.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob
Sullivan
Sent: Thursday, 11 November 2010 2:02 PM
To: PDML
Subject: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
Two samples shot outdoors today.
iso 100, 31mm f4.0 1/250th
uncropped, one slightly crooked (i know) see
: Thursday, 11 November 2010 2:02 PM
To: PDML
Subject: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
Two samples shot outdoors today.
iso 100, 31mm f4.0 1/250th
uncropped, one slightly crooked (i know) see captions underneath
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5Samples#5538133005917003170
and
http
You have Dynamic Range expansion turned on?
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Love
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:52 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
I've read through this entire thread and I am completely confused here. How
can
Of
Peter Loveday
Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2010 9:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
You have Dynamic Range expansion turned on?
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Love
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:52 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
Changing computers is a pain in the butt, but you might want to do that first.
I suspect a $500US laptop is better than the old desktop.
And so much faster.
Regards, Bob S.
It probably would be Bob.
Wonder if
My opinion is it /should/ work fine. Reality however may intrude.
On 11/16/2010 10:01 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Bob Sullivanrf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
Changing computers is a pain in the butt, but you might want to do that first.
I suspect a $500US
From: Tanya Love
I've read through this entire thread and I am completely confused here. How
can this be? Unless I am doing something relly wrong, my K-7 only
goes down to iso200?
Sounds like the dynamic range is set to 200%.
Go into Fn, select ISO and see if it says D-range 200%.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:13 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
My opinion is it /should/ work fine. Reality however may intrude.
Reality being, better off with a PC than a laptop, or the iMac.
dAVE
On 11/16/2010 10:01 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at
much thinner purple fringing in the K-5 picture. This could be
another newly-discovered plus.
Dario
- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:02 AM
Subject: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
Two samples shot
Boris,
I shot RAW DNG's in both cameras.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
And one more time K5 comes out on top of K7 w.r.t. color fidelity.
Bob, did you shoot both cameras in DNG? Or are these camera JPGs?
Boris
On 11/11/2010 6:02
On Nov 11, 2010, at 0:21, Boris Liberman wrote:
And one more time K5 comes out on top of K7 w.r.t. color fidelity.
Well, to be fair... if you weren't there, you don't know which image is truer
to the actual colors.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
List
Emne: Re: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
.. and I see much thinner purple fringing in the K-5 picture. This could be
another newly-discovered plus.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
08:11
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
.. and I see much thinner purple fringing in the K-5 picture. This could be
another newly-discovered plus.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
...@virgilio.it]
Sendt: 11. november 2010 08:11
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
.. and I see much thinner purple fringing in the K-5 picture. This
could be
another newly-discovered plus.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
Funny, I thought then opposite. Maybe the K7 gives better Virginia colors.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
And one more time K5 comes out on top of K7 w.r.t. color fidelity.
Bob, did you shoot both cameras in DNG? Or are these camera JPGs?
Boris
On
Agreed. I had to be more precise with my wording. What I meant is that
/to me/ the colors of K5 look more natural than those of K7. It is not
the mathematical of physical color fidelity I was talking about, but
rather that of an individual perception.
Thank you for pointing this out.
Boris
Assuming that LR defaults were used to process both RAW files, it
would be interesting to see the old color chart photographed by both
cameras. I'm especially curious about the RED response. (Of course, it
must be remembered that the three channels are all monochrome through
different color
My pics were all shot with AWB, and I assume that the difference in
tonality was due to the way the camera handles that. In regard to the
high ISO pics that included the tabletop, I can say with certainty
that the K5 was more accurate. I always shoot with AWB, so I'd prefer
to see how the
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:22 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My pics were all shot with AWB, and I assume that the difference in tonality
was due to the way the camera handles that.
That's my point. You can shoot and post-process any way that you like
(of course) but if we are
I don't test, scientifically or otherwise. I provided a few pics
because there was some interest here. Now I'm strictly in shooting mode.
Paul
On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:36 AM, CheekyGeek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:22 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
My pics were all shot
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:50:44AM -0600, CheekyGeek wrote:
As an aside, the biggest downside to the K-5 seems to be the
combination of larger (14 bit) RAW files and hence much lower burst
depth before the buffer fills (22 full-resolution best-quality JPGs
compared to the K-7's 40 - and for
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Boris,
I shot RAW DNG's in both cameras.
Regards, Bob S.
Just to confer, older versions of PS and LR will open the DNG files, correct.
Dave
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
Yes, I shot RAW DGN's with the K10 and K20, and opened then in LR2.~
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:35 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Boris,
I shot RAW DNG's in both cameras.
Regards,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
Yes, I shot RAW DGN's with the K10 and K20, and opened then in LR2.~
Regards, Bob S.
Ok.
I cannot justify a newer computer AND camera.
Wait, a DSLR IS a computer.
Hey now i can get two.:-)
Dave
On Thu,
Darren,
Both cameras shot and processed into LR3.2, then exported as jpg's of
max 1,500 pixels.
Both shots open with color temps of 4700 with tints of +15 (K-7) and -3 (K-5).
I was there and I can't say which colors were more accurate.
Paul,
Yes, I have to calibrate my focus for the 31mm. On
Dave,
Changing computers is a pain in the butt, but you might want to do that first.
I suspect a $500US laptop is better than the old desktop.
And so much faster.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:46 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Bob
Two samples shot outdoors today.
iso 100, 31mm f4.0 1/250th
uncropped, one slightly crooked (i know)
see captions underneath
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5Samples#5538133005917003170
and
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5Samples#5538133048011802098
Regards, Bob S.
--
And one more time K5 comes out on top of K7 w.r.t. color fidelity.
Bob, did you shoot both cameras in DNG? Or are these camera JPGs?
Boris
On 11/11/2010 6:02 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Two samples shot outdoors today.
iso 100, 31mm f4.0 1/250th
uncropped, one slightly crooked (i know)
see
.. and I see much thinner purple fringing in the K-5 picture. This could be
another newly-discovered plus.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:02 AM
Subject: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
Two
...@virgilio.it]
Sendt: 11. november 2010 08:11
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100
.. and I see much thinner purple fringing in the K-5 picture. This could be
another newly-discovered plus.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
30 matches
Mail list logo
