considerations - the color of the ceiling you're bouncing the
flash off of and the color temperature of the ambient light.
A white ceiling may not be the same color as other white ceilings and it
may not even be a white ceiling. The bounced flash is going to pick up
some color.
From: Mark Roberts
William Robb wrote:
Igor, filters aren't all that spectrum specific, and tend to be cut
filters, in that they don't pass any spectrum below a particular
wavelength (which will vary from filter to filter).
UV florescence has been a problem since the dawn of electronic flash.
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light, so, I used
a flash bounced from the ceiling, which made the light rather uniform.
There were some party items in two colors: green and purple.
In all shots, the
On 15 June 2011 01:03, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light, so, I used
a flash bounced from the ceiling, which made the light rather uniform.
There were some
Purple for me too.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 June 2011 01:03, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light, so,
Tue Jun 14 11:08:09 EDT 2011
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 15 June 2011 01:03, Igor Roshchin str at komkon.org wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light, so, I used
a flash bounced from the
Igor, under Lightroom develop module, TSI, tint: adjusting blue and
purple made a lot of difference and look more like the colour you
linked as reference.
I got blue +25 and purple +72.
I dunno if this is close enough, but a lot better, at least to me.
2011/6/14 Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:03:41AM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light, so, I used
a flash bounced from the ceiling, which made the light rather uniform.
[ . . . ]
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light, so, I used
a flash bounced from the ceiling, which made the light rather uniform.
There
Tue Jun 14 13:48:28 EDT 2011
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:03:41AM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light, so, I used
a flash bounced from the
On 14/06/2011 12:46 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Tue Jun 14 13:48:28 EDT 2011
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:03:41AM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light,
William Robb wrote:
Igor, filters aren't all that spectrum specific, and tend to be cut
filters, in that they don't pass any spectrum below a particular
wavelength (which will vary from filter to filter).
UV florescence has been a problem since the dawn of electronic flash. A
lot of things
On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Igor, filters aren't all that spectrum specific, and tend to be cut
filters, in that they don't pass any spectrum below a particular
wavelength (which will vary from filter to filter).
UV florescence has been a problem
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:46:42PM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Tue Jun 14 13:48:28 EDT 2011
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:03:41AM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with
On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:49 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:46:42PM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Tue Jun 14 13:48:28 EDT 2011
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:03:41AM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All!
The sensor doesn't qualify the light hitting it
Igor,
Time to check your display's calibration.
It's purple to me...
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Hi All!
After taking photos at a party, I discovered an interesting effect.
It was indoors, with uneven and not very bright light, so,
On 14/06/2011 3:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
So it may be necessary to put a UV filter over the flash, not over the lens.
I noticed a huge improvement in colour fidelity at weddings when I
stopped using Vivitar shoe mount flashes on R. Goldberg brackets and
started using pro grade Metz
That's awesome. Do you have any of them scanned? I'd love to show
them to a MUA friend.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:40 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/06/2011 12:46 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Tue Jun 14 13:48:28 EDT 2011
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at
26 matches
Mail list logo
