- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
> In a message dated 8/25/2007 10:01:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Aug 26, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Rebekah wrote:
>
>
In a message dated 8/25/2007 10:01:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Aug 26, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Rebekah wrote:
> Bah - I don't have any tattoos yet. Besides, you never even looked
> at the other ones!
Here's one I was sent the other day
http://www.bmeink.com/A70
Hmm...I wonder if that would be "accessible art" or edging towards
particle physics...it seems I'm unable to "get" that art there. But,
whatever floats that person's boat!
rg2
On 8/26/07, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Rebekah wrote:
>
> > Bah - I don't
On Aug 26, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Rebekah wrote:
> Bah - I don't have any tattoos yet. Besides, you never even looked
> at the other ones!
Here's one I was sent the other day
http://www.bmeink.com/A70722/high/bmegl562499.jpg
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/
> Pics or it ain't true.
>
> --
> Scott Loveless
Bah - I don't have any tattoos yet. Besides, you never even looked
at the other ones!
rg2
On 8/25/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rebekah wrote:
> > What, the rest of you guys don't have "Pentaxian" tattooed across your
> > fore
Rebekah wrote:
> What, the rest of you guys don't have "Pentaxian" tattooed across your
> foreheads?
>
> Amateurs.
>
> John
> ;)
>
>
> Forehead? Mine's more Von Dutch.
>
> rg2
>
>
>
Pics or it ain't true.
--
Scott Loveless
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailm
What, the rest of you guys don't have "Pentaxian" tattooed across your
foreheads?
Amateurs.
John
;)
Forehead? Mine's more Von Dutch.
rg2
On 8/25/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
>
> :-)
>
> Dave
>
> On 8/25/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 24
**
:-)
Dave
On 8/25/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/08/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >No but Cotty shows up at your place, reworks an A85 to Canon mount and
> >then buggers off.
>
> That's A*85 to you mr Brooks!!
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cot
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>
> Well, I guess that's better than our guys, who don't seem to have
> learned anything.
>
>
At least your guys seem able to keep their dirty tricks quiet for more than
a wee
On 24/08/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>No but Cotty shows up at your place, reworks an A85 to Canon mount and
>then buggers off.
That's A*85 to you mr Brooks!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
From:
"William Robb"
> From: "Scott Loveless" Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>> William Robb wrote:
>>> - Original Message - From: "Glen Tortorella" Subject: Re:
>>> JMDC Sticker
>>>
>> It gets worse. You Canadians are
No but Cotty shows up at your place, reworks an A85 to Canon mount and
then buggers off.
I 'v sen this happen. Its horrible, sort of like getting the looting
and pilaging thing backwards.
Dave
On 8/24/07, Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> If I were to remove a JMDC inspect
>>In my view, they should have just attached the sticker to the
>>customer's receipt or to something else.
>
> I think they should have just tattooed the product model and serial
> number on the back of the buyer's neck.
What, the rest of you guys don't have "Pentaxian" tattooed across your
foreh
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
> William Robb wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Glen Tortorella"
>> Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>>
>>
> It gets worse. You Canadians are up to something. Or maybe i
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Tortorella"
Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>I suppose my reason for wanting to take it off is twofold: first, I
> have always thought that these stickers look goofy (and detract from
> the aesthetics of a nice camera), and, sec
I don't know if it's still available, but Radio Shack "Tuner Cleaner"
would take grease, oxidation and most other contaminants off of the
exteriors of metal objects and leave them looking brand new.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an older camera
Glen Tortorella wrote:
>In my view, they should have just attached the sticker to the
>customer's receipt or to something else.
I think they should have just tattooed the product model and serial
number on the back of the buyer's neck.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pd
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Glen Tortorella"
> Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>
>
>
>> Another good one...though in the age of "Homeland Security" (aka Big
>> Brother) and warrantless wiretaps, there is li
This is what I was thinking, except that I had characterized the
effect in terms of fading rather than oxidation. In my view, they
should have just attached the sticker to the customer's receipt or to
something else.
Glen
On Aug 24, 2007, at 3:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If I were
One can never be too cautious... :-)
Glen
On Aug 24, 2007, at 4:04 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Glen Tortorella"
> Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>
>
>> Good one, William...like those white tags on couches--do not remove
>
7;s started already. The invasion has begun.
>>
>> Tom C.
>>
>>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>>> D
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Tortorella"
Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
> Good one, William...like those white tags on couches--do not remove
> "under penalty of law" :-)
Many years ago, my parents bought a new set of furniture for the living
room. Of course
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Tortorella"
Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
> Another good one...though in the age of "Homeland Security" (aka Big
> Brother) and warrantless wiretaps, there is little that would
> surprise me.
http://www.cbc.ca/tec
> If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an older camera
> body (late 70s or early 80s vintage), would an oval "spot" show up in
> place of the sticker (i.e. from fading)? Overall, the camera is in
> nice condition. Have any of you ever tried this with an older camera?
If you r
e it off?
rg2
On 8/24/07, Tom Cakalic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's started already. The invasion has begun.
>
> Tom C.
>
> >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
It's started already. The invasion has begun.
Tom C.
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:16:45 -0400
Yes, you'll start to get e-mails from Tom
is
> removed and then strange things will start happening to you.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>&
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
>> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:30:03 -0600
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Glen Tortorella"
&g
Only if it needs to be cleaned...
Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an older camera
> body (late 70s or early 80s vintage), would an oval "spot" show up in
> place of the sticker (i.e. from fading)? Overall, the camera is in
> nice condi
Good one, William...like those white tags on couches--do not remove
"under penalty of law" :-)
Glen
On Aug 24, 2007, at 1:30 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Glen Tortorella"
> Subject: JMDC Sticker
>
>
>> Hi All,
Those stickers have tracers in them. The government will know if the tag is
removed and then strange things will start happening to you.
Tom C.
>From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
&g
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Tortorella"
Subject: JMDC Sticker
> Hi All,
>
> If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an older camera
> body (late 70s or early 80s vintage), would an oval "spot" show up in
> place of the sticker (i.e. fr
Hi All,
If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an older camera
body (late 70s or early 80s vintage), would an oval "spot" show up in
place of the sticker (i.e. from fading)? Overall, the camera is in
nice condition. Have any of you ever tried this with an older camera?
Thanks,
33 matches
Mail list logo
