Re: K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-10 Thread Toralf Lund
Boris Liberman wrote: Hi! It is 90/2.5 1:2 macro and with matching adaptor it is 180/5 1:1 macro. The latter being even more useful because of greater working distance from the subject - less intrusive! How well does the adaptor work? I mean, does it hurt the performance in any way? I

Re: K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-09 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! It is 90/2.5 1:2 macro and with matching adaptor it is 180/5 1:1 macro. The latter being even more useful because of greater working distance from the subject - less intrusive! How well does the adaptor work? I mean, does it hurt the performance in any way? I guess I'm a bit sceptical

Re: K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-09 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! Another question is what the right price for it would be. I found a shop in the UK (or rather, their website) that have both a used SMC-A 100 F/4 and a Tamron 90mm F/2.5 in stock right now. They ask for £245 for the Pentax lens, but only 145 for the Tamron *including a 1:1 extension

K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-08 Thread Toralf Lund
I'm still sort of casually looking for a real macro lens... Just wondering, how do you people reckon the old f/4 Pentax macros compare to the newer FA-100 f/2.8? (Just came across one of the former class for sale; not sure if it is the F, A or original K variant - I'm assuming these are all

Re: K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-08 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! I'm still sort of casually looking for a real macro lens... Just wondering, how do you people reckon the old f/4 Pentax macros compare to the newer FA-100 f/2.8? (Just came across one of the former class for sale; not sure if it is the F, A or original K variant - I'm assuming these are

Re: K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-08 Thread Toralf Lund
Boris Liberman wrote: Hi! I'm still sort of casually looking for a real macro lens... Just wondering, how do you people reckon the old f/4 Pentax macros compare to the newer FA-100 f/2.8? (Just came across one of the former class for sale; not sure if it is the F, A or original K variant -

Re: K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-08 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Boris Liberman wrote: My answer to similar question was to buy Tamron 90/2.5 SP lens in Adaptall 2 mount. It is fast and quite excellent optically. It is manual focus, but I don't find it an obstacle. Actually for macro work manual focus lenses are probably better because

Re: K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-08 Thread Andre Langevin
Boris Liberman wrote: Hi! I'm still sort of casually looking for a real macro lens... Just wondering, how do you people reckon the old f/4 Pentax macros compare to the newer FA-100 f/2.8? (Just came across one of the former class for sale; not sure if it is the F, A or original K variant -

Re: K/M/A f/4 100 mm macro vs FA-100 f/2.8

2005-07-08 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! My answer to similar question was to buy Tamron 90/2.5 SP lens in Adaptall 2 mount. It is fast and quite excellent optically. Is this a 1:2 macro? It is 90/2.5 1:2 macro and with matching adaptor it is 180/5 1:1 macro. The latter being even more useful because of greater working